Protocol for a feasibility randomised control trial for continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes at first-level hospitals in rural Malawi

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The majority of people living with type 1 diabetes (PLWT1D) in low-income countries struggle to access high-quality care and lack access to technologies like continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).
– There are no studies in the literature describing the feasibility or effectiveness of CGM at rural first-level hospitals in low-income countries.
– This study aims to assess the feasibility and clinical outcomes of introducing CGM to PLWT1D in two rural hospitals in Neno, Malawi.
Study Highlights:
– This is a 3-month, 2:1 open-randomized trial.
– Participants in the intervention arm will receive Dexcom G6 CGM devices with sensors and solar chargers, while participants in the control arm will receive Safe-Accu home glucose meters and logbooks.
– Primary outcomes of interest include fidelity to protocols, appropriateness of technology, HbA1c (a measure of blood glucose control), and severe adverse events.
– The study is approved by the National Health Sciences Research Committee of Malawi and the Mass General Brigham.
Study Recommendations for Lay Reader and Policy Maker:
– The study aims to assess the feasibility and impact of CGM among PLWT1D in rural hospitals in Malawi.
– The findings of this study will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and acceptability of CGM in low-resource settings.
– If the study demonstrates positive outcomes, policy makers may consider integrating CGM technology into the standard care for PLWT1D in rural areas.
Key Role Players:
– T1D research and clinical fellow
– NCD clinicians
– Community health workers (CHWs)
– Research coordinator
– Study staff
– Clinical teams
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training on the study protocol for NCD clinicians
– Dexcom G6 CGM devices with sensors and solar chargers
– Safe-Accu home glucose meters, test strips, lancets, and logbooks
– Monthly follow-up clinic visits
– Dexcom computer software CLARITY for data analysis
– Educational sessions for participants on proper disposal of Dexcom sensors and insertion devices
– Clinical staff availability for monitoring and clinical management of adverse events
– Storage of data in password-protected files and computers
– Transfer of data between sites via password-protected and encrypted email accounts
Please note that the above cost items are estimates and not actual costs. The actual budget for implementing the recommendations may vary.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is rated 7 because it provides a detailed description of the study design, methods, and outcomes of interest. However, it does not provide information on the sample size, statistical analysis plan, or potential limitations of the study. To improve the evidence, the abstract could include these missing details and also provide information on the expected impact or implications of the study findings.

Introduction The majority of people living with type 1 diabetes (PLWT1D) struggle to access high-quality care in low-income countries (LICs), and lack access to technologies, including continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), that are considered standard of care in high resource settings. To our knowledge, there are no studies in the literature describing the feasibility or effectiveness of CGM at rural first-level hospitals in LICs. Methods and analysis This is a 3-month, 2:1 open-randomised trial to assess the feasibility and clinical outcomes of introducing CGM to the entire population of 50 PLWT1D in two hospitals in rural Neno, Malawi. Participants in both arms will receive 2 days of training on diabetes management. One day of training will be the same for both arms, and one will be specific to the diabetes technology. Participants in the intervention arm will receive Dexcom G6 CGM devices with sensors and solar chargers, and patients in the control arm will receive Safe-Accu home glucose metres and logbooks. All patients will have their haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measured and take WHO Quality of Life assessments at study baseline and endline. We will conduct qualitative interviews with a selection of participants from both arms at the beginning and end of study and will interview providers at the end of the study. Our primary outcomes of interest are fidelity to protocols, appropriateness of technology, HbA1c and severe adverse events. Ethics and dissemination This study is approved by National Health Sciences Research Committee of Malawi (IRB Number IR800003905) and the Mass General Brigham (IRB number 2019P003554). Findings will be disseminated to PLWT1D through health education sessions. We will disseminate any relevant findings to clinicians and leadership within our study catchment area and networks. We will publish our findings in an open-access peer-reviewed journal. Trial registration number PACTR202102832069874.

