Epidemiology of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli infections and associated outcomes in the MAL-ED birth cohort

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aims to investigate the risk factors for enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) infections in young children and their associations with diarrhea, intestinal inflammation, and growth outcomes.
– EAEC infections have been increasingly recognized as enteric pathogens in children, and understanding their impact is important for public health interventions.
– The study provides valuable insights into the potential long-term consequences of early exposure to EAEC and the role of exclusive breastfeeding in preventing these infections.
Study Highlights:
– The study found that asymptomatic EAEC infections were common in early childhood, with almost all children having at least one detection by two years of age.
– Exclusive breastfeeding, higher enrollment weight, and macrolide use within the preceding 15 days were found to be protective against EAEC infections.
– Although EAEC infections were not associated with diarrhea, they were weakly associated with biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and more strongly associated with reduced length at two years of age.
– The findings suggest that increasing the duration of exclusive breastfeeding may help prevent potentially inflammatory EAEC infections and reduce the long-term impact on growth.
Study Recommendations:
– Promote and support exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life to reduce the risk of EAEC infections and associated growth shortfalls.
– Raise awareness among healthcare providers and caregivers about the potential impact of EAEC infections on long-term growth outcomes.
– Further research is needed to explore the mechanisms through which EAEC infections affect growth and to develop targeted interventions to mitigate their impact.
Key Role Players:
– Researchers and scientists specializing in epidemiology, microbiology, and child health.
– Public health officials and policymakers responsible for implementing interventions to improve child health.
– Healthcare providers and community health workers involved in promoting and supporting exclusive breastfeeding.
– Caregivers and parents who play a crucial role in providing optimal nutrition and care for young children.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Research funding for further studies on the mechanisms and interventions related to EAEC infections.
– Resources for training healthcare providers and community health workers on the importance of exclusive breastfeeding and strategies to promote it.
– Development and dissemination of educational materials for caregivers and parents on the prevention and management of EAEC infections.
– Monitoring and evaluation of interventions to assess their effectiveness and make necessary adjustments.
– Collaboration and coordination among different stakeholders to ensure a comprehensive approach to addressing EAEC infections and their impact on child growth.

Background: Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) have been associated with mildly inflammatory diarrhea in outbreaks and in travelers and have been increasingly recognized as enteric pathogens in young children with and without overt diarrhea. We examined the risk factors for EAEC infections and their associations with environmental enteropathy biomarkers and growth outcomes over the first two years of life in eight low-resource settings of the MAL-ED study. Methods: EAEC infections were detected by PCR gene probes for aatA and aaiC virulence traits in 27,094 non-diarrheal surveillance stools and 7,692 diarrheal stools from 2,092 children in the MAL-ED birth cohort. We identified risk factors for EAEC and estimated the associations of EAEC with diarrhea, enteropathy biomarker concentrations, and both short-term (one to three months) and long-term growth (to two years of age). Results: Overall, 9,581 samples (27.5%) were positive for EAEC, and almost all children had at least one detection (94.8%) by two years of age. Exclusive breastfeeding, higher enrollment weight, and macrolide use within the preceding 15 days were protective. Although not associated with diarrhea, EAEC infections were weakly associated with biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and more strongly with reduced length at two years of age (LAZ difference associated with high frequency of EAEC detections: -0.30, 95% CI: -0.44, -0.16). Conclusions: Asymptomatic EAEC infections were common early in life and were associated with linear growth shortfalls. Associations with intestinal inflammation were small in magnitude, but suggest a pathway for the growth impact. Increasing the duration of exclusive breastfeeding may help prevent these potentially inflammatory infections and reduce the long-term impact of early exposure to EAEC.

