Maternal and perinatal outcomes of birth preparedness and complication readiness in recently delivered women of a Southwestern Nigerian Town

listen audio

Study Justification:
This study aimed to investigate the maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) in recently delivered women in a Southwestern Nigerian town. The study was conducted to address the knowledge gaps in understanding the impact of BPCR on maternal and perinatal health outcomes. By examining the relationship between BPCR and outcomes such as perinatal mortality, the study aimed to provide evidence for the importance of BPCR in improving maternal and newborn health.
Highlights:
– The study involved 827 recently delivered women attending selected health facilities in Ikenne, southwestern Nigeria.
– BPCR was observed in 56.8% of the participants.
– Knowledge of financial and transportation assistance was low, with only 15.1% and 6.8% of participants having knowledge, respectively.
– Knowledge of ≥ 5 danger signs of pregnancy was also low, with only 34.6% of participants having knowledge.
– Institutional delivery was only 40% and depended on being birth prepared and complication ready.
– Perinatal deaths were significantly higher among women who were not birth prepared.
– No significant difference was found for perinatal and maternal morbidities.
Recommendations:
Based on the study findings, the following recommendations can be made:
1. Improve knowledge and awareness of financial and transportation assistance available for pregnant women.
2. Enhance education and awareness programs to increase knowledge of danger signs of pregnancy.
3. Promote birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women to improve perinatal outcomes.
4. Strengthen healthcare systems to ensure access to skilled obstetric care during delivery.
Key Role Players:
To address the recommendations, the following key role players are needed:
1. Government health departments and policymakers to develop and implement education and awareness programs.
2. Healthcare providers to deliver comprehensive antenatal care and promote birth preparedness.
3. Community leaders and organizations to support and advocate for birth preparedness and complication readiness.
4. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to provide financial and transportation assistance to pregnant women.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
While the actual cost may vary, the following cost items should be considered in planning the recommendations:
1. Development and implementation of education and awareness programs.
2. Training of healthcare providers on birth preparedness and complication readiness.
3. Provision of financial and transportation assistance to pregnant women.
4. Monitoring and evaluation of the impact of the recommendations.
Please note that the provided information is based on the study description and may not include all details. For a comprehensive understanding, it is recommended to refer to the original publication in the Annals of African Medicine, Volume 19, No. 1, Year 2020.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong, but there are areas for improvement. The study design is cross-sectional, which limits the ability to establish causality. Additionally, the sample size of 827 recently delivered women is relatively small, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. To improve the strength of the evidence, future studies could consider using a longitudinal design to establish temporal relationships and increase the sample size to enhance generalizability.

Birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR) have been shown to increase knowledge of danger signs and enhance access to skilled obstetric care. Previous studies have focused on intermediate outcomes of BPCR such as utilization of skilled care for pregnancy and delivery. Aims: This study aims to determine the maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with birth preparedness and complication readiness. Settings and Design: A cross-sectional study involving 827 recently delivered women, attending selected health facilities in Ikenne, southwestern Nigeria. Materials and Methods: BPCR was determined from a set of eight indicators that were developed by the John Hopkin’s Bloomberg School of Public Health. Statistical Analysis: The data were analyzed using SPSS version 21. Bivariate analysis was done using Chi-square test, and binary logistic regression model was used to assess factors related to BPCR practice among respondents. The level of statistical significance was set to P 2 years preceding this study, or who were critically ill, or are below 15 or above 49 years or failed to give consent for the study were excluded. Descriptive cross-sectional study. The minimum sample size was determined using the Leslie Kish formula for estimating single proportion.[16] The prevalence of 58.2% obtained for BPCR from a similar study done in Tanzania,[14] was applied to the formula, to calculate the sample size. A minimum sample size of 410 was obtained and multiplied by a design effect of 2 obtained from a previous similar study assessing BPCR among recently delivered women,[14] to remove cluster effect from the multistage sampling technique. Thus, a final sample size of n = 820 was calculated for the study. Data were obtained from women attending the ANC, postnatal clinic, infant welfare clinic, family planning, gynecology clinics, and the general outpatient department. A multi-stage sampling technique was employed. First, the health facilities in Ikenne were divided into two broad categories: providers of comprehensive EOC (6 in number) and the providers of basic EOC services (BEOC, 16 in numbers; 10 PHCs and 6 registered private clinics/maternity centers). A sampling frame of 1 in every 3 health facility was used to determine the representative health facilities that were included. Thus 2 Comprehensive providers and 6 BEOC providers (4 PHC and 2 private clinics) were selected giving a total of 8 health facilities within the Ikenne LGA. Simple random sampling was then done at the individual clinics of each selected facility, using the same sampling frame. Thus, 1 in every 3 women who met the selection criteria was recruited at the clinics for interview. Exit interviews were conducted for the participants with the aid of a modified, interviewer administered, semistructured questionnaire adapted from the safe motherhood questionnaire developed by the maternal and neonatal health program of JHPIEGO an affiliate of the Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland, USA.[7] This was adapted according to context and the objectives of this study. The questionnaire was translated into the Yoruba language and translated back into the English language to retain the original meaning of the questions. Five research assistants, who are fresh graduates of the school of public and allied health of the Babcock University, served as data collectors after training by the principal investigator. BPCR was calculated from a set of eight indicators that were developed by the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, which applied to recently delivered mothers; these indicators were expressed as percentage of women having each specific characteristic.[7] The BPCR indicators are as follows: The mothers who fulfilled 3 of 5 selected BPCR practice indicators were considered as “Birth prepared and complication ready” (BPCR), the selected indicators were; “identified a mode of transportation to the place of delivery,” delivery attended by skilled provider, saved money for child birth, had at least 4 ANC visits with a skilled provider and ‘made arrangement for blood before delivery’. Similar sets of BPCR indicators have been reported in literature.[14,17,18] The key danger signs that were expected to be spontaneously known and supplied by the respondents include that designed by the JHPIEGO, MNH programme in the BPCR manual and they include:[7] MNM was defined as an acute obstetric complication that immediately threatened a woman’s survival but did not result in her death; either by chance or because of hospital care she received during pregnancy, labor or within 6 weeks after termination of pregnancy or delivery.[19] A participant was considered as having had institutional delivery if she delivered at a health facility and was attended by a skilled birth attendant (Physicians, Nurses, Midwives, or community health officers).[14] Perinatal mortality was considered as stillbirths or neonatal deaths that occurred within the first 7 days of life. A stillbirth was considered as the death of foetus occurring in the interval from 28 weeks gestational age to delivery. The data was edited on a daily basis before leaving the field and entered using excel spread sheet before converting into SPSS version 21 (Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for computer analysis. Bivariate analysis was done using Chi-square test for categorical variables and binary logistic regression model was used to assess the factors related to BPCR practice in the respondents. The level of statistical significance was set to P < 0.05. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Babcock University Health Research and Ethics Committee and permissions from the Ikenne LGA, through the PHC department and the administrative heads of all facilities that were involved in the study, before commencing data collection. Written informed consent with signature or thumb print was obtained from the study participants before the start of the interview. Respondents that were assessed preliminarily and found not to have been birth prepared and complication ready were counseled regardless of the outcome of that pregnancy.

N/A

Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations for innovations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications: Develop and implement mobile applications that provide information on birth preparedness and complication readiness, including danger signs of pregnancy, transportation assistance, and financial support. These apps can also provide reminders for ANC visits and help women save money for childbirth expenses.

2. Community-Based Health Insurance: Expand and strengthen community-based health insurance programs, such as the “Araya” program mentioned in the study, to provide free maternal, newborn, and under-five care. This can help remove financial barriers to accessing skilled obstetric care.

3. Community Health Workers: Train and deploy community health workers to educate women and families about birth preparedness and complication readiness. These workers can provide personalized support and guidance, conduct home visits, and ensure that women are aware of the importance of skilled birth attendance.

4. Telemedicine and Teleconsultations: Utilize telemedicine and teleconsultation services to connect women in remote or underserved areas with skilled healthcare providers. This can help overcome geographical barriers and ensure that women have access to timely and appropriate care during pregnancy and childbirth.

5. Public-Private Partnerships: Foster collaborations between public and private healthcare providers to improve access to skilled obstetric care. This can involve leveraging the resources and expertise of private hospitals and clinics to expand service delivery in underserved areas.

6. Maternal Health Education Campaigns: Launch targeted education campaigns to raise awareness about the importance of birth preparedness and complication readiness. These campaigns can use various media channels, including radio, television, and social media, to reach a wide audience and promote behavior change.

7. Strengthening Health Facilities: Invest in improving the infrastructure, equipment, and staffing of health facilities that provide skilled obstetric care. This can help ensure that women have access to quality services and reduce the risk of maternal and perinatal complications.

8. Collaboration with Traditional Birth Attendants: Engage and train traditional birth attendants to recognize danger signs and refer women to skilled healthcare providers. This can help bridge the gap between traditional and modern healthcare systems and improve access to timely and appropriate care.

