Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV: A cross-sectional study in malawi

listen audio

Study Justification:
The study aimed to estimate the use and outcomes of the Malawian program for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV. This information is important for evaluating the effectiveness of the program and identifying areas for improvement. By understanding the uptake of antenatal HIV testing, maternal antiretroviral therapy, infant prophylaxis, and infant HIV testing, the study provides valuable insights into the success of the program in preventing MTCT.
Highlights:
– The estimated uptake of antenatal testing was 97.8%, indicating high utilization of this service.
– Maternal antiretroviral therapy was received by 96.3% of mothers, showing good adherence to this component of the program.
– Infant prophylaxis was provided to 92.3% of infants, indicating a high level of coverage.
– However, only 53.2% of infants received HIV testing, suggesting a need for improvement in this area.
– The estimated ratio of MTCT was 4.7% overall, but increased to 7.7% for pairs that missed maternal antiretroviral therapy, 10.7% for those missing both maternal antiretroviral therapy and infant prophylaxis, and 11.4% for those missing all four steps.
Recommendations:
– Increase efforts to ensure all infants receive HIV testing, as this step had the lowest coverage.
– Focus on improving adherence to maternal antiretroviral therapy and infant prophylaxis to further reduce the risk of MTCT.
– Target interventions towards younger women and those who have not started maternal antiretroviral therapy, as they were more likely to miss important steps in the program.
Key Role Players:
– Ministry of Health: Responsible for overseeing the implementation of the prevention of MTCT program and coordinating efforts to address the study’s recommendations.
– Health facility staff: Involved in providing antenatal care, HIV testing, maternal antiretroviral therapy, infant prophylaxis, and infant HIV testing.
– Community health workers: Play a crucial role in educating and supporting pregnant women and new mothers to ensure they receive the necessary services.
– Non-governmental organizations: Provide additional support and resources to strengthen the program and address gaps in service delivery.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training and capacity building for health facility staff on the prevention of MTCT program.
– Procurement and distribution of antenatal HIV testing kits, antiretroviral therapy medications, nevirapine prophylaxis, and HIV testing supplies for infants.
– Monitoring and evaluation activities to assess the impact of interventions and track progress towards reducing MTCT.
– Community outreach and education campaigns to raise awareness about the importance of HIV testing and adherence to treatment.
– Support for data management and analysis to ensure accurate reporting and inform decision-making.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is based on a cross-sectional study with a large sample size, providing a good representation of the population. The study estimates the use and outcomes of the Malawian program for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV. The study provides percentages and ratios for various steps in the program, allowing for an assessment of the effectiveness of the program. However, the study is limited to a specific geographic region (Malawi) and does not provide a comparison group or long-term follow-up. To improve the evidence, future studies could include a control group and longer follow-up periods to assess the long-term impact of the program.

Objective To estimate the use and outcomes of the Malawian programme for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Methods In a cross-sectional analysis of 33 744 mother–infant pairs, we estimated the weighted proportions of mothers who had received antenatal HIV testing and/or maternal antiretroviral therapy and infants who had received nevirapine prophylaxis and/or HIV testing. We calculated the ratios of MTCT at 4–26 weeks postpartum for subgroups that had missed none or at least one of these four steps. Findings The estimated uptake of antenatal testing was 97.8%; while maternal antiretroviral therapy was 96.3%; infant prophylaxis was 92.3%; and infant HIV testing was 53.2%. Estimated ratios of MTCT were 4.7% overall and 7.7% for the pairs that had missed maternal antiretroviral therapy, 10.7% for missing both maternal antiretroviral therapy and infant prophylaxis and 11.4% for missing maternal antiretroviral therapy, infant prophylaxis and infant testing. Women younger than 19 years were more likely to have missed HIV testing (adjusted odds ratio, aOR: 4.9; 95% confidence interval, CI: 2.3–10.6) and infant prophylaxis (aOR: 6.9; 95% CI: 1.2–38.9) than older women. Women who had never started maternal antiretroviral therapy were more likely to have missed infant prophylaxis (aOR: 15.4; 95% CI: 7.2–32.9) and infant testing (aOR: 13.7; 95% CI: 4.2–83.3) than women who had. Conclusion Most women used the Malawian programme for the prevention of MTCT. The risk of MTCT increased if any of the main steps in the programme were missed.

