Integration of chronic oncology services in noncommunicable disease clinic in rural Rwanda

listen audio

Study Justification:
– In rural sub-Saharan Africa, access to care for severe non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is limited due to delivery challenges.
– The study aimed to address this gap by implementing an integrated NCD clinic inclusive of cancer services at a district hospital in rural Rwanda.
– The goal was to improve access to care for severe NCDs, including cancer, in a rural setting.
Study Highlights:
– The study implemented an integrated NCD clinic at Rwinkwavu District Hospital (RDH) in rural Rwanda.
– The clinic provided nurse-led care for severe NCDs, including oncology, hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, and chronic respiratory disease.
– The study found good retention rates in the clinic, with 12-month retention rates ranging from 47.4% to 81.6% for different disease groups.
– The integrated NCD clinic filled a gap in accessible care for severe NCDs, including cancer, at rural district hospitals.
Study Recommendations:
– The study recommends the continued implementation and expansion of integrated NCD clinics in rural settings to improve access to care for severe NCDs.
– The recommendations include developing and approving national NCD clinical and operational protocols, training healthcare providers in NCD care delivery, addressing gaps in essential medicines and equipment, and establishing referral pathways for complex cases.
– The study also highlights the importance of partnerships with external organizations and specialists to support training, mentorship, and drug procurement.
Key Role Players:
– Rwandan Ministry of Health
– Partners In Health
– District-level healthcare providers
– Nurses and physicians trained in NCD care delivery
– Cardiologists and endocrinologists
– Social workers
– Data officers and clerks
– External partners and specialists from organizations like Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women’s Cancer Center
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Development and approval of national NCD clinical and operational protocols
– Training curricula for healthcare providers
– Procurement of essential medicines and equipment
– Subsidies for drug procurement
– Support for training and mentorship from external partners and specialists
– Administrative support for clinic workflow
– Transportation fees and food packages for vulnerable patients
– Referral facilities for more advanced diagnostics and treatments
– Maintenance and expansion of electronic medical record system (OpenMRS)
– Costs associated with establishing and maintaining referral pathways for complex cases
– Costs associated with training and mentorship programs, including travel and accommodation expenses

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong, but there are some areas for improvement. The study provides descriptive statistics and retention rates for patients enrolled in the integrated NCD clinic in rural Rwanda. However, the abstract does not mention the sample size or provide any statistical analysis. To improve the evidence, the authors could include more details about the study design, such as the methods used to collect and analyze the data. Additionally, it would be helpful to include information about any limitations or potential biases in the study. Overall, the study provides valuable information about the implementation and outcomes of the integrated NCD clinic, but more details and analysis would strengthen the evidence.

Background: In rural sub-Saharan Africa, access to care for severe non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is limited due to myriad delivery challenges. We describe the implementation, patient characteristics, and retention rate of an integrated NCD clinic inclusive of cancer services at a district hospital in rural Rwanda. Methods: In 2006, the Rwandan Ministry of Health at Rwinkwavu District Hospital (RDH) and Partners In Health established an integrated NCD clinic focused on nurse-led care of severe NCDs, within a single delivery platform. Implementation modifications were made in 2011 to include cancer services. For this descriptive study, we abstracted medical record data for 15 months after first clinic visit for all patients who enrolled in the NCD clinic between 1 July 2012 and 30 June 2014. We report descriptive statistics of patient characteristics and retention. Results: Three hundred forty-seven patients enrolled during the study period: oncology – 71.8%, hypertension – 10.4%, heart failure – 11.0%, diabetes – 5.5%, and chronic respiratory disease (CRD) – 1.4%. Twelve-month retention rates were: oncology – 81.6%, CRD – 60.0%, hypertension – 75.0%, diabetes – 73.7%, and heart failure – 47.4%. Conclusions: The integrated NCD clinic filled a gap in accessible care for severe NCDs, including cancer, at rural district hospitals. This novel approach has illustrated good retention rates.

