Objective To assess knowledge of neonatal danger signs and their associations among husbands of mothers who gave birth in the last 6 months in Gurage Zone, Southern Ethiopia, from 1 February to 28 February 2020. Design Community-based cross-sectional study. Setting Gurage Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Participants The study was conducted among 633 participants living in Gurage Zone from 1 February to 28 February 2020. 618 completed the questionnaire. A multistage sampling technique was employed to obtain study participants. Data were collected through face-To-face interviews conducted by 20 experienced and trained data collectors using a pretested structured questionnaire. To assess knowledge, 10 questions were adopted from the WHO questionnaire, which is a standardised and structured questionnaire used internationally. Data were entered into EpiData V.3.1 and exported to SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) V.24 for analysis. Descriptive statistics were performed and the findings were presented in text, figures and tables. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the association between each independent variable and the outcome variable. All variables with p<0.25 in the bivariate analysis were included in the final model and statistical significance was declared at p<0.05. Voluntary consent was taken from all participants. Results A total of 618 participants were included in the study, with a response rate of 97.6%. Of the participants, 40.7% had good knowledge (95% CI 36.3 to 44.2). Urban residence (adjusted OR=6.135, 95% CI 4.429 to 9.238) and a primary and above educational level (adjusted OR=4.294, 95% CI 1.875 to 9.831) were some independent predictors of husbands' knowledge status. Conclusion Knowledge of neonatal danger signs in this study was low. Urban residence, primary and above educational level, the husband's wife undergoing instrumental delivery and accompanying the wife during antenatal care visits were independent predictors of knowledge. Thus, strong multisectoral collaboration should target reducing the knowledge gap by improving husbands' attitude with regard to accompanying their wives during antenatal care and postnatal care visits, or create a strategy to increase husbands' participation in access to maternal and child health service since husbands are considered decision-makers when it comes to healthcare-seeking in the family. The government should come up with policies that will help promote formal education in the community and increase their media access.
A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Gurage Zone from 1 February to 28 February 2020. The study was conducted in the selected woreda of Gurage Zone in Southern Ethiopia. According to the data obtained from the zonal administration, Gurage Zone is one of the administrative zones in SNNPR in Ethiopia. It has 16 districts and 5 town administrations. The town of Wolkite is the zone’s capital. According to the 2017 Ethiopian Central Statistical Agency population projection, Gurage Zone has a total population of 1 635 311, of these 842 065 were female and the remaining 793 246 were male.16 There are seven hospitals (five public and two non-government) serving the zone’s total population. Five of the hospitals in the zone are primary hospitals, and the remaining two are general zonal hospitals. All hospitals found in Gurage Zone provide comprehensive emergency obstetric care services for saving the lives of women and their children. Additionally, 72 health centres provide basic emergency obstetric care services. The study population was sourced from husbands in Gurage Zone with children less than 6 months of age. The study population included husbands with children less than 6 months of age in randomly selected kebeles of Gurage Zone. All husbands with children less than 6 months of age and who were residents of Gurage Zone for at least 6 months were included in the study. Husbands who were seriously ill and unable to respond at the time of data collection were excluded. Separate sample size was calculated for each specific objective (to determine the magnitude of husbands’ knowledge of neonatal danger signs and to identify the factors associated with knowledge of neonatal danger signs) by using both single and double population proportion formula. The sample size for the first objective (to determine the magnitude of husbands’ knowledge of neonatal danger signs) was calculated using the single population proportion formula, with the following assumptions: n=minimum sample size required for the study, (Z α/2)2= standard normal distribution with 95% CI, P=50% men’s knowledge of danger signs (due to the absence of previous findings on men in Ethiopia), and d=a tolerable margin of error (d=0.04). The sample size for the second objective was calculated by Epi Info V.7 Stat Cal using different factors. The sample size for the first objective was greater than that of the second objective. The final sample size was derived by adding a non-response rate of 10%. A design effect of 1.5 was used because the sampling procedure was a population-based, one-stage cluster sampling. The calculated sample size for this study was 633. A multistage cluster sampling method was used to draw the final sample size. Gurage Zone has 16 districts and 5 town administrations. From these districts and town administrations, we selected five districts and two town administrations by simple random sampling technique using lottery method. For the districts, Cheha, Muhur Aklil, Mesqan, Mareqo and Abeshge were selected, and for town administrations Emdebir and Butajira Town were selected. Three kebeles from each selected district were chosen randomly. Households with husbands with children less than 6 months of age within the selected kebeles were listed from the family folder of the health extension workers. The total sample size was allocated proportionally to the selected kebeles and towns based on the number of husbands in their respective kebeles and all husbands who participated. No patients were involved. The dependent variable is husbands’ knowledge of neonatal danger signs. To assess husbands’ level of knowledge of neonatal danger signs, a total of 10 yes/no answer questions were asked: is difficulty/fast breathing a danger sign, is lethargy/unconsciousness a danger sign, is convulsion a danger sign, is a baby who did not cry a danger sign, is fever a danger sign, is coldness a danger sign, is pus discharge from the umbilicus a danger sign, is poor feeding or unable to suckle a danger sign, is persistent vomiting a danger sign, and is diarrhoea a danger sign? The total knowledge score ranges between 0 and 10. Those who scored equal or more than the mean were classified as having good knowledge and those who scored below the mean were classified as having poor knowledge. The independent variables were sociodemographic factors (age, age of the child, residence, income, educational status of wife and husband, occupation of husband and wife, marital status, age at marriage, religion, family size), history of infant illness, place of seeking care, decision-maker during care-seeking, number of children (birth order), index baby’s place of birth and mode of delivery, wife’s antenatal care (ANC) visit and frequency, husband accompanied the wife during maternal and child health (MCH) service visit, and source of information about neonatal danger signs. After reviewing relevant literature from previous related studies and other materials, the questionnaire was prepared in English5 11 18–21 and translated to Amharic (the local language spoken in the area) by experts, and then back-translated to English to check for consistency. The questionnaire was administered with the Amharic version to facilitate understanding. The questionnaire used to assess knowledge was adopted from the WHO questionnaire, which is a standardised and structured questionnaire used internationally.15 The Amharic version of the questionnaire has been validated in mothers as a screening tool in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, with a sensitivity and a specificity of 78.9 and 75.3, respectively. Two days of training were provided to the data collectors and supervisors, and the questionnaire was pretested a week before the actual survey in a comparable setting in the town of Agena on 5% of the calculated sample size, after which the necessary corrections and modifications were made accordingly. Data were collected by 20 experienced and trained data collectors, who are bachelor’s degree holders, through a face-to-face interview using a structured questionnaire during household visits. Two experienced supervisors supervised the data collection process. Before the interview, the data collectors provided information about the aim of the study, the purpose, possible risks and benefits, participants’ rights to refuse participation in the study, and confidentiality issues. Husbands who were willing to participate and signed the voluntary consent were then interviewed. Data collection was done for 28 consecutive days. The data collectors visit up to three times if they did not see the participant at the first home visit, and participants who were not available after three visits were included as non-respondents. Completed questionnaires were checked daily for completeness and internal consistency. The collected data were checked and reviewed for completeness, coded, cleaned, edited and entered into EpiData V.3.1, and exported to SPSS V.24 for analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the frequency of different variables. The data were then presented using simple frequencies, tables and figures. The associations between the dependent and independent variables were examined using bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Variables (p2 were dropped from the multivariable analysis. Model fitness was checked using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The direction and strength of statistical association were measured by OR with 95 % CI using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Adjusted OR (AOR) along with 95% CI was estimated to identify the factors associated with knowledge status. In this study a p value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant results.