Implementation of the Malawi integrated PMTCT/ART guidelines began in July 2011. In theory, this gave all pregnant and breastfeeding women access to HIV testing, HIV counselling and ART. At the time of HIV status ascertainment, each HIV-infected pregnant woman should be given enough nevirapine to provide her baby with six weeks of prophylaxis from birth. She should also be asked to bring her child, for HIV testing, to a clinic for the care of children younger than five years, known as an under-5 clinic in Malawi, as soon as the course of prophylaxis is complete at an age of six weeks.4 Our aim was to draw a representative sample for national estimates of the ratios of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (MTCT) in Malawi. The sampling frame included all 579 health facilities that provided PMTCT services in Malawi in 2012–2013. We estimated that we would need to enrol at least 3376 HIV-exposed infants to determine the ratio of MTCT at 24 months postpartum reliably. Probability-proportional-to-size selection was used, without replacement, to select the 54 study facilities: 14 rural and nine urban facilities in the North or Central regions and 22 rural and nine urban in the South region. We subjected data obtained at all 54 study facilities to a cross-sectional analysis. Between October 2014 and May 2016, women attending under-5 clinics at each of the study facilities were screened for study eligibility. To be enrolled, a woman had to be a mother of or a legal caregiver for an infant aged 4–26 weeks and be willing and able to give informed consent. Information about age, parity, uptake of antenatal care, HIV testing and whether the woman’s HIV status had been ascertained during or before the index pregnancy, if ever, was collected in standardized interviews. Whenever possible, interviewers checked the mothers’ health booklets to check the accuracy of the mothers’ responses. Women who had only discovered that they were HIV-infected through study screening were not asked about their uptake of maternal ART, infant nevirapine prophylaxis or infant HIV testing. After being interviewed, each enrolled woman was tested, within the study facility, for HIV. Maternal HIV testing, which was based on an initial rapid Determine HIV-1/2 test (Alere Medical, Tokyo, Japan) and confirmation with Unigold HIV-1/2 (Trinity Biotech, Bray, Ireland), followed national guidelines.12 The Joint Clinical Research Centre in Kampala, Uganda, performed qualitative tests for HIV-1 deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), based on COBAS AmpliPrep and version 2.0 of the COBAS TaqMan assay (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, United States of America), on batched dried spots of blood from all identified HIV-exposed infants. We focused on five main steps in the PMTCT cascade of care: attendance at an antenatal clinic – known as step 0; ascertainment of HIV status during antenatal care (step 1); uptake of maternal ART (step 2); use of infant nevirapine prophylaxis (step 3); and HIV testing, before the study, of HIV-exposed infants when more than eight weeks old (step 4). The denominators used to calculate weighted proportions for step 1, steps 2 and 3 and step 4 were, respectively, the total number of mother–infant pairs included in the cohort, the total number of known HIV-infected mothers and the total number of known HIV-infected mothers with infants that were more than eight weeks old, i.e. with infants that should have been tested for HIV. Mothers who claimed to be HIV-negative and were subsequently found negative in the rapid test were categorized as confirmed HIV-uninfected. Similarly, mothers who claimed to be HIV-positive and were subsequently found positive in the rapid test were categorized confirmed HIV-infected. The HIV status of the other mothers was categorized either as missed HIV diagnosis, if the mother claimed to be HIV-negative or not know her HIV status, but was subsequently found positive in the rapid test, or as inconclusive, if the rapid test results were inconclusive. We recorded ratios of MTCT at 4–26 weeks postpartum as the percentage of infants tested for HIV-1 DNA that were found positive. We calculated an overall MTCT ratio and also separate ratios for the mother–infant pairs who had missed none or one or more PMTCT cascade steps or who were categorized as missed HIV diagnosis. We report unweighted numbers and weighted categorical proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Missing data were treated as additional categories. We used χ2 tests to compare weighted MTCT ratios. We used a weighted multivariable binary logistic regression to identify factors associated with missing steps 1, 2, 3 and/or 4 of the cascade of care or a missed HIV diagnosis. In each model, weighted odds ratios with 95% CI were adjusted for region and maternal age, parity and uptake of antenatal care, at the study site or a different site, to give adjusted odds ratios (aOR). In the models for missed maternal ART uptake, missed nevirapine prophylaxis and missed infant HIV testing, we also adjusted for ascertained maternal HIV status. We also adjusted for maternal ART status and timing in the model for missed uptake of nevirapine prophylaxis and for uptake of nevirapine prophylaxis in the model for missed infant HIV testing. All analyses were conducted using SPSS Statistics 23 (IBM, Chicago, USA), and adjusted for the complex design of the whole national evaluation of Malawi’s PMTCT programme. Each observation was weighted according to sampling interval and the probabilities of districts, clusters and subjects being selected.13 Ethical approval was provided by Malawi’s National Health Sciences Research Committee (#1262), the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (#2014–054–7) and the University of Toronto (#30448). All mothers or caregivers provided written informed consent.

N/A

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could be used to improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile Health (mHealth) Solutions: Develop mobile applications or text messaging services to provide pregnant women with information about antenatal care, HIV testing, and maternal antiretroviral therapy. These tools can also send reminders for appointments and medication adherence.

2. Community Health Workers: Train and deploy community health workers to provide education and support to pregnant women in remote areas. These workers can conduct home visits, offer counseling, and assist with HIV testing and medication adherence.

3. Telemedicine: Implement telemedicine services to connect pregnant women in rural areas with healthcare providers. This can enable remote consultations, monitoring, and support, reducing the need for travel and improving access to specialized care.

4. Integration of Services: Strengthen the integration of maternal health services with HIV testing and treatment programs. This can ensure that pregnant women receive comprehensive care and support throughout the entire prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) cascade.