This study was conducted at RDH, a hospital located in Southern Kayonza District in the Eastern Province of Rwanda (see Figure ​Figure1).1). The hospital’s catchment area covers a population of approximately 179,000 and encompasses eight health centers. The population of Southern Kayonza is predominantly rural (90%), female (51.6%) and young, with 49.4% of the population less than 18 years of age in the 2012 census [11]. In addition to the NCD clinic, RDH houses neonatal, pediatric, maternal, internal medicine, surgical, laboratory, radiology, pharmacy and general outpatient departments. Map of Rwanda with catchment area of Rwinkwavu District Hospital (Southern Kayonza District) highlighted along with the location of the Butaro Cancer Center of Excellence, the primary referral hospital for cancer service. The initial step in the integrated NCD clinic’s implementation focused on governance [12]. PIH’s strong partnership with the RMoH at both the central and district levels allowed for collective strategic planning and commitment. Subsequent steps included drafting and approving national NCD clinical and operational protocols for heart failure, hypertension, type 1 and 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and palliative care. Based on the protocols, training curricula for nurses and physicians helped establish a new cadre of Rwandan health care delivery pioneers for management of severe chronic NCDs. Using a combination of practical and didactic training, in the first year (2007–2008) four nurses from outpatient services and six general practitioners from inpatient services were trained in multiple areas of NCD care delivery, such as diagnostics and monitoring, which included the following specialized tools: echocardiography, International Normalized Ratio (INR), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and peak flow meter. The duration of the combined didactic and practical training was two months. Trainers included US-based internal medicine, cardiology, and pulmonology specialists. Additionally, gaps in the availability of essential medicines and equipment were identified and addressed. Initial procurement operations were heavily supported and subsidized by PIH/IMB; these supports and subsidies have since been substantially reduced. The integrated NCD clinic was housed in a single room with a desk, filing cabinet for patient medical records, a laptop computer, one exam table, and one of each of the following pieces of medical equipment: ultrasound with cardiac probe, stethoscope, sphygmomanometer, peak flow meter, HbA1c point-of-care machine, INR point-of-care machine, monofilament, glucometer, and a weight scale. Disease-specific clinical forms were developed with input from both clinicians and monitoring and evaluation (M&E) specialists; training on completion of forms was also provided. These forms were later programmed into PIH/IMB’s electronic medical record (EMR) system, OpenMRS (OpenMRS Inc., Indianapolis, USA), to allow for continuity of care and more robust M&E and research. To support continuity and comprehensive care, criteria were developed to guide social workers in identifying vulnerable patients who required social assistance in the form of subsidizing transportation fees and distributing food packages. Essential human resources within the integrated NCD clinic included three nurses, a general practitioner, a data officer and a clerk. NCD-trained nurses led the majority of patient encounters. The general practitioner attended to more complex cases such as patients not responding to standardized treatment regimens or those at especially high risk for clinical exacerbation. The data officer managed patient data and files, transcribed data from the paper forms into the EMR, and monitored form completeness. The clerk facilitated administrative workflow within the clinic and its interactions with the rest of the hospital. In addition, a cardiologist and an endocrinologist visited the clinic on a monthly basis to evaluate complex patients as well as newly diagnosed patients. These specialists also provided direct mentorship and education to the clinic staff. The integrated NCD clinic operated on a weekly schedule with each day of the week exclusively dedicated to a particular disease unless the patient had multiple NCD diagnoses, in which case s/he would receive treatment for all illnesses during one clinic visit. Patients were referred to the NCD clinic from health centers, the RDH’s general outpatient department, inpatient departments, self-referral, or other district hospitals without such specialized services. Ultimately, the clinic was able to establish and communicate clear referral criteria for complex cases requiring a higher level of care. The addition of oncology services to the integrated NCD clinic provided an opportunity to establish a model integrated district-level approach that provided decentralized cancer care with referrals to higher levels of care as needed. Given the unique intricacies of cancer care delivery, program leadership developed and implemented new training and referral pathways for both diagnosis and treatment. A two-month national oncology training inclusive of both didactic and practical components was organized at RDH in 2013 and covered both inpatient and outpatient content. Training of physicians and subsequent care delivery at RDH was focused on initial evaluation, including peripheral mass and bone marrow biopsy, staging, and initial treatment plan for select cancers, including lymphoma, leukemia, breast, and cervical cancers. For treatment, RDH provided a limited selection of intravenous chemotherapy and oral hormonal treatment regimens as well as palliative care, however the intravenous chemotherapy would later be phased out. Referral facilities were routinely used for more invasive biopsy, pathology diagnosis, advanced radiography, advanced intravenous chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. The primary referral facility was Butaro Cancer Center of Excellence (BCCOE), in Butaro Hospital, Northern Province. Central University Hospital in Kigali (CHUK), Rwanda Military Hospital, also in the capital city, Kigali, and Central University Hospital in Butare (CHUB) of the Southern Province provided key support as referral hospitals, especially with respect to treatment plan, follow-up, surgeries, CT scans, and biopsies [13]. Radiotherapy required transfer to cancer centers in Uganda and Kenya [14]. Regarding training and mentorship, US-based oncologists and nurses from Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women’s Cancer Center supported the RMoH in clinical protocol writing, on-site training, routine conference calls and email communication surrounding specific patient cases and programmatic challenges. Drug procurement was also subsidized by external partners. Advanced medications, including chemotherapy and warfarin, were not readily available through the public supply chain, so PIH procured these medications as to support the RMoH until the public sector was able to procure independently. The RMoH and partners also established an oncology platform within the OpenMRS EMR. This was a retrospective cohort study of new patients who enrolled in the RDH integrated NCD clinic with the addition of oncology services, between 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2014. All qualifying patients were then assessed for 12 months as described below. Patients of all ages diagnosed with heart failure, diabetes, CRD, hypertension or a type of cancer were included in the analysis. De-identified data on demographic, clinical and outcome variables were extracted from the EMR. As some diseases did not have representative electronic forms, EMR records were not available for patients with chronic kidney and liver disease and, thus, those patients were not included in this study. If a patient was enrolled in more than one disease program, each enrollment was treated as a separate record. Data were reported by disease group to better describe the clinical profile of patients, and the most relevant characteristics of each disease group (e.g. diabetes type, cancer type, heart failure diagnosis) were reported if those data was available. The primary outcome was patient status at 12 months after his/her enrollment date. A patient was considered to be “alive and in care” if s/he had a recorded follow-up visit within ±3 months of the 12-month milestone; “lost to follow-up” (LTFU) if s/he did not have a recorded visit within ±3 months of the 12-month milestone; and “dead” if s/he had a date of death recorded in the EMR during the study window. Extracted data were cleaned and analyzed using Stata v14 (College Park, TX). Descriptive statistics were calculated and number and percentages presented for categorical data. The research protocol was approved by the Rwanda National Ethics Committee, National Health Research Committee, and by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital Institutional Review Board in Boston, Massachusetts, USA, prior to the initiation of the study.