This protocol is reported following the Standard Protocol Items Recommendations for Interventional Trials. This study will be conducted at two rural first-level hospitals in Neno, Malawi. Neno District in southern Malawi has a population of about 138 000 people, who mostly rely on subsistence agriculture. Neno has two Ministry of Health (MOH) hospitals: one district hospital in the centre of Neno, and a community hospital in Lisungwi. Since 2007, Partners In Health (PIH), a US-based non-government organisation known locally as Abwenzi Pa Za Umoyo, has partnered with the MOH to improve healthcare and socioeconomic development in Neno District. In 2018, Neno District opened two advanced non-communicable disease (NCD) clinics at each of the first-level hospitals. The clinics provide high-quality care for complex NCDs, consistent with the PEN-Plus model.8 Patients with T1D are enrolled in this clinic and receive care from mid-level providers (clinical officers) with specialised training in NCDs. All insulin is provided free of charge to all patients at their routine monthly appointments. In addition, every household in Neno is assigned a community health worker (CHW) who visit households monthly for education and screening for multiple common conditions, enrolment into maternal and chronic care, and accompaniment to clinic. PLWT1D are supported through more frequent visits, when CHWs conduct treatment and adherence counselling, identification of side effects or danger signs, and missed visit tracking. This is a 3-month feasibility 2:1 parallel arm open-randomised control study to assess the feasibility and impact of CGM among PLWT1D in two rural hospitals in Neno, Malawi. Prior to the start of data collection, NCD clinicians will partake in a 1-week training on the study protocol as it applies to the use of CGM, glucose metres and logbooks. Providers will have the opportunity to wear a Dexcom device as part of their training to familiarise themselves with the technology. Initial education will be followed up by real-time, ongoing digital training every 2 weeks. The trial will consist of two arms in a 2:1 ratio (intervention to comparison). In the intervention group participants will be given the CGM Dexcom G6 model with transmitters, receivers and solar charges. The comparator group is to be given Safe-Accu glucose metres, Safe-Accu test strips, lancets and locally made logbooks, which are increasingly being used in low-resource settings and are the current standard of care in Neno. This comparator intervention was used as it has been shown to be feasible and effective in LICs14 and does not require the level of resources or training that CGM does. At the beginning of the trial, both arms will attend a 2-day training for participants, their families and CHWs. Training related to diabetes management will be adapted from the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes and Life for a Child curriculum.15 On the first training day, all participants will receive training in a culturally appropriate manner on diabetes management including: diabetes symptom recognition, insulin treatment, managing hypoglyacaemia, sick day management, blood glucose monitoring, nutritional management, physical activity management and dispelling of myths and false beliefs surrounding diabetes. On the second day, each arm will receive specialised training related to either CGM or home glucose metres, including a refresher of the first day’s material regarding safe diabetes management in the context of using a CGM or glucose metre. Participants in both groups will be expected to attend at least monthly follow-up clinic visits. For participants in the treatment group, clinicians will use the Dexcom computer software CLARITY to upload CGM data, create reports, and review data to inform their management of T1D. For those in the control group, participants will be required to bring their glucose metre machines and logbooks to monthly visits, consistent with current practice. During these visits the study staff will assess the utilisation of the log book by checking completeness as per the expected number of recordings. The utilisation of the glucose metre will be assessed by reviewing the historical memory. To check the validity of the log book records, the records in the log book will be compared by study staff to those in the glucose metre memory including the time and readings of the glucose levels. In line with current practice, we will not be encouraging patients to self-titrate. We are instead focusing on encouraging providers to help patients problem-solve possible scenarios around diabetes management that may require adjusting insulin doses (eg, food insecurity and illness). All participants will receive routine T1D care including regular blood tests for HbA1c every 3 months. Thus, all participants will receive HbA1c testing at enrolment and on conclusion of the study period. At the beginning and end of the study, we will conduct semistructured interviews with 3–4 purposively selected participants from both arms to ask about their experiences with living with and managing their T1D and their experience utilising CGM if in the treatment group. Sequence generation: The research coordinator based in Neno will randomise subjects using a random number table. Allocation concealment: Allocation will be concealed through the use of sealed envelopes. The research coordinator will be responsible for the allocation at all sites, and this person will not have access to the subject records. Due to the nature of the study blinding will not be possible. We will enrol all eligible participants in the respective T1D programmes from the PIH supported districts. Any patient diagnosed with T1D will be eligible to participate. The inclusion and exclusion criteria will be as follows: Eligible participants will be identified through electronic medical records, chart review or referred to the study staff by the NCD clinicians. The study staff will then contact the participants either during routine follow-up visits or phone calls to obtain informed