Stunting in children less than five years of age is widespread in Sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to: (i) evaluate how the prevalence of stunting has changed by socio-economic status and rural/urban residence, and (ii) assess inequalities in children’s diet quality and access to maternal and child health care. We used data from nationally representative demographic and health- and multiple indicator cluster-surveys (DHS and MICS) to disaggregate the stunting prevalence by wealth quintile and rural/urban residence. The composite coverage index (CCI) reflecting weighed coverage of eight preventive and curative Reproductive, Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health (RMNCH) interventions was used as a proxy for access to health care, and Minimum Dietary Diversity Score (MDDS) was used as a proxy for child diet quality. Stunting significantly decreased over the past decade, and reductions were faster for the most disadvantaged groups (rural and poorest wealth quintile), but in only 50% of the countries studied. Progress in reducing stunting has not been accompanied by improved equity as inequalities in MDDS (p < 0.01) and CCI (p < 0.001) persist by wealth quintile and rural-urban residence. Aligning food- and health-systems’ interventions is needed to accelerate stunting reduction more equitably.
The most recent available data were obtained from nationally representative cross-sectional Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from Sub-Saharan African countries. The DHS gather data on indicators that can help assess access to health care, child nutrition, and infant and young child feeding practices. For example dietary diversity, meal frequency, and the proportion of children meeting the minimum adequate diet are captured using standardized questionnaires. The DHS uses a multistage stratified sampling design, with households drawn randomly at the last stage. Stunting was defined as height/length-for-age z-scores <−2 SD relative to the WHO child growth standards [11]. The prevalence of stunting was estimated for children younger than five years of age. The time trends in stunting by urban-rural residence and wealth quintile was presented for countries with at least two surveys spaced between 1998–2008 and 2009–2018. The annual absolute excess change was presented by deducting the percentage point changes in the urban to the rural, and the prevalence in the wealthiest to the poorest. Negative values indicated faster changes in the most disadvantaged group (poorest wealth quintile/rural). The Composite Coverage Index (CCI) is a weighted score reflecting the coverage of the following eight preventive and curative Reproductive, Maternal, Neonatal and Child interventions (RMNCH) along the continuum of care—(1) demand for family planning satisfied (modern methods); (2) antenatal care coverage (at least four visits); (3) births attended to by skilled health personnel; (4) BCG immunization coverage among one-year-olds; (5) measles immunization coverage among one-year-olds; (6) DTP3 immunization coverage among one year-olds; (7) children aged less than five years with diarrhea receiving oral rehydration therapy and continued feeding; and (8) children aged less than five years with pneumonia symptoms taken to a health facility [12,13]. The interventions, although not directly linked to nutritional outcomes, are good proxies of access to health care, which is the entry point for most nutrition-specific interventions. For example, vaccination coverage can be a proxy for Vitamin A supplementation, 4+ antenatal care for nutrition counseling, and oral rehydration therapy, and continued feeding during diarrhea can be related to counseling on child feeding during and after sickness. The CCI has been successfully used to track the changes in universal health coverage, but also to monitor the within country socio-economic inequalities [13,14]. Data used to calculate the CCI are derived from the re-analysis of the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS), and Reproductive Health Surveys (RHS) data, which are publicly available. The proportion of infants and young children that are meeting the minimum meal frequency (MMF), minimum dietary diversity (MDD), and minimum acceptable diet (MAD) were calculated using the revised UNICEF/WHO indicators [15]. As part of the DHS survey design, these indicators are collected from the youngest child under two years of age born to mothers aged 15–49 years and from children living with the mother at the time of the survey. The revised UNICEF/WHO indicator counts breastfeeding as one group, thus allowing better comparability between breastfed and non-breastfed children. Wealth quintiles and place of residence were used as stratification variables in our analyses. DHS uses a wealth index derived using principal component analyses applied to a list of household assets/characteristics, which are country-specific. The first quintile (Q1) represents the 20% poorest families, and the last quintile (Q5) represents the 20% wealthiest families. Quintiles correspond to the relative position of households within each national sample. Urban and rural residence was classified according to boundaries provided by local authorities. All the analyses were based on publicly available data from national DHS surveys. Ethical clearance was the responsibility of the institutions that administered the surveys. The data was obtained after registering in the DHS website, and the datasets did not contain any personal identifiers. Analyses were done using SPSS version 20. Descriptive statistics were presented as a mean or median for continuous variables, and as a percentage for counts. Inequalities in stunting prevalence and complementary diet quality measures were presented by wealth quintile and rural/urban residence using equiplots (http://www.equidade.org/equiplot.php) generated using STATA version 12. Each horizontal line shows the results by quintile or rural/urban for a given country. Normal distributions of the variables were checked using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Independent-t-test was used to compare CCI and DDS between rural-urban and poorest-richest wealth quintiles. p-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.