Risk factors for Bordetella pertussis disease in hospitalized children

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Despite a resurgence of pertussis (whooping cough) in low and middle-income countries, the risk factors for the disease in children are poorly understood.
– This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for pertussis in African children hospitalized with severe lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI).
– Understanding the risk factors can help inform prevention and control strategies for pertussis in these settings.
Study Highlights:
– The study enrolled 460 children hospitalized with severe LRTI in Cape Town, South Africa.
– Bordetella pertussis infection was confirmed in 32 (7.0%) of the children.
– The study identified several risk factors associated with an increased risk of pertussis, including:
– Infants younger than two months.
– HIV-exposed but uninfected infants.
– HIV-infected infants.
– Mild or moderate under-nutrition in children.
– Detection of B. pertussis in the nasopharyngeal swabs of caregivers.
– Completion of the primary pertussis vaccine schedule (three or more doses) was found to be protective against pertussis.
Recommendations for Lay Reader and Policy Maker:
– Improve primary pertussis vaccine coverage in low and middle-income countries.
– Prioritize pertussis vaccination of pregnant women, especially those with HIV infection.
– Address HIV exposure and infection, undernutrition, and detection of B. pertussis in caregivers as risk factors for pertussis in children.
– Implement strategies to ensure timely and complete vaccination of children.
– Enhance public health education and awareness about pertussis prevention and control measures.
Key Role Players Needed to Address Recommendations:
– National and local health authorities
– Healthcare providers and clinics
– Immunization programs and services
– Maternal and child health programs
– Public health educators and communicators
– Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working in healthcare and child welfare
Cost Items to Include in Planning the Recommendations:
– Vaccine procurement and distribution
– Training and capacity building for healthcare providers
– Immunization program management and monitoring
– Public health education campaigns
– Healthcare infrastructure and equipment
– Surveillance and diagnostic testing for pertussis
– Support services for HIV-exposed and infected individuals
– Research and evaluation of intervention strategies

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong. The study was conducted over a one-year period and included 460 children hospitalized with severe LRTI in Cape Town, South Africa. The study used PCR testing to confirm Bordetella pertussis infection in 32 children. The study found that younger age, HIV exposure or infection, undernutrition, and detection of maternal nasal B. pertussis were associated with increased risk of pertussis in African children. Completion of the primary vaccine schedule was found to be protective. The study suggests an urgent need to improve primary pertussis vaccine coverage in low and middle-income countries, and prioritize pertussis vaccination of pregnant women, especially those with HIV infection. To improve the strength of the evidence, future studies could include a larger sample size and a longer follow-up period.

Introduction Despite a resurgence of disease, risk factors for pertussis in children in low and middle-income countries are poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate risk factors for pertussis disease in African children hospitalized with severe LRTI. Methods A prospective study of children hospitalized with severe LRTI in Cape Town, South Africa was conducted over a one-year period. Nasopharyngeal and induced sputum samples from child and nasopharyngeal sample from caregiver were tested for Bordetella pertussis using PCR (IS481+/hIS1001). History and clinical details were documented. Results 460 children with a median age of 8 (IQR 4–18) months were enrolled. B. pertussis infection was confirmed in 32 (7.0%). The adjusted risk of confirmed pertussis was significantly increased if infants were younger than two months [aRR 2.37 (95% CI 1.03–5.42]), HIV exposed but uninfected (aRR 3.53 [95% CI 1.04–12.01]) or HIV infected (aRR 4.35 [95% CI 1.24–15.29]). Mild (aRR 2.27 [95% CI 1.01–5.09]) or moderate (aRR 2.70 [95% CI 1.13–6.45]) under-nutrition in the children were also associated with higher risk. The highest adjusted risk occurred in children whose caregivers had B. pertussis detected from nasopharyngeal swabs (aRR 13.82 [95% CI 7.76–24.62]). Completion of the primary vaccine schedule (three or more doses) was protective (aRR 0.28 [95% CI 0.10–0.75]). Conclusions HIV exposure or infection, undernutrition as well as detection of maternal nasal B. pertussis were associated with increased risk of pertussis in African children, especially in young infants. Completed primary vaccination was protective. There is an urgent need to improve primary pertussis vaccine coverage in low and middle-income countries. Pertussis vaccination of pregnant women, especially those with HIV infection should be prioritized.

