Introduction: Institutional delivery is a major concern for a country’s long-term growth. Rapid population development, analphabetism, big families, and a wider range of urban-rural health facilities have had a negative impact on institutional services in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries. The aim of this study was to look into the factors that influence women’s decision to use an institutional delivery service in SSA. Methods: The most recent Demographic and Health Survey (DHS), which was conducted in nine countries (Senegal, Ethiopia, Malawi, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zambia, Namibia, Ghana, the Democratic Republic of Congo) was used. The service’s distribution outcome (home delivery or institutional delivery) was used as an outcome predictor. Logistic regression models were used to determine the combination of delivery chances and different covariates. Results: The odds ratio of the experience of institutional delivery for women living in rural areas vs urban area was 0.44 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41–0.48). Primary educated women were 1.98 (95% CI 1.85–2.12) times more likely to deliver in health institutes than non-educated women, and secondary and higher educated women were 3.17 (95% CI 2.88–3.50) times more likely to deliver in health centers with facilities. Women aged 35–49 years were 1.17 (95% CI 1.05–1.29) times more likely than women aged under 24 years to give birth in health centers. The number of ANC visits: women who visited four or more times were 2.98 (95% CI 2.77–3.22) times, while women who visited three or less times were twice (OR = 2.03; 95% CI 1.88–2.18) more likely to deliver in health institutes. Distance from home to health facility were 1.18 (95% CI 1.11–1.25) times; media exposure had 1.28 (95% CI 1.20–1.36) times more likely than non-media-exposed women to delivery in health institutions. Conclusions: Women over 24, primary education at least, urban residents, fewer children, never married (living alone), higher number of prenatal care visits, higher economic level, have a possibility of mass-media exposure and live with educated husbands are more likely to provide health care in institutions. Additionally, the distance from home to a health facility is not observed widely as a problem in the preference of place of child delivery. Therefore, due attention needs to be given to address the challenges related to narrowing the gap of urban-rural health facilities, educational level of women improvement, increasing the number of health facilities, and create awareness on the advantage of visiting and giving birth in health facilities.
We use data from the most recent Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) to collect institutional delivery services data from nine countries: Senegal in 2017, Ethiopia in 2016, Malawi in 2016, Rwanda in 2015, Tanzania in 2016, Zambia in 2014, Namibia in 2013, Ghana in 2014, and the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2014 (Table (Table11). Year of survey and number of women in the nine Sub-Saharan Africa using Demographic and Health Surveys 2013–2017 The countries were chosen based on data availability and historical significance. Measure DHS gave the authors permission to download and use these data for this report. The DHS survey was a cross-sectional study that used stratified multistage (mostly two-stage) cluster sampling to sample people across the country. The Population and Housing Census (PHC) sampling frames were used in the Enumeration Areas (PHC). It had been used as a preliminary cluster sampling method. Random samples of households were taken in the second stage of clustering within each cluster. All subpopulations are fairly represented in the survey results. The DHS data are open to the public and provide information on maternal, infant, and child mortality, as well as socio-demographic, economic, and health-related variables. We obtained the information from the DHS, which included the location of birth for mothers aged 15 to 49 years, as determined by sampled households in each cluster unit. The woman questionnaire was used to obtain the dependent variable, which is the place of delivery. The data was gathered from qualified women aged 15 to 49 years old, who were asked questions about their socio-demographic and economic backgrounds (age, sex, education, marital status, and income), birth history, health facility, media exposure, antenatal visits, women and their husbands’ job status, and other topics. The dependent variable in this study was registered as a dichotomous variable: home delivery (no) and institutional delivery (yes). The residence of the families residing in; fathers’ and mothers’ educational status; women’s age (in years at the time of the survey); the number of living children inside the family; the existence of mothers’ occupation; the household head; the income index; the number of antenatal care (ANC) visits during the pregnancy; the distance between home and health facilities; women’s marital status (at the time of the survey); and access to mass media were all considered independent variables. The independent variables are used because they are available in the dataset and have been studied previously. The independent variables were categorize to make the study simpler (Table (Table22). Relationship between correlates and place of delivery in nine Sub-Saharan Africa *Single, widowed, divorced The relation between the odds of the place of delivery and the aforementioned explanatory variables was estimated using Pearson chi-square (X2) and logistic regression models. STATA 14 was used to perform the data analysis. At the univariable point, the chi-square test of association was used to statistically test whether there was a meaningful association between the place of delivery and other explanatory categorical variables or not. As an outcome to the logistic regression model, a binary outcome (home delivery (no) or institutional delivery (yes) is used. The availability of a meaningful effect or correlation of independent variables with the outcome variable is tested using a p-value less than 0.05 or 5%. The data analyses conducted using the publicly available data of the 2013–2017 DHS of nine Sub-Saharan African countries (https://dhsprogram.com/Data/terms-of-use.cfm). The DHS program has given a written permission letter.
N/A