Viewpoints of pregnant mothers and community health workers on antenatal care in Lweza village, Uganda

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Uganda is a low-income country with high fertility, adolescent birth, and maternal mortality rates.
– The implementation of antenatal education guidelines and utilization of health facilities by pregnant women in Uganda is unclear.
– This study aimed to determine how women obtain education during pregnancy, what guidelines health educators follow, and what barriers exist to receiving antenatal care in Lweza Village, Uganda.
Study Highlights:
– Household surveys were conducted with women in Lweza who were or had previously been pregnant.
– Focus group discussions were conducted with community members and Lweza Primary School teachers.
– Interviews were conducted with key informants, including midwives, a traditional birth attendant, a community leader, and a Village Health Team member.
– Most women in Lweza did not receive the recommended number of antenatal appointments and lacked standardized antenatal education.
– Barriers to receiving antenatal care included long wait times at health facilities, reliance on family or traditional healers for education, and being told to delay antenatal care.
– Education was lacking on family planning, postpartum depression, and the use of traditional herbs during pregnancy.
– Recommendations include implementing community-based education programs to overcome barriers to antenatal care and improve health outcomes for women in Lweza Village.
Recommendations for Lay Reader and Policy Maker:
– Implement community-based education programs to improve antenatal care utilization and health outcomes for pregnant women in Lweza Village.
– Focus on addressing barriers such as long wait times at health facilities and reliance on traditional healers for education.
– Provide education on family planning, postpartum depression, and the safe use of traditional herbs during pregnancy.
– Increase the number of antenatal appointments received by pregnant women to meet WHO recommendations.
Key Role Players:
– Ministry of Health in Uganda
– Mukono District Health Center IV
– Village Health Team members
– Midwives
– Traditional birth attendants
– Community leaders
– Lweza Primary School teachers
– Child Care and Youth Empowerment Foundation (CCAYEF)
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Development and implementation of community-based education programs
– Training and capacity building for health educators and Village Health Team members
– Outreach and awareness campaigns
– Transportation and logistics for health workers
– Materials and resources for educational programs
– Monitoring and evaluation of program effectiveness

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong, but there are some areas for improvement. The study design is described as a cross-sectional study, which is appropriate for gathering information about a specific population at a specific point in time. The study includes a variety of data collection methods, such as household surveys, focus group discussions, and interviews with key informants, which helps to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic. The study also mentions ethical approval and consent procedures, which are important for ensuring the protection of participants. However, there are some limitations to consider. The sample size is relatively small, with only 100 household surveys conducted. Additionally, the questionnaire used in the study was not validated, which may affect the reliability of the data. To improve the strength of the evidence, future studies could consider increasing the sample size and validating the questionnaire to ensure the accuracy of the data collected.

Background Uganda is a low-income country with high fertility, adolescent birth, and maternal mortality rates. How Ugandan Ministry of Health antenatal education guidelines have been implemented into standardized health education and how pregnant women utilize health facilities remains unclear. Objective We aimed to determine how women obtain education during pregnancy, what guidelines health educators follow, and what barriers exist to receiving antenatal care in Lweza Village, Uganda. Methods Household surveys were conducted with women in Lweza who were or had previously been pregnant. Focus group discussions were conducted with community members and Lweza Primary School teachers. Interviews were conducted with key informants, including midwives, a traditional birth attendant, a community leader, and a Village Health Team member. Data collection was done in English along with a Luganda translator. Results Of the 100 household surveys conducted, 86% of women did not meet the WHO recommendation of 8 antenatal appointments during their pregnancies. Reasons cited for inadequate visits included facing long wait times (>7 h) at health facilities, getting education from family or traditional healers, or being told to delay antenatal care until 6 months pregnant. Informant interviews revealed that no standardized antenatal education program exists. Respondents felt least educated on family planning and postpartum depression, despite 37% of them reporting symptoms consistent with postpartum depression. Education was also lacking on the use of traditional herbs, although most women (60%) reported using them during pregnancy. Conclusions Most women in Lweza do not receive 8 antenatal appointments during their pregnancies or any standardized antenatal education. Educational opportunities on family planning, postpartum depression, and the safety of traditional herbs during pregnancy exist. Future studies should focus on ways to overcome barriers to antenatal care, which could include implementing community-based education programs to improve health outcomes for women in Lweza Village.

