Background: Despite remarkable progress in the reduction of under-five mortality, preterm birth associated mortality and morbidity remains a major public health problem in Sub-saharan Africa. In Ethiopia, study findings on the association of preterm birth with intimate partner violence and maternal malnutrition have been inconsistent. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis estimates the pooled effect of intimate partner violence and maternal malnutrition on preterm birth. Methods: International databases including PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Library, were systematically searched. All identified observational studies and/or predictors were included. I2 statistics and Egger’s test were used to assess the heterogeneity and publication biases of the studies. A random-effects model was computed to estimate the prevalence and its determinants of preterm birth. Results: The random effects meta-analysis showed that a pooled national prevalence of preterm birth was 13% (95% CI: 10.0%, 16.0%). The highest prevalence of preterm birth was 25% (95% CI: 21.0%, 30.0%) in Harar, and the lowest prevalence was 8% in Southern Nations Nationalities People of Representatives. The meta-analysis suggested a decrease in preterm birth of up to 61% among women receiving antenatal care [POR = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.21, 0.72)]. Women who experienced intimate partner violence [POR = 2.52 (95% CI: 1.68, 3.78)], malnutrition during pregnancy [POR = 2.00 (95% CI: 1.16, 3.46)], and previous preterm birth [POR = 3.73 (95% CI: 2.37, 5.88)] had significantly higher odds of preterm birth. Conclusion: One in every eight live births in Ethiopia were preterm. Women who experienced intimate partner violence, malnutrition, and had previous preterm exposure were significantly associated with preterm birth. Thus, improving antenatal care visits and screening women who experience previous preterm birth are key interventions. The Federal Ministry of Health could be instrumental in preventing intimate partner violence and improving the nutritional status of pregnant women through proper and widespread implementation of programs to reduce preterm birth.
The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis have been reported based on the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2009 statement checklist (S1 Table) [39]. All published articles were searched from major international databases including: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Science Direct, Google Scholar, African Journals Online databases, and Google hand searches. Additionally, a search was made for the reference list of studies already identified in order to retrieve additional articles. The PECO (Population, Exposure, Comparison, and Outcomes) search formula was used for this review. The population of interest was all live births delivered between 28 weeks of gestation and 37 weeks of gestation in Ethiopia. The exposure determinants of preterm birth included maternal area of residence, presence of antenatal care visits, frequency of antenatal care visits, IPV, malnutrition during pregnancy, and previous exposure of preterm birth. Comparisons were defined for each predictor with the respective reported reference group for each predictor per variable. The outcome of interest was preterm birth. The secondary outcomes included the predictors and adverse perinatal or neonatal outcomes of preterm birth. For each of the selected components of PECO, electronic databases were searched using the keyword search and the medical subject heading [MeSH] words. The keywords include preterm birth, adverse perinatal outcomes, determinants, predictors, associated factors, and Ethiopia. The search terms are combined by the Boolean operators “OR” and “AND”. Preterm birth is defined as a newborn being born between 28 and 37 weeks of gestation. IPV is defined as “any behaviour within an intimate relationship that causes physical, psychological or sexual harm to those in the relationship. Such behaviour includes acts of physical aggression, such as slapping, hitting, kicking and beating, as well as psychological abuse, such as intimidation, constant belittling and humiliation, and forced intercourse and other forms of sexual coercion based on the WHO definition. It can involve various controlling behaviours, such as isolating a person from their family and friends, monitoring their movements, and restricting their access to information [40]. Malnutrition during pregnancy was defined based on the mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC). MUAC <23 cm (cm) was considered as being malnourished [41]. This review included studies that reported preterm birth or predictors, antenatal care visits, IPV, and previous preterm birth. All published studies published in the English language until the end of our search on July 4, 2020 have been retrieved to assess eligibility for inclusion in this review and critical assessment. The review excluded studies that were case reports of populations, surveillance data (Demographic Health Surveys), abstracts for conferences, and articles without full access. First, through title, abstract, and full review, the two reviewers (MD and FA) evaluated the articles for inclusion. Any disagreement between the two reviewers was resolved by consensus. There was then a full-text analysis of those potentially qualifying studies, whether or not the specified set of criteria had been met, and for duplicated records. During the encounter of duplication, only the full-text article was retained. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies based on three components: the selection of the study groups, comparability of the study groups, and ascertainment of exposure or outcome [42]. The main component of the tool was graded from five stars and mainly emphasized the methodological quality of each primary study. The other component of the tool graded from two stars and mainly scored the comparability of each study, and the last component of the tool graded from three stars and was used to evaluate the results and statistical analysis of each original study. The NOS included three categorical criteria with a maximum score of 9 points. The quality of each study was assessed using the following score algorithms: ≥7 points was considered “good”, 4 to 6 points was considered “moderate”, and ≤3 points was considered “poor” quality studies. In order to improve the validity of this systematic review result, only primary studies of fair to good quality were included. The two reviewers (MD and TYA) independently assessed or extracted articles for overall study quality and/or included in the review articles using a standardized data extraction format. The data extraction format included primary author, year of publication, geographic region of the study, sample size, the reported outcome (preterm birth), and the number of cases of live births developing the respective outcome. Selected predictors of preterm birth including association with antenatal care visits, IPV, previous preterm birth, and adverse neonatal outcomes were also extracted. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger's [43] and Begg's [44] tests with a p-value of less than 0.05. The I [2] statistic was used to assess heterogeneity between studies, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was used. As a result of the presence of heterogeneity, a random-effects model was used as a method of analysis [45] resulting in the use of a random-effects meta-analysis model to estimate the pooled effect based on the metaprop software of the double arcsine transformations [46]. The proportions contain inadmissible values near the boundary resulting in computation of confidence intervals not being possible. Hence, the estimated standard error is set to zero and one. Data were extracted in Microsoft Excel and exported to Stata version 11 for analysis. Subgroup analysis was conducted by geographic region and study design. A meta-regression model based on sample size, geographic region, study design, and year of publication was used to identify the sources of random variations in the included studies. The effect of selected determinant variables was analyzed using separate categories of meta-analysis [47]. The findings of the meta-analysis were presented using a forest plot and Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). In addition, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to assess whether the pooled prevalence estimates were influenced by individual studies.