What elements of the work environment are most responsible for health worker dissatisfaction in rural primary care clinics in Tanzania?

listen audio

Study Justification:
This study aims to investigate the factors that contribute to health worker dissatisfaction in rural primary care clinics in Tanzania. Understanding these factors is crucial for improving the quality of healthcare in rural areas and addressing high maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality rates. By identifying the specific elements of the work environment that impact health worker satisfaction, resources can be allocated effectively to improve job satisfaction and reduce attrition rates.
Study Highlights:
– 70 health workers in rural Tanzania participated in a job satisfaction survey.
– The survey assessed 17 aspects of the work environment, including pay, availability of equipment and supplies, and supportive interpersonal relationships.
– Results showed that while 73.9% of health workers were satisfied with their job overall, only 11.6% were satisfied with their level of pay and 2.9% with the availability of equipment and supplies.
– Two categories of factors emerged from the analysis: tools and infrastructure to provide care, and supportive interpersonal environment.
– Nurses and medical attendants, as well as older health workers, reported higher satisfaction levels.
– The study suggests that improving infrastructure and supportive interpersonal relationships can enhance health worker morale and potentially reduce attrition rates.
Recommendations:
Based on the findings of the study, the following recommendations are proposed:
1. Improve the availability of equipment and supplies in rural primary care clinics to enhance health worker satisfaction.
2. Enhance the infrastructure of healthcare facilities, including access to electricity and clean water, to create a conducive work environment.
3. Strengthen supportive interpersonal relationships among health workers to improve job satisfaction and morale.
4. Develop and implement human resource policies that address the specific needs and concerns of health workers in rural areas.
5. Provide training and support for health workers to enhance their skills and competencies.
6. Conduct regular assessments of health worker satisfaction to monitor progress and identify areas for improvement.
Key Role Players:
1. Ministry of Health: Responsible for developing and implementing policies to improve health worker satisfaction in rural primary care clinics.
2. District Health Management Teams: Provide oversight and support to healthcare facilities in rural areas.
3. Health Facility Managers: Responsible for implementing strategies to improve the work environment and address health worker dissatisfaction.
4. Health Workers: Play a crucial role in providing feedback, participating in training programs, and contributing to a positive work environment.
Cost Items:
1. Equipment and Supplies: Budget allocation for the procurement and maintenance of essential obstetric equipment, supplies, and drugs.
2. Infrastructure Improvement: Funds for upgrading facilities, ensuring access to electricity and clean water, and conducting renovations.
3. Training and Capacity Building: Budget for training programs to enhance health worker skills and competencies.
4. Monitoring and Evaluation: Resources for conducting regular assessments of health worker satisfaction and monitoring progress.
5. Policy Development and Implementation: Funding for the development and implementation of human resource policies targeted at improving health worker satisfaction in rural areas.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong. The study includes a sample size of 70 health workers in rural Tanzania and uses a self-administered job satisfaction survey. The study also employs principal components analysis (PCA) to identify groupings of variables and examines bivariate associations between health worker demographics and clinic characteristics. However, the study does not provide information on the representativeness of the sample or the generalizability of the findings. To improve the strength of the evidence, future studies could consider using a larger sample size and conducting a more comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing health worker satisfaction.

Background: In countries with high maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality, reliable access to quality healthcare in rural areas is essential to save lives. Health workers who are satisfied with their jobs are more likely to remain in rural posts. Understanding what factors influence health workers’ satisfaction can help determine where resources should be focused. Although there is a growing body of research assessing health worker satisfaction in hospitals, less is known about health worker satisfaction in rural, primary health clinics. This study explores the workplace satisfaction of health workers in primary health clinics in rural Tanzania. Methods: Overall, 70 health workers in rural Tanzania participated in a self-administered job satisfaction survey. We calculated mean ratings for 17 aspects of the work environment. We used principal components analysis (PCA) to identify groupings of these variables. We then examined the bivariate associations between health workers demographics and clinic characteristics and each of the satisfaction scales. Results: Results showed that 73.9% of health workers strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their job; however, only 11.6% strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their level of pay and 2.9% with the availability of equipment and supplies. Two categories of factors emerged from the PCA: the tools and infrastructure to provide care, and supportive interpersonal environment. Nurses and medical attendants (compared to clinical officers) and older health workers had higher satisfaction scale ratings. Conclusions: Two dimensions of health workers’ work environment, namely infrastructure and supportive interpersonal work environment, explained much of the variation in satisfaction among rural Tanzanian health workers in primary health clinics. Health workers were generally more satisfied with supportive interpersonal relationships than with the infrastructure. Human resource policies should consider how to improve these two aspects of work as a means for improving health worker morale and potentially rural attrition. Trial registration: (ISRCTN 17107760).

