Niger’s child survival success, contributing factors and challenges to sustainability: A retrospective analysis

listen audio

Study Justification:
This study aims to analyze the factors contributing to Niger’s success in reducing child mortality and explore the challenges to sustaining these improvements. The study is important because it provides insights into the effectiveness of child survival policies and programs, identifies high-impact interventions, and highlights the need for continued investment in maternal and child health.
Study Highlights:
– Niger has experienced a significant decline in under-5 mortality, with the national mortality rate decreasing from 286 child deaths per 1000 live births in 1989-1990 to 128 child deaths per 1000 live births in 2011-2012.
– Improvements in the coverage of maternal and child health interventions have played a crucial role in reducing childhood deaths.
– Key interventions that have had the largest impact on deaths averted include decreases in stunting rates, increases in oral rehydration salts (ORS) usage, the Hib vaccine, and breastfeeding.
– Community-level care seeking has also contributed to reducing child mortality, with an estimated 7,800 additional deaths averted in 2012.
– The introduction of free health care provision for women and children in 2006 and the establishment of a community health worker program in 2008 have been instrumental in improving access to care.
Study Recommendations:
– Sustain and strengthen the free health care provision for women and children to ensure continued access to essential health services.
– Expand and improve the community health worker program to further enhance care-seeking at the community level.
– Address the challenges posed by persistently high fertility rates, unpredictable GDP growth, dependence on donor support, and increasing pressures on government funding to ensure the sustainability of child survival efforts.
Key Role Players:
– Government of Niger: Responsible for policy formulation, resource allocation, and implementation of child survival programs.
– Ministry of Health: Oversees the delivery of health services and coordinates with other stakeholders.
– Community Health Workers: Provide essential health services at the community level and play a crucial role in improving access to care.
– Donor Organizations: Provide financial and technical support to strengthen child survival programs.
– Civil Society Organizations: Advocate for improved maternal and child health and play a role in community mobilization and awareness.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Funding for free health care provision: Budget allocation for ensuring the availability of essential health services to women and children.
– Investment in community health worker program: Resources for training, supervision, and support of community health workers.
– Infrastructure and equipment: Funding for the establishment and maintenance of health posts and other health facilities.
– Health education and awareness campaigns: Budget for community mobilization, behavior change communication, and health promotion activities.
– Monitoring and evaluation: Resources for data collection, analysis, and reporting to track progress and identify areas for improvement.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong, as it includes data from nationally representative household surveys and uses the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) to estimate the number of child lives saved. The abstract also provides specific details on the interventions that had the largest impact on deaths averted. However, to improve the evidence, the abstract could include more information on the methodology used for data analysis and the limitations of the study.

Background: Household surveys undertaken in Niger since 1998 have revealed steady declines in under-5 mortality which have placed the country ‘on track’ to reach the fourth Millennium Development goal (MDG). This paper explores Niger’s mortality and health coverage data for children under-5 years of age up to 2012 to describe trends in high impact interventions and the resulting impact on childhood deaths averted. The sustainability of these trends are also considered. Methods and Findings: Estimates of child mortality using the 2012 Demographic and Health Survey were developed and maternal and child health coverage indicators were calculated over four time periods. Child survival policies and programmes were documented through a review of documents and key informant interviews. The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) was used to estimate the number of child lives saved and identify which interventions had the largest impact on deaths averted. The national mortality rate in children under-5 decreased from 286 child deaths per 1000 live births (95% confidence interval 177 to 394) in the period 1989-1990 to 128 child deaths per 1000 live births in the period 2011-2012 (101 to 155), corresponding to an annual rate of decline of 3.6%, with significant declines taking place after 1998. Improvements in the coverage of maternal and child health interventions between 2006 and 2012 include one and four or more antenatal visits, maternal Fansidar and tetanus toxoid vaccination, measles and DPT3 vaccinations, early and exclusive breastfeeding, oral rehydration salts (ORS) and proportion of children sleeping under an insecticide-treated bed net (ITN). Approximately 26,000 deaths of children under-5 were averted in 2012 due to decreases in stunting rates (27%), increases in ORS (14%), the Hib vaccine (14%), and breastfeeding (11%). Increases in wasting and decreases in vitamin A supplementation negated some of those gains. Care seeking at the community level was responsible for an estimated 7,800 additional deaths averted in 2012. A major policy change occurred in 2006 enabling free health care provision for women and children, and in 2008 the establishment of a community health worker programme. Conclusion: Increases in access and coverage of care for mothers and children have averted a considerable number of childhood deaths. The 2006 free health care policy and health post expansion were paramount in reducing barriers to care. However the sustainability of this policy and health service provision is precarious in light of persistently high fertility rates, unpredictable GDP growth, a high dependence on donor support and increasing pressures on government funding.