Children less than 13 years of age admitted over a one-year period (07 September 2012 to 06 September 2013) for LRTI to the Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital (RCH), Cape Town, South Africa, were prospectively screened for enrolment. The hospital provides services for children up to 12 years of age. Children with WHO-defined severe pneumonia (age specific tachypnoea or/and lower chest indrawing requiring hospitalization) or apnea were eligible to be included. A child was included if the legal guardian gave written consent and the child had not been in contact with a health care facility in the previous 48 hours to two weeks prior to screening for enrolment. Enrolment was limited to the first four qualifying children per working weekday. History of symptoms of the presenting illness and information on current socio-demographic factors including type of housing, access to amenities such as tap water, electricity and toilet facilities, was taken from the caregiver. The mother’s level of education was recorded. Socio-economic status was categorized into quartiles on the basis of a validated weighted composite score used elsewhere that included asset ownership, employment and education [18]. The use of household biofuels, presence of smokers in the household and the number of people sharing the bedroom with the child were established. Information on day-care attendance was also collected. The mother’s HIV status (and that of the primary caregiver if this was not the mother) was established. If the mother or caregiver was HIV infected the latest available CD4 count was recorded and used in the staging of HIV disease according to the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) classification [19]. History was taken on the presence and duration of recent primary caregiver respiratory symptoms as well as presence and numbers of other household members with similar symptoms. The vaccination status of each child was verified using the national standardized immunization handheld record, the Road to Health Card (RTHC); specifically, the date and type of each vaccine was copied from the record. All children who missed any vaccinations that should have been received for age, where referred to an immunization catch-up program. The weight of each child, as measured on admission, was used to evaluate nutritional status using World Health Organization (WHO) weight for age Z scores (WAZ). Mild under-nutrition was defined as ≤ -1 WAZ > -2, moderate under-nutrition ≤ -2 WAZ > -3 and severe under-nutrition WAZ ≤ -3 [20]. Each child was screened for HIV infection using an ELISA test (Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo, Abbott Diagnostics, Wiesbaden). The diagnosis of HIV infection was made if both the ELISA and an HIV PCR test (COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS Taqman HIV-1, Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Pleasanton, CA) were positive in children younger than 18 months. A positive ELISA was confirmed with a different ELISA test (Enzygnost Anti-HIV 1/2 Plus, Siemens/Dade Behring, Erlangen) in children older than 18 months to diagnose HIV infection. Children younger than 18 months who were ELISA positive, but PCR negative were classified as HIV exposed uninfected while older children were classified as HIV exposed uninfected if the mother was HIV infected at the time of the pregnancy but the child tested HIV negative. Caregivers who did not know their HIV status were counselled and offered HIV testing. Children or caregivers with HIV who were not accessing appropriate treatment were referred to public health facilities for further follow up and treatment of HIV. Methods employed in the collection of respiratory specimens have been published [21]. Briefly, nasopharyngeal (NP) specimens from caregivers as well as paired NP and induced sputum (IS) specimens from children were tested by PCR for B. pertussis. The NP specimen was taken with a flocked nylon swab which was transported in a nucleic acid preservation medium (PrimeStore® MTM, Longhorn Vaccines and Diagnostics, San Antonio, TX). The IS specimen was collected after the NP was taken from each child. All specimens were frozen at minus 80°C until they were thawed for batched molecular diagnostic testing. A commercially validated duplex real-time PCR assay targeting the insertion sequence IS481 for Bordetella and IS1001 for Bordetella parapertussis (LightMix® Bordetella pertussis and parapertussis Kit, TIB MolBiol, Berlin, Germany) was used for screening all the respiratory specimens [22, 23]. All specimens testing positive for IS481 were further tested for the presence of insertion site hIS1001 in order to exclude Bordetella holmesii (IS481 +, IS1001-, hIS1001 +) before the diagnosis of B. pertussis infection was made [24]. Positive cases were offered macrolide treatment and the same offered to household contacts for prophylaxis. The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences of the University of Cape Town; Reference: 371/2011. Written informed consent was sought and received from the legal guardian for the participation of both the child and the guardian/caregiver in the study. The study aimed to investigate risk factors for pertussis as a secondary outcome and was thus not specifically powered to achieve this secondary outcome. The study sample was determined to attain a 3% precision above and below a point estimate risk of 5% for the primary outcome (prevalence of pertussis). Categorical data are presented as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI). All continuous data are summarized as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). A χ2 test assessed strength of association between two categorical variables with a two-tailed cut-off significance set at p<0.05. A causal model employing the current understanding of respiratory disease processes and pathogenesis of pertussis was constructed using a directed acyclic graph (DAG) to identify variables in the model required for minimal sufficient adjustment sets for estimating total independent effects of each assessed risk factor [25]. To adjust for potential confounders for each risk factor as identified by the DAG, a generalized linear Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRR) and their 95% level of confidence in a multivariable analysis. For all analyses, Stata Statistical Software Release 13 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX) was employed.

Based on the provided information, here are some potential innovations that could be used to improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications: Develop mobile applications that provide information and resources related to maternal health, including prenatal care, nutrition, and vaccination schedules. These apps can be easily accessible to pregnant women and their caregivers, providing them with essential knowledge and guidance.

2. Telemedicine: Implement telemedicine services that allow pregnant women in remote or underserved areas to consult with healthcare professionals remotely. This can help overcome geographical barriers and ensure that women receive timely prenatal care and medical advice.

3. Community Health Workers: Train and deploy community health workers who can provide education, support, and basic healthcare services to pregnant women in their communities. These workers can help identify and address risk factors, promote healthy behaviors, and facilitate access to healthcare facilities.

