Household level of air pollution and its impact on the occurrence of Acute Respiratory Illness among children under five: secondary analysis of Demographic and Health Survey in West Africa

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Indoor air pollution is a significant contributor to the occurrence of Acute Respiratory Illness (ARI) in children under five.
– One out of ten deaths of children under five are attributable to indoor air pollution.
– This study aims to characterize indoor air pollution in the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) area and estimate its impact on the occurrence of ARI in children under five.
Study Highlights:
– The study analyzed data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted in WAEMU countries.
– The study created a composite variable called “Household level of air pollution” to characterize indoor air pollution based on degradation factors of indoor air quality.
– Results showed that Burkina Faso had the highest number of households with a high level of pollution (63.7%), followed by Benin (43.7%) and Togo (43.0%).
– The main exposure factor, “Household level of air pollution,” was associated with ARI symptoms in Togo (prevalence = 51.3%).
– Exposure to a high level of pollution constituted a risk for ARI, although not statistically significant in Ivory Coast, Senegal, and Togo.
Recommendations:
– Implement interventions to reduce indoor air pollution in households, especially in countries with high levels of pollution like Burkina Faso, Benin, and Togo.
– Promote the use of low pollution fuels (electricity, Liquefied Petroleum Gas, natural gas, biogas) for cooking.
– Raise awareness about the health risks of indoor air pollution and the importance of proper ventilation.
– Conduct further research to explore the relationship between indoor air pollution and ARI in different contexts.
Key Role Players:
– Ministry of Health: Responsible for implementing interventions and policies related to indoor air pollution and child health.
– Environmental Protection Agency: Involved in regulating and monitoring air quality standards.
– Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs): Engaged in community education and awareness campaigns on indoor air pollution.
– Researchers and Academics: Conducting further research to deepen understanding and develop evidence-based interventions.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Public awareness campaigns: Budget for developing and disseminating educational materials, organizing workshops, and conducting media campaigns.
– Infrastructure improvement: Funds for promoting the use of clean cooking fuels and providing access to improved ventilation systems.
– Research funding: Allocation of resources for conducting further studies on the impact of indoor air pollution on child health.
– Monitoring and evaluation: Budget for monitoring the implementation and effectiveness of interventions, including data collection and analysis.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is relatively strong, but there are some areas for improvement. The study design is a retrospective cross-sectional study, which limits the ability to establish causality. Additionally, the abstract does not provide information on the sample size or the representativeness of the sample. To improve the evidence, the study could consider using a prospective cohort design to establish causality and provide more details on the sample size and representativeness of the sample.

Background: One out of ten deaths of children under five are attributable to indoor air pollution. And Acute Respiratory Illness (ARI) is among the direct causes. Objective: This study showed the possibilities of characterizing indoor air pollution in West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) area and it also made it possible to estimate its impact on the occurrence of ARI in children under five. Methods: It has been a secondary analysis based on Demographic and Health Surveys (DHSs) from WAEMU countries’ data. “Household level of air pollution” is the created composite variable, from questions on the degradation factors of indoor air quality (domestic combustion processes) which served to characterize indoor air pollution and to measure its impact by a logistic regression. Results: Burkina Faso stands out with a greater number of households with a high level of pollution (63.7%) followed by Benin (43.7%) then Togo (43.0%). The main exposure factor “Household level of air pollution” was associated with ARI symptoms (Togo: prevalence = 51.3%; chi-squared test’s p-value < 0.001). Exposure to high level of pollution constitutes a risk (AOR [95 CI]), even though it is not significant (Ivory Coast: 1.29 [0.72–2.30], Senegal: 1.39 [0.94–2.05] and Togo: 1.15 [0.67–1.95]) and this could be explained by the high infectious etiology of the ARI.

