Parental imprisonment as a risk factor for cardiovascular and metabolic disease in adolescent and adult offspring: A prospective Australian birth cohort study

listen audio

Study Justification:
This study aims to investigate the association between parental imprisonment and cardiovascular and metabolic disease risk in adolescent and adult offspring. It is the first prospective cohort analysis and non-U.S. based study to examine this relationship. The study provides valuable insights into the long-term health effects of parental imprisonment, particularly in early childhood, and highlights the need for interventions and support for affected individuals.
Highlights:
– The study followed 7,223 children born in Brisbane, Australia, from 1981 to 1984.
– Data on parental imprisonment was collected at ages 5 and 14, and biometric data was collected at ages 14, 21, and 30.
– Among female respondents, parental imprisonment at ages ≤5 was associated with higher body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, sedentary hours, and waist circumference at ages 14, 21, and 30.
– Parental imprisonment when the child was aged ≤14 was associated with increased BMI and blood pressure at age 30 for females.
– No significant associations were observed for males.
– These findings suggest that parental imprisonment, especially in early childhood, is a risk factor for cardiometabolic health issues in later life among females.
Recommendations:
– Develop targeted interventions and support programs for individuals with a history of parental imprisonment, particularly females who experienced parental imprisonment in early childhood.
– Implement policies to address the underlying factors contributing to parental imprisonment, such as socioeconomic disparities and access to education.
– Promote awareness and education about the potential long-term health effects of parental imprisonment among healthcare professionals, policymakers, and the general public.
Key Role Players:
– Researchers and scientists specializing in cardiovascular and metabolic health, criminology, and public health.
– Healthcare professionals, including doctors, nurses, and psychologists, who can provide support and interventions for affected individuals.
– Policy makers and government officials responsible for implementing policies related to criminal justice, education, and healthcare.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Development and implementation of targeted interventions and support programs.
– Training and education for healthcare professionals on addressing the needs of individuals with a history of parental imprisonment.
– Research funding for further studies and evaluations of the effectiveness of interventions.
– Resources for public awareness campaigns and educational materials.
– Policy development and implementation costs, including data collection and analysis, stakeholder consultations, and monitoring and evaluation.

Objectives: Parental imprisonment is linked with child health in later life. The present study provides the first prospective cohort analysis and non-U.S. based study examining parental imprisonment and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescence and adulthood. Methods: The study followed 7,223 children born from live, singleton births from 1981 to 1984 in Brisbane, Australia. Data on parental imprisonment was collected at mother interview when the children were ages 5 and 14. Our sample analyzes offspring with biometric data collected by health professionals, including 3,794 at age 14, 2,136 at age 21, and 1,712 at age 30. Analyses used multivariate linear and logistic regression, and time-varying growth curve models. Results: Among female respondents, parental imprisonment at ages ≤5 was associated with higher body-mass index (BMI) at ages 14, 21, and 30; higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at age 30; and increased sedentary hours, larger waist circumference, and odds of a high-risk waist circumference at age 30. Parental imprisonment when the child was aged ≤14 was associated with increased BMI and SBP at age 30 for females. In growth-curve models, parental imprisonment when the child was aged ≤5 and ≤ 14 among females was linked with increased BMI; parental imprisonment when the child was aged ≤5 was associated with increased SBP and DBP. No significant associations were observed for males. Conclusions: Using prospective cohort data, our results support research showing that parental imprisonment, particularly in early childhood, is associated with increased BMI, blood pressure, sedentary hours, and waist circumference in females in early adulthood. These findings implicate parental imprisonment as a risk factor for cardiometabolic health issues in later life among females.

