Background: Despite the focus of the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) to bridge healthcare utilisation gap among women in Ghana, recent evidence indicates that most maternal deaths still occur from rural Ghana. The objective of this study was to examine the rural-urban differences in the effects of NHIS enrolment on delivery care utilisation (place of delivery and assistance at delivery) and antenatal care services among Ghanaian women. Methods: A nationally representative sample of 4169 women from the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey was used. Out of this sample, 2880 women are enrolled in the NHIS with 1229 and 1651 being urban and rural dwellers, respectively. Multivariate logistic and negative binomial models were fitted as the main estimation techniques. In addition, the Propensity Score Matching technique was used to verify rural-urban differences. Results: At the national level, enrolment in NHIS was observed to increase delivery care utilisation and the number of ANC visits in Ghana. However, rural-urban differences in effects were pronounced: whereas rural women who are enrolled in the NHIS were more likely to utilise delivery care [delivery in a health facility (OR = 1.870; CI = 1.533–2.281) and assisted delivery by a medical professional (OR = 1.994; CI = 1.631–2.438)], and have a higher number of ANC visits (IRR = 1.158; CI = 1.110–1.208) than their counterparts who are not enrolled, urban women who are enrolled in the NHIS on the other hand, recorded statistically insignificant results compared to their counterparts not enrolled. The PSM results corroborated the rural-urban differences in effects. Conclusion: The rural-urban differences in delivery and antenatal care utilisation are in favour of rural women enrolled in the NHIS. Given that poverty is endemic in rural Ghana, this positions the NHIS as a potential social equaliser in maternal health care utilisation especially in the context of developing countries by increasing access to delivery care services and the number of ANC visits.
We deployed the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey (GDHS) which is a nationally representative survey administered by the Ghana Statistical Service (GSS). The 2014 GDHS employed a two-staged stratified sample frame where systematic sampling with probability proportional to size was used to identify enumeration areas from which households were selected based on 2010 Population and Housing Census. The GDHS covered 9396 eligible women aged 15–49 out of 9656 registering a response rate of 97.3%. Our focus group was women with birth histories within the past five years preceding the survey. This group constitutes 4294 women. However, after managing the data and accounting for missing observations across the three dependent variables and twelve independent variables in the inferential analyses, our total comparable sample size reduced to 4169 registering an attrition rate of 2.9%. The rural and urban sub-samples considered for the analyses are 2457 and 1712 women respectively. It is worth mentioning that the nonproportional allocation of the women sample to different regions and to their urban and rural areas using the GDHS can cause differences in probability of selection and response rates in our sample distribution. The study adjusted for these concerns by applying individual weight for women using analytic weight for the descriptive statistics and by declaring our survey design to include the individual weight variable for women divided by 1,000,000 in the case of the inferential analyses. Three main variables were used to measure delivery and antenatal care utilisation, namely place of delivery, assistance at delivery and the number of ANC visits. The place of delivery is a binary dependent variable which measures whether the delivery took place at a health facility or otherwise. Deliveries that took place at a health facility were recoded as one (1), otherwise zero (0). Assistance at delivery measures whether the birth attendant is a trained medical professional or otherwise. Birth attendants in the categories of doctor, nurse, midwife and community health officers were recoded as one (1), otherwise zero. The number of ANC visits, on the other hand, is a count variable measuring the number of antenatal care visits made during pregnancy. Whereas the first two dependent variables depend on the availability of health facilities and skilled medical professionals, the third depends on the medical condition and needs of the specific woman. However, with WHO’s current recommended number of visits of at least eight (8) as of December 2017, regular visits are encouraged for expectant mothers, than otherwise. The leading independent variable is enrolment in Ghana’s NHIS program. Respondents who are enrolled in the scheme were coded as one, and zero for those who are not enrolled. The study also controlled for demographic, socio-economic and locational factors that influence maternal health care