This is a retrospective cross-sectional study, in which we carried out a secondary analysis on data from DHS conducted in WAEMU member states. WAEMU is composed of eight Sahelian countries, linked by a common currency and cultural traditions: these are Benin, Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Ivory Coast, Guinea-Bissau, Senegal and Togo [16, 17]. It covers an area of 3.5 million km2 and has more than 120 million inhabitants, 34.8% of whom live in urban areas with disparities between countries [18, 19]. Indeed, urban population is larger in Ivory Coast (53.8%), Senegal (46.5%) and Benin (44.6%) and lower in Niger (14.9%). In addition, Ivory Coast represents 20.6% of the total population of the area, followed by Niger with 17.3% [19]. WAEMU area faces challenges related to poverty, access to basic social services, high fertility and is characterized by a high infant mortality [19]. In sum, the study included 59,765 children (Benin: 12,432; Burkina Faso: 13,583; Ivory Coast: 6941; Mali: 9222; Senegal: 11,182; and Togo: 6405), and 65,705 households (Benin: 14,156; Burkina Faso: 14,424; Côte d'Ivoire: 9686; Mali: 9510; Senegal: 8380; and Togo: 9549). DHS are designed to be nationally representative and aimed to provide information on the characteristics of the population (family planning, maternal and child health, child survival status, HIV/AIDS, Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs), reproductive health, nutritional status, etc.). Data were collected according to a complex multi-stage stratified cluster sampling design. At first, Enumeration Areas (EAs) were identified and then drawn from a list established during the last General Population and Housing Census (RGPH), then in each selected EA, a sample of households was drawn from an updated list. Survey participants included women aged 15 to 49, men aged 15 to 59, and children under five. As regards to the latter, their mothers were invited to provide information on their demographic characteristics as well as their health status. Four questionnaires were used for data collection: household questionnaire, female questionnaire, male questionnaire and biomarker questionnaire. Household questionnaire served as a tool for collecting information on household characteristics (main source of drinking water, type of toilet, hand washing equipment, source of lighting, fuels and cooking place, passive smoking, etc.). It also allowed to identify household members eligible for individual interviews and/or biological tests and measurements. A Biomarker questionnaire allowed informing the anthropometric measurements as well as results of tests carried out on blood samples [20–26]. Results presented in this paper are based on characteristics of households and children under five included in the sixth DHS (Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast) and seventh DHS (Benin, Senegal, Togo, Mali). Databases were obtained following a request and a justification of study from managers of the DHS program. Guinea Bissau is not concerned by the DHS program and is therefore excluded, as is Niger due to the unavailability of some variables of interest in the used database. “Household level of air pollution” is the created composite variable, from questions on the degradation factors of indoor air quality (domestic combustion processes) which served to characterize indoor air pollution and to measure its impact by a logistic regression. These questions were: “Does your household have electricity?”; “What type of fuel does your household mainly use for cooking?”; “Is the cooking usually done in the house in a separate building or outdoors?”; “How often does anyone smoke inside your house, would you say daily, weekly, monthly, less often than once a month, or never?”; “Do you currently smoke cigarettes every day, some days, or not at all?”. The possible answers to some of these questions were first grouped before being assigned a score. As regards to the type of cooking fuel, grouping is based on the work of Mishra et al. [27]. Three categories corresponding to high pollution fuels (wood, straw/shrubs/grass, agricultural crop or animal dung), medium pollution fuels (Kerosene, coal/lignite or charcoal), and low pollution fuels (electricity, Liquefied Petroleum Gas, natural gas, biogas) are indeed defined on the basis of the answers to this question. The scores assigned to these categories were 3, 2 and 1 respectively. The question on the smoking status of household members was also categorized into three modalities (never, sometimes and daily) with scores of 0, 1 and 2 respectively. “sometimes” was introduced as a new modality and includes the following responses: weekly, monthly, and less often than once a month. Concerning the mothers’ smoking status, the variable was binarized (yes/no) by regrouping under the “yes” modality, the following answers: every day or some days. Thus, the score assigned to this variable was 1 for “yes” and 0 for “no”. The same is applied to the availability of electricity, which was collected in a binary form. Also, the place of cooking was not recoded, and the answers were outdoors, in a separate building or in the house, corresponding respectively to the following scores: 1, 2 and 3. The maximum summation of the scores is 10. Subsequently, three levels of scores were defined for “Household level of air pollution”: low level corresponding to households with a score less than 4; medium level for those with a score between 4 and 6; and high level when the score is greater than 6. The second variable of interest is defined by symptoms of ARI and is used to characterize respiratory health of children. The definition proposed for this indicator has evolves over time and this work retained the DHS Statistics Guide’s latest definition. Symptoms of ARI in the child is defined as “short, rapid breathing which was chest-related and/or difficult breathing which was chest-related” during two weeks preceding the survey [28]. These symptoms were self-reported by children’s mothers. Moreover, DHS Statistics Guide also classified types of drinking water and sanitation facilities into one of the following: improved and unimproved [28]. This classification is based on guidelines of WHO/UNICEF’s Joint Monitoring Program for water supply and sanitation [29]. We did a a frequency measurement to describe households and children included in the study. The two main variables used for this purpose are: “Household level of air pollution” and symptoms of ARI. In addition to variables used to construct these indicators, other variables were included in this phase of the analysis. For households, the latter variables are relating to the access of water, hygiene and sanitation, as for children, they are: age, sex, birth weight and the mothers’ age and level of education. The second phase of analysis was carried out by measures of association using the chi-squared test and logistic regression. At this stage, symptoms of ARI are defined as dependent variable and “Household level of air pollution” as the main exposure factors. Other variables used in households and children’s description steps were also taken into account. A multivariate logistic regression model was fitted by including all variables significantly associated with the occurrence of ARI in any of the WAEMU member countries according to chi-squared test’s p-value. Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) were estimated from regression models as well as 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). All statistical analyses were carried out using the R software. The “survey” package is used to weigh all the observations in order to compensate for the oversampling of certain categories of respondents and to take into account the complexity of the sampling plan.