We use data from the Mater Hospital-University of Queensland Study on Pregnancy (MUSP). The MUSP is a cohort study of 7,223 mothers whose pregnancies resulted in live, singleton births from 1981 to 1984 in the obstetrics unit of the Mater-Misericordiae Hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Mother and child clinical and survey data have been collected at several follow-up waves until the children reached age 30. This study uses data collected from mothers prenatally and when their children were aged 5 and 14; and child data are from waves of data collected at ages 14, 21, and 30. Among the 7,223 children who were initially enrolled in the study, we examine subsets of respondents who had clinical biometric data completed at ages 14, 21, and 30 during physical assessments by a trained health professional. These numbers include 3,794 respondents at age 14, 2,136 respondents at age 21, and 1,712 respondents at age 30. Further details of the MUSP data are available in the MUSP cohort profiles and research publications (Najman et al., 2005, 2015). The attrition in the sample is a potential issue for the representativeness of the data. As noted in two MUSP cohort profiles, early and later attrition through age 30 have not been found to substantially bias results for parent and child outcomes in the MUSP and the representativeness of the original Brisbane sample (Najman et al., 2005, 2015). Attrition analyses of the MUSP data for mothers found that having problems with the law was not associated with increased attrition, while ethnic minorities and those with lower SES were more likely be lost in the sample (Saiepour et al., 2019); to address this potential attrition bias, we control for family SES and ethnicity in the analysis. Attrition for biometric measures, such as blood pressure, height, and weight, has been limited due to collection of these measures at the Mater Misericordiae clinic, limiting access for those who may have moved outside of the Brisbane area (Das et al., 2020). However, this limitation for the biometric data has not been found to bias results using the age 21 and age 30 cohort data in research (Das et al., 2020; Najman et al., 2020). Ethics approval was received from relevant committees at The University of Queensland and the Mater Misericordiae Hospital, South Brisbane, Australia for data collection. For the present study, we use deidentified secondary data exempt from Human Ethics approval. To maintain confidentiality, data from the MUSP are not made publicly available. Data may be obtained from the University of Queensland through the study website at: https://social-science.uq.edu.au/mater-university-queensland-study-pregnancy?p=9#9. Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2). Based on measured height (meters) and weight (kilograms) during physical assessments at ages 14, 21, and 30. Normal body mass is in the range 18.5 ≤ BMI<25, overweight BMI is in range 25 ≤ BMI 75 mmHG, normal is 74–84, high-normal is 85–89 mmHG, and hypertension is ≥ 90 mmHG (Conen et al., 2007). Sedentary hours. Number of self-reported hours per day over the prior week spent watching TV or using a computer for non-work purposes at age 30. Increased sedentary time, such as TV viewing time, is linked to increased cardiovascular risk (Wijndaele et al., 2010). Waist size. Self-reported waist size (centimetres) at age 30. To measure waist size, respondents were provided with a paper measuring tape and detailed instructions. High-risk waist size. An indicator for respondent waist sizes measured at age 30 being ≥88 cm for females and ≥102 cm for men. These waist sizes are considered to be strongly associated with subsequent risk of cardiometabolic diseases (Klein et al., 2007). Parental imprisonment. When children were ages 5 and 14, biological mothers were asked if they or their current partner had been detained in prison. From these variables, two measures were constructed for (1) if the mother or current partner had ever been detained in prison before age 5 and (2) if the mother reported she or current partner had ever been detained in prison at age 5 and/or age 14 interviews. We note that ‘current partner’ to the biological mother may be either the biological father or a non-biological father. Maternal education. Maternal education is based on the biological mother’s self-reported educational level prior to birth. Using this measure, we construct an indicator for if the mother had not completed secondary school or had completed any tertiary educational studies. Mother’s education is used to control for child socio-economic status. Child birth weight. Measured birth weight in grams from obstetric reports. Child birth weight is a significant predictor of increased BMI and cardiometabolic disease risk in adulthood (Jornayvaz et al., 2016; Kinge, 2017). Non-European ethnicity. Based on a constructed classification, an indicator for the child being of non-European ethnicity (i.e., of Asian and/or Indigenous Australian descent). This control allows us to adjust for potential ethnic variation in the sample. Sex. Respondent sex at birth was classified from obstetric data. Sex at birth is both a control and a potential moderator of results in the sample. Pregnancy status. At child ages 21 and 30, an indicator for female respondents who report being pregnant at the time of interview. To better compare results with Roettger and Boardman (2012), we include a control for whether or not the individual is pregnant to control for increased BMI related to pregnancy. We note that removing pregnant females from the sample did not substantively alter the results presented below. We used multivariate OLS regression to estimate continuous outcomes at ages 14, 21, and 30. We used multivariate logistic regression to estimate the odds of having a high-risk waist size at age 30. In addition, we used multivariate growth-curve models to estimate the association between parental imprisonment and time-varying measures of 1) BMI at ages 14, 21, and 30 and 2) systolic and DBP at ages 21 and 30. In doing so, we model the time-varying variations of these measures associated with parental imprisonment by using a random individual-level intercept. As Curran and colleagues note (Curran et al., 2010), this analysis allows us to make use of partial-data for individuals across waves and also determine if the associations observed at single waves hold as individuals progress through the life course. The estimation of change over time provides more robust findings holding across waves, relative to single-wave trends which may be influenced by single-wave attrition. To examine sex differences in risk, we estimate results for (1) pooled sex, (2) males only, and (3) females only. We conducted analyses using Stata 15.1. In the statistical analyses from regression analyses presented below, we report the unstandardized beta coefficient or adjusted odds ratio, along with 95% confidence intervals.

