Geographical distribution and prevalence of podoconiosis in Rwanda: a cross-sectional country-wide survey

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Podoconiosis is a neglected tropical disease that causes swelling of the lower limbs and has significant economic and social impacts.
– Reliable and detailed data on the prevalence and distribution of podoconiosis in Rwanda are lacking.
– This study aimed to fill this data gap by conducting a nationwide survey to estimate the number of cases throughout Rwanda.
Highlights:
– The study screened over 1.3 million individuals in 30 districts across Rwanda.
– 914 individuals were confirmed to have podoconiosis, with an overall prevalence of 68.5 per 100,000 people.
– Podoconiosis was found to be widespread in Rwanda, with district-level prevalence ranging from 28.3 to 119.2 per 100,000 people.
– The study estimated that 6,429 people live with podoconiosis across Rwanda.
Recommendations for Lay Reader:
– Podoconiosis is a significant health issue in Rwanda, with many cases going undiagnosed and limited access to treatment.
– Targeted interventions and a well-coordinated health system response are needed to manage those affected by podoconiosis.
– The findings of this study should inform national-level planning, monitoring, and implementation of interventions.
Recommendations for Policy Maker:
– Allocate resources for targeted interventions and a comprehensive health system response to address podoconiosis in Rwanda.
– Develop and implement strategies for early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of podoconiosis cases.
– Strengthen health systems to ensure access to appropriate care and support for individuals with podoconiosis.
– Enhance public awareness and education campaigns to reduce social stigma associated with podoconiosis.
Key Role Players:
– Ministry of Health: Responsible for overall coordination and implementation of interventions.
– Health workers: Provide diagnosis, treatment, and management of podoconiosis cases.
– Community health workers: Conduct community-based screening and raise awareness about podoconiosis.
– Non-governmental organizations: Support implementation of interventions and provide resources for podoconiosis programs.
– Research institutions: Conduct further studies to enhance understanding of podoconiosis and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Diagnostic equipment and supplies for screening and diagnosis of podoconiosis cases.
– Training programs for health workers and community health workers on podoconiosis management.
– Treatment and management services, including medications, wound care, and rehabilitation.
– Public awareness campaigns and educational materials.
– Monitoring and evaluation systems to assess the impact of interventions and track progress.
Please note that the cost items provided are for planning purposes and do not reflect actual costs.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong, as it provides detailed information about the study design, methods, and findings. However, to improve the evidence, the abstract could include more information about the sample size, response rate, and limitations of the study.

Background: Podoconiosis is a type of tropical lymphoedema that causes massive swelling of the lower limbs. The disease is associated with both economic insecurity, due to long-term morbidity-related loss of productivity, and intense social stigma. Reliable and detailed data on the prevalence and distribution of podoconiosis are scarce. We aimed to fill this data gap by doing a nationwide community-based study to estimate the number of cases throughout Rwanda. Methods: We did a population-based cross-sectional survey to determine the national prevalence of podoconiosis. A podoconiosis case was defined as a person with bilateral, asymmetrical lymphoedema of the lower limb present for more than 1 year, who tested negative for Wuchereria bancrofti antigen (determined by Filariasis Test Strip) and specific IgG4 (determined by Wb123 test), and had a history of any of the associated clinical signs and symptoms. All adults (aged ≥15 years) who resided in any of the 30 districts of Rwanda for 10 or more years were invited at the household level to participate. Participants were interviewed and given a physical examination before Filariasis Test Strip and Wb123 testing. We fitted a binomial mixed model combining the site-level podoconiosis prevalence with continuous environmental covariates to estimate prevalence at unsampled locations. We report estimates of cases by district combining our mean predicted prevalence and a contemporary gridded map of estimated population density. Findings: Between June 12, and July 28, 2017, 1 360 612 individuals—719 730 (53%) women and 640 882 (47%) men—were screened from 80 clusters in 30 districts across Rwanda. 1143 individuals with lymphoedema were identified, of whom 914 (80%) had confirmed podoconiosis, based on the standardised diagnostic algorithm. The overall prevalence of podoconiosis was 68·5 per 100 000 people (95% CI 41·0–109·7). Podoconiosis was found to be widespread in Rwanda. District-level prevalence ranged from 28·3 per 100 000 people (16·8–45·5, Nyarugenge, Kigali province) to 119·2 per 100 000 people (59·9–216·2, Nyamasheke, West province). Prevalence was highest in districts in the North and West provinces: Nyamasheke, Rusizi, Musanze, Nyabihu, Nyaruguru, Burera, and Rubavu. We estimate that 6429 (95% CI 3938–10 088) people live with podoconiosis across Rwanda. Interpretation: Despite relatively low prevalence, podoconiosis is widely distributed geographically throughout Rwanda. Many patients are likely to be undiagnosed and morbidity management is scarce. Targeted interventions through a well coordinated health system response are needed to manage those affected. Our findings should inform national level planning, monitoring, and implementation of interventions. Funding: Wellcome Trust.

