Cross-sectional trends in HIV prevalence among pregnant women in Botswana: an opportunity for PrEP?

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Young women in sub-Saharan Africa are at high risk of HIV acquisition.
– “Test and treat” strategies have the potential to reduce transmission in this age group.
– However, the effectiveness of these strategies outside of clinical trials is not well-studied.
– This study aims to fill this knowledge gap by analyzing data from nationwide surveillance among pregnant women in Botswana.
Study Highlights:
– The study analyzed data from 120,755 women who delivered at eight government hospitals in Botswana between 2015 and 2019.
– Overall HIV prevalence among pregnant women was 24.1%.
– HIV prevalence varied by site of delivery and increased with age.
– Factors associated with HIV infection included lower educational attainment and being unmarried.
– HIV prevalence decreased linearly during the study period from 25.8% to 22.7%.
– However, HIV prevalence among the youngest age group remained stagnant.
– The study highlights the need for targeted prevention interventions, specifically pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), during the high-risk period surrounding a woman’s first pregnancy.
Recommendations for Lay Reader and Policy Maker:
– Prioritize preventative interventions utilizing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) during the high-risk period surrounding a woman’s first pregnancy.
– Implement targeted prevention strategies to address stagnant HIV prevalence among the youngest age group.
– Increase access to education and support for young women to reduce HIV transmission.
– Strengthen efforts to promote safe sexual practices and increase awareness about HIV prevention methods.
Key Role Players:
– Ministry of Health: Responsible for implementing and coordinating prevention interventions and policies.
– Healthcare Providers: Involved in delivering prevention services, including PrEP, to pregnant women.
– Community Health Workers: Play a crucial role in raising awareness, providing education, and promoting HIV prevention methods.
– Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs): Support implementation of prevention programs and provide additional resources and support.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training and Capacity Building: Budget for training healthcare providers and community health workers on PrEP implementation and counseling.
– Medication and Supplies: Allocate funds for procuring PrEP medications and necessary supplies for service delivery.
– Awareness and Education Campaigns: Budget for developing and implementing campaigns to raise awareness about HIV prevention methods, including PrEP.
– Monitoring and Evaluation: Allocate resources for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of prevention interventions and adjusting strategies as needed.
– Support Services: Consider budgeting for additional support services, such as counseling and psychosocial support, for pregnant women accessing PrEP.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is relatively strong, but there are some areas for improvement. The study utilized a nationally representative dataset and included a large sample size, which enhances the generalizability of the findings. The study also employed statistical analyses to identify trends and factors associated with HIV prevalence. However, the abstract could be improved by providing more details on the methodology, such as the specific statistical tests used and any potential limitations of the study. Additionally, it would be helpful to include information on the data collection process and any steps taken to ensure data quality. Overall, the evidence is solid, but providing more transparency and clarity in the abstract would enhance its strength.

Introduction: Young women in sub-Saharan Africa are at particularly high risk of HIV acquisition. Recent shifts towards “test and treat” strategies have potential to reduce transmission in this age group but have not been widely studied outside of clinical trials. Using data from nationwide surveillance among pregnant women in Botswana, where a “test and treat” program was implemented in 2016, we describe trends in HIV prevalence over time and highlight opportunities for targeted prevention. Methods: The Tsepamo study abstracted data from obstetric records of all women delivering at eight government hospitals in Botswana between 2015 and 2019, accounting for 45% of all births in the country (n = 120,755). We used a stratified analysis to identify prevalence trends and evaluated decreases in HIV prevalence over time using the Cochrane–Armitage test for linear trend. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was also performed to identify factors associated with declines in HIV prevalence. Results: Overall HIV prevalence was 24.1% among 120,755 women who delivered during the study period. Prevalence differed by site of delivery, ranging from 16.1% to 28.2%, and increased markedly with age. Lower educational attainment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.07–3.50) and being unmarried (aOR = 1.98; 95% CI 1.88–2.08) were associated with HIV infection. HIV prevalence was 10.0% with a first pregnancy, 21.0% with a second and 39.2% with a third or greater (aOR = 2.20; for any prior pregnancy; 95% CI 2.10–2.29). The same age-adjusted trends were seen when data were limited to women aged 15–24, with a two- to three-fold increase in HIV prevalence between a first and third pregnancy. Prevalence decreased linearly during the 5-year study period from 25.8% to 22.7% (p <0.001). Among age-specific strata, the greatest absolute decline occurred in those aged 35–39, with an 8.7% absolute decrease in HIV prevalence from 2015 to 2019. Minimal declines were seen in those 15–24, with a decrease of only 1.5% over the same period. Conclusions: While overall trends in Botswana show HIV prevalence declining among pregnant women, prevalence among the youngest age group has remained stagnant. Preventative interventions utilizing pre-exposure prophylaxis should be prioritized during the high-risk period surrounding a woman's first pregnancy.