N/A

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could be recommended to improve access to maternal health:

1. Indoor Air Pollution Monitoring: Develop and implement innovative technologies or devices that can accurately measure and monitor indoor air pollution levels in households. This could help raise awareness about the harmful effects of indoor air pollution on maternal and child health and encourage households to take necessary measures to reduce pollution.

2. Clean Cooking Solutions: Promote the use of clean cooking technologies and fuels, such as improved cookstoves or clean energy sources like liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) or biogas. These solutions can help reduce indoor air pollution and its associated health risks for pregnant women and children.

3. Behavior Change Communication: Design and implement targeted behavior change communication campaigns to educate pregnant women and their families about the importance of reducing indoor air pollution and adopting clean cooking practices. This could include providing information on the health risks, benefits of clean cooking solutions, and practical tips for implementation.

4. Financial Incentives: Explore the possibility of providing financial incentives or subsidies to encourage households to switch to clean cooking technologies or fuels. This could help overcome financial barriers and make clean cooking solutions more affordable and accessible for pregnant women and their families.

5. Health Worker Training: Provide training and capacity building for healthcare providers on the health risks associated with indoor air pollution and the importance of addressing this issue in maternal health care. This could help ensure that healthcare providers are equipped with the knowledge and skills to educate and support pregnant women in adopting clean cooking practices.

6. Policy and Advocacy: Advocate for policy changes and regulations that prioritize the reduction of indoor air pollution and promote the use of clean cooking technologies. This could involve working with government agencies, policymakers, and other stakeholders to develop and implement policies that support the adoption of clean cooking practices and ensure access to clean energy sources.

It is important to note that these recommendations are based on the specific context and findings of the study mentioned in the description. Further research and evaluation would be needed to assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and scalability of these innovations in improving access to maternal health in different settings.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the information provided, the recommendation to improve access to maternal health is to address household-level air pollution, which has been found to have an impact on the occurrence of Acute Respiratory Illness (ARI) among children under five.