consent to participate in the study. All participants will be required to sign an informed consent form on the day of enrolment (online supplemental appendix A). Assent will be collected from children under the age of 18 (online supplemental appendix B). Patients will be enrolled regardless of literacy. No patients with mental impairment will be included. bmjopen-2021-052134supp001.pdf bmjopen-2021-052134supp002.pdf All 50 PLWT1D identified at the two hospitals in Neno will be offered to take part. Figure 1 shows the expected power for examining difference in reduction of HbA1c between arms. Given an expected SD of 1.6 or less we would have 80% power to identify a 1.2% difference in reduction between the treatment arm and the control arm. Power table showing expected power for range of changes in HbA1c levels for different SD. HbA1c, haemoglobin A1c. The study is expected to begin recruitment in March 2022. We expect data collection to be completed by June 2022. A T1D research and clinical fellow, who is experienced in CGM care delivery, training and evaluation, will be on site for the training at the initiation of the study. All participants will complete the intake form on enrolment to include information on duration since diagnosis with T1D, marital status and education level. At baseline and endline all participants will complete the WHO Quality of Life questionnaire and a point-of-care test for HbA1c. We will also conduct chart reviews to obtain information about insulin dosage and dose adjustments. Fidelity: Variables that reflect the participants’ adherence to the per protocol utilisation of technology including (1) Per cent of time worn; (2) Per cent of expected blood glucose readings logged; (c) Per cent of participants who brought log book to clinic during study period; (4) Per cent of expected times blood sugar test was performed (based on logbooks, home glucose metres, numbers of strips); (5) Per cent of expected times CGM and SMBG information was used to inform lifestyle adjusted interventions and (6) Number of sensors worn. Appropriateness: Factors will be assessed from quantitative and qualitative data. The frequency of technology or battery issues will be measured. Additionally, participants will take part in qualitative interviews at baseline and endline discussing the ease of use and benefits and challenges of CGM technology in their setting. Change in HbA1C: HbA1c in rural Malawi is generally tested via a point-of-care device and requires a lancet-induced drop of capillary blood from the participant’s fingertip. The resulting per cent value reflects the blood glucose level over the past 1–3 months. This will be measured at study enrolment and on conclusion of the study period. While per cent time in range is considered the gold standard in CGM trials, because in this trial we are unsure what proportion of individuals will be able to successfully use their CGM, we are choosing HbA1c as a primary outcome, as we will be able to measure it in all study participants. Severe adverse events: Potential adverse events include infection, local skin reaction, bleeding, hospitalisation, hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia. Data sources will include readings/reports from CGM and home glucose metres, clinician’s reports and self-reports through logbooks and qualitative interviews. Acceptability: In qualitative interviews at baseline and endline, participants and clinical providers will discuss their satisfaction with content, complexity, comfort and delivery of CGM or SMBG technologies. Per cent time in range: This value represents the proportion of blood glucose readings observed by the subject which are within the normal range (70–180 mg/dL). This will be measured using uploaded CGM data in the intervention arm. Average SD in HbA1c: This statistic will determine variability in the SD of HbA1C in order to inform further studies. Quality of life: WHO Quality of Life surveys will be conducted at the start and conclusion of the study period. The analysis will be conducted as an intention to treat. We will also conduct a secondary sensitivity per-protocol analysis. For continuous outcomes including HbA1c, we will use analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models adjusting for baseline levels and site. For binary outcomes we will conduct logistic regressions adjusting for possible confounders including site. For qualitative outcomes, we will conduct a narrative synthesis using a thematic analysis. All participants will be provided an educational session about the project and training on proper disposal of Dexcom sensors and insertion devices. While rates of infection, skin reaction and traumatic bleeding are extremely low, clinical staff will be available by phone and in-person at health facilities for monitoring and appropriate clinical management. Clear protocols warranting medical attention will be provided to participants. Research staff and clinical teams will be well-versed in proper protocols and/or clinical management for any adverse events. Any reported adverse events will be immediately assessed and documented. A monthly report describing all adverse events will be reviewed by research staff, including the principal investigator, and reported to the NCD Unit within the Clinical Services Directorate at the Malawi MOH. All data will be stored in password-protected files and/or computers in locked research offices and the patient’s CGM receiver. All patients will be trained to keep receivers with them at all times and not share the device with others. Any transfer of data between sites will occur via password protected and encrypted email accounts housed within the participating institutions PLWT1D will be engaged throughout the entire study. As the primary outcome of this research is feasibility and acceptability, perspectives, experiences and views of the technology by PLWT1D is core to the entire study. One of the study coauthors (GF) is living with T1D, and will be involved throughout the design of the protocol, tools and implementation of the study.