We conducted a retrospective serial cross‐sectional study using data from the Tsepamo Study [15], which performs birth outcomes surveillance at 18 government hospitals in Botswana. The Tsepamo database is a nationally representative dataset that captures data from the obstetrical records of women in Botswana who deliver live or stillborn infants in participating maternity wards. For this analysis, we utilized data from the eight original Tsepamo sites, which had complete data from January 2015 to December 2019, and accounted for approximately 45% of all births in the country during this period. Ten sites were excluded given that they were added between 2018 and 2019, and did not have complete data covering the study period of interest. The study sites included were comprised of two tertiary referral hospitals, five district hospitals and one primary‐level hospital. Analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 University Edition and Stata (Version 16, StataCorp, College Station, TX). Ethics approval for this study was granted by the Botswana Human Research and Development Division and by the institutional review board of Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health. Informed consent was not required because records were deidentified and the study was observational. Our main exposures of interest were maternal age, calendar time and hospital location. Maternal age was documented at delivery and categorized into four strata (35). However, narrower age strata using increments of 5 years were used in the descriptive analysis to allow for more granular trends to be characterized. Calendar time was analysed categorically and stratified by year to allow for the assessment of annual trends. Hospital location served as a proxy for maternal home district and covered both urban and rural areas of Botswana. Additional demographic data, including marital status, education, gravida and occupation, were used as measures of socio‐economic status and included in the regression model as categorical variables to identify factors associated with HIV infection. The primary outcome was HIV status at delivery, which was used to calculate prevalence. Maternal HIV status was obtained directly from the obstetric card and in most cases, was confirmed by additional HIV treatment records and maternal confirmation at the maternity ward. A subset of diagnoses were also verified through direct access to Botswana’s national HIV laboratory system if there were discrepancies. HIV diagnosis in Botswana is generally made using dual enzyme immunoassay testing, and HIV RNA testing by PCR is also performed in the context of treatment. At each site, research assistants abstracted de‐identified data, including the primary outcome and covariates, from maternal obstetrical cards at the time of discharge from the postnatal ward and entered into the Tsepamo database. Maternal deaths during delivery were not included in the dataset. We used descriptive stratified analyses to identify prevalence trends by age, calendar year, gravida and location. Our unadjusted stratified analysis included a quantitative assessment of trends using Cochran–Armitage trend testing to help identify significant decreases in HIV prevalence over time. Subsequently, we used a multivariable logistic regression model, where HIV status at delivery was used as the outcome variable, to estimate the adjusted odds ratios of being HIV positive while controlling for age, calendar year, delivery site, marital status, education, gravida and employment. The model was also used to verify significant trends in HIV prevalence by age, calendar year and location in the descriptive analysis. A complete case analysis was performed and collinearity testing between variables was also conducted to ensure that variables with a variance inflation factor (VIF) greater than five were not included in the regression model. Sensitivity analyses were also performed to determine whether women with a missing or undisclosed HIV serostatus impacted the direction of associations by assuming that women with missing HIV serostatus were either all HIV positive or all HIV negative.

N/A

The recommendation to improve access to maternal health based on the provided description is to prioritize preventative interventions utilizing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) during the high-risk period surrounding a woman’s first pregnancy. This recommendation is supported by the findings of a study conducted in Botswana, which showed that while overall HIV prevalence declined among pregnant women, prevalence among the youngest age group remained stagnant. By implementing PrEP, which is a medication taken by individuals at high risk for HIV to prevent infection, during the high-risk period surrounding a woman’s first pregnancy, the transmission of HIV can be further reduced. This targeted approach can help address the persistent high HIV prevalence among young women in sub-Saharan Africa and improve maternal health outcomes. The recommendation was published in the Journal of the International AIDS Society in 2022.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation to improve access to maternal health based on the provided description is to prioritize preventative interventions utilizing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) during the high-risk period surrounding a woman’s first pregnancy. This recommendation is supported by the findings of the study conducted in Botswana, which showed that while overall HIV prevalence declined among pregnant women, prevalence among the youngest age group remained stagnant. By implementing PrEP, which is a medication taken by individuals at high risk for HIV to prevent infection, during the high-risk period surrounding a woman’s first pregnancy, the transmission of HIV can be further reduced. This targeted approach can help address the persistent high HIV prevalence among young women in sub-Saharan Africa and improve maternal health outcomes. The recommendation was published in the Journal of the International AIDS Society in 2022.
AI Innovations Methodology
To simulate the impact of the main recommendations on improving access to maternal health, the following methodology can be used:

1. Data Collection: Collect data from obstetric records of women delivering at government hospitals in Botswana between 2015 and 2019. This data should include information on HIV prevalence, maternal age, calendar time, hospital location, marital status, education, gravida, and occupation.

2. Study Population: Include all women delivering at the selected hospitals during the study period, accounting for approximately 45% of all births in the country.

3. Data Analysis: Perform a retrospective serial cross-sectional analysis using statistical software such as SAS or Stata. Stratify the data by maternal age, calendar time, and hospital location to identify prevalence trends.

4. Descriptive Analysis: Conduct descriptive stratified analyses to identify prevalence trends by age, calendar year, gravida, and location. Use Cochran-Armitage trend testing to assess significant decreases in HIV prevalence over time.

5. Multivariable Logistic Regression: Use a multivariable logistic regression model to estimate adjusted odds ratios of being HIV positive while controlling for age, calendar year, delivery site, marital status, education, gravida, and employment. This model will help identify factors associated with declines in HIV prevalence.

6. Sensitivity Analysis: Perform sensitivity analyses to determine the impact of missing or undisclosed HIV serostatus on the associations. Assume that women with missing HIV serostatus are either all HIV positive or all HIV negative.

7. Ethical Considerations: Ensure that the study has obtained ethics approval from the Botswana Human Research and Development Division and the institutional review board of Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. Informed consent is not required as the study uses de-identified records and is observational.

8. Reporting: Summarize the findings of the analysis, including prevalence trends, factors associated with declines in HIV prevalence, and the impact of missing HIV serostatus. Present the results in a clear and concise manner.

9. Recommendations: Based on the findings, make recommendations to prioritize preventative interventions utilizing pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) during the high-risk period surrounding a woman’s first pregnancy to improve access to maternal health. Highlight the potential impact of this targeted approach on reducing HIV transmission and improving maternal health outcomes.

10. Publication: Publish the study in a reputable journal such as the Journal of the International AIDS Society, ensuring that the methodology, results, and recommendations are clearly presented.

By following this methodology, the impact of the main recommendations on improving access to maternal health can be simulated and the findings can contribute to evidence-based decision-making and policy development.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email