This analysis was conducted within a large cluster-randomized maternal and newborn health quality improvement study (ISRCTN 17107760). 24 government-managed primary healthcare facilities (dispensaries), in four districts of rural Pwani Region, Tanzania (Bagamoyo, Kibaha Rural, Kisarawe, and Mkuranga) were selected for inclusion in the study (Figure  1). To be included, facilities had to be government-managed, have at least one medically trained staff member (e.g., clinical officer or nurse), and be actively providing delivery services. From the 62 eligible facilities, the 6 primary care clinics from each district with the highest volumes of deliveries in the 6-month period from January to June 2011 were selected for inclusion. Map of study facilities, Pwani Region, Tanzania. All health workers working in the study facilities were invited to participate in the satisfaction survey. If health workers were not available on the day of data collection, the study team arranged for an additional visit to the facility in order to increase participation. The self-administered survey was adapted from the Revised Nursing Work Index [25]. The survey includes a 17-question index addressing aspects of the work environment, asking health workers to state their agreement on a 4-point Likert scale. Additionally, we conducted an assessment of the 24 primary care clinics where the health workers were employed. This was done using a structured questionnaire adapted from the needs assessment created by the Averting Maternal Death and Disability Program and the UN system that has been previously used in more than 30 countries, including Tanzania [26]. The survey included questions regarding human resources, infrastructure, and services available as well as a record review of the volumes of services provided and was answered by the most senior provider available on the day of data collection. Data were collected from December 5, 2011, to May 15, 2012, by three teams of three data collectors. Data collectors were trained for one week in ethical data collection and conducting interviews. The project was approved by ethical review committees at Columbia University (United States), Ifakara Health Institute (Tanzania), and National Institute for Medical Research (Tanzania). Written consent was obtained from each participant. The survey administered to health workers included 17 questions related to aspects of the work environment. An additional three questions related to overall job satisfaction were asked, namely, how satisfied they were with their own job, how satisfied other people are in similar jobs, and, finally, how much they would like to continue to work for this facility. Based on the literature we identified a range of determinants of health worker satisfaction: health worker demographics, health worker length of employment, facility size, facility infrastructure, and services provided by the facility. We assessed health worker’s age, sex, cadre, and whether they were full or part-time. We categorized the time the health worker had worked in the facility at more than two years based on an inflection point seen in the data. To assess the workload of the facility we looked at the average monthly facility deliveries in 2011 and the average monthly outpatient visits for 2011. Where data were missing for a month in a facility we substituted the average of the contiguous months (data were missing for 2.3% of facility-months). If data were missing from two consecutive months (two instances), we created an average using the months where facility data were available. We also looked at the number of outreach visits the facility conducted in the 90 days before interview and the number of health workers at the facility. We assessed the facilities’ performance of basic emergency obstetric care (i.e., number of obstetric signal functions in the past three months, such as administering uterotonics or conducting newborn resuscitation), as a measure of the complexity of obstetric services provided in the facility. In order to assess the effect of the availability of equipment, supplies, and drugs on health worker satisfaction, we created an index. We utilized Tanzanian government guidelines, findings from the literature, and expert opinion to develop a list of essential obstetric equipment, supplies, and drugs [27,28]. We then calculated a summative score, where a single point was given for each item available and functioning on the day of assessment. We further assessed the infrastructure of the facility through the availability of electricity, clean water, and whether or not the facility had received an upgrade or renovation in the past year. We assessed the extent of supervision through the number of managerial meetings and supervisor visits in the past 90 days. Finally, because management of health facilities occurs through district-based teams, we assessed differences across the four districts in our study. Data were entered and variables were examined for missingness and outliers. Descriptive statistics were calculated for health worker and facility-level characteristics. We created a binary variable that grouped health workers into “strongly agree” versus all others, for health workers’ assessment of general job satisfaction. We conducted a principal components analysis (PCA) of the 17 questions related to aspects of the work environment. PCA identifies underlying components that are described by the index through identifying questions that strongly correlate. Cattell’s Scree test graphically demonstrated that a majority of the variation in satisfaction was due to two components. We therefore extracted two components and used varimax rotation to simplify interpretation of the factors by allowing each variable to load strongly on only one factor. All 17 questions from the original index were maintained in the PCA. We created scores for each of the subscales using the sum of the subscale regression weights (factor loadings) multiplied by the healthcare worker’s response for each question [29]. We standardized the resulting subscales to aid in interpretation. We calculated Cronbach’s α to assess internal consistency of the subscales. We then examined the association between the satisfaction subscale scores and each of the characteristics of the health workers and health facilities using bivariate linear regression analyses. We further explored correlation between dependent variables. Data analysis was conducted using Stata version 12.1 (StataCorp, 2012, College Station, TX, USA).

N/A

Based on the information provided, here are some potential recommendations for innovations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Improve availability of equipment and supplies: Only 2.9% of health workers strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the availability of equipment and supplies. Innovations could focus on ensuring that primary health clinics in rural areas have access to essential obstetric equipment, supplies, and drugs. This could involve developing efficient supply chain systems, utilizing technology for inventory management, and implementing regular monitoring and evaluation processes.

2. Enhance infrastructure: The study found that health workers were generally more satisfied with supportive interpersonal relationships than with the infrastructure. Innovations could focus on improving the infrastructure of primary health clinics, including access to electricity and clean water. This could involve exploring renewable energy solutions, implementing water purification systems, and conducting facility upgrades or renovations.