N/A

Based on the provided information, here are some potential innovations that could be used to improve access to maternal health:

1. Telemedicine: Implementing telemedicine services can allow pregnant women in rural areas to access healthcare remotely. This would enable them to consult with healthcare providers, receive prenatal care, and access medical advice without having to travel long distances.

2. Mobile clinics: Setting up mobile clinics that travel to remote areas can bring essential maternal healthcare services closer to the population. These clinics can provide prenatal care, vaccinations, and health education to pregnant women who may not have easy access to healthcare facilities.

3. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers who can provide basic maternal healthcare services in rural areas can help bridge the gap in access to healthcare. These workers can conduct prenatal check-ups, provide health education, and refer women to healthcare facilities when necessary.

4. Health information systems: Implementing electronic health records and health information systems can improve the coordination and continuity of care for pregnant women. This would allow healthcare providers to access and share patient information, track pregnancies, and provide appropriate care based on the woman’s medical history.

5. Transportation support: Providing transportation support to pregnant women in rural areas can help overcome the barrier of distance. This can include arranging transportation services or subsidizing transportation costs to ensure that women can access healthcare facilities for prenatal care, delivery, and postnatal care.

6. Maternal waiting homes: Establishing maternal waiting homes near healthcare facilities can provide a safe and comfortable place for pregnant women to stay as they approach their due dates. This can help ensure that women have timely access to healthcare services during labor and delivery, reducing the risk of complications.

7. Health education programs: Implementing comprehensive health education programs that focus on maternal health can empower women with knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth, and postnatal care. These programs can be delivered through community workshops, radio broadcasts, or mobile phone applications.

It’s important to note that these recommendations are based on general innovations to improve access to maternal health and may not specifically address the context of the provided study.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation to improve access to maternal health based on the study is the integration of maternal health services into the existing integrated non-communicable disease (NCD) clinic in rural Rwanda. This approach has already been successful in providing accessible care for severe NCDs, including cancer, at rural district hospitals.

By integrating maternal health services into the NCD clinic, pregnant women in rural areas would have improved access to quality healthcare. This would address the challenges of limited access to care for maternal health in sub-Saharan Africa. The integrated clinic can provide comprehensive care for both NCDs and maternal health, ensuring that pregnant women receive the necessary medical attention and support.

The implementation of this recommendation would involve adapting the existing governance and operational protocols of the NCD clinic to include maternal health services. Training programs for healthcare providers would need to be expanded to include maternal health care. Essential medicines and equipment for maternal health would also need to be procured and made available at the clinic.

By integrating maternal health services into the existing NCD clinic, pregnant women in rural areas would have improved access to healthcare, leading to better maternal and child health outcomes. This innovative approach has the potential to fill the gap in accessible care for maternal health in rural areas and improve overall healthcare delivery in these communities.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, the study focused on improving access to care for severe non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in rural Rwanda, including cancer services. To further improve access to maternal health, the following innovations and recommendations could be considered:

1. Integrated Maternal Health Services: Similar to the integrated NCD clinic, a comprehensive maternal health clinic could be established within the existing healthcare infrastructure. This clinic would provide a range of services including antenatal care, postnatal care, family planning, and emergency obstetric care.

2. Nurse-Led Care: Implementing a nurse-led care model for maternal health services can help address the shortage of doctors in rural areas. Nurses can be trained to provide routine maternal health services, with doctors providing support and oversight for complex cases.

3. Training and Capacity Building: Develop training programs for healthcare providers, including nurses and midwives, to enhance their skills and knowledge in maternal health. This can include training on antenatal and postnatal care, emergency obstetric care, and management of complications during childbirth.

4. Mobile Health (mHealth) Solutions: Utilize mobile health technologies to improve access to maternal health information and services. This can include mobile apps for pregnant women to track their health, receive reminders for appointments, and access educational resources. Additionally, healthcare providers can use mHealth tools for remote consultations and monitoring of high-risk pregnancies.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Define Key Indicators: Identify key indicators to measure the impact of the recommendations, such as the number of women accessing antenatal care, the percentage of women receiving skilled birth attendance, and the maternal mortality rate.

2. Data Collection: Collect baseline data on the identified indicators before implementing the recommendations. This can be done through surveys, interviews, and analysis of existing health records.

3. Implement Recommendations: Implement the recommended innovations, such as establishing the integrated maternal health clinic, training healthcare providers, and deploying mHealth solutions.

4. Monitor and Evaluate: Continuously monitor and evaluate the implementation of the recommendations. Collect data on the indicators identified in step 1 after the implementation of the innovations.

5. Data Analysis: Analyze the collected data to assess the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. Compare the baseline data with the post-implementation data to determine any changes or improvements.

6. Interpretation and Reporting: Interpret the findings of the data analysis and prepare a report summarizing the impact of the recommendations. This report can be used to inform future decision-making and further improvements in maternal health services.

By following this methodology, it would be possible to simulate the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health and assess the effectiveness of the implemented innovations.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email