We did a population-based cross-sectional survey on podoconiosis targeting all 30 districts in Rwanda. In July, 2017, trained community health workers did a census of the communities within the selected sectors (a sector being the smallest administrative unit in Rwanda). In November, 2017, expert clinical diagnostic teams verified all suspected cases of lymphoedema (listed by community health workers) within these sectors. Rwanda is a densely populated, landlocked country of about 26 000 km2 in central eastern Africa. The country has a population of 12·1 million people (as of 2018)13 and is administratively divided into five provinces, 30 districts, and 416 sectors.13 Important country indicators include maternal mortality of 210 per 100 000 livebirths and child mortality of 50 per 1000 livebirths.14 The average life expectancy is 66·6 years.13 All adults (aged ≥15 years) who lived in any of the 30 districts were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were terminally ill patients who could not respond to the interview and patients with a mental health condition that would make interviewing difficult and results unreliable. Ethical approval was obtained from the Rwanda National Ethics Committee and the Brighton and Sussex Medical School Research Governance and Ethics Committee, Brighton, UK. Written informed consent was obtained from all respondents, except for illiterate respondents who provided their thumbprint and a signature from a literate witness. Individuals younger than 18 years provided assent and a parent or guardian provided written consent. A summary of the protocol is available in the appendix. Between June 12, and July 28, 2017, 282 trained community health workers did a census of the communities within the selected sectors. They registered residence, sex, and age, and recorded the presence of leg swelling of any type. All individuals with swelling of one or both lower limbs were documented as suspected cases during an exhaustive house-to-house census and case listing. Community volunteers were provided with case definitions and pictures of podoconiosis-related morbidity to identify the suspected cases. Between Nov 19, and Dec 6, 2017, expert clinical diagnostic teams verified all suspected cases of lymphoedema (listed by community health workers) within the randomly selected sectors, on the basis of procedures previously used in Cameroon.15 Each team included four health workers, a medical doctor, a nurse, a laboratory technician, and a team leader. To ensure effective community engagement, members of the team were recruited from the targeted sectors. Questionnaires were translated into Kinyarwanda language and data were collected using the LINKS software package (version 1.4.2; Secure Data Kit, Atlanta, GA, USA) installed onto Android smartphones.16 Individual data on age, sex, education, occupation, place of residence, shoe wearing, and foot hygiene practices were recorded, as were household data on water, sanitation, and hygiene. Geographic coordinates from surveyed communities were taken using smartphones. Data collectors could not proceed to the next question without completing all required fields. We used automated skip patterns to maintain the quality of the data. Each patient with suspected podoconiosis underwent a complete physical examination in a private room at the nearest public health centre. We used data collection methods used in previous similar surveys done in other countries.15, 17 Key questions were age at onset of swelling, family member (living or dead) with history of leg swelling, type of swelling (ascending or descending), and self-reported chronic illness, such as heart disease, kidney disease, or diabetes. Ascending swelling refers to swelling that starts from the foot and progresses up the leg; descending swelling is swelling that starts from the upper leg or groin area and progresses down. Suspected patients were also asked about previous clinical diagnoses of known causes of lymphoedema (such as congenital disorders, leprosy, and postoperative lymphoedema) and about the co-occurrence of swelling in other parts of the body, such as the hands, face, and scrotum (hydrocele). All lymphoedema cases were screened for circulating Wuchereria bancrofti antigen, using Filariasis Test Strips, and circulating specific IgG4 antibody, using Wb123 tests. Screening was done by trained laboratory technicians according to the manufacturer’s instructions.18, 19 Test results with the individual’s unique ID number were recorded both on the card, and on each individual’s data questionnaire. Briefly, for the rapid test, we used positive and negative controls for quality control of test batches before starting the daily activity. The patient’s third or fourth finger was cleaned with 70% alcohol and punctured using a sterile lancet. The initial drop of blood was removed using a cotton swab, and sufficient fresh blood was obtained to fill a 75-μl capillary tube. The blood sampled was transferred from the capillary tube to the pad on a Filariasis Test Strip card. The result of each card was read at 10 min exactly. A positive result was two lines, and a negative result was a single line. The tests were repeated if the control line was not shown. For the detection of IgG4 antibodies against W bancrofti, 10-μl capillary blood was transferred from the capillary tube to the pad of a Wb123 card and four drops of assay diluent were dispensed vertically into the square assay diluent well. The result of each Wb123 card was read at 30 min. A positive result was two lines, and a negative result was a single line. The following covariates were used in our analysis in a gridded format (raster datasets): precipitation, day land surface temperature, elevation, enhanced vegetation index, distance from closest waterway, clay content, silt content, night light emissivity, and distance to stable night light (appendix). These factors are associated with podoconiosis and have been included in previous modelling studies.20 Details on the source and processing are available in the appendix. Input grids were resampled to a common spatial resolution of 1 km2 using the nearest neighbour approach and clipped to match the geographic extent of a map of Rwanda, and eventually aligned to the map. Raster manipulation and processing was done using the raster package in R v3.3.2 and final map layouts created with ArcGIS software (version 10.5; Esri, Redlands, CA, USA). Geographic coordinates of each community were used to extract estimates from the aforementioned covariates. We defined a podoconiosis case as a person residing in the surveyed district for at least 10 years who had bilateral, asymmetrical lymphoedema of the lower limb lasting for more than 1 year, negative Filariasis Test Strip (Alere; Scarborough, ME, USA) and Wb123 tests, and a history of any of the signs and symptoms associated with podoconiosis.17 We collected occupational data in precoded categories: government employee, non-government employee, subsistence farmer or fishing, self-employed, full-time student, at home doing housework, unemployed (but able to work), unemployed (unable to work), and retired. Collected data were screened every day by the field supervisors and immediate feedback was given to the enumerators; field team leaders gave overall feedback and supervision. Final assessment of the full database was done after data collection every day to identify inconsistencies and missing items. We used a system for grading the clinical stages of podoconiosis that had been developed and validated in Ethiopia previously.21 The system has five stages: stage 1, swelling reversible overnight (ie, the swelling is not present when the patient first gets up in the morning); stage 2, below-knee swelling that is not completely reversible overnight, with knobs or bumps below the ankle only (if present); stage 3, below-knee swelling that is not completely reversible overnight, with knobs or bumps above the ankle; stage 4, above-knee swelling that is not completely reversible overnight, with knobs or bumps at any location; and stage 5, swelling at any place in the foot or leg, and the ankle or toe joints become fixed and difficult to flex or dorsiflex—these symptoms can be accompanied by apparent shortening of the toes. The survey used a cluster sampling design. We included all 30 districts of Rwanda. In each district, at least two sectors were randomly selected. The survey was powered to generate prevalence estimates for podoconiosis with a precision of 0·003% at the national level, assuming a conservative prevalence estimate of 42 cases per 100 000 from a surveillance report (M Jean Bosco, Rwanda Biomedical Center–Ministry of Health, personal communication). Under a design effect of 1·6 (calculated from a mapping survey in Cameroon)15 and a community participation rate of 80%, we estimated a sample size of 986 376 individuals to be screened from 60 sectors (two sectors per district). To adjust for sector size, sectors were assigned to districts proportional to the number of sectors per district. The adjustment resulted in 80 of 416 sectors being selected, with independent selection in each district. In the selected sectors, a census of all eligible individuals was done. All individuals aged 15 years and older, who had lived in the area for at least 10 years before the survey (to exclude individuals who might have acquired lymphoedema elsewhere) were included. We described the individual characteristics and prevalence of lymphoedema and podoconiosis with 95% CIs. We estimated district-level prevalence and number of cases across Rwanda using a binomial mixed model, accounting for fixed effects (covariates) and random effects. We chose this method over geostatistical and Bayesian frameworks on the basis of the absence of spatial structure on podoconiosis prevalence, explored by fitting an empirical variogram (appendix). Spatial dependence is a prerequisite for such methods. Our model used the prevalence estimates and covariates for smoothing the prediction. Briefly, let Yi denote the random variable associated with the number of positively detected cases of podoconiosis at a community location xi. We then modelled Yi using a binomial mixed model with probability of having podoconiosis p(xi) such that: where the dj(xi) are georeferenced covariates and Zi are independent and identically distributed zero-mean Gaussian variables with variance σ2. We fitted the model using the lme4 package (version 3.4) in R software.22 Using the approach described by Bates and colleagues,23 we tested the presence of residual spatial correlation by generating the 95% CIs for the variogram of the random effects Zi under the assumption of spatial independence. As the variogram that was based on the estimated Zi using the original data fell within the 95% CIs, we concluded that there was no evidence of residual spatial correlation. Therefore, a binomial non-spatially explicit mixed model was constructed. This model was used to produce continuous predictions of podoconiosis prevalence at 1 km2 spatial resolutions. We also developed a probability map of exceeding 0·1% prevalence. For a given location x, we obtain where βj hat is the maximum likelihood estimate of the regression coefficient βj for j=0,1,…,9. To compute the probability of exceeding 0·1% prevalence, we used the multivariate Gaussian approximation of the maximum likelihood estimator.24 Gridded maps of population density and age structure were obtained from the WorldPop project.25, 26 We used this gridded population surface to compute the estimates of affected population by pixel, by multiplying prevalence of podoconiosis in 1 km2 area with the corresponding population at the same spatial resolution. We used this surface to extract the aggregate number of people with podoconiosis by district. The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author and the last author had full access to all the data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Based on the provided information, here are some potential innovations that could be used to improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile Health (mHealth) Solutions: Develop mobile applications or SMS-based systems to provide pregnant women with information on prenatal care, nutrition, and safe delivery practices. These platforms can also be used to send reminders for appointments and medication adherence.