5. Task Shifting: Train and empower non-specialist healthcare providers, such as nurses and midwives, to deliver certain aspects of maternal health services. This can help alleviate the shortage of skilled healthcare professionals and improve access to care in underserved areas.

6. Quality Improvement Initiatives: Implement quality improvement initiatives to address gaps and bottlenecks in the PMTCT cascade. This can involve regular monitoring and evaluation, feedback mechanisms, and continuous training and capacity building for healthcare providers.

7. Public-Private Partnerships: Foster collaborations between the public and private sectors to leverage resources and expertise in improving access to maternal health. This can involve partnerships with pharmaceutical companies, technology companies, and non-governmental organizations.

It is important to note that the specific context and needs of the Malawian population should be considered when implementing these innovations.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the information provided, the following recommendation can be developed into an innovation to improve access to maternal health:

1. Strengthening Antenatal Care: Implement strategies to ensure that all pregnant women have access to antenatal care, including HIV testing and counseling. This can be achieved by increasing the number of health facilities that provide antenatal care services, training healthcare providers on HIV testing and counseling, and raising awareness among pregnant women about the importance of antenatal care.

2. Improving Maternal Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Uptake: Develop interventions to increase the uptake of maternal ART among HIV-positive pregnant women. This can be done by providing comprehensive information about the benefits of ART during pregnancy, addressing barriers to ART initiation and adherence, and offering support services to help women adhere to their treatment regimens.

3. Enhancing Infant Prophylaxis: Implement strategies to ensure that all infants born to HIV-positive mothers receive nevirapine prophylaxis. This can be achieved by training healthcare providers on the administration of nevirapine, improving the availability and accessibility of nevirapine in health facilities, and educating mothers about the importance of giving nevirapine to their infants.

4. Increasing Infant HIV Testing: Develop innovative approaches to increase the uptake of HIV testing among infants born to HIV-positive mothers. This can be done by implementing routine HIV testing for all infants at the recommended age, providing counseling and support to mothers during the testing process, and addressing barriers to accessing testing services, such as distance and transportation.

5. Targeting Vulnerable Populations: Develop targeted interventions to address the specific needs of vulnerable populations, such as adolescent mothers and women who have never started maternal ART. This can be achieved by providing tailored information and support services, ensuring confidentiality and non-judgmental care, and involving community leaders and organizations in the delivery of maternal health services.

Overall, the recommendation is to implement a comprehensive approach that addresses the different steps in the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, including antenatal care, maternal ART, infant prophylaxis, and infant HIV testing. By improving access to these services and addressing barriers to care, it is possible to reduce the risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and improve maternal and child health outcomes.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Strengthen Antenatal Care: Enhance antenatal care services to ensure that all pregnant women have access to HIV testing and counseling, as well as maternal antiretroviral therapy. This can be achieved by training healthcare providers, improving infrastructure, and increasing awareness among pregnant women about the importance of antenatal care.

2. Improve Infant Prophylaxis: Enhance the availability and distribution of nevirapine prophylaxis to ensure that all infants born to HIV-positive mothers receive the necessary treatment. This can be done by optimizing supply chains, implementing tracking systems, and providing training to healthcare workers on the administration of nevirapine.

3. Increase HIV Testing for Infants: Implement strategies to increase the rate of HIV testing for infants, aiming for a higher percentage than the current 53.2%. This can be achieved by conducting community outreach programs, providing mobile testing units, and offering incentives for mothers to bring their infants for testing.

4. Targeted Interventions for Vulnerable Groups: Develop specific interventions to address the higher risk of missed HIV testing and infant prophylaxis among younger women and those who have never started maternal antiretroviral therapy. These interventions can include targeted education campaigns, peer support programs, and improved access to healthcare services in underserved areas.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Define the Key Indicators: Identify the key indicators that will be used to measure the impact of the recommendations, such as the percentage of pregnant women receiving antenatal HIV testing, the percentage of infants receiving nevirapine prophylaxis, and the percentage of infants tested for HIV.

2. Collect Baseline Data: Gather baseline data on the current status of these indicators in the target population. This can be done through surveys, interviews, and data analysis of existing health records.

3. Develop a Simulation Model: Create a simulation model that incorporates the baseline data and the potential impact of the recommendations. The model should consider factors such as population size, geographical distribution, healthcare infrastructure, and resource availability.

4. Run Simulations: Run multiple simulations using different scenarios, varying the implementation strategies and intensity of the recommendations. This will help assess the potential impact of each recommendation and identify the most effective combination of interventions.

5. Analyze Results: Analyze the results of the simulations to determine the projected changes in the key indicators. Compare the outcomes of different scenarios to identify the most promising strategies for improving access to maternal health.

6. Refine and Implement: Based on the simulation results, refine the recommendations and develop an implementation plan. This plan should include specific actions, timelines, and responsibilities for each recommendation. Monitor the progress and make adjustments as needed.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare providers can make informed decisions on how to allocate resources and implement interventions that will have the greatest impact on improving access to maternal health.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email