Demographics, clinical characteristics and neonatal outcomes in a rural Ugandan NICU

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aims to understand the demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of neonates admitted to a rural neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in central Uganda.
– This information is important for identifying determinants of neonatal mortality in developing countries and targeting improvements in facility-based neonatal care.
– The study provides insights into the challenges and opportunities for expanding access to quality neonatal care in rural areas.
Study Highlights:
– The study analyzed data from 809 neonates admitted to the NICU between December 2005 and September 2008.
– The most common admission diagnoses were infection, prematurity, respiratory distress, and asphyxia.
– Survival to discharge was 78%, and mortality was inversely proportional to birthweight and gestational age.
– Outborn neonates had higher mortality rates compared to inborn neonates.
– The study highlights the need for improved access to quality facility-based neonatal care, especially for outborn neonates.
Study Recommendations:
– Increase access to quality facility-based neonatal care in rural areas to reduce neonatal mortality.
– Strengthen community-based approaches for the identification and management of neonatal illness.
– Enhance prenatal care and support to reduce the incidence of prematurity and improve birth outcomes.
– Improve transportation and referral systems for neonates requiring pediatric subspecialty care.
– Invest in training and staffing of healthcare professionals in rural NICUs.
Key Role Players:
– Healthcare professionals: doctors, nurses, midwives, and pediatric subspecialists.
– Hospital administrators and managers.
– Government officials and policymakers.
– Community health workers and volunteers.
– Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working in maternal and child health.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training and capacity building for healthcare professionals.
– Equipment and supplies for NICUs, including thermoregulation, intravenous hydration, phototherapy, and oxygen concentrators.
– Transportation infrastructure and vehicles for neonatal referrals.
– Support for community-based approaches, including training and supervision of community health workers.
– Data management systems and electronic medical records.
– Research and evaluation to monitor and improve neonatal care outcomes.
Please note that the cost items provided are general categories and not actual cost estimates. The actual cost will depend on the specific context and implementation plan.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong. The study provides descriptive statistics and reports on a large number of neonates admitted to the NICU over a significant period of time. The study also includes information on demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. However, the study is limited to a single rural NICU in Uganda, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. To improve the strength of the evidence, future studies could include multiple NICUs in different regions to provide a more comprehensive understanding of neonatal mortality in developing countries.

Background: Ninety-six percent of the world’s 3 million neonatal deaths occur in developing countries where the majority of births occur outside of a facility. Community-based approaches to the identification and management of neonatal illness have reduced neonatal mortality over the last decade. To further expand life-saving services, improvements in access to quality facility-based neonatal care are required. Evaluation of rural neonatal intensive care unit referral centers provides opportunities to further understand determinants of neonatal mortality in developing countries. Our objective was to describe demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomes from a rural neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in central Uganda from 2005-2008. Methods: The NICU at Kiwoko hospital serves as a referral center for three rural districts of central Uganda. For this cross sectional study we utilized a NICU clinical database that included admission information, demographics, and variables related to hospital course and discharge. Descriptive statistics are reported for all neonates (<28 days old) admitted to the NICU between December 2005 and September 2008, disaggregated by place of birth. Percentages reported are among neonates for which data on that indicator were available. Results: There were 809 neonates admitted during the study period, 68% (490/717) of whom were inborn. The most common admission diagnoses were infection (30%, 208/699), prematurity (30%, 206/699), respiratory distress (28%, 198/699) and asphyxia (22%, 154/699). Survival to discharge was 78% (578/745). Mortality was inversely proportional to birthweight and gestational age (P-value test for trend <0.01). This was true for both inborn and outborn infants (p < 0.01). Outborn infants were more likely to be preterm (44%, (86/192) vs. 33%, (130/400), P-value <0.01) and to be low birthweight (58%, (101/173) vs. 40%, (190/479), P-value <0.01) than inborn infants. Outborn neonates had almost twice the mortality (33%, 68/208) as inborn neonates (17%, 77/456) (P-value <0.01). Conclusions: Understanding determinants of neonatal survival in facilities is important for targeting improvements in facility based neonatal care and increasing survival in low and middle income countries.