utilisation. The demographic variables include age which was measured as current age in completed years, marital status recoded as (1 = never married; 2 = currently married; 3 = Formerly married), ethnicity dummies (1 = Akan; 2 = Ga; 3 = Ewe; 4 = Northern), and religion dummies (1 = Christian; 2 = Moslem; 3 = Traditional; 4 = No religion). The socio-economic variables include mothers’ level of education recoded (1 = no level of schooling; 2 = primary education; 3 = secondary school and beyond), employment status of mothers was recoded (0 = not employed; 1 = employed), wealth quintile which is a composite index constructed from household asset data and dwelling characteristics using principal component analyses was coded as (1 = poorest; 2 = poorer; 3 = middle; 4 = rich/richest). Two locational factors were used in the analyses, namely residential dummy (0 = rural; 1 = urban) and regional dummies (1 = Western; 2 = Central; 3 = Greater Accra; 4 = Volta; 5 = Eastern; 6 = Ashanti; 7 = Brong Ahafo; 8 = Northern; 9 = Upper East; 10 = Upper West). The PCA was used to create a continuous variable from barriers to seeking medical care (getting permission to go for treatment; getting the money needed for treatment; distance to health facility; not wanting to go alone). Each of the mentioned variables was recoded as one (1) in the case of a big problem, and zero (0) otherwise. Hence the PCA is imposed on these dummies to derive a continuous variable representing the barriers to medical care with Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure (KMO) of 0.65. The study deployed two main estimation techniques, the binary logistic and the negative binomial estimation techniques. The choice of the two variant estimation techniques was underscored by the six hypotheses of the study, measurement of the dependent variables and the need to correct for biases associated with overdispersion in the data. To suggest attributions, the results from the mentioned estimation techniques were verified using a quasi-experimental approach in the Propensity Score Matching. Subsequent sub-sections provide a brief description of the analytical tools deployed. The odds ratio variant of the logistic estimation technique was used to examine the rural-urban effects of NHIS enrolment on the place of delivery and the delivery care provided. This is because the two dependent variables are binary outcomes variables. The two models are specified as: Where λi1−λi is the odds that a pregnant woman delivers in a health facility, and πi1−πi is the odds that the pregnant woman received a delivery care from a medical professional, NHIS represents the NHIS enrolment, WQ is the wealth quintile, EDUC is the level of education, EMP is the employment status, MAR is the marital status, Age denotes the age, REL is the religious affiliation, ETHNi is the ethnicity variable, RES is the area of residence, REG represents the regional dummies, BTA denotes barriers to access and FTV is the frequency of watching television. The Negative Poisson estimation technique was used to analyse the third outcome variable “number of antenatal visits during pregnancy”. The choice of this estimation technique is underscored by the observation that the mentioned variable is not only a count variable, but preliminary diagnostic indicates that the variance exceeds the mean by 1.681. This cumulated into a problem of overdispersion which potentially biases the standard errors and the parameters of interest. The negative Binomial estimation technique is presented below: E(ANC) is the expected log count of the number of ANC visits, whereas the other covariates are in the case of Eqs. (1) and (2). Finally, the Incident Rate Ratio (IRR) was imposed on the expected log count of the number of ANC visits for the ease of interpretation and policy advocacy. This estimation technique enables the study to adjust for confounding effects and match women who are enrolled in the NHIS with those who are not enrolled. Given the binary nature of two of our dependent variables (place of delivery and assistance at delivery), we imposed a Linear Probability Model (LPM) assumption on their distributions to produce meaningful and intuitive corroborative results of the PSM. The PSM model for this study is stated as: Where Y1 and Y0 are the potential outcomes (delivery care and ANC visits) corresponding to women who are enrolled in the NHIS and otherwise; πi is the average treatment effect of a pregnant women enrolled in NHIS on delivery care and the number of ANC visits; H is the NHIS enrolment which is equal to 1; and X include women with similar propensities to be included in either the treated (enrolment) or the control group (non-enrolment) . The study adopted three main matching techniques, namely common support, nearest neighbour, and kernel in estimating Eq. (4). The bootstrap standard errors over 100 iterations were used to ensure robust results, whereas a seed of 1001 was used to guarantee the replicability of our PSM findings.
N/A