The evaluation included all nationally representative household survey datasets available: 2000 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) [21], 2006 DHS [22], 2010 Survival and Mortality Survey [23], and 2012 DHS [24]. The 1998 DHS collected data only for children up to 3 years of age, and was therefore excluded from this analysis for comparability purposes, as many of the indicators that were analysed across survey years included children up to 5 years of age. Estimates of intervention coverage at population level from the 2006 and 2012 DHS were used as inputs to the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) to model the overall estimated lives saved as well as the additional independent impact of care seeking at the community level on deaths averted. Birth and death history data of all children of women aged 15 to 49 years sampled in the 2012 DHS was used to calculate under-5 mortality. Full survey datasets with district sampling weights were used for the analysis. For further details on the surveys included in the analysis see Table A in S1 File. Adjustments were made to align indicator definitions across the DHS, MICS and 2010 Survival and Mortality surveys (S1 File: Additional methods information). Contextual information about child health policies, CI/IHSS implementation and other relevant child health programmes was obtained through a desk review of documents and databases, and key informant interviews conducted during a 10-day country visit (April 2013). The information gathered from these sources was used to compile a policy and programme timeline (Fig 1). For further details on the contextual analysis see Box B in S1 File. For under-5 mortality estimation, we used a direct method based on the synthetic cohort approach [25, 26]. Age-specific mortality probabilities for narrow age ranges and defined periods were calculated using death events and exposures. These probabilities were combined to compute the probability that a child has not died before reaching age 5 years. Two year periods were used beginning with two years before the survey, and survival probabilities were calculated over age ranges; 0, 1–2, 3–5, 6–11, 12–23, 24–35, 36–47, 48–59 months as recommended by DHS (S1 File: Mortality analysis) [26]. The standard errors for the computed mortality estimates were obtained using the Jackknife variance estimation, a repeated sampling method [25]. A series of mortality estimates were obtained by deleting and replacing each primary sampling unit; this produced a sample of under-5 estimates, from which the variance was computed in turn. For more information see see S1 File: Mortality analysis. All relevant coverage indicators from each survey dataset were calculated using standard definitions for tracking progress towards MDG 4 [27]. Anthropometric indicators including stunting and wasting in children under-5 years of age were calculated from raw survey data using the 2006 WHO child growth standards. For stunting and wasting, moderate and severe forms were aggregated. Significant differences in coverage of pertinent indicators between survey years were determined based on the overlap in the 95% confidence intervals around the estimates. Changes in care-seeking patterns were also analysed, with a particular focus on community level care-seeking. Data relating to care sought and received for fever, suspected pneumonia and diarrhoea were extracted from available surveys. The sampling design of these household surveys such as regional and rural/urban stratification, clustering at enumeration areas and sampling weights (due to non-proportional sampling) were taken into account. Stata (version 12) was used for coverage and mortality trend analyses. The retrospective LiST analysis investigated the extent to which changes in mortality could be associated with changes in intervention coverage between 2006 and 2012. Annual coverage values were interpolated linearly between the 2006 and 2012 household survey data points, using only DHS to maintain comparability of sources. In this analysis, anthropometric data were entered directly into the model in order to calculate deaths averted due to decreases in stunting and wasting rates. LiST methods and inputs have been widely published [28–30]. Further details on the LiST analysis can be found in S1 File: Additional details regarding the LiST analysis. To quantify the impact of increased health access through community level services on child mortality, we used LiST to estimate the deaths averted between 2006 and 2012 from all care-seeking for childhood illness at appropriate providers (i.e. not including pharmacies, shops and traditional practitioners), using methods described in detail elsewhere [31]. We compared this with a scenario where care-seeking at community level (i.e. from ASCs and health posts) was removed from the coverage estimates in order to determine the number of lives saved that could be attributed to the introduction of community level services. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the South African Medical Research Council (EC026-9/2012). Approval was also provided by the UNICEF Niger country office. Data for the analysis of intervention coverage and mortality was taken from secondary sources (nationally representative household surveys) which are anonymized and de-identified prior to public release.

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could be considered to improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile health clinics: Implementing mobile health clinics that travel to remote areas, providing maternal health services and education to women who may not have easy access to healthcare facilities.

2. Telemedicine: Utilizing telemedicine technology to connect pregnant women in rural areas with healthcare professionals, allowing them to receive prenatal care and consultations remotely.

