Risk factors and practices contributing to newborn sepsis in a rural district of Eastern Uganda, August 2013: A cross sectional study

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Newborn deaths in Uganda accounted for a significant proportion of infant deaths in 2010.
– Newborn sepsis contributes to a high mortality rate among newborns.
– Improved strategies are needed to reduce newborn sepsis.
– Understanding the risk factors and practices contributing to newborn sepsis is crucial for developing and implementing effective interventions.
Highlights:
– 21.8% of newborns in the study had laboratory confirmed sepsis.
– Staphylococcus aureus was the most common cause of sepsis.
– Factors associated with increased likelihood of sepsis included mothers not screened and treated for infections during antenatal care, and inability of sick newborns to breastfeed.
– Lack of health education during antenatal care about care seeking and newborn danger signs was also associated with sepsis.
– Inadequate supply of antibiotics and sundries within the health facility hindered sepsis control.
Recommendations:
– Encourage women to attend health facility antenatal care to receive health education about alternative feeding practices, screening, and treatment for infections.
– District sensitization programs should focus on the importance of antenatal care and its role in preventing newborn sepsis.
– Improve the supply of antibiotics and sundries within health facilities to effectively control sepsis.
Key Role Players:
– District health authorities
– Health facility staff (midwives, nurses, clinical officers)
– District focal person for maternal and child health activities
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training and sensitization programs for health workers and district health authorities
– Procurement of antibiotics and sundries for health facilities
– Communication and outreach materials for district sensitization programs

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is relatively strong, but there are some areas for improvement. The study design is a cross-sectional study, which limits the ability to establish causality. Additionally, the sample size is relatively small, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. To improve the evidence, a larger sample size could be used to increase the statistical power and generalizability of the results. Additionally, a longitudinal study design could be considered to better understand the temporal relationship between risk factors and newborn sepsis. Finally, including a control group of healthy newborns could help to further establish the associations between risk factors and sepsis.

Background: In Uganda, newborn deaths constituted over 38 % of all infant deaths in 2010. Despite different mitigation interventions over years, the newborn mortality rate is high at 27/1,000 and newborn sepsis contributes to 31 % of that mortality. Therefore, improved strategies that contribute to reduction of newborn sepsis need to be developed and implemented. Understanding the context relevant risk factors that determine and practices contributing to newborn sepsis will inform this process. Methodology: A cross sectional study was conducted at Kidera Health Centre in Kidera Sub County, Buyende district between January and August 2013. A total of 174 mothers of sick newborns and 8 health workers were interviewed. Main outcome was newborn sepsis confirmed by blood culture. Independent variables included; mothers’ demographics characteristics, maternal care history and newborn care practices. The odds ratios were used to measure associations and Chi square or Fisher’s exact tests to test the associations. 95 % confidence intervals and P values for the odds ratios were determined. Logistic regression was conducted to identify predictor factors for newborn sepsis. Results: 21.8 % (38/174) of newborns had laboratory confirmed sepsis. Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest aetiological agent. Mothers not screened and treated for infections during antenatal (OR = 3.37; 95 % CI 1.23-9.22) plus inability of sick newborns to breast feed (OR = 3.9; 95 % CI 1.54-9.75) were factors associated with increased likelihood of having laboratory confirmed sepsis. Women not receiving health education during antenatal about care seeking (OR 2.22; 95 % CI 1.07-4.61) and newborn danger signs (OR 2.26; 95 % CI 1.08-4.71) was associated with laboratory confirmed newborn sepsis. The supply of antibiotics and sundries was inadequate to sufficiently control sepsis within health facility. Conclusion: Lack of antenatal care or access to it at health facilities was likely to later result in more sick newborns with sepsis. Poor breastfeeding by sick newborns was a marker for serious bacterial infection. Therefore district sensitization programs should encourage women to attend health facility antenatal care where they will receive health education about alternative feeding practices, screening and treatment for infections to prevent spread of infections to newborns. Supply of antibiotics and sundries should be improved to sufficiently control sepsis within the health facility.

This was a cross-sectional study conducted at Kidera Health centre between January and August 2013. Kidera Health Centre is a level four facility located in Kidera County, Buyende District Eastern Uganda. It is the main referral unit for Buyende District. The Health Centre serves the five counties in the district with an estimated population of 248,000 people. The study population was mother and sick newborn pairs admitted at the health facility during the study period. The sick newborns were those admitted with signs and symptoms of sepsis. The definition of neonatal sepsis was adopted from the International Paediatric Sepsis Consensus criteria (PSC) and the Intensive care chapter of Indian Academy of Paediatrics (IAP) [23, 24]. We excluded cases where mothers or newborns were too ill to participate because they had to be referred to Kamuli district hospital for emergency medical care. The estimated sample size using the formula by Kish Leslie (1965), assuming a prevalence of sick newborns with sepsis to be 37 % [25] and a maximum error of 5 % within a 95 % confidence interval was 183 mother and sick newborn pairs. The level of significance was set at p  0.05) were included in the final results. Qualitative data from key informant interviews were transcribed, coded, analysed and separated into themes. It was triangulated with the findings from the questionnaires to gain a deeper understanding of the information observed. The ethical approval was obtained from Makerere University School of Public Health Institutional Review Board, the Higher Degrees and Ethics Committee and the National Council of Science and Technology. Buyende District health authorities and in-charge of Kidera health centre were asked for permission to use their facilities. Informed written consent was obtained from all the participants after explaining the risks and benefits of the study before they were interviewed. We used anonymous identifiers on the questionnaires to ensure privacy of the participants. All the members of the study team complied with good clinical practices.