2. Telemedicine: Implement telemedicine services to connect pregnant women in remote areas with healthcare providers. This allows for remote consultations, monitoring, and follow-up care, reducing the need for travel and improving access to specialized care.

3. Community Health Workers: Train and equip community health workers to provide basic prenatal care, education, and support to pregnant women in underserved areas. These workers can also identify high-risk pregnancies and refer women to appropriate healthcare facilities.

4. Transport and Referral Systems: Establish efficient transport and referral systems to ensure that pregnant women can access healthcare facilities in a timely manner. This can involve partnerships with local transportation providers or the use of ambulances for emergency cases.

5. Maternal Health Vouchers: Introduce voucher programs that provide pregnant women with subsidized or free access to essential maternal health services, including antenatal care, delivery, and postnatal care. These vouchers can be distributed through community health workers or local health facilities.

6. Maternal Waiting Homes: Set up maternal waiting homes near healthcare facilities to accommodate pregnant women who live far away and need to stay closer to the facility towards the end of their pregnancy. This reduces the risk of delays in accessing care during labor and delivery.

7. Health Information Systems: Implement electronic health records and health information systems to improve data collection, monitoring, and coordination of maternal health services. This can help identify gaps in care, track outcomes, and inform decision-making for resource allocation.

8. Public-Private Partnerships: Foster collaborations between the government, private sector, and non-profit organizations to leverage resources, expertise, and innovation in improving access to maternal health services. This can involve initiatives such as mobile clinics, public awareness campaigns, and capacity-building programs.

It is important to note that the specific context and needs of the target population should be considered when implementing these innovations.
AI Innovations Description
The study conducted a population-based cross-sectional survey to estimate the prevalence and distribution of podoconiosis, a type of tropical lymphoedema, in Rwanda. The survey covered all 30 districts in Rwanda and involved screening over 1.3 million individuals. The results showed that podoconiosis is widely distributed geographically throughout Rwanda, with a prevalence of 68.5 cases per 100,000 people. The highest prevalence was found in districts in the North and West provinces.