3. Community health worker programs: Expanding and strengthening community health worker programs, as they have been shown to be effective in improving access to maternal health services, especially in rural areas.

4. Maternal health vouchers: Introducing maternal health vouchers that can be used by women to access essential maternal health services, such as antenatal care, skilled birth attendance, and postnatal care.

5. Public-private partnerships: Collaborating with private healthcare providers to increase the availability and accessibility of maternal health services, particularly in underserved areas.

6. Health education campaigns: Implementing targeted health education campaigns to raise awareness about the importance of maternal health and encourage women to seek timely and appropriate care during pregnancy and childbirth.

7. Improving transportation infrastructure: Investing in transportation infrastructure, such as roads and ambulances, to ensure that pregnant women can reach healthcare facilities quickly and safely in case of emergencies.

8. Maternity waiting homes: Establishing maternity waiting homes near healthcare facilities to accommodate pregnant women who live far away, allowing them to stay closer to the facility as they approach their due dates.

9. Task-shifting and training: Training and empowering non-specialist healthcare providers, such as nurses and midwives, to provide a wider range of maternal health services, thereby increasing the availability of skilled care.

10. Strengthening health systems: Investing in the overall strengthening of health systems, including improving infrastructure, ensuring the availability of essential medicines and supplies, and enhancing the capacity of healthcare workers, to provide comprehensive and quality maternal health services.

It is important to note that the specific context and needs of Niger should be taken into consideration when implementing any of these innovations.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the information provided, the recommendation to improve access to maternal health in Niger is to focus on the following strategies:

1. Strengthening maternal and child health interventions: Continue to improve the coverage and quality of key interventions such as antenatal care, vaccination, breastfeeding, and access to insecticide-treated bed nets. These interventions have shown significant impact on reducing childhood deaths.

2. Enhancing community-level care: Invest in expanding and strengthening community health worker programs and health posts. These community-level services have played a crucial role in reducing barriers to care and have contributed to saving additional lives.

3. Ensuring sustainability: Address the challenges related to sustainability, such as high fertility rates, unpredictable GDP growth, and dependence on donor support. Develop strategies to increase government funding for maternal and child health services to ensure long-term sustainability.

4. Monitoring and evaluation: Continuously monitor and evaluate the impact of interventions and programs to identify areas for improvement and ensure that resources are allocated effectively. Use tools like the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) to estimate the number of lives saved and identify the interventions with the largest impact on reducing childhood deaths.

By implementing these recommendations, Niger can further improve access to maternal health and continue its progress towards achieving the Millennium Development Goal of reducing child mortality.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations for improving access to maternal health:

1. Strengthen community-level care: Expand and enhance community health worker programs to provide essential maternal health services, including antenatal care, postnatal care, and family planning. This can help reach women in remote areas who may have limited access to healthcare facilities.

2. Improve transportation infrastructure: Invest in improving transportation infrastructure, such as roads and transportation systems, to ensure that pregnant women can easily access healthcare facilities for prenatal and postnatal care, as well as emergency obstetric services.

3. Increase awareness and education: Implement comprehensive maternal health education programs to raise awareness about the importance of prenatal and postnatal care, family planning, and safe delivery practices. This can help empower women to make informed decisions about their health and seek appropriate care.

4. Strengthen health systems: Invest in strengthening healthcare systems, including training healthcare providers, improving healthcare facilities, and ensuring the availability of essential medicines and supplies for maternal health services.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define indicators: Identify key indicators to measure the impact of the recommendations, such as the number of women receiving antenatal care, the number of facility-based deliveries, and maternal mortality rates.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current status of maternal health access, including the number of women accessing antenatal care, the number of facility-based deliveries, and maternal mortality rates.

3. Model the impact: Use modeling tools, such as the Lives Saved Tool (LiST), to simulate the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This tool can estimate the number of lives saved and identify which interventions have the largest impact on reducing maternal mortality.

4. Input data: Input data on the implementation of the recommendations, such as the expansion of community health worker programs, improvements in transportation infrastructure, and the implementation of maternal health education programs.

5. Analyze results: Analyze the results of the simulation to determine the projected impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This can include estimating the number of additional women accessing antenatal care, the increase in facility-based deliveries, and the reduction in maternal mortality rates.

6. Monitor and evaluate: Continuously monitor and evaluate the implementation of the recommendations to assess their effectiveness and make any necessary adjustments. This can involve collecting data on key indicators and comparing them to the baseline data to measure progress.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare providers can gain insights into the potential impact of different recommendations on improving access to maternal health and make informed decisions about resource allocation and program implementation.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email