N/A

The provided text appears to be a description of a study on the relationship between parental imprisonment and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescent and adult offspring. It includes information about the study design, data collection methods, variables measured, and statistical analyses conducted.

To improve access to maternal health, some potential innovations could include:

1. Telemedicine: Implementing telemedicine services that allow pregnant women to consult with healthcare providers remotely, reducing the need for in-person visits and improving access to prenatal care.

2. Mobile health applications: Developing mobile applications that provide pregnant women with information, resources, and reminders for prenatal care, nutrition, and exercise, making it easier for them to access and follow recommended guidelines.

3. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers who can provide education, support, and assistance to pregnant women in underserved areas, bridging the gap between healthcare facilities and the community.

4. Transportation services: Establishing transportation services specifically for pregnant women to ensure they can easily access healthcare facilities for prenatal visits, delivery, and postnatal care, particularly in rural or remote areas.

5. Maternal health clinics: Setting up dedicated maternal health clinics in areas with limited healthcare infrastructure, providing comprehensive prenatal and postnatal care services, including screenings, vaccinations, and counseling.

6. Financial assistance programs: Implementing financial assistance programs that help cover the costs of prenatal care, delivery, and postnatal care for low-income women, reducing financial barriers to accessing essential maternal health services.

7. Maternity waiting homes: Establishing maternity waiting homes near healthcare facilities, where pregnant women from remote areas can stay closer to the facility as they approach their due dates, ensuring timely access to skilled care during labor and delivery.

These are just a few examples of potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health. The specific approach should be tailored to the local context and address the unique challenges faced by pregnant women in the target population.
AI Innovations Description
The provided text appears to be a description of a research study on the association between parental imprisonment and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescent and adult offspring. The study used data from the Mater Hospital-University of Queensland Study on Pregnancy (MUSP), a cohort study of mothers and their children born between 1981 and 1984 in Brisbane, Australia. The study followed the children until they reached the ages of 14, 21, and 30, collecting data on biometric measures such as body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, sedentary hours, and waist circumference. The study found that parental imprisonment, particularly during early childhood, was associated with increased BMI, blood pressure, sedentary hours, and waist circumference in females in early adulthood.

Based on this research, a recommendation to improve access to maternal health could be to implement targeted interventions and support programs for women who have experienced parental imprisonment. These programs could focus on providing comprehensive healthcare services, including regular check-ups, screenings, and counseling, to address the potential long-term health effects associated with parental imprisonment. Additionally, efforts should be made to improve access to healthcare for this population, ensuring that they have the necessary resources and support to prioritize their health and well-being. This could involve collaborating with community organizations, healthcare providers, and policymakers to develop strategies that address the unique needs and challenges faced by women who have experienced parental imprisonment.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, the study aims to examine the association between parental imprisonment and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescence and adulthood. The methodology involves analyzing data from the Mater Hospital-University of Queensland Study on Pregnancy (MUSP), which is a cohort study of 7,223 mothers and their children born between 1981 and 1984 in Brisbane, Australia. The study collects data through clinical assessments and surveys at various follow-up waves until the children reach age 30.

To simulate the impact of recommendations on improving access to maternal health, the following methodology can be used:

1. Identify the specific recommendations: Based on the study’s objectives and findings, identify the recommendations that can potentially improve access to maternal health. For example, if the study identifies that maternal education is associated with better health outcomes, a recommendation could be to provide educational programs for pregnant women.

2. Define the simulation parameters: Determine the variables and parameters that will be used to simulate the impact of the recommendations. This may include factors such as the number of women affected, the timeframe for implementation, and the expected changes in health outcomes.

3. Collect baseline data: Gather relevant data on the current state of maternal health access, including factors such as healthcare facilities, healthcare providers, and availability of services. This will serve as a baseline for comparison.

4. Model the impact of recommendations: Use statistical modeling techniques, such as regression analysis or simulation models, to estimate the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This may involve analyzing the association between the recommended interventions and health outcomes, considering factors such as socioeconomic status, education, and geographical location.

5. Validate the simulation: Validate the simulation results by comparing them with real-world data, if available. This can help ensure the accuracy and reliability of the simulation.

6. Assess the feasibility and scalability: Evaluate the feasibility and scalability of implementing the recommendations based on the simulation results. Consider factors such as cost, infrastructure requirements, and potential barriers to implementation.

7. Monitor and evaluate the implementation: Once the recommendations are implemented, establish a monitoring and evaluation framework to track the progress and impact of the interventions on improving access to maternal health. This may involve collecting data on key indicators, conducting surveys or interviews, and analyzing the outcomes.

By following this methodology, researchers and policymakers can gain insights into the potential impact of recommendations on improving access to maternal health and make informed decisions regarding implementation strategies.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email