4. Maternal Health Vouchers: Introduce voucher programs that provide pregnant women with subsidized or free access to essential maternal health services, such as prenatal check-ups, vaccinations, and delivery care. This can help reduce financial barriers and increase utilization of healthcare services.

5. Public-Private Partnerships: Foster collaborations between public and private sectors to improve access to maternal health services. This can involve leveraging private healthcare providers and facilities to expand service coverage, improve infrastructure, and enhance the quality of care.

6. Health Education Campaigns: Launch targeted health education campaigns to raise awareness about the importance of maternal health and encourage women to seek timely care. These campaigns can utilize various media channels, community outreach programs, and partnerships with local organizations.

7. Maternal Health Hotlines: Establish dedicated helplines or hotlines that pregnant women can call to seek information, ask questions, and receive guidance regarding their maternal health concerns. Trained healthcare professionals can provide support and direct women to appropriate resources.

It’s important to note that these recommendations are general and may need to be tailored to the specific context and needs of the target population.
AI Innovations Description
The study mentioned in the description aimed to investigate risk factors for pertussis (whooping cough) in African children hospitalized with severe lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). The findings of the study identified several risk factors associated with pertussis in African children:

1. Age: Infants younger than two months had a significantly increased risk of pertussis.
2. HIV Exposure and Infection: HIV-exposed but uninfected infants and HIV-infected infants had a higher risk of pertussis.
3. Undernutrition: Children with mild or moderate undernutrition were associated with a higher risk of pertussis.
4. Maternal Nasal Carriage: Children whose caregivers had B. pertussis detected from nasopharyngeal swabs had the highest adjusted risk of pertussis.
5. Vaccination: Completion of the primary pertussis vaccine schedule (three or more doses) was found to be protective against pertussis.

Based on these findings, the study recommends the following to improve access to maternal health and reduce the risk of pertussis in African children:

1. Improve Primary Pertussis Vaccine Coverage: There is an urgent need to improve primary pertussis vaccine coverage in low and middle-income countries. This can be achieved through strengthening immunization programs and ensuring that children receive the recommended doses of the pertussis vaccine.

2. Prioritize Pertussis Vaccination of Pregnant Women: Vaccination of pregnant women, especially those with HIV infection, should be prioritized. This can help protect both the mother and the newborn from pertussis infection.

By implementing these recommendations, it is expected that access to maternal health will be improved, leading to a reduction in the incidence of pertussis in African children.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Increase awareness and education: Implement comprehensive public health campaigns to educate pregnant women and their families about the importance of maternal health, including the risks and prevention of diseases such as pertussis. This can be done through various channels such as community outreach programs, social media, and healthcare facilities.

2. Strengthen immunization programs: Prioritize pertussis vaccination for pregnant women, especially those with HIV infection. This can help protect both the mother and the newborn from pertussis infection. Collaborate with healthcare providers to ensure that pregnant women receive the recommended number of doses of the pertussis vaccine.

3. Improve access to healthcare facilities: Enhance the availability and accessibility of healthcare facilities that provide maternal health services, particularly in low and middle-income countries. This can be achieved by increasing the number of healthcare facilities, improving transportation infrastructure, and reducing financial barriers to healthcare.

4. Enhance antenatal care services: Strengthen antenatal care services to ensure early detection and management of risk factors for maternal and neonatal health. This can include regular check-ups, screening for infections, and providing appropriate interventions and treatments.

5. Promote maternal nutrition: Implement programs to address undernutrition in pregnant women, as it is associated with an increased risk of pertussis in children. This can involve providing nutritional supplements, educating women about healthy eating habits, and addressing socio-economic factors that contribute to poor nutrition.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could involve the following steps:

1. Define the target population: Determine the specific population that will be affected by the recommendations, such as pregnant women in low and middle-income countries.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current status of maternal health access, including vaccination rates, healthcare facility availability, and maternal health outcomes. This can be done through surveys, medical records, and existing databases.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a mathematical or statistical model that incorporates the various factors influencing access to maternal health, such as vaccination coverage, healthcare facility density, and socio-economic factors. This model should be able to simulate the impact of the recommendations on these factors.

4. Input data and parameters: Input the baseline data and parameters into the simulation model. This includes information on the target population, the effectiveness of the recommendations, and any assumptions or constraints.

5. Run simulations: Use the simulation model to run multiple scenarios, varying the parameters and assumptions to assess the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This can involve running simulations over different time periods and considering different implementation strategies.

6. Analyze results: Analyze the simulation results to evaluate the potential impact of the recommendations. This can include assessing changes in vaccination rates, healthcare facility utilization, and maternal health outcomes. Compare the results of different scenarios to identify the most effective strategies.

7. Validate and refine the model: Validate the simulation model by comparing the simulated results with real-world data, if available. Refine the model based on feedback and additional data to improve its accuracy and reliability.

8. Communicate findings: Present the findings of the simulation study to relevant stakeholders, such as policymakers, healthcare providers, and community organizations. Use the results to advocate for the implementation of the recommendations and inform decision-making processes.

It is important to note that the specific methodology for simulating the impact of the recommendations may vary depending on the available data, resources, and expertise.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email