Determining staffing needs for improving primary health care service delivery in Kaduna State, Nigeria

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The equitable distribution of a skilled health workforce is crucial for effective health service delivery.
– Kaduna State has invested in revamping the primary health care system but is facing challenges due to workforce shortages and inequitable distribution.
– This study aims to determine the staffing needs in primary health care facilities in Kaduna State to guide workforce planning strategies and future investments.
Highlights:
– The study used the Workload Indicator for Staffing Need (WISN) methodology to estimate staffing requirements.
– Findings revealed a shortage of Nurses/Midwives and Community Health Workers across the study facilities.
– Nine out of ten primary health care facilities had a WISN ratio < 1 for Nurses/Midwives, indicating insufficient staff to cope with the workload.
– Two facilities had an excess of Community Health Workers, with a WISN ratio > 1.
– The study provides evidence for an evidence-based approach to determine staffing needs and guide workforce planning in the primary health care sector.
Recommendations:
– Increase the number of Nurses/Midwives in primary health care facilities to meet the workload demands.
– Reallocate excess Community Health Workers to facilities with shortages.
– Implement the WISN methodology in other primary health care facilities in Kaduna State to assess staffing needs.
– Use the study findings to inform future investments and workforce development strategies in the health sector.
Key Role Players:
– Steering Committee: Responsible for overseeing the study and providing advisory support.
– Technical Task Force: Assists in conducting the study and providing technical expertise.
– Expert Group: Convenes to obtain input from clinical experts and determine time spent on activities by health care workers.
– Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs): Provide representation and expertise from relevant government bodies.
– Health training institutions: Contribute knowledge and expertise in health workforce development.
– Civil Society Organizations (CSOs): Provide input and support from the civil society perspective.
– Health facilities: Participate in data collection and implementation of recommendations.
– Development partners: Offer support and resources for workforce planning and development.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Staff recruitment and training costs
– Salary and benefits for additional staff
– Equipment and supplies for increased staffing levels
– Monitoring and evaluation costs
– Capacity-building activities for health care workers
– Data collection and analysis expenses
– Stakeholder engagement and coordination costs
– Communication and dissemination of study findings
Note: The actual cost estimates will depend on the specific context and implementation plan.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong because it presents the findings of a Workload Indicator for Staffing Need (WISN) study conducted in Kaduna State’s primary health care facilities. The study reveals a shortage of Nurses/Midwives and Community Health Workers, with a WISN ratio < 1 indicating insufficient staff to cope with the workload. The study also highlights the excess of Community Health Workers in two facilities, with a WISN ratio > 1. The evidence is supported by the use of the WHO WISN tool and the involvement of multiple technical working groups. To improve the evidence, the abstract could provide more specific details about the methodology used in the WISN study, such as the sample size and data collection methods. Additionally, including information about the limitations of the study and potential implications of the findings would further strengthen the evidence.

Background: The equitable distribution of a skilled health workforce is critical to health service delivery. Kaduna state has taken significant steps to revamp the primary health care system to ensure access to health care for its populace. However, these investments are yet to yield the desired outcomes due to health workforce shortages and the inequitable distribution of those available. Methods: A Workload Indicator for Staffing Need (WISN) study was conducted at Kaduna state’s primary health care level. The study focused on estimating staffing requirements; Nurses/Midwives and Community Health Worker practitioners, Community Health Officers, Community Health Extension Workers, and Junior Community Health Extension Workers in all government-prioritised primary health care facilities. A total of ten focal primary health care facilities in Kaduna North Local Government Area (LGA) were included in the study. Results: Findings from the study revealed a shortage of Nurses/Midwives and Community Health Workers across the study facilities. For the Nurse/Midwife staffing category, nine of the ten PHCs have a WISN ratio 1 was calculated. Conclusion: The WISN study highlights staffing needs in Kaduna State’s government-prioritised primary health care facilities. This evidence establishes the basis for applying an evidence-based approach to determining staffing needs across the primary health care sector in the State to guide workforce planning strategies and future investments in the health sector. The World Health Organisation (WHO) WISN tool is useful for estimating staffing needs required to cope with workload pressures, particularly in a resource-constrained environment like Kaduna State.

Written informed consent was obtained before data collection during the field visit through the Health Research Ethics Committee (HREC) of the Kaduna State Ministry of Health and had an approved registration number NHREC/17/03/2018. The study employed the WISN methodology to determine staffing needs. WISN is designed by the WHO and supports the evidential determination of the number of health workers by cadre required to cope with the workload in a particular health facility. The WISN methodology considers several relevant components by health worker cadre that includes: (i) services delivered, (ii) the time it takes to deliver both clinical and non-clinical services, (iii) the total annual work time available to each Health Care Workers (HCW) cadre as well as (iv) retrospective annual service delivery statistics in the health facility. 13 Computation of the statistics from these components produces a determined number of HCWs by cadre required in each health facility. The WISN study was completed in Kaduna North Local Government Area and included ten (10) primary health facilities. The study population were clinical health workers available and tasked with providing healthcare services to patients at these primary health facilities. These prioritised cadres are Nurses/Midwives and Community Health Workers (CHWs), comprising Community Health Officers (CHOs), Community Health Extension Workers (CHEWs), and Junior Community Health Extension Workers (JCHEWS). Health services such as Reproductive Maternal and Newborn Child Health (RMNCH), predominantly provided at the primary care level and make up most of the health facility visits in the LGA, were prioritised for the study. Three Technical Working Groups (TWGs): Steering Committee, Technical Task Force, and an Expert Group were inaugurated to conduct the study. These study groups were a subset of the State’s larger HRH TWG. Their objectives include providing HRH-related advisory and technical support to the State government to enable workforce development. The three group members were drawn from relevant Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDA), health training institutions, Civil Society Organisations (CSO), health facilities and development partners. These groups were engaged to build local capacity and create utility for study results. Kaduna North Local Government Areas (LGA) was selected for convenience for this study. Consequently, all government-prioritised PHC facilities that had been in operation for at least one year before the time of the study were included. Kaduna North LGA is an urban area and one of the most densely populated areas in the State. The decision to include only government-prioritised PHC facilities is hinged on the significant investments made by the State government and donors in these facilities and a resultant increase in service utilisation rates. After a review of relevant documents that include the Nigeria Task Shifting and Task Sharing (TSTS) policy, the MSP, Ward Minimum Healthcare Package (WMHCP) and the public service handbook, data collection tools were developed. Data on health service statistics, facility HRH composition, staff Available Work Time (AWT) and time spent by healthcare workers on clinical and non-clinical activities were collected and compared from both primary and secondary sources. Primary data sources included health facility service delivery registers, staff registers, and expert judgments through an Expert Group discussion. Primary data collection lasted three weeks between June and July 2021. Secondary data sources included the Nigeria District Health Information System (DHIS2) and Kaduna State Primary Healthcare Board (KSPHCB) Human Resources for Health Information System (HRH-IS). The DHIS2 is the electronic instance of the National Health Management Information System (NHMIS), a paper-based mechanism aggregating all healthcare services delivered in a health facility. For health service statistics, data for family planning, antenatal care, postnatal care, immunization, diarrhoea, pneumonia and malaria in children and adults from January to December 2019 were obtained from health facility registers and compared with those retrieved from the DHIS2. Further, during field visits, facility workforce data focusing on clinical cadres were obtained from health facility staff registers. A multi-step approach was taken to obtain information on staff AWT (the total amount of time available to a HCW by cadre to perform daily tasks in a year, considering authorised and unauthorised absences). Firstly, a desk review of relevant public service statutory policy, rules, and guidelines was conducted to obtain the total number of HCW’s work hours per day, work days per week, and authorised and unauthorised absences allowed within the State’s service. Finally, the Staff AWT was subsequently reviewed and approved by the study’s governance structure. An Expert Group comprising 17 clinical experts were convened to obtain time spent on clinical and non-clinical activities by HCWs in the study’s cadres of interest. These experts were purposefully selected and included individuals who are members of the study’s cadre of interest, currently employed in the public service, and have at least 15 years of experience providing health care services at the primary care level. All experts in the group responded on time that it takes the prioritised health worker cadre to perform the selected activities to acceptable standards, and the mean value of their responses was utilised. The data collected were analysed using MS Excel, consistent with the WISN methodology. Activity standards, clinical and non-clinical workload components, annual service delivery statistics and AWT for the prioritised cadre for each facility were included. To complete the computation, the data collected was defined and analysed as follows: Where in the formula: AWT is the total staff available working time A is the number of possible working days in a year B is the number of days off for public holidays in a year C is the number of days off for official leave in a year D is the number of days off due to sick leave in a year E is the number of days off due to casual leave, study or training leave and maternity leave in a year. Core health activities i = 1,2,3 … n AWi = Annual statistics for each core clinical health service SWi = Standard Workload for each core clinical health service Staff requirement for individual activities: Individual Allowance Standard (IAS), which is the total number of hours per year needed to perform all additional activities undertaken by some HCWs, was also calculated. An Individual Allowance Factor (IAF) identifying the staffing requirement to undertake these workloads was estimated using the: WISN staffing results with fractions were handled as recommended by the WISN guide. 13 WISN differences and ratios were also calculated for each health facility. The WISN difference, which is calculated as the variance between the current staffing norm available by cadre and the computed staffing requirements and identifies staffing gaps or excesses by cadre. The WISN ratio represents the work pressure experienced by the HCW. A WISN ratio of > 1 indicates the availability of more HCWs than required to meet the facility workload.

N/A

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could be recommended to improve access to maternal health in Kaduna State, Nigeria:

1. Task Shifting and Task Sharing: Implementing the Nigeria Task Shifting and Task Sharing (TSTS) policy to allow for the delegation of certain tasks from higher-level healthcare workers to lower-level healthcare workers. This can help alleviate the shortage of Nurses/Midwives and Community Health Workers by empowering other cadres, such as Community Health Officers, Community Health Extension Workers, and Junior Community Health Extension Workers, to provide maternal health services.