Based on these findings, the following recommendation can be developed into an innovation to improve access to maternal health:

1. Increase awareness and education: Develop targeted health education campaigns to raise awareness about podoconiosis among healthcare providers, pregnant women, and the general population. This can help improve early detection and diagnosis of the condition, leading to timely treatment and management.

2. Strengthen healthcare infrastructure: Invest in improving healthcare infrastructure, particularly in districts with high prevalence rates of podoconiosis. This includes establishing specialized clinics or centers for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of podoconiosis. These facilities should be equipped with trained healthcare professionals and necessary resources.

3. Enhance training and capacity building: Provide training and capacity building programs for healthcare providers on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of podoconiosis. This will ensure that healthcare professionals have the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively address the needs of pregnant women with podoconiosis.

4. Integrate podoconiosis screening into maternal health services: Incorporate podoconiosis screening into routine antenatal care services to ensure early detection and timely intervention for pregnant women. This can be done by including podoconiosis screening as part of the standard antenatal care package and providing healthcare providers with the necessary tools and resources.

5. Improve access to treatment and management: Ensure that pregnant women with podoconiosis have access to appropriate treatment and management options. This includes providing access to medications, such as lymphedema management kits, and facilitating referrals to specialized healthcare facilities when needed.

6. Strengthen collaboration and coordination: Foster collaboration and coordination among relevant stakeholders, including government agencies, non-governmental organizations, and community-based organizations, to ensure a comprehensive and integrated approach to addressing podoconiosis in the context of maternal health.

By implementing these recommendations, it is possible to improve access to maternal health for pregnant women affected by podoconiosis in Rwanda. This will contribute to reducing maternal morbidity and mortality associated with the condition and improving overall maternal health outcomes.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations for improving access to maternal health:

1. Strengthening healthcare infrastructure: Invest in improving healthcare facilities, including maternal health clinics, hospitals, and birthing centers. This can involve upgrading existing facilities, constructing new ones, and ensuring they are adequately staffed with skilled healthcare professionals.

2. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions: Utilize mobile technology to provide maternal health information, reminders, and support to pregnant women and new mothers. This can include sending SMS messages with important health tips, appointment reminders, and emergency contact information.

3. Community health workers: Train and deploy community health workers to provide maternal health education, counseling, and support at the community level. These workers can conduct home visits, organize community health events, and refer women to appropriate healthcare services.

4. Telemedicine services: Implement telemedicine services to enable remote consultations between pregnant women and healthcare providers. This can help overcome geographical barriers and provide access to specialized care for high-risk pregnancies.

5. Maternal health insurance coverage: Expand health insurance coverage to include comprehensive maternal health services. This can help reduce financial barriers and ensure that women have access to quality prenatal, delivery, and postnatal care.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could involve the following steps:

1. Define indicators: Identify key indicators to measure the impact of the recommendations, such as the number of pregnant women receiving prenatal care, the percentage of births attended by skilled healthcare providers, and maternal mortality rates.

2. Data collection: Gather baseline data on the selected indicators before implementing the recommendations. This can involve surveys, interviews, and analysis of existing health data.

3. Modeling and simulation: Use statistical modeling techniques to simulate the potential impact of the recommendations on the selected indicators. This can involve creating mathematical models that take into account factors such as population demographics, healthcare infrastructure, and the effectiveness of the proposed interventions.

4. Sensitivity analysis: Conduct sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of the simulation results. This involves testing the model with different assumptions and parameters to determine the range of potential outcomes.

5. Scenario analysis: Explore different scenarios by adjusting the parameters of the model to simulate the impact of variations in the implementation of the recommendations. This can help identify the most effective strategies and prioritize resource allocation.

6. Evaluation and monitoring: Continuously monitor and evaluate the actual impact of the implemented recommendations on the selected indicators. This can involve collecting data post-implementation and comparing it to the simulated results to assess the accuracy of the model and make necessary adjustments.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare stakeholders can gain insights into the potential impact of different recommendations on improving access to maternal health and make informed decisions on resource allocation and program implementation.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email