Social stratification, diet diversity and malnutrition among preschoolers: A survey of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aims to assess diet diversity and malnutrition in preschoolers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
– It seeks to evaluate the relative importance of socioeconomic resources in relation to diet and different forms of malnutrition.
– The study addresses the double burden of malnutrition, with both undernutrition (stunting, wasting) and overnutrition (overweight/obesity) prevalent among preschoolers.
– It recognizes the limited knowledge about the stratification and relative importance of socioeconomic drivers to diet and malnutrition in the region.
Highlights:
– The prevalence of stunting was 19.6%, wasting was 3.2%, and overweight/obesity was 11.4% among preschoolers in Addis Ababa.
– Stunting, overweight, wasting, and limited diet diversity were present in all social strata.
– Low maternal education was associated with an increased risk of stunting and limited diet diversity, but reduced odds of being overweight.
– The study emphasizes the need for interventions that promote diet quality for the undernourished while addressing the problem of being overweight.
Recommendations:
– Implement interventions that improve diet quality for undernourished preschoolers.
– Develop strategies to address the growing problem of overweight and obesity among preschoolers.
– Focus on improving maternal education as an important factor in reducing stunting and improving diet diversity.
– Consider socioeconomic factors, such as household wealth and food security, in designing interventions to address malnutrition.
Key Role Players:
– Researchers and experts in nutrition and public health.
– Government officials and policymakers in Ethiopia.
– Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working in the field of nutrition and child health.
– Community leaders and local healthcare providers.
– Educators and teachers involved in early childhood development.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Research and data collection expenses, including personnel salaries, