A case-control study on the driving factors of childhood brain volume loss: What pediatricians must explore

listen audio

Study Justification:
This study aimed to investigate the factors that contribute to childhood brain volume loss, also known as brain atrophy. Brain atrophy in children can lead to neurocognitive changes and alter their general personality. While clinicians focus on managing the neurological manifestations of brain atrophy, less is known about the underlying causes. This study aimed to fill this knowledge gap and provide insights for pediatricians to explore.
Highlights:
– The study included 168 subjects with brain atrophy and 168 age and gender-matched control subjects with normal brains.
– Significant risk factors for brain atrophy in children were identified, including age between 14-17, male gender, birth outside a medical facility, immaturity, malnutrition, head trauma, maternal alcoholism, antiepileptic drugs & convulsive disorders, radiation injury, space-occupying lesions and intracranial pressure, and birth injury/asphyxia.
– The study found that space-occupying lesions and intracranial pressure were the most profound causes of brain atrophy in childhood.
Recommendations:
– Pediatricians should consider the identified risk factors for brain atrophy in their clinical practice.
– Further research is needed to explore preventive measures and interventions for the identified risk factors.
– Efforts should be made to improve access to CT scan imaging services in regions where they are currently unavailable.
– Collaboration between healthcare facilities and the national healthcare network system should be strengthened to ensure proper referral and care for patients.
Key Role Players:
– Pediatricians and neurologists
– Radiologists
– Healthcare facility administrators
– National healthcare network system representatives
– Ethical review committees
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Equipment and maintenance costs for CT scan imaging services
– Training and education for healthcare professionals on brain atrophy and its risk factors
– Research and data collection expenses
– Collaboration and networking costs between healthcare facilities and the national healthcare network system
– Ethical review and approval process expenses

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is rated 7 because it provides a detailed description of the study design, sample size, and significant risk factors for brain atrophy in children. However, it lacks information on the statistical analysis performed and the specific results obtained. To improve the evidence, the abstract should include more specific information on the statistical tests used, the effect sizes of the risk factors, and any significant associations found. Additionally, it would be helpful to provide a summary of the limitations of the study and suggestions for future research.

Background The brain volume loss also known as brain atrophy is increasingly observed among children in the course of performing neuroimaging using CT scan and MRI brains. While severe forms of brain volume loss are frequently associated with neurocognitive changes due to effects on thought processing speed, reasoning and memory of children that eventually alter their general personality, most clinicians embark themselves in managing the neurological manifestations of brain atrophy in childhood and less is known regarding the offending factors responsible for developing pre-senile brain atrophy. It was therefore the goal of this study to explore the factors that drive the occurrence of childhood brain volume under the guidance of brain CT scan quantitative evaluation. Methods This study was a case-control study involving 168 subjects with brain atrophy who were compared with 168 age and gender matched control subjects with normal brains on CT scan under the age of 18 years. All the children with brain CT scan were subjected to an intense review of their birth and medical history including laboratory investigation reports. Results Results showed significant and influential risk factors for brain atrophy in varying trends among children including age between 14-17(OR = 1.1), male gender (OR = 1.9), birth outside facility (OR = 0.99), immaturity (OR = 1.04), malnutrition (OR = 0.97), head trauma (OR = 1.02), maternal alcoholism (OR = 1.0), antiepileptic drugs & convulsive disorders (OR = 1.0), radiation injury (OR = 1.06), space occupying lesions and ICP (OR = 1.01) and birth injury/asphyxia (OR = 1.02). Conclusions Pathological reduction of brain volume in childhood exhibits a steady trend with the increase in pediatric age, with space occupying lesions & intracranial pressure being the most profound causes of brain atrophy.

Four facilities were included in the study, namely Agakhan Health Center, the Arusha Lutheran medical Center, Afyamax polyclinic all in Arusha region and the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center in Kilimanjaro region of Tanzania. The centers were picked intentionally for individuals residing inside Northern Tanzania on the basis of availability and access to CT scan imaging services. During this study period, the two locations, namely Tanga and Manyara, did not have functioning CT scans. Their patients were however sampled by referral system set by the national health care network system. Charan & Biswas, 2013, derived the sample size from a statistical formula, by the guide that part of the investigation concerned quantitative variables in case control [19]. Where as: Standard variable Z1-α /2 standard (the error is 1.96 at 5% type 1 (P<0.05). The standard deviation value was derived from Holger Schmidt’s previous work and 2.3 was found [20]. d = The expected mean difference between case and control but in this case, half the value of the SD was considered to be 1.15. r = Ratio of control to cases, 1 for equal number of Case and Control. Z = Standard normal power variate; the value is 1.28 for 90% power. In this study, the 90% power was selected with SD (2.3) and d values (1.15), the sample size was calculated to be 168 and when the ratio of 1:1 [21] was considered the study then recruited 168 cases and 168 controls. Cases and controls were included after meeting inclusion criteria by being (i) less than 18 years of age; (ii) have performed brain CT scan. (iii) Accessibility and availability of quality CT scan image of patients. (iv) Presence of the biological mother for the birth and early infancy history. The exclusion criteria of the study involved (i) Individuals of 18 years and above. Children who were not born and raised in Northern Tanzania were excluded. The matching criteria involved age and sex. Case-control ratio of 1:1 with age interval of 2 years was considered. A radiologist examined the Brain CT-scan images, which evaluated sulcal width, lateral ventricular body width and the Evans index using the three familiar radiological linear procedures. Diagonal multi-linear (DBF) approach was calculated to identify the presence or absence of brain atrophy for those who qualified for the use of this technique [22]. The collection of data included questionnaires designed to assess the presence of 10 non- demographic categories of risk factors using primary information from mothers of children covering medical history from antenatal to adolescents, examination of obvious risk factors through image analysis such as tumors, intracranial pressure, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy as well as head injury was conducted (Fig 1). Additional data as age and sex were considered from hospitals data base. After parents’ approval, children whose results for HIV tests were not found were subjected to such tests. A: Volume rendering 3D CT scan image of a 3 months’ child with birth related head injury presenting with cephalohematoma at the vertex. B: Axial CT scan image of the same child A showing diffuse reduction in brain volume in cortical regions as evidenced by prominent sulci. C: Volume rendering 3D image of 1-year male child showing premature closure of the sagittal suture with overall increase in anterior-posterior diameter of the head(craniosynostosis). D: Sagittal CT brain image of the same child C showing loss of brain volume in the frontal lobes showing gross deviation from the calvarium with prominent CSF spaces. E: A 2 months’ female child presenting with diffuse reduction in cerebral hemispheric density sparing the cerebellum (White cerebella sign) representing hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy with early bi-temporal cerebral atrophy. F: A 4 months’ male child showing increased intracranial pressure evidenced by effacement of sulci and gyri as a result of ballooning of the lateral and 3rd ventricles. The 4th ventricle is small due to obstructive hydrocephalus following aquiductal stenosis. The descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage and graphical visualization (bar graphs) were produced. Some inferential statistics were also performed. A simple linear regression model was produced to assess the impact of risk factors such as head trauma, birth asphyxia among others toward the response variable (brain atrophy). The significant risk factors were then exported to the multiple linear regression analysis. All liner regression assumptions were checked including normality of the continuous variables. Shapiro-Wilk test and variance inflation factor (VIF) were used to check for normality and collinearity tests respectively. Variables with VIF above 10 were removed from the model otherwise they were retained in the model development. All tests were performed at 5% confidence level. Also, the coefficient of determination (R-square) was used to check for model goodness of fit. The R-statistical software version 4.0.1 was used for all analyses. For ethical approval of this study, the Northern Zone Health Research Ethics Committee (KNCHREC) was consulted, and a research permit number KNCHREC 0010 dated 20th December 2019 was obtained. Covering letters were then sent to each health facility, requesting permission to collect and use data from their archives within the parameters of this study at no additional cost. Once the study was explained to the participants, their parents or guardians freely consented to their participation by signing pre-written forms. Patients’ names and other personal identifiers were not recorded in order to maintain confidentiality. The retrospective data components were anonymized.