Kiwoko hospital serves as a rural referral center for three districts of central Uganda (combined population: 600,000) where 31% of births take place at home and only 33% of births are registered with the government [18]. As of 2006, this region had a neonatal mortality rate consistent with other rural areas in Uganda (33 per 1000 live births) and an under-5 mortality rate of 129 per 1000 live births [19]. Kiwoko hospital has 4–8 doctors working at a time and has bed capacity for up to 300 patients. The NICU in Kiwoko hospital accepts inborn and outborn newborns with gestational ages greater than 24 weeks and up to a chronologic age of 3–6 months. It opened in 2001 as a 20-bed unit with 300 admissions per year and was staffed by one nurse and two midwives [20]. The most commonly reported admission diagnoses at that time were prematurity, neonatal tetanus, prematurity with respiratory distress, and birth asphyxia. By 2012, the NICU had 35 beds, admitted 600 newborns per year, the majority of which were born at the hospital, and was staffed by 23 nurses and an assigned physician. A prospective NICU database containing 203 demographic and clinical variables for all admissions was established in 2005, allowing for more in-depth analysis of patient characteristics and outcomes. During the period of this study, the NICU had capacity for thermoregulation, intravenous hydration, cup and nasogastric tube feedings, limited phototherapy equipment, limited number of oxygen concentrators for use with nasal cannula, and an intermittent electrical supply. Neonates requiring pediatric subspecialty care required transfer to the national referral center in Kampala, located two hours’ travel by car. (Figure 1) During the study period there was at least one other NICU in Uganda (at the national hospital in the capital city) that had similar capabilities to care for ill neonates. Location of Kiwoko Hospital, Uganda. Kiwoko Hospital in Nakaseke district shown with hut symbol (used with permission of the ISIS foundation). This study was conducted by retrospective review of all admissions to the NICU from December 2005 through September 2008. Prior to 2005, no medical information systems existed in the Kiwoko NICU. Beginning in October of 2005 nurses recorded relevant health information at the time of admission for each infant using a medical record form developed for this NICU. The form was then updated throughout the hospitalization by the nursing staff, and completed at discharge/death of the patient. The medical record form included: maternal and delivery characteristics (e.g., maternal age, type of birth attendant), neonatal clinical characteristics (e.g., birth weight, admission diagnosis), hospital course (e.g., blood transfusions, oxygen therapy) and discharge status. Data from all forms during the study period were manually entered in to an electronic database in SPSS. All analyses reported in this paper are restricted to infants less than 28 days of age at admission. Descriptive statistics were used to assess demographic and clinical characteristics as well as neonatal outcomes. Medians and ranges were calculated for continuous variables. As appropriate, continuous variables were converted to clinically meaningful categories and analyzed as categorical variables. Frequencies were calculated for categorical variables. All analyses were disaggregated by location of birth, with those born at Kiwoko Hospital referred to as “inborn”, and those born outside of the hospital in a surrounding village health post or at home referred to as “outborn”. The chi-square test was used to evaluate differences between inborn and outborn infants and linear regression test for trend was used to evaluate differences in mortality based on birth weight and gestational age group. Gestational age was determined (in order of preference) by the mother’s report of her due date as determined from prenatal care, her last menstrual period or using Ballard assessment at admission if available. When birth weight was not known, admission weight was used if the patient was admitted within 3 days of birth. Admission diagnoses were categorized (such as prematurity, respiratory distress, infection, etc.). A neonate could have multiple admission diagnoses recorded. For admission diagnoses, reported percentages reflect the number of neonates with a particular diagnosis recorded as a proportion of the total number of neonates included in the study. For all analyses the reported unit of analysis is the neonate. The University of Washington Human Subjects Division reviewed the protocol and designated this study Minimal Risk and granted a waiver of consent due to the nature of the retrospective review and inability to contact subjects that were included in the database (HSD Study #43072). Local approval was obtained from Kiwoko hospital. This research has adhered to the STROBE guidelines for cross sectional studies.

N/A

Based on the provided information, here are some potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health:

1. Telemedicine: Implementing telemedicine services can allow healthcare providers to remotely monitor and provide consultations to pregnant women in rural areas. This can help address the lack of healthcare facilities and specialists in these areas.

2. Mobile clinics: Setting up mobile clinics equipped with basic maternal healthcare services can bring healthcare closer to rural communities. These clinics can provide prenatal check-ups, vaccinations, and education on maternal health.

3. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers who can provide basic maternal healthcare services and education in remote areas can help bridge the gap in access to healthcare.

4. Birth preparedness and complication readiness programs: Implementing programs that educate pregnant women and their families about the importance of planning for childbirth and recognizing potential complications can help improve maternal health outcomes.

5. Improving transportation infrastructure: Enhancing transportation infrastructure, such as roads and ambulances, can facilitate timely access to healthcare facilities for pregnant women in rural areas.