3. Strengthen supportive interpersonal work environment: The study identified supportive interpersonal relationships as an important factor influencing health worker satisfaction. Innovations could focus on promoting teamwork, communication, and collaboration among health workers. This could involve implementing training programs on effective communication and teamwork, establishing regular team meetings and feedback sessions, and fostering a positive work culture.

4. Address issues related to pay: Only 11.6% of health workers strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their level of pay. Innovations could focus on improving the financial incentives for health workers in rural primary care clinics. This could involve exploring alternative payment models, such as performance-based incentives or rural retention bonuses, and advocating for fair and competitive salaries for health workers in rural areas.

5. Support professional development and career advancement: The study found that nurses and medical attendants, as well as older health workers, had higher satisfaction ratings. Innovations could focus on providing opportunities for professional development and career advancement for health workers in rural areas. This could involve implementing training programs, mentorship initiatives, and scholarship opportunities to support the growth and advancement of health workers’ careers.

It is important to note that these recommendations are based on the specific findings of the study conducted in rural Tanzania. The implementation of these innovations should be context-specific and tailored to the needs and resources of each setting.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the analysis conducted in rural primary care clinics in Tanzania, two dimensions of the health workers’ work environment were found to be most responsible for dissatisfaction: infrastructure and supportive interpersonal work environment. Health workers reported low satisfaction with their level of pay and the availability of equipment and supplies.

To improve access to maternal health, the following recommendations can be developed into innovations:

1. Improve infrastructure: Enhance the physical facilities of rural primary care clinics by providing reliable electricity, clean water, and necessary upgrades or renovations. This will create a conducive environment for health workers to provide quality maternal health services.

2. Increase availability of equipment and supplies: Ensure that rural primary care clinics have adequate and functioning obstetric equipment, supplies, and drugs. This can be achieved by following Tanzanian government guidelines and regularly assessing the availability of essential items.

3. Foster a supportive interpersonal work environment: Implement strategies to improve relationships and communication among health workers in rural primary care clinics. This can include team-building activities, regular managerial meetings, and supervisor visits to provide guidance and support.

4. Address issues related to pay: Explore options to improve the level of pay for health workers in rural primary care clinics. This can involve advocating for fair compensation and incentives to attract and retain skilled health workers in these areas.

By implementing these recommendations, it is expected that the work environment in rural primary care clinics will be improved, leading to increased job satisfaction among health workers. This, in turn, can contribute to better access to maternal health services and ultimately save lives in countries with high maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, the study aims to identify the elements of the work environment that contribute to health worker dissatisfaction in rural primary care clinics in Tanzania. The methodology used in the study includes a self-administered job satisfaction survey completed by 70 health workers in rural Tanzania. The survey consists of 17 questions addressing various aspects of the work environment, such as pay, availability of equipment and supplies, and supportive interpersonal relationships. Principal components analysis (PCA) was conducted to identify groupings of these variables, resulting in two categories: tools and infrastructure to provide care, and supportive interpersonal environment. Bivariate linear regression analyses were then used to examine the associations between health worker demographics, clinic characteristics, and each satisfaction scale.

To simulate the impact of recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a similar methodology can be employed. Here is a brief description of the methodology:

1. Identify potential recommendations: Conduct a comprehensive review of existing literature, policies, and best practices related to improving access to maternal health. This can include interventions such as increasing the number of skilled health workers, improving infrastructure and equipment, enhancing training and supervision, implementing community-based programs, and strengthening health systems.

2. Develop a simulation model: Create a simulation model that incorporates the identified recommendations and their potential impact on improving access to maternal health. The model should consider various factors such as population demographics, health worker distribution, facility capacity, and geographical accessibility.

3. Define outcome measures: Determine the outcome measures that will be used to assess the impact of the recommendations. This can include indicators such as the number of maternal deaths averted, increase in the number of skilled deliveries, improvement in antenatal and postnatal care coverage, and reduction in travel time to reach health facilities.

4. Collect data: Gather relevant data on the current status of maternal health access, including health worker availability, facility infrastructure, and service utilization. This data will serve as the baseline for the simulation model.

5. Implement recommendations in the simulation model: Incorporate the identified recommendations into the simulation model and simulate their impact on the outcome measures. This can be done by adjusting variables such as the number of skilled health workers, facility capacity, and availability of equipment and supplies.

6. Analyze results: Analyze the simulation results to assess the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This can involve comparing the baseline scenario with the simulated scenarios to determine the magnitude of change in the outcome measures.

7. Validate the model: Validate the simulation model by comparing the simulated results with real-world data, if available. This will help ensure the accuracy and reliability of the model’s predictions.

8. Refine and iterate: Based on the analysis and validation, refine the simulation model and repeat the simulation process if necessary. This iterative process will help fine-tune the recommendations and improve the accuracy of the simulation results.

By following this methodology, policymakers and stakeholders can gain insights into the potential impact of different recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This information can then be used to inform decision-making and resource allocation for maternal health interventions.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email