It is important to note that these recommendations should be tailored to the specific context and needs of the community in order to be effective.
AI Innovations Description
The study titled “Maternal and perinatal outcomes of birth preparedness and complication readiness in recently delivered women of a Southwestern Nigerian Town” aimed to determine the maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR). BPCR refers to the knowledge and practice of certain indicators that enhance access to skilled obstetric care.

The study was conducted in the Ikenne Local Government Area (LGA) of Ogun state, Nigeria. The LGA is semi-urban and includes five towns. The facilities that provide skilled emergency obstetric care (EOC) in the LGA include Babcock University Teaching Hospital, State General Hospital, State Hospital, Community Hospital, and ten Primary Health Care (PHC) Centers. There are also eight registered private hospitals and clinics where deliveries occur. The Ikenne local government offers a community-based health insurance program called “Araya” that provides free maternal, newborn, and under-five care for women who register with the PHCs.

The study included 827 recently delivered women who were attending selected health facilities in Ikenne. The participants were women aged 15-49 years who were within 2 years of their last delivery and were currently attending ANC, postnatal, infant welfare, gynecology, or general outpatient clinics. Women who were critically ill, below 15 or above 49 years, or failed to give consent were excluded.

Data were collected through exit interviews using a modified, interviewer-administered, semi-structured questionnaire. BPCR was determined using a set of eight indicators developed by the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. These indicators included factors such as identifying a mode of transportation to the place of delivery, delivery attended by a skilled provider, saving money for childbirth, having at least 4 ANC visits with a skilled provider, and making arrangements for blood before delivery.

The study found that BPCR was observed in 56.8% of the participants. However, knowledge of financial and transportation assistance was low, with only 15.1% and 6.8% of participants having knowledge of these indicators, respectively. Knowledge of at least 5 danger signs of pregnancy was also low, with only 34.6% of participants having this knowledge. Institutional delivery was reported by only 40% of participants, and it was found to depend on being birth prepared and complication ready.

The study also found that perinatal deaths were significantly higher among women who were not birth prepared. However, there was no significant difference in perinatal and maternal morbidities between birth prepared and non-prepared women.

In conclusion, the study highlighted the poor knowledge and practice of key indicators of BPCR in the Ikenne Local Government Area. BPCR was found to be an important determinant of perinatal survival. The study suggests the need for interventions to improve access to maternal health services, including increasing knowledge of danger signs, improving transportation and financial assistance, and promoting institutional delivery.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided study, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Increase awareness and education: Implement community-based education programs to increase knowledge about birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPCR). This can include educating women and their families about the importance of antenatal care, danger signs during pregnancy, and the benefits of skilled birth attendance.

2. Strengthen health infrastructure: Improve the availability and accessibility of skilled obstetric care facilities in the study area. This can involve upgrading existing health facilities, ensuring the availability of essential equipment and supplies, and training healthcare providers to deliver quality maternal healthcare services.

3. Enhance financial and transportation assistance: Develop programs that provide financial support and transportation assistance to pregnant women, especially those from low-income backgrounds. This can help overcome barriers to accessing healthcare services, such as the cost of transportation to health facilities.

4. Promote community-based health insurance: Expand the coverage and benefits of community-based health insurance programs, such as the “Araya” program mentioned in the study. This can help ensure that women have access to free maternal, newborn, and under-five care, reducing financial barriers to accessing healthcare services.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could involve the following steps:

1. Define indicators: Identify key indicators that reflect access to maternal health, such as the percentage of women receiving antenatal care, the percentage of institutional deliveries, and the percentage of women aware of danger signs during pregnancy.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current status of these indicators in the study area. This can be done through surveys, interviews, or existing data sources.

3. Implement interventions: Introduce the recommended interventions, such as community-based education programs, infrastructure improvements, and financial assistance programs.

4. Monitor and evaluate: Continuously monitor the implementation of interventions and collect data on the indicators. This can involve conducting follow-up surveys or interviews to assess changes in knowledge, behavior, and access to maternal health services.

5. Analyze data: Use statistical analysis software, such as SPSS, to analyze the collected data. Compare the baseline data with the post-intervention data to determine the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health.

6. Interpret results: Interpret the results of the analysis to understand the effectiveness of the interventions. Identify any significant changes in the indicators and assess the overall impact on improving access to maternal health.

7. Adjust and refine interventions: Based on the findings, make any necessary adjustments or refinements to the interventions to further improve access to maternal health. This can involve scaling up successful interventions, addressing any challenges or barriers identified during the evaluation, and continuously monitoring and evaluating the impact of the interventions.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email