BACKGROUND: Efforts to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity must address societal and cultural factors that affect women’s health and their access to services. There was no research conducted previously on delivery site preferences and associated factors among married women of child bearing age in the study area. The aim of this study was to assess the delivery site preferences and associated factors among women of child bearing age in Bench Maji Zone, Southwest Ethiopia.
Study area and design: A community based cross sectional quantitative study design supplemented by qualitative data was used to assess delivery site preferences among married women of reproductive age group in Bench Maji Zone from April 20 to May 20, 2013. Bench Maji Zone is located in Southern Nation Nationality Regional State (SNNP), Southwest Ethiopia, around 565km away from the capital city, Addis Ababa, with its center, Mizan Teferi Town. In this zone, there are one town administration and 10 rural districts. The zone’s total population is 781,006 out of which women of childbearing age are181, 974. In addition, there are one general hospital, 35 health centers, 182 Health posts, one university and one Health sciences college. Study participants: All currently married women between 15–49 years of age who were living in selected kebeles of the zone (kebele is the smallest administrative unit of Ethiopia consisting of at least 500 families).Mothers who have at least one child birth at the time of the survey were included. While, those who were critically ill, could not talk or listen were excluded. Sample size and sampling procedure: Sample size was determined using the formula for a single population proportion: Prevalence (p) of institutional delivery among child bearing women which is 18.2% was used (14) to calculate total sample of 458. Adding 10% allowance for non-response and refusal to participate, a total of 504 married women were selected. Among 10 districts and one administrative town in Bench Maji Zone, five districts were randomly selected from which 504 respondents were selected. Then, the sample for each selected district was allocated proportional to the population size. The districts were further classified into kebeles and the kebeles were randomly selected. Households in selected kebeles were selected using systematic random sampling technique to contact and interview eligible women. Regarding sampling frame, all of the households in the selected kebeles were enumerated. Closed households during data collection were revisited three times at different times. The next nearest households were included for unsuccessful visits. To supplement quantitative data, in-depth interview was conducted with a total of 20 individuals [health professionals, HEWs, model mothers and religious leaders] judgmentally selected from each of the five districts of the study. The interview was not intensive exploratory as it was simply intended to supplement the quantitative study. The interview guide was developed based on the predetermined specific quantitative research objectives. Data collection tools and procedure: Both the interviewers and supervisors were given a two days’ training before the actual work about the aim of study and data collection techniques by going through the questionnaire question by question. After pre-test had been made, data was collected by interviewing married women by interviewer using a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire incorporated questions addressing socio-demographic variables, preference of delivery site and factors affecting the preferences among married women who delivered at least one child in the study area. It was prepared in English and translated to Amharic, the official language of Ethiopia. Qualitative data was collected using unstructured interview guideline. Each interview was recorded using ape recorder. Data quality assurance: Data quality was assured by properly designing and pre-testing the questionnaire, training the interviewers and supervisors on data collection procedures and, categorizing and coding of the questionnaire. Questionnaire was checked everyday for completeness by the supervisors and the necessary feedback was offered to data collectors in the next morning before data collection. Qualitative data was directly collected by the principal investigators. Different categories of respondents were recruited to ensure credibility. Transcription and coding was done by two different individuals separately to check cridebility of the findings and interpretations. Also, in addition to triangulating the qualitative findings with the quantitative one, direct quotes of individual respondents were used Data processing and analysis: Data was entered using EPI INFO version 3.5 statistical packages. It was exported to statistical packages for social scientists (SPSS) software (v 16.0; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA), where coding, recoding and categorizing were done. Mean, standard deviation and percentage were used as descriptive statistics and summary measures. Using odds ratio (OR) with 95 % limit of confidence interval, the association of dependent and independent variables was assessed and their degree of associations was computed. P-value <5% was considered to show significant statistical association. Qualitative data was first reread and transcribed. Coding and categorization was done to form primary themes based on a predetermined concepts/objectives of the study. Besides, quotes of participants' expressions that exemplify key concepts were used directly during analysis and then, the concepts were developed into major themes under each discussion guides. Finally, the result was triangulated with that of the quantitative one. Ethical considerations: Ethical clearance was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the College of Health Sciences, Mizan-Tepi University, before data collection. Then, permission letter was obtained from each district administrators, and verbal consent was taken from each eligible woman in each selected kebele. Study participants were informed that the study would not have any risks. In addition, the objective and benefits of the study were explained to them. Items seeking personal information (name, phone number, etc) were not included in the questionnaire to ensure privacy and confidentiality.
N/A