Ethical approval was received via the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Institutional Review Board (IRB). The Principal Medical Officer of Mukono wrote a letter to the IRB committee expressing support for the project and stating that IRB approval was not necessary for the scope of the project. The chairman of Lweza Village signed a letter of approval for participation in the study. Written consent was given by the Principal Health Officer of Mukono Municipality, Uganda to conduct the study in Lweza. Verbal consent was given by all participating community members and leaders; declining to be involved in the study did not affect any woman’s treatment. Verbal, rather than written, consent was obtained as approved by the IRB. Given that the study was occurring in an area of low literacy and was being conducted verbally, verbal consent was deemed appropriate. A consent statement was read aloud and participants signed or used their thumb print to agree to the verbal consent on the questionnaire. No identifiable patient information was included in the questionnaire. Women under the age of 18 years were excluded. An exploratory, community-based, cross-sectional study was conducted, in the form of a semi-structured patient questionnaire with open and closed question types. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches were taken with the understanding that the qualitative data was necessary for illustrating community member experiences with pregnancy and health care. A variety of antenatal care topics were discussed with community women who access these services, midwives, community leaders, and a Village Health Team member who provides care and education. Data collection tools included a standardized questionnaire, in-depth interview question guides, and focus group discussion guides. Each of these guides explored various aspects of antenatal care including: number of pregnancies, antenatal care practices, health education topics, nutrition and medications, breastfeeding, family planning, HIV and malaria transmission, postpartum depression, and preparedness for the first baby. As a part of the household questionnaire, women were asked to rate their knowledge of various health topics on a scale of 0 to 5, where 0 represented that they knew nothing about the topic and 5 represented they knew everything about that topic, even enough to teach someone else. To assess education during pregnancy and barriers to receiving antenatal care in rural Uganda the authors (M.D., A.K., and R.M.) developed a questionnaire. The questionnaire was pilot tested with two women from Lweza to ensure proper wording and adequate translation of the questions, but was not validated. The household interviews were done in the participants language of choice and were led by the translator who conducted the questionnaire in a verbal manner and filled out the appropriate responses on the questionnaire. The translator was not part of the research team. The in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, conducted mostly in English and occasionally in Luganda, were translated to English in real-time as needed. The key informant interviews and focus group discussions were all recorded with permission and later transcribed. The questionnaire, which involved 47 questions, most of which (45/47) were closed-ended, included questions about patient demographics, pregnancy history and information, health education and practices, and rating the level of knowledge about various pregnancy health topics. Closed-ended question data were entered in Excel and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results. Quantitative data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, build 1.0.0.1508 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA) for descriptive statistics such as frequencies and percentages. Open-ended question responses were manually analyzed by the authors using a thematic approach in which similar responses were grouped into thematic categories. To limit author bias, no responses were eliminated. Direct respondent statements were included to avoid translation bias. Qualitative data (e.g., open-ended question responses) were transcribed and analyzed by the authors using thematic analysis following the steps similar to those recommended by Braun and Clarke [12]. To become familiar with the data, the first author (M.D.) read through all the transcripts and field notes recorded from the standardized questionnaire, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions multiple times. Data were coded, manually analyzed, and grouped by assessing for relationships between them to form sub-themes. Based on this process, the key themes examined included navigating the available healthcare systems, pregnancy health education, herbal medicine, common community concerns, family dynamics, and family planning. This study was performed in Lweza Village, Uganda, which is located in the Mukono District, just east of Kampala, Uganda’s capital city. Mukono is comprised of 602 villages and spans nearly 3,000 square kilometers. Most of the population belong to the Baganda ethnic group, the largest kingdom in Uganda’s central region. The major public health care facility in Mukono is the Mukono District Health Center IV, a government hospital that provides numerous services including primary care, laboratory testing, surgery, mental health, dental and eye care, pharmacy, radiology, HIV/AIDS, TB, and maternal and child health (antenatal, maternity, family planning, post-natal, immunizations). Each year, this 45 bed facility serves thousands of patients, including performing 7,789 deliveries, 15,126 antenatal care visits, and 1,708 cesarean sections [13]. The Mukono District Health Center IV is located in close proximity to Lweza Village, only about a 3 km walk or boda boda (motorcycle taxi) ride away. In addition to this health facility, private hospitals are available to patients throughout the district. Besides these formal health care services, traditional medicine and herbal medicine facilities are available, including TBAs for pregnant and laboring women. Each village elects two Village Health Team members who are responsible for community health promotion, health education, and passing along health messages from the government hospitals. The study target population was women who currently reside in Lweza Village and who had given birth in the Mukono District. Lweza Village was selected due to prior established relationships between the research team and the community. Lweza Village has a population of about 7,000 people. The research team, comprised of a University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health medical student (M.D.), a translator, and a Village Health Team member, started from a central location in Lweza and randomly selected a direction to begin household interviews. The translator and Village Health Team members were not part of the research team. The Village Health Team member identified households with eligible women for interviewing and every other household was interviewed until the team reached the end of the village. A new direction was then randomly selected and the interviews were carried out in this new direction working back through Lweza Village until there were 100 respondents. In addition to the household interviews, six key informant interviews were held. Informant participants were selected based off of recommendations from the Mukono Municipality Principal Medical Officer. After permission was obtained, in-depth interviews occurred in private spaces at each informants’ place of employment. The informants were compensated for their time with 10,000 UGX or roughly 2.71 USD. The key informants included: two government midwives, one private midwife, a local TBA, a Village Health Team member from the neighboring village of Basiima-Kikooza to minimize bias, and a leader from the Child Care and Youth Empowerment Foundation (CCAYEF). The CCAYEF is a local organization that was established to provide a gathering place for young girls and teenage mothers to share experiences, learn skills, and provide support to one another. Two focus group discussions were conducted. These group discussions were arranged by a local translator who was familiar with the community. The first focus group discussion was with ten teachers at the Lweza Primary School. The second focus group discussion was with nine women who were all part of the Village Health Project Uganda, a local community organization that meets weekly for learning activities and participates in local sustainable projects like sack gardening or building rain-water tanks. Each of these focus group participants were compensated a small amount of money for their time.