The study design and methods of the MAL-ED study have been extensively described [30]. Briefly, children were enrolled within 17 days of birth and followed until two years of age at eight sites: Dhaka, Bangladesh (BGD), Vellore, India (INV), Bhaktapur, Nepal (NEB), Naushahro Feroze, Pakistan (PKN), Fortaleza, Brazil (BRF), Loreto, Peru (PEL), Venda, South Africa (SAV), and Haydom, Tanzania (TZH). Non-diarrheal surveillance stool samples were collected monthly and diarrheal stool samples were collected during 94% of diarrhea episodes identified by active surveillance at twice weekly home visits. Diarrhea was defined as maternal report of three or more loose stools in 24 hours or one stool with visible blood [31]. Monthly surveillance stool samples in the first year of life, quarterly stool samples in the second year of life, and all diarrheal stool samples were tested for more than 50 enteropathogens [32] and stool biomarkers of environmental enteropathy: α-1-antitrypsin (ALA), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and neopterin (NEO) [33]. For EAEC specifically, we picked and pooled five lactose-fermenting colonies resembling E. coli, and characterized them for virulence genes using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Presence of the enteroaggregative E. coli pathotype was defined by amplification of either the aatA or aaiC virulence genes (or both) [32], such that detected EAEC were heterogeneous with respect to virulence gene content. Results were consistent when requiring the presence of both aatA and aaiC to define EAEC. We included all stool samples that were tested for EAEC in this analysis even if they were not tested for the full suite of other pathogens. Fieldworkers also collected information on other illnesses, medicines, and feeding practices at home visits. Sociodemographic information was collected by questionnaire biannually and summarized using a construct of access to improved water and sanitation (as defined by WHO guidelines [34]), wealth measured by eight assets, years of maternal education, and average monthly household income (Water, Assets, Maternal education, and Income, WAMI) [35]. Plasma α-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP), a marker of systemic inflammation, was measured at 7, 15, and 24 months. Urinary lactulose:mannitol excretion ratios were measured at 3, 6, 9 and 15 months and converted into a sample-based z-score (LMZ) using the Fortaleza, Brazil cohort as the internal reference population [36]. Weight and length were measured monthly and converted into weight-for-age (WAZ) and length-for-age (LAZ) z-scores using the 2006 WHO child growth standards [37]. Length measurements from Pakistan were excluded due to measurement quality concerns. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Health Sciences Research, University of Virginia, USA as well as the respective governmental, local institutional, and collaborating institutional ethical review boards at each site: Ethical Review Committee, ICDDR,B (BGD); Committee for Ethics in Research, Universidade Federal do Ceara; National Ethical Research Committee, Health Ministry, Council of National Health (BRF); Institutional Review Board, Christian Medical College, Vellore; Health Ministry Screening Committee, Indian Council of Medical Research (INV); Institutional Review Board, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University; Ethical Review Board, Nepal Health Research Council; Institutional Review Board, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (NEB); Institutional Review Board, Johns Hopkins University; PRISMA Ethics Committee; Health Ministry, Loreto (PEL); Ethical Review Committee, Aga Khan University (PKN); Health, Safety and Research Ethics Committee, University of Venda; Department of Health and Social Development, Limpopo Provincial Government (SAV); Medical Research Coordinating Committee, National Institute for Medical Research; Chief Medical Officer, Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (TZH). Informed written consent was obtained from the parent or guardian of each participating child on their behalf. We identified risk factors for EAEC detection in surveillance stools using log-binomial regression with general estimating equations (GEE) and robust variance to account for correlation between stools within children, adjusting for site and a restricted quadratic spline [38] for age. Variables were assessed individually in this model and were included in the multivariable model if statistically significant (p<0.05). We estimated the association between EAEC and diarrheal versus non-diarrheal stools using Poisson regression with the robust variance estimator to estimate risk ratios [39] since log-binomial models did not converge, adjusting for the age spline, site, the interaction between age and site, and antibiotic use within the preceding 15 days. We then estimated the association between EAEC detection and stool biomarker concentrations (ALA, MPO, and NEO) on the logarithmic scale in the same stool using multivariable linear regression with GEE and robust variance to account for correlation between stools within children. We also estimated the association of EAEC detection with serum and urine biomarkers (AGP and LMZ, respectively) measured in the same month as the stool collection. Because Campylobacter was the most common pathogen detected in stools and has been previously shown to be associated with intestinal inflammation in the MAL-ED cohort [40,41], we assessed potential interactions between the effects of EAEC and Campylobacter on MPO by including an interaction term between presence of EAEC and Campylobacter. All estimates were adjusted for site, the age spline, sex, WAMI, percent exclusive breastfeeding in previous month, contemporary presence of Campylobacter in the stool sample, and a qualitative description of stool consistency (for stool biomarkers only). Finally, we estimated the association between EAEC detection and short-term and long-term growth using multivariable linear regression. Short-term growth was defined by the change in WAZ and LAZ over both the one and three months following each monthly stool collection. We compared differences in short-term growth velocity between children who had surveillance stools with and without EAEC detection, using GEE and adjusting for site, age, sex, WAMI, percent exclusive breastfeeding in the exposure month, and detection of Campylobacter in the stool. We further assessed the interaction between MPO levels and EAEC positivity to explore the role of intestinal inflammation in the potential effect of EAEC on short-term growth impairment. In the adjusted short-term growth models examining WAZ and LAZ velocity over the one and three months following EAEC testing, we estimated the additive interaction effect of EAEC detection and high MPO concentration in the same stool using an interaction term. High MPO was defined as an MPO concentration in the highest quartile on the logarithmic scale among all non-diarrheal stools collected at that child’s site and 3-month age period. Values defining high MPO (range: 2,515–33,190 ng/mL) were higher than previous reports from non-tropical settings (<2,000 ng/mL) [42]. Effects on long-term growth were then estimated as the total difference in size at two years of age as a function of the percent surveillance stools positive for EAEC. The long-term model was adjusted for the WAZ and LAZ measurements at enrollment (within 17 days of birth), site, sex, WAMI, the age at which exclusive breastfeeding first stopped, and the percent surveillance stools positive for Campylobacter in the first 2 years of life. Adjusting for the same covariates, we assessed the potential synergistic interaction between the effects of EAEC and Campylobacter on growth at 2 years given that both have been associated with gut inflammation, by including an interaction term between an indicator for a high frequency of detection (at least 50% surveillance stools positive) of EAEC and an indicator for a high frequency of detection of Campylobacter. We also repeated the model described above, but focused on EAEC detections in specific age periods (1–6, 7–12, and 15–24 months) and growth outcomes at 2 years to assess if there were specific age periods of susceptibility.