N/A

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could be recommended to improve access to maternal health:

1. Strengthening Antenatal Care: Implementing strategies to ensure that all pregnant women have access to antenatal care, including regular screenings and treatment for infections. This could involve increasing the number of health facilities that provide antenatal care services and training healthcare providers on the importance of early detection and treatment of infections during pregnancy.

2. Health Education: Developing and implementing comprehensive health education programs for pregnant women, focusing on care-seeking behaviors and recognizing newborn danger signs. This could involve providing information through community outreach programs, mobile health clinics, and educational materials in local languages.

3. Alternative Feeding Practices: Providing education and support for alternative feeding practices for sick newborns who are unable to breastfeed. This could include training healthcare providers on safe and appropriate feeding methods, as well as providing resources and supplies for alternative feeding options.

4. Strengthening Supply Chains: Improving the availability and accessibility of antibiotics and other necessary supplies for the treatment of newborn sepsis within health facilities. This could involve strengthening supply chains, improving storage and distribution systems, and ensuring that health facilities have adequate stock of essential medicines and supplies.

5. District Sensitization Programs: Implementing district-wide sensitization programs to encourage pregnant women to attend health facility antenatal care. These programs could include community meetings, radio broadcasts, and other communication channels to raise awareness about the importance of antenatal care and the services available at health facilities.

By implementing these innovations, it is hoped that access to maternal health services will be improved, leading to a reduction in newborn sepsis and overall improvement in maternal and newborn health outcomes.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the findings of the study, the following recommendations can be made to improve access to maternal health and reduce newborn sepsis:

1. Strengthen antenatal care: Ensure that all pregnant women have access to antenatal care services at health facilities. This includes regular screenings and treatment for infections during pregnancy. Health education should be provided to pregnant women about care-seeking behaviors and newborn danger signs.

2. Improve breastfeeding practices: Promote and support exclusive breastfeeding for sick newborns. Provide education to mothers on the importance of breastfeeding and alternative feeding practices when breastfeeding is not possible.

3. Enhance health facility capacity: Ensure an adequate supply of antibiotics and other necessary resources to effectively control sepsis within health facilities. This includes providing training to health workers on proper diagnosis and treatment of newborn sepsis.

4. District sensitization programs: Implement district-level programs to raise awareness among women about the importance of attending antenatal care and seeking appropriate healthcare services. These programs should emphasize the prevention and management of infections during pregnancy to prevent the spread of infections to newborns.

By implementing these recommendations, access to maternal health can be improved, leading to a reduction in newborn sepsis and ultimately a decrease in newborn mortality rates.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations for improving access to maternal health:

1. Strengthen antenatal care: Ensure that all pregnant women have access to regular antenatal care, including screening and treatment for infections. This can help prevent the spread of infections to newborns and reduce the likelihood of newborn sepsis.

2. Improve health education: Provide comprehensive health education to pregnant women during antenatal care visits, focusing on care-seeking behaviors and recognizing newborn danger signs. This can empower women to seek timely and appropriate care for themselves and their newborns.

3. Promote breastfeeding practices: Encourage and support breastfeeding, especially for sick newborns. Breastfeeding can help prevent serious bacterial infections and improve overall health outcomes for newborns.

4. Enhance supply of antibiotics and sundries: Ensure that health facilities have an adequate supply of antibiotics and other necessary medical supplies to effectively control sepsis. This can help improve the quality of care provided within the health facility.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Define the target population: Determine the specific population that will be affected by the recommendations, such as pregnant women in a particular region or district.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current access to maternal health services, including antenatal care utilization, rates of newborn sepsis, and availability of antibiotics and medical supplies.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a mathematical model that incorporates the various factors influencing access to maternal health, such as antenatal care attendance, health education, breastfeeding practices, and availability of antibiotics. This model should consider the interplay between these factors and their potential impact on reducing newborn sepsis.

4. Input data and parameters: Input the baseline data and relevant parameters into the simulation model. This may include data on population size, healthcare infrastructure, and the effectiveness of interventions.

5. Run simulations: Use the simulation model to project the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This can involve running multiple scenarios with different combinations of interventions and analyzing the outcomes.

6. Analyze results: Evaluate the results of the simulations to determine the potential effectiveness of the recommendations in improving access to maternal health. This may include assessing changes in antenatal care utilization, rates of newborn sepsis, and other relevant indicators.

7. Refine and validate the model: Continuously refine and validate the simulation model based on new data and feedback from stakeholders. This will help ensure the accuracy and reliability of the model’s predictions.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare providers can gain insights into the potential impact of implementing the recommended interventions and make informed decisions to improve access to maternal health.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email