Based on the provided information, here are some potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health in Lweza Village, Uganda:

1. Community-based education programs: Implementing community-based education programs that focus on antenatal care, family planning, postpartum depression, and the safe use of traditional herbs during pregnancy. These programs can be conducted by trained community health workers and can be tailored to the specific needs and cultural context of Lweza Village.

2. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions: Utilizing mobile phones and technology to provide health education and reminders to pregnant women. This can include sending text messages with important information about antenatal care appointments, nutrition, and other relevant topics. mHealth interventions can also provide a platform for women to ask questions and receive support from healthcare providers.

3. Improving healthcare facility efficiency: Addressing long wait times at health facilities by implementing strategies to improve efficiency, such as streamlining appointment scheduling, increasing staffing levels, and optimizing patient flow. This can help reduce barriers to accessing antenatal care and ensure that women receive timely and quality care.

4. Strengthening antenatal education guidelines: Developing and implementing standardized antenatal education guidelines that cover a comprehensive range of topics, including family planning, postpartum depression, and the safe use of traditional herbs. These guidelines should be evidence-based and culturally sensitive, and should be integrated into the training curriculum for healthcare providers.

5. Engaging traditional birth attendants (TBAs): Collaborating with TBAs and integrating them into the formal healthcare system. TBAs play a significant role in providing care to pregnant women in many communities, and by training and equipping them with accurate and up-to-date information, they can become valuable allies in improving access to maternal health services.

6. Increasing awareness and knowledge through community outreach: Conducting community outreach programs to raise awareness about the importance of antenatal care and address misconceptions or cultural beliefs that may hinder women from seeking care. These programs can involve community leaders, religious leaders, and other influential individuals to help disseminate accurate information and promote positive health-seeking behaviors.

It is important to note that these recommendations are based on the provided information and may need to be further tailored and adapted to the specific context and needs of Lweza Village.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the description provided, the following recommendation can be developed into an innovation to improve access to maternal health:

Implementing community-based education programs: Based on the findings of the study, it is clear that there is a lack of standardized antenatal education in Lweza Village, Uganda. To address this issue, a recommendation would be to develop and implement community-based education programs. These programs can be designed to provide pregnant women with essential information on antenatal care, family planning, postpartum depression, and the safe use of traditional herbs during pregnancy. The programs can be delivered by trained community health workers who can visit households, conduct group sessions, or utilize mobile health technologies to reach a wider audience. By providing education directly to pregnant women in their communities, this innovation can help overcome barriers to accessing antenatal care and improve health outcomes for women in Lweza Village.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health in Lweza Village, Uganda:

1. Implement a standardized antenatal education program: Develop and implement a comprehensive antenatal education program that covers important topics such as family planning, postpartum depression, and the safe use of traditional herbs during pregnancy. This program should be accessible to all pregnant women in Lweza Village and should be delivered by trained health educators.

2. Reduce wait times at health facilities: Address the issue of long wait times at health facilities by improving the efficiency of service delivery. This could involve increasing the number of healthcare providers, streamlining administrative processes, and implementing appointment systems to reduce overcrowding.

3. Strengthen community-based education programs: Establish community-based education programs that aim to improve health outcomes for pregnant women in Lweza Village. These programs could be led by trained community health workers or Village Health Team members who can provide education and support to pregnant women in their own communities.

4. Increase awareness and utilization of antenatal care services: Conduct targeted awareness campaigns to increase knowledge and understanding of the importance of antenatal care among pregnant women and their families. These campaigns should emphasize the benefits of regular antenatal visits and address any misconceptions or cultural beliefs that may discourage women from seeking care.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Baseline data collection: Collect data on the current utilization of antenatal care services, including the number of appointments attended by pregnant women in Lweza Village. This data can be obtained through surveys or interviews with pregnant women and healthcare providers.

2. Intervention implementation: Implement the recommended interventions, such as the standardized antenatal education program, reducing wait times, and strengthening community-based education programs. Ensure that these interventions are properly implemented and accessible to the target population.

3. Post-intervention data collection: After a period of time, collect data on the impact of the interventions. This can include measuring the number of antenatal appointments attended by pregnant women, assessing the level of knowledge and understanding of antenatal care among pregnant women and their families, and evaluating the effectiveness of the community-based education programs.

4. Data analysis: Analyze the collected data to determine the impact of the interventions on improving access to maternal health. This can involve comparing the pre- and post-intervention data to identify any changes or improvements.

5. Evaluation and adjustment: Evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions and make any necessary adjustments or improvements based on the findings. This may involve refining the interventions, addressing any challenges or barriers that were identified, and implementing additional strategies to further improve access to maternal health.

By following this methodology, it will be possible to assess the impact of the recommended interventions on improving access to maternal health in Lweza Village, Uganda.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email