2. Telemedicine and Mobile Health: Introducing telemedicine and mobile health technologies to provide remote consultations, prenatal care, and health education to pregnant women in underserved areas. This can help bridge the gap in access to healthcare services and improve maternal health outcomes.

3. Community Health Worker Training and Deployment: Increasing the training and deployment of Community Health Workers (CHWs) in rural and remote areas to provide essential maternal health services, including antenatal care, postnatal care, and family planning. CHWs can play a crucial role in reaching pregnant women who may have limited access to healthcare facilities.

4. Strengthening Health Workforce Planning: Utilizing evidence-based approaches, such as the Workload Indicator for Staffing Need (WISN) tool developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), to determine staffing needs and guide workforce planning strategies. This can help ensure an adequate number of skilled healthcare workers, including Nurses/Midwives and Community Health Workers, are available to meet the workload and provide quality maternal health services.

5. Public-Private Partnerships: Collaborating with private healthcare providers and organizations to expand access to maternal health services. This can involve establishing partnerships to increase the number of healthcare facilities offering maternal health services, improving infrastructure and equipment, and enhancing the training and capacity-building of healthcare providers.

6. Mobile Clinics and Outreach Programs: Implementing mobile clinics and outreach programs to bring maternal health services directly to underserved communities. This can involve setting up temporary clinics in remote areas, conducting health screenings, providing prenatal and postnatal care, and offering health education and counseling.

7. Community Engagement and Empowerment: Engaging and empowering local communities to take an active role in improving maternal health. This can include community awareness campaigns, training community health volunteers, and involving community leaders in decision-making processes related to maternal health.

It is important to note that the implementation of these innovations should be tailored to the specific context and needs of Kaduna State, Nigeria.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the information provided, the recommendation to improve access to maternal health in Kaduna State, Nigeria is to use the findings from the Workload Indicator for Staffing Need (WISN) study to guide workforce planning strategies and future investments in the health sector. The WISN study revealed a shortage of Nurses/Midwives and Community Health Workers in primary health care facilities in Kaduna State. This evidence-based approach can help determine the staffing needs required to cope with workload pressures and ensure that an adequate number of health workers are available to provide maternal health services.

The WISN methodology, designed by the World Health Organization (WHO), considers several components such as services delivered, time required for clinical and non-clinical activities, total annual work time available to each health worker cadre, and retrospective annual service delivery statistics. By analyzing these components, the WISN study determines the number of health workers by cadre required in each health facility.

The findings from the WISN study can be used to address the staffing shortages and inequitable distribution of health workers in primary health care facilities. This can be achieved by recruiting and deploying additional Nurses/Midwives and Community Health Workers to the facilities where there is a shortage. Additionally, the excess number of Community Health Workers in some facilities can be redistributed to areas with higher demand.

By ensuring an adequate and equitable distribution of health workers, access to maternal health services can be improved in Kaduna State. This recommendation provides a data-driven approach to address the staffing needs and enhance the delivery of primary health care services, particularly in the area of reproductive, maternal, and newborn child health.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Increase the number of Nurses/Midwives: The study revealed a shortage of Nurses/Midwives in primary health care facilities. Increasing the number of these skilled health workers can help meet the workload demands and improve access to maternal health services.

2. Redistribute Community Health Workers (CHWs): The study found that some primary health care facilities have an excess number of CHWs, while others have shortages. Redistributing CHWs to facilities with shortages can help ensure equitable access to maternal health services.

3. Improve workforce planning strategies: The evidence from the study can be used to guide workforce planning strategies in the primary health care sector. This can involve identifying areas with staffing shortages and developing targeted recruitment and training programs to address these gaps.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology can be developed using the following steps:

1. Collect baseline data: Gather information on the current staffing levels, workload, and service delivery statistics in primary health care facilities.

2. Define indicators: Identify key indicators that reflect access to maternal health services, such as the number of antenatal care visits, deliveries attended by skilled birth attendants, and postnatal care coverage.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a model that incorporates the baseline data and simulates the impact of different staffing scenarios. This model should consider factors such as the number of additional Nurses/Midwives, the redistribution of CHWs, and the resulting changes in service delivery.

4. Run simulations: Use the simulation model to run different scenarios and assess their impact on the selected indicators. This can help determine the potential improvements in access to maternal health services.

5. Analyze results: Analyze the simulation results to identify the most effective staffing strategies for improving access to maternal health. This can involve comparing the different scenarios and evaluating their impact on the selected indicators.

6. Make recommendations: Based on the analysis, provide recommendations on the optimal staffing strategies to improve access to maternal health. These recommendations should consider the specific context of Kaduna State and the available resources.

7. Monitor and evaluate: Implement the recommended staffing strategies and continuously monitor and evaluate their impact on access to maternal health services. This can involve tracking the selected indicators over time and making adjustments as needed.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare providers can make evidence-based decisions to improve access to maternal health services in Kaduna State.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email
Chat Icon DIMA AI Care
×