N/A

Based on the provided information, it seems that the focus of the study is on identifying risk factors for childhood brain volume loss, rather than improving access to maternal health. Therefore, it is not directly related to innovations for improving maternal health access. However, if you are looking for innovations to improve access to maternal health, here are a few potential recommendations:

1. Telemedicine: Implementing telemedicine services can improve access to maternal health by allowing pregnant women in remote or underserved areas to consult with healthcare professionals remotely. This can help overcome geographical barriers and provide timely medical advice and support.

2. Mobile health (mHealth) applications: Developing mobile applications that provide information, education, and reminders related to maternal health can empower women to take control of their own health. These apps can provide guidance on prenatal care, nutrition, exercise, and track important milestones during pregnancy.

3. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers who can provide basic maternal health services, education, and support in underserved areas can greatly improve access to care. These workers can conduct home visits, provide antenatal and postnatal care, and refer women to higher-level healthcare facilities when needed.

4. Maternal health clinics: Establishing dedicated maternal health clinics in areas with limited access to healthcare facilities can ensure that pregnant women have access to essential prenatal care, skilled birth attendants, and postnatal care. These clinics can also provide family planning services and education on reproductive health.

5. Public-private partnerships: Collaborations between public and private sectors can help improve access to maternal health services. This can involve leveraging private sector resources, such as clinics, hospitals, and transportation, to provide affordable and accessible maternal health services to underserved populations.

Remember, these recommendations are not directly related to the provided study on childhood brain volume loss, but they can be potential innovations to improve access to maternal health.
AI Innovations Description
The provided text does not contain information about improving access to maternal health. It focuses on a case-control study on childhood brain volume loss. If you have any specific questions or need assistance with a different topic, please let me know.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided description, the focus of the study is on identifying the factors that drive the occurrence of childhood brain volume loss (brain atrophy) using a case-control study design. The study aims to improve understanding of the risk factors associated with brain atrophy in children.

To improve access to maternal health, the following innovations could be considered:

1. Telemedicine: Implementing telemedicine services can provide remote access to maternal health care, allowing pregnant women to consult with healthcare professionals and receive necessary guidance and support without the need for physical visits to healthcare facilities.

2. Mobile health (mHealth) applications: Developing mobile applications that provide information and resources related to maternal health can empower women with knowledge and enable them to take proactive steps towards ensuring their own health and the health of their babies. These applications can provide information on prenatal care, nutrition, exercise, and other relevant topics.

3. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers who can provide basic maternal health services, education, and support in remote or underserved areas can help bridge the gap in access to maternal healthcare. These workers can conduct regular check-ups, provide health education, and facilitate referrals to higher-level healthcare facilities when necessary.

4. Maternal health clinics: Establishing dedicated maternal health clinics in areas with limited access to healthcare facilities can provide comprehensive care for pregnant women. These clinics can offer prenatal care, delivery services, postnatal care, and family planning services in one location, ensuring continuity of care throughout the pregnancy and beyond.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define the target population: Identify the specific population that will benefit from the innovations, such as pregnant women in rural areas or low-income communities.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather information on the current state of access to maternal health services in the target population, including factors such as distance to healthcare facilities, availability of healthcare professionals, and utilization rates of maternal health services.

3. Implement the innovations: Introduce the recommended innovations, such as telemedicine services, mobile health applications, community health workers, or maternal health clinics, in the target population. Ensure proper training and infrastructure are in place to support the implementation.

4. Monitor and evaluate: Track the utilization and impact of the innovations over a defined period of time. Collect data on metrics such as the number of telemedicine consultations, app downloads and usage, community health worker activities, and utilization rates of maternal health clinics.

5. Analyze the data: Analyze the collected data to assess the impact of the innovations on improving access to maternal health. Compare the utilization rates and outcomes before and after the implementation of the innovations to determine their effectiveness.

6. Adjust and refine: Based on the findings from the analysis, make adjustments and refinements to the innovations as needed. This could involve scaling up successful interventions, addressing any barriers or challenges identified, and continuously improving the delivery of maternal health services.

By following this methodology, it would be possible to simulate the impact of the recommended innovations on improving access to maternal health and make evidence-based decisions on their implementation and scalability.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email