Physical activity level during pregnancy in south africa: A facility-based cross-sectional study

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Physical activity during pregnancy has numerous health benefits for both the mother and the infant.
– However, there is limited information about the physical activity levels and determinants among pregnant women in South Africa.
– This study aimed to assess the physical activity level and associated factors among pregnant women in South Africa.
Study Highlights:
– The study enrolled 1082 pregnant women attending public health facilities in Buffalo City Municipality, Eastern Cape, South Africa.
– Only 25.7% of the women met the recommended level of physical activity during pregnancy (≥150 min of moderate intensity exercise per week).
– The average time spent in moderate-vigorous physical activity was 151.6 min per week.
– Light exercises and household activities were the most preferred forms of activity.
– Factors negatively associated with physical activity during pregnancy included younger age, semi-urban residence, lower educational level, unemployment, and nulliparity.
– Starting physical activity in the first trimester was positively associated with prenatal physical activity.
Recommendations for Lay Reader and Policy Maker:
– Future efforts should focus on improving knowledge, access, and support for physical activity among pregnant women in South Africa.
– Education and advocacy regarding physical activity should be provided to professionals involved in maternal health provision.
Key Role Players:
– Health professionals involved in maternal health provision
– Policy makers in the healthcare sector
– Community health centers and primary health clinics
– Health facility managers
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Education and training programs for health professionals
– Development and dissemination of educational materials
– Awareness campaigns and advocacy efforts
– Infrastructure improvements to support physical activity during pregnancy
– Research and evaluation to monitor progress and effectiveness of interventions

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is based on a cross-sectional study with a large sample size, which adds strength to the findings. The study used a validated tool to assess physical activity levels during pregnancy. However, the study design limits the ability to establish causality or determine long-term effects. To improve the evidence, future studies could consider using a longitudinal design to assess physical activity patterns over time and explore the impact on maternal and fetal health outcomes.

Physical activity participation during pregnancy confers many maternal and foetal health benefits to the woman and her infant and is recommended by various health bodies and institutions. However, in South Africa, scant information exists about the physical activity status and its determinants among pregnant women. The aim of this study was to assess the physical activity level and associated factors among pregnant women. This cross-sectional study enrolled 1082 pregnant women attending public health facilities in Buffalo City Municipality, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Information on socio-demographic and maternal characteristics were obtained, and the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to assess physical activity during pregnancy. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations between physical activity and the predictor variables during pregnancy. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were applied to estimate factors associated with physical activity levels. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Only 278 of the women (25.7%) met recommendations for prenatal activity (≥150 min moderate intensity exercise per week). The average time spent in moderate–vigorous physical activity was 151.6 min (95% CI: 147.2–156.0). Most of the women participated in light exercises with a mean of 65.9% (95% CI: 64.8–67.0), and 47.6% (95% CI: 46.3–48.9) participated in household activities. The majority of the women did not receive physical activity advice during prenatal care sessions (64.7%). Factors negatively associated with prenatal physical activity were lower age (<19 years) (adjusted odd ratio (AOR) = 0.3; CI: 0.16–0.76), semi-urban residence (AOR = 0.8; CI: 0.55–1.03), lower educational level (AOR = 0.5; CI: 0.20–0.71), unemployment (AOR = 0.5; CI: 0.29–0.77) and nulliparity (AOR = 0.6; CI: 0.28–1.31). However, prenatal physical activity was positively associated with starting physical activity in the first trimester (AOR = 1.9; CI: 1.06–3.31) compared to other trimesters. The findings of this study demonstrated low levels of physical activity during pregnancy in South Africa. The majority of women did not meet the recommendation of 150 min of moderate intensity activity per week. Light intensity and household activities were the most preferred form of activity. The factors affecting physical activity of women in this present study include lower age, semi-urban setting, low educational level, unemployment and nulliparity. In order to increase activity levels, future work should seek to improve knowledge, access and support for physical activity in pregnant women in South Africa. This should include education and advocacy regarding physical activity for professionals involved in maternal health provision.