Based on the provided information, the potential innovations that can be used to improve access to maternal health include:

1. Telemedicine: Implementing telemedicine services can allow pregnant women in rural areas to access healthcare remotely. This can include virtual consultations with healthcare providers, remote monitoring of vital signs, and remote access to medical records.

2. Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications: Developing mobile applications specifically designed for maternal health can provide pregnant women with access to important information, reminders for prenatal care appointments, and educational resources. These applications can also include features for tracking pregnancy progress and receiving personalized recommendations.

3. Community Health Workers (CHWs): Training and deploying CHWs in rural areas can improve access to maternal health services. CHWs can provide education, support, and basic healthcare services to pregnant women in their communities. They can also help with referrals to healthcare facilities when necessary.

4. Transportation Solutions: Improving transportation infrastructure and implementing transportation solutions, such as mobile clinics or ambulances, can help pregnant women in remote areas reach healthcare facilities in a timely manner. This can ensure access to prenatal care, emergency obstetric care, and safe delivery services.

5. Health Information Systems: Implementing electronic health records and health information systems can improve the coordination of care for pregnant women. This can enable healthcare providers to access and share patient information, track prenatal care visits, and monitor maternal health outcomes.

6. Maternal Health Education Programs: Developing and implementing targeted education programs for pregnant women and their families can improve awareness and understanding of maternal health issues. These programs can cover topics such as prenatal care, nutrition, breastfeeding, and postpartum care.

7. Public-Private Partnerships: Collaborating with private sector organizations, such as pharmaceutical companies or technology companies, can help leverage resources and expertise to improve access to maternal health services. This can include initiatives for providing affordable or subsidized healthcare products and services.

It’s important to note that these recommendations are general and may need to be adapted to the specific context and needs of the target population.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation to improve access to maternal health based on the provided information is to conduct a feasibility randomized control trial for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in patients with type 1 diabetes at first-level hospitals in rural Malawi. This trial aims to assess the feasibility and clinical outcomes of introducing CGM to the population of patients with type 1 diabetes in two rural hospitals in Neno, Malawi.

The trial will involve enrolling 50 patients with type 1 diabetes, who will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group. Participants in the intervention group will receive Dexcom G6 CGM devices with sensors and solar chargers, while participants in the control group will receive Safe-Accu home glucose meters and logbooks. Both groups will receive training on diabetes management, with one day of training specific to the diabetes technology being used.

The primary outcomes of interest in this trial are fidelity to protocols, appropriateness of technology, HbA1c levels (a measure of blood glucose control), and severe adverse events. The study will also include qualitative interviews with participants and providers to gather their experiences and perspectives.

Ethics approval has been obtained for the study, and findings will be disseminated to patients with type 1 diabetes through health education sessions. Relevant findings will also be shared with clinicians and leadership within the study catchment area and networks. The study results will be published in an open-access peer-reviewed journal.

By conducting this trial, the aim is to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of CGM in rural first-level hospitals in Malawi. If successful, this innovation could improve access to maternal health by providing better diabetes management for pregnant women with type 1 diabetes, thus reducing the risk of complications during pregnancy and childbirth.
AI Innovations Methodology
The protocol described in the provided text is for a feasibility randomized control trial to assess the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on patients with type 1 diabetes in rural Malawi. The study aims to improve access to high-quality care and technology for patients with type 1 diabetes in low-income countries.

To simulate the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed using the following steps:

1. Define the objectives: Clearly define the specific objectives of the recommendations, such as improving access to maternal health services, reducing maternal mortality rates, or increasing the utilization of antenatal care.

2. Identify key indicators: Identify key indicators that can measure the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. These indicators could include the number of women receiving antenatal care, the number of skilled birth attendants, or the maternal mortality rate.

3. Collect baseline data: Collect baseline data on the identified indicators to establish a starting point for measuring the impact of the recommendations. This data could be obtained from existing health records, surveys, or other sources.

4. Implement the recommendations: Implement the recommended innovations or interventions to improve access to maternal health. These could include initiatives such as mobile health clinics, community health worker programs, or telemedicine services.

5. Monitor and evaluate: Continuously monitor and evaluate the impact of the recommendations on the identified indicators. This could involve collecting data on the indicators at regular intervals, such as quarterly or annually.

6. Analyze the data: Analyze the collected data to assess the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This could involve statistical analysis, such as comparing pre- and post-intervention data or conducting regression analysis to identify factors influencing the outcomes.

7. Interpret the results: Interpret the results of the data analysis to understand the effectiveness of the recommendations in improving access to maternal health. This could involve identifying trends, patterns, or correlations in the data.

8. Communicate the findings: Communicate the findings of the impact assessment to relevant stakeholders, such as healthcare providers, policymakers, and the community. This could be done through reports, presentations, or other forms of dissemination.

9. Adjust and refine: Based on the findings, make any necessary adjustments or refinements to the recommendations to further improve access to maternal health. This could involve modifying the interventions, scaling up successful initiatives, or addressing any identified challenges or barriers.

By following this methodology, it would be possible to simulate the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health and make evidence-based decisions for further interventions or improvements.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email