Background: The long acting and permanent contraceptive methods (LAPCMs) has not used unlike that of short-acting methods in Ethiopia. Ethiopia is the second most populous country in Sub Saharan Africa with a high total fertility rate, and high maternal and child mortality rates. This study summarized the evidence of practice and intention to use long acting and permanent family planning methods among women in Ethiopia using systemic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published and unpublished observational studies were conducted. Original studies were identified using databases of Medline/Pubmed, and Google Scholar. Heterogeneity across studies was checked using Cochrane Q test statistic and I2test. The pooled proportion of intention to use and the practice of long acting and permanent contraceptive methods were computed using a/the random effect model. Results: Based on the ten observational studies included in the meta-analysis, the pooled prevalence of intention to use long acting and permanent contraceptive methods among married women according to the random effect model was 42.98 % (95 % CI 32.53, 53.27 %). On the other hand, the pooled practice of long acting and permanent methods of contraceptive among the study participants was 16.64 % (95 % CI 12.4 to 20.87 %). Conclusion: This meta-analysis revealed that women’s intention to use LAPCMs is generally good but their utilization is low. It is recommended, therefore, that LAPMCs must be made more readily available and accessible to women at the lower level of health service delivery who are in need of it.
This study was a systemic review and meta-analysis of the published and unpublished observational studies on prevalence rate of practice and intention to use LAPCMs among married women in Ethiopia. English language publications in the Medline data base, Google Scholar and HINARI (Health Inter Network Access to Research Initiative) were identified and cross-checked with reference lists containing combinations of the key words “intention to use” “demand” and “prevalence rate of LAPCMs”. In addition, a search was also made for cross-reference lists of identified original articles and reviews for other relevant articles. The data abstraction was performed from October 1 to June, 2015. A systematic review and meta-analysis were made on cross-sectional studies that were focused on the intention to use and practice of LAPCMs among married women in Ethiopia. We included articles in the meta-analysis if they reported the practice and/or intention to use LAPCMs among married women in Ethiopia without restriction of publication date. Reports of original studies, unpublished master theses and PhD dissertations which are written in English language were also included. Studies were excluded from the analysis for any of the following reasons: articles were focused on short term contraceptives, meta-analysis or systematic reviews; articles consisted of comments, editorials, or duplicate publication of the same study; response rate was less than 80 %, articles available only in abstract form and articles with sample size of less than 50. The selection of articles for review was done in three stages: titles alone, abstracts, and then full-text articles. Study quality indicators were sample size, reporting of response rate and appraisal of external validity of the study. Studies were assessed for quality and those with high quality were included for analysis. High quality studies were studies that: reported outcomes on at least 50 patients; had response rates greater than 80 %; and, reported on either practice of LAPCMs and/or intention to use LAPCMs. The data abstraction was conducted independently by two investigators (YM, KT). The selected studies were reviewed by using pretested and standardized abstraction format and the following data were extracted: title, authors, year of publication, study site/base (community-based or institution-based), sample size, response rates, and measure of rate with its confidence interval (CI). When there was a discrepancy in data abstraction between the investigators, it was resolved through discussion and consensus. STATA version 11.0 software was used for data entry and analysis. The descriptions of original studies were made using tables and forest plots. The overall effect (pooled estimated prevalence rate) of LAPCMs practice and intention to use was carried out by using a random effects model and measured by using a prevalence rate with 95 % confidence intervals [95 % CI]. Heterogeneity across studies was estimated by Cochran’s Q test [16] and I2test which shows the proportion of total variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than to chance [17].
N/A