N/A

Based on the provided information, it is difficult to identify specific innovations for improving access to maternal health. The text primarily focuses on the epidemiology of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) infections and their associations with various health outcomes in young children. To recommend innovations for improving access to maternal health, it would be helpful to have more information specifically related to maternal health and the challenges faced in accessing maternal healthcare services.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the information provided, the recommendation to improve access to maternal health is to increase the duration of exclusive breastfeeding. The study found that exclusive breastfeeding, higher enrollment weight, and macrolide use within the preceding 15 days were protective against EAEC infections. Asymptomatic EAEC infections were common early in life and were associated with linear growth shortfalls. Increasing the duration of exclusive breastfeeding may help prevent these potentially inflammatory infections and reduce the long-term impact of early exposure to EAEC.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided description, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Strengthening healthcare infrastructure: Investing in healthcare facilities, equipment, and trained healthcare professionals in low-resource settings can improve access to maternal health services. This includes establishing well-equipped maternity clinics and hospitals, ensuring availability of essential medicines and supplies, and training healthcare workers to provide quality maternal care.

2. Community-based interventions: Implementing community-based interventions can help improve access to maternal health services, especially in remote areas. This can involve training community health workers to provide basic antenatal and postnatal care, conducting health education sessions for pregnant women and their families, and organizing mobile clinics to reach underserved populations.

3. Telemedicine and digital health solutions: Utilizing telemedicine and digital health solutions can help overcome geographical barriers and improve access to maternal health services. This can involve providing remote consultations, telemonitoring of high-risk pregnancies, and delivering health information and reminders through mobile apps or SMS.

4. Maternal health insurance schemes: Implementing maternal health insurance schemes can help reduce financial barriers to accessing maternal healthcare. This can involve providing subsidized or free maternal health services, including antenatal care, delivery, and postnatal care, to women enrolled in the insurance scheme.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define the target population: Identify the specific population group or geographic area that will be the focus of the simulation. This could be a specific region, country, or community.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather relevant data on the current status of maternal health access in the target population. This could include information on healthcare infrastructure, availability of services, utilization rates, and health outcomes related to maternal health.

3. Define indicators: Determine the key indicators that will be used to measure the impact of the recommendations. This could include indicators such as the number of women accessing antenatal care, the percentage of deliveries attended by skilled birth attendants, maternal mortality rates, and other relevant indicators.

4. Develop a simulation model: Create a simulation model that incorporates the baseline data and the potential impact of the recommendations. This could involve using mathematical modeling techniques to estimate the changes in the selected indicators based on the implementation of the recommendations.

5. Run simulations: Use the simulation model to run different scenarios that represent the implementation of the recommendations. This could involve varying parameters such as the scale of implementation, the coverage of the interventions, and the time frame for implementation.

6. Analyze results: Analyze the results of the simulations to assess the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This could involve comparing the indicators before and after the implementation of the recommendations, as well as comparing different scenarios to identify the most effective strategies.

7. Validate and refine the model: Validate the simulation model by comparing the simulated results with real-world data, if available. Refine the model based on feedback and further analysis to improve its accuracy and reliability.

8. Communicate findings: Present the findings of the simulation study in a clear and concise manner, highlighting the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This can help inform decision-making and policy development in the field of maternal health.

It is important to note that the methodology for simulating the impact of recommendations on improving access to maternal health may vary depending on the specific context and available data.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email