6. Strengthening referral systems: Developing efficient referral systems between primary healthcare centers and higher-level facilities can ensure that pregnant women with complications receive appropriate care in a timely manner.

7. Maternal health awareness campaigns: Conducting awareness campaigns to educate communities about the importance of maternal health, including antenatal care visits, skilled birth attendance, and postnatal care, can help improve access to these services.

8. Financial incentives: Providing financial incentives, such as cash transfers or subsidies, to pregnant women in rural areas can help alleviate the financial burden associated with accessing maternal healthcare services.

9. Public-private partnerships: Collaborating with private healthcare providers to establish and support maternal healthcare services in rural areas can help expand access to quality care.

10. Health information systems: Implementing electronic health records and data collection systems can improve the monitoring and evaluation of maternal health services, leading to better decision-making and resource allocation.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the information provided, a recommendation to improve access to maternal health in rural Uganda could be to establish and strengthen community-based approaches for the identification and management of neonatal illness. This can be achieved through the following steps:

1. Increase awareness and education: Implement community-based education programs to raise awareness about the importance of facility-based neonatal care and the signs of neonatal illness. This can be done through community health workers, local leaders, and community meetings.

2. Strengthen referral systems: Improve the referral systems between community health posts, village health centers, and the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at Kiwoko hospital. This can involve training health workers on proper referral protocols and ensuring efficient transportation for neonates in need of specialized care.

3. Enhance capacity at the NICU: Increase the capacity of the NICU at Kiwoko hospital by expanding the number of beds, recruiting and training more healthcare professionals, and ensuring the availability of essential equipment and supplies for neonatal care.

4. Improve data collection and analysis: Establish a comprehensive database to collect and analyze data on neonatal admissions, demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. This will help identify trends, determine areas for improvement, and monitor the impact of interventions.

5. Collaborate with other healthcare facilities: Strengthen collaboration between Kiwoko hospital and other healthcare facilities, including the national referral center in Kampala, to ensure seamless transfer of neonates requiring specialized care.

6. Advocate for policy changes: Work with local and national authorities to advocate for policy changes that prioritize maternal and neonatal health, including increased funding for healthcare facilities, improved infrastructure, and better access to essential medications and equipment.

By implementing these recommendations, it is possible to improve access to quality facility-based neonatal care, reduce neonatal mortality, and ultimately improve maternal health outcomes in rural Uganda.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the information provided, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Strengthening community-based approaches: Building on the success of community-based approaches to neonatal illness identification and management, further efforts can be made to expand these services. This can include training community health workers to provide basic maternal health services, such as antenatal care, postnatal care, and early identification of complications.

2. Improving facility-based neonatal care: Enhancing the quality and accessibility of facility-based neonatal care is crucial. This can involve increasing the number of healthcare providers, improving infrastructure and equipment, and ensuring a continuous supply of essential medicines and supplies.

3. Enhancing transportation and referral systems: Developing efficient transportation and referral systems is essential for timely access to maternal health services. This can include establishing ambulance services, improving road infrastructure, and strengthening communication networks between healthcare facilities.

4. Increasing awareness and education: Conducting awareness campaigns and educational programs can help improve knowledge and understanding of maternal health issues among the community. This can empower women to seek timely care and make informed decisions about their health.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Data collection: Gather data on the current state of maternal health access, including information on the number of births, place of birth, maternal and neonatal mortality rates, and availability of healthcare facilities.

2. Define indicators: Identify key indicators to measure the impact of the recommendations, such as the percentage of births attended by skilled healthcare providers, the number of maternal deaths, and the number of neonatal deaths.

3. Establish baseline values: Determine the current values of the selected indicators to establish a baseline for comparison.

4. Develop scenarios: Create different scenarios based on the recommendations, considering factors such as the scale of implementation, time frame, and available resources. For example, one scenario could involve implementing all recommendations simultaneously, while another scenario could focus on a specific intervention.

5. Simulate impact: Use mathematical models or simulation tools to estimate the potential impact of each scenario on the selected indicators. This can involve projecting changes in the indicators over a specific time period, taking into account factors such as population growth and healthcare utilization patterns.

6. Analyze results: Compare the projected outcomes of each scenario to the baseline values to assess the potential impact of the recommendations. This can help identify the most effective interventions and prioritize resources for implementation.

7. Refine and iterate: Based on the analysis, refine the scenarios and assumptions as needed. Repeat the simulation process to further evaluate the potential impact and make informed decisions on the best course of action.

It is important to note that the methodology for simulating the impact of recommendations on improving access to maternal health may vary depending on the available data, resources, and context.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email