To develop this recommendation into an innovation, the following steps can be taken:

1. Raise awareness: Conduct public health campaigns to educate communities, especially mothers and caregivers, about the harmful effects of household air pollution on maternal and child health. Emphasize the link between indoor air pollution and ARI in children under five.

2. Promote clean cooking technologies: Encourage the use of clean cooking technologies, such as improved cookstoves or alternative fuels, that reduce indoor air pollution. Provide information on the availability and benefits of these technologies, and explore partnerships with organizations that distribute or subsidize clean cooking solutions.

3. Improve ventilation: Advocate for improved ventilation in households to reduce the concentration of indoor air pollutants. This can be achieved through simple interventions like opening windows or using exhaust fans. Provide guidance on proper ventilation practices and promote the importance of maintaining good indoor air quality.

4. Support policy changes: Work with policymakers to develop and implement regulations and standards that promote clean indoor air quality. Advocate for the inclusion of indoor air pollution reduction strategies in national maternal and child health programs. Collaborate with relevant government agencies to ensure the enforcement of these policies.

5. Strengthen monitoring and research: Conduct further research to better understand the specific sources and levels of indoor air pollution in different settings. Monitor the implementation and impact of interventions aimed at reducing household air pollution on maternal and child health outcomes. Use this data to inform evidence-based decision-making and refine strategies for improving access to maternal health.

By implementing these recommendations, it is possible to develop innovative approaches to address household-level air pollution and improve access to maternal health, ultimately reducing the occurrence of ARI among children under five.
AI Innovations Methodology
In order to improve access to maternal health, there are several potential recommendations that can be considered:

1. Strengthening healthcare infrastructure: This includes improving the availability and quality of healthcare facilities, ensuring access to essential medical equipment and supplies, and increasing the number of skilled healthcare providers.

2. Enhancing community-based healthcare services: Implementing community health worker programs and mobile clinics can help reach remote and underserved areas, providing essential maternal health services and education.

3. Improving transportation and logistics: Enhancing transportation systems and logistics can help overcome geographical barriers and ensure timely access to healthcare facilities for pregnant women.

4. Increasing awareness and education: Conducting awareness campaigns and providing education on maternal health, including prenatal care, safe delivery practices, and postnatal care, can help improve knowledge and encourage women to seek appropriate healthcare services.

5. Strengthening health information systems: Developing robust health information systems can help track maternal health indicators, identify gaps in service delivery, and inform evidence-based decision-making.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define indicators: Identify key indicators to measure access to maternal health, such as the number of antenatal care visits, skilled birth attendance, postnatal care utilization, and maternal mortality rates.

2. Data collection: Gather data on the current status of these indicators in the target population. This can be done through surveys, health facility records, and existing health information systems.

3. Baseline assessment: Analyze the collected data to establish a baseline for the selected indicators. This will provide a reference point for measuring the impact of the recommendations.

4. Intervention design: Develop a simulation model that incorporates the potential recommendations for improving access to maternal health. This model should consider factors such as population demographics, healthcare infrastructure, transportation systems, and community engagement.

5. Simulation analysis: Run the simulation model using the baseline data and the proposed interventions. This will help estimate the potential impact of each recommendation on the selected indicators.

6. Sensitivity analysis: Conduct sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of the simulation results. This involves testing the model with different assumptions and parameters to understand the range of potential outcomes.

7. Interpretation and recommendations: Analyze the simulation results and interpret the findings. Based on the impact estimates, identify the most effective recommendations for improving access to maternal health.

8. Implementation and monitoring: Develop an implementation plan for the recommended interventions and establish a monitoring system to track progress and evaluate the actual impact on access to maternal health over time.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare stakeholders can make informed decisions on which recommendations to prioritize and invest in to improve access to maternal health.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email