Background Dietary diversity has continued to receive a global attention among pregnant women as they have been considered susceptible to malnutrition because of their increased nutrient demands. Thus, a variety of foodstuffs in their diet are necessary for ensuring the appropriateness of their nutrient consumptions. This study, therefore assessed the dietary diversity practice and its determinants among pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at Wachemo University Nigist Eleni Mohammed memorial referral hospital, Southern Ethiopia. Methods A hospital-based cross-sectional study was carried out on 303 participants from May 1 to June 15, 2019 using a systematic random sampling technique. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS (version24.0). Both bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to decide the association of each explanatory variable with the outcome variable. Odds ratio with their 95% confidence intervals was calculated to identify the presence and strength of association, and statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05. Results The overall prevalence of adequate dietary diversity practices was observed to be 42.6%. The determinants of dietary diversity practice included earning of a monthly income ≥2000 Ethiopian birr (AOR = 1.62; 95%CI:1.19–2.85), maternal educational level (AOR = 2.50; 95% CI: 1.05–6.12), educational status of partner (AOR = 2.45; 95% CI:1.20, 9.57), having a partner who was a government employee (AOR = 4; 95% CI:2.18–7.21), and the receiving of nutritional information (AOR = 1.35; 95% CI: 3.39–6.94). Conclusions The study indicated that the overall consumption of adequate dietary diversity practice was found to be low. Therefore, increasing household income, enhancing nutritional related information, advancing the academic level of both wife and her partner is essential to improve women’s dietary diversity practice.
A hospital-based cross-sectional study was carried out from May 1 to June 15, 2019 among pregnant women attending the ANC clinic at Wachemo University Nigist Eleni Mohammed Memorial referral hospital (WUNEMMRH), in Hossana town, Hadiya Zone, Southern Nation’s Nationalities and Peoples Region at 232 kilometers south of Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia. WUNEMMRH gives preventive, curative and rehabilitative clinical services structured in four case teams in outpatient, inpatient, emergency and critical care, maternal, child health and obstetrics, and the operation theatre. The hospital was chosen due to its highest patient and client attendance. It is the biggest hospital in Hadiya Zone serving the Zonal population and bordering Zones and special woredas including Silte, Gurage, Halaba and Kambata-Tembaro. The source population comprised all pregnant women attending the ANC clinic at WUNEMMRH during the study period, while the study population encompassed randomly selected pregnant women attending the ANC clinic at WUNEMMRH during the study period. Pregnant women who were critically ill or unable to communicate were excluded from the study. The sample size of 306 was calculated using a single population proportion formula with the following considerations: the prevalence of dietary diversity practices is 25.4%, which was taken from the research conducted in Shashemane [19], with a 95% confidence interval, a margin error of 5%, and 5% non-response rate. A systematic random sampling technique was used to recruit the study participants. Since sampling interval was computed to be three, every third interval was used to enroll the participants. The questionnaire was first prepared in English, translated into Amharic, and then translated back to English to ensure the consistency. Two different experts ensured consistency by translating it back to English. Data was collected in Amharic (which is the local language). Data was collected through a structured and pretested questionnaire used in face to face interviews. Dietary intake information was measured by asking participants to list all food items they consumed in the last 24 hours preceding the survey day. Midwives, four with diplomas and two with a bachelor’s degree, were recruited for the data collection and supervision. The data collectors and supervisors were given training on the content of the tool, the purpose of the study, and how to collect the data. The questionnaire was adapted from Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) dietary diversity guidelines [20]. The validity of the questionnaire was approved through the proper application of validity criteria (content validity). Reliability was assured through stability (the instrument was given to the same respondents more than once under similar situations and it was found consistent). Data were collected on socio-demographic data; obstetric related history, food groups and dietary diversity practice. The validity and reliability of the instrument was ensured in scientific manner. The questionnaire were pretested on 15 pregnant women in Hossana health center which is out of the study area before the actual data collection period. After the pretest, understand ability, clearness, and organization of the instrument was also checked. The supervisors and the investigators strictly monitored the data collection process every day over course of the pretest and the actual data collection period. Further, the filled tool was collected and signed by the supervisor after being observed for any lacking items and certainty. For this study, a total of ten food groups was used and participants who consumed ≥5 food groups were categorized as having an adequate dietary diversity practice while those participants who consumed < 5 food groups was categorized as having an inadequate dietary diversity practice [20]. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS (version 24.0). Descriptive statistics, frequency, and proportions were calculated to summarize the data. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify determinants of diversity dietary practice. Firstly, bivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted on all explanatory variables. Then, multivariable logistic regression was undertaken on variables that had a p-value ≤ 0.25 in the bivariate logistic regression analysis. The degree of association between explanatory variables, and outcome were evaluated using odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. P<0.05 was stated as statistically significant. The Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic had a significance of 0.86 showing that the model was a good fit. Multi-collinearity was tested for interaction between explanatory variables through variance inflation factor which displayed a value of < 5. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Hossana College of Health Science. Formal letter was attained from the Hossana town health bureau. Then, permission was obtained from WUNEMMRH before starting the data collection. The participants were informed about purpose, procedures, potential risks and benefits of the study. Informed written consent was sought from selected participant to confirm their willingness to participate in the study before the interview. Parental or legal guardian consent was taken for respondents who were under 18 years of age. To keep confidentiality, name was not included in the written questionnaire. Additionally, the participants were ensured that refusal to consent or withdrawal from the study would not alter or put at risk their access to care.