This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted among pregnant women in 12 primary health centres in Buffalo City Municipality, in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Buffalo City Municipality is situated on the East Coast of the Eastern Cape Province. The details of the study setting have been described in a recent publication [41]. Briefly, the municipality is economically, one of the poorest provinces among the nine provinces in South Africa. The Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality accounts for a total population of 884,000, or 12.2% of the total population in the Eastern Cape Province. In total, 460,000 (51.99%) of the total population are females and 424,000 (48.01%) males [42]. Buffalo City Municipality has two provincial Hospitals (Frere and Cecilia Makhiwane hospitals), and two district hospitals (Bhisho and Grey hospitals). There are five community health centres, 72 primary health clinics, and 12 mobile health services [42]. In addition, all the community health centres and primary health clinics offer antenatal healthcare services freely to all pregnant women regardless of their geographical residence, ethnic, and socio-economic background. The community and primary health facilities deliver antenatal care services every working day. Personal communication with a health facility manager revealed that, on average, the clinics register 5–6 new pregnant women who visit the primary health centres per day. Therefore, annually, an estimated 17,000 pregnant women visit the 12 selected primary health clinics for antenatal services. We applied the Sarmah et al. [43] formulae for an infinite population to calculate the sample size at a confidence level of 95%, with the precision level of ±3%, and at a prevalence of physical activity or exercise during pregnancy of 50% (p = 0.5) as follows: p = 0.5 and hence q = 1 − 0.5 = 0.5; e = 0.03; z = 1.96 So, n0 = (1.96)2 (0.5)(0.5)(0.3)2=1067=1067. However, adding 10% non-response, the final sample size was 1215 women, to account for possible attrition and to protect against possible data loss. We applied a two-stage sampling technique to select pregnant women, regardless of the gestation period. Firstly, using a simple random procedure, 12 antenatal primary health centres were selected to participate in the study and, secondly, participants who meet the inclusion criteria were conveniently selected because of cost and easy accessibility, since the study was conducted at the health facilities. Pregnant women were included in the study if 18 years or older, receiving antenatal care, having a single pregnancy (not multiple ones), and could read or understand the IsiXhosa, Afrikaans or English languages. Women with disabilities or reasons to cease exercise at the time of recruitment, such as “persistent excessive shortness of breath that does not resolve on rest, severe chest pain, regular and painful uterine contractions, vaginal bleeding, persistent loss of fluid from the vagina indicating rupture of the membranes, and persistent dizziness or faintness that does not resolve on rest” [44], were excluded. Detailed information about the recruitment of the participants is shown in Figure 1. Flow diagram of sample selection and participation. The University of Fort Hare Health Research Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (Ref#2019 = 06 = 009 = OkaforUB). In addition, permission was obtained from the Eastern Cape Department of Health and all the selected health facilities. Informed consent was obtained from the pregnant women prior to data collection. Data collection was conducted between July to October 2019. To ensure the required sample size, data collection was carried out at each antenatal health clinic on pre-specified days, in a designated room allocated to the primary researcher by the health facility manager. All eligible pregnant women attending their antenatal care visits at selected health facilities during the study period were randomly approached to participate in the study, after signing an informed consent form. The Pregnant Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ) [45] was used to assess the level, type and intensity of prenatal activity. The primary outcome measure was active and inactive participation of pregnant women in physical activity during pregnancy. The PPAQ is a validated and reliable tool, widely used across countries to measure prenatal physical activity [45,46,47]. The PPAQ is comprised of 32 physical activities, which include household and care-giving (13 activities), occupational (five activities), sports and exercise (eight activities), transportation (three activities), and inactivity (three activities). We solicited participants’ participation on these different activities, and the type, intensity, duration and frequency of physical activity recorded as hours and minutes per day. To maximise the accuracy and ensure completeness of information, the PPAQ was interviewer-administered to the participants at 12 selected primary health centres during their antenatal visit and took approximately 20 to 25 min. The Metabolic Equivalent Task (MET) of each activity was categorised as sedentary (6.0 METs) [45]. We developed a structured questionnaire to solicit information on socio-demographic, obstetrics and lifestyle behaviours of the participants. As with the PPAQ, this aspect of the questionnaire was interviewer-administered to obtain information on age, residence, ethnicity, marital status, level of education, employment status, religion, family support, and behavioural and lifestyle characteristics, which include, current exposure to alcohol and smoking. We categorised women as ‘smokers’, if they reported smoking any number of cigarettes during pregnancy, ‘non-smokers’ (reported not smoking), ‘drinkers’, as those who reported any use of alcohol during pregnancy, and ‘non-drinkers’ (reported no-drinking). Other information included whether participants had had antepartum haemorrhage in their first trimester, perceived health condition in pregnancy (women were asked how they perceive their general health: very good, good, or bad), whether participants received prenatal physical activity advice from health professionals, and had engaged in physical activity before and during pregnancy. We obtained information on parity, mode of pregnancy delivery, and pregravid body mass index from the antenatal records of the participants. We adopted the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended BMI cut-off values to classify underweight (30.0 kg/m2) [48]. Descriptive statistics, including mean and standard deviation (SD), median and inter-quartile range (IQR) or as proportions was applied. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations was used to classify women as ‘inactive’ (reporting 0–149 min of exercise per week), and ‘active’ (reported 150 min or more of physical activity) based on the combined moderate–vigorous minutes per week [49]. We applied bivariate and multivariate analyses to assess the factors affecting physical activity behaviour during pregnancy. The Chi-square was used to determine the associations between the physical activity levels and socio-demographic, lifestyle and obstetric characteristics. All the covariates associated with physical activity (that is, age, area of residence, marital status, educational level, employment status, parity, family support, mode of pregnancy delivery, antepartum haemorrhage, pre-pregnancy BMI, employment status, lifestyle behaviours, and physical activity before and during pregnancy) were included in the models. The odds ratio (OR) and corresponding confidence interval (CI) of 95% were calculated. A multiple logistic regression, using automatic variable selection procedure was applied to determine the factors that predict physical activity levels. Automatic variable selection procedures are statistical tools for choosing the best subset of predictor variables for a given response variable. The significance level was set at p = 0.05. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (Version 24.0, IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used to perform all statistical analyses.

N/A

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health in South Africa:

1. Mobile Health Services: Implementing mobile health services that bring antenatal care and physical activity advice directly to pregnant women in remote or underserved areas. This could involve using mobile clinics or healthcare professionals equipped with portable technology to reach pregnant women who may have limited access to healthcare facilities.

2. Telemedicine: Introducing telemedicine services that allow pregnant women to receive prenatal care and physical activity guidance remotely. This could involve virtual consultations with healthcare providers, remote monitoring of vital signs, and the use of mobile apps or online platforms to provide educational resources and support.

3. Community Health Workers: Training and deploying community health workers to provide personalized physical activity advice and support to pregnant women in their local communities. These workers could conduct home visits, organize group exercise sessions, and serve as a bridge between pregnant women and healthcare facilities.

4. Education and Advocacy: Increasing awareness and knowledge about the importance of physical activity during pregnancy through targeted education and advocacy campaigns. This could involve partnering with local organizations, schools, and community leaders to disseminate information and promote the benefits of physical activity for maternal and fetal health.

5. Integration of Services: Integrating physical activity promotion into routine antenatal care services. This could involve training healthcare providers to incorporate physical activity assessments and counseling into their regular prenatal visits, ensuring that every pregnant woman receives guidance on safe and appropriate exercise during pregnancy.

6. Peer Support Programs: Establishing peer support programs where pregnant women can connect with and receive guidance from other women who have successfully maintained an active lifestyle during pregnancy. This could involve creating online communities, support groups, or buddy systems to foster social support and motivation.

7. Incentives and Rewards: Implementing incentive programs to encourage pregnant women to engage in regular physical activity. This could involve providing rewards or benefits for meeting physical activity goals, such as discounts on maternity clothes, free prenatal classes, or vouchers for healthy food options.

It’s important to note that these recommendations are based on the information provided and may need to be tailored to the specific context and resources available in South Africa.
AI Innovations Description
The study conducted in South Africa aimed to assess the physical activity level and associated factors among pregnant women in order to improve access to maternal health. The study found that only 25.7% of the women met the recommended level of physical activity during pregnancy, which is at least 150 minutes of moderate intensity exercise per week. The average time spent in moderate-vigorous physical activity was 151.6 minutes. Most of the women participated in light exercises (65.9%) and household activities (47.6%). The study also revealed that the majority of the women did not receive physical activity advice during prenatal care sessions (64.7%). Factors negatively associated with prenatal physical activity were lower age (
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the information provided, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Increase awareness and education: Develop and implement educational programs to raise awareness about the importance of physical activity during pregnancy and its benefits for maternal and fetal health. This can be done through community outreach programs, antenatal care sessions, and media campaigns.

2. Improve access to prenatal care: Ensure that all pregnant women have access to quality prenatal care services, including regular check-ups and consultations with healthcare professionals who can provide guidance on physical activity during pregnancy.

3. Provide personalized physical activity advice: Healthcare professionals should assess each pregnant woman’s individual needs and provide personalized advice on physical activity based on their health status, gestational age, and personal preferences. This can help women make informed decisions about the type and intensity of physical activity that is safe and beneficial for them.

4. Enhance support systems: Establish support systems for pregnant women to encourage and motivate them to engage in physical activity. This can include support groups, peer counseling, and online platforms where women can connect with each other and share their experiences.

5. Address barriers to physical activity: Identify and address barriers that prevent pregnant women from engaging in physical activity, such as lack of time, transportation, or access to safe exercise facilities. This may involve providing resources and solutions to overcome these barriers, such as offering prenatal exercise classes or promoting active transportation options.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define the target population: Identify the specific population group that will be the focus of the simulation, such as pregnant women in a particular region or healthcare facility.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current access to maternal health services and physical activity levels among the target population. This can be done through surveys, interviews, or existing data sources.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a mathematical or computational model that represents the relationships between the different variables involved in improving access to maternal health. This model should consider factors such as the implementation of the recommendations, the characteristics of the target population, and the potential outcomes of the interventions.

4. Input data and parameters: Input the collected baseline data and relevant parameters into the simulation model. This includes information on the current physical activity levels, healthcare infrastructure, and other relevant factors.

5. Run simulations: Use the simulation model to run multiple scenarios that simulate the impact of implementing the recommendations. This can involve varying parameters such as the coverage of prenatal care services, the effectiveness of educational programs, or the availability of support systems.

6. Analyze results: Analyze the simulation results to assess the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This can include evaluating changes in physical activity levels, utilization of prenatal care services, and other relevant outcomes.

7. Validate and refine the model: Validate the simulation model by comparing the simulated results with real-world data, if available. Refine the model based on feedback and further data analysis.

8. Communicate findings: Present the findings of the simulation study to relevant stakeholders, such as healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations. This can help inform decision-making and guide the implementation of interventions to improve access to maternal health.

It is important to note that the methodology for simulating the impact of recommendations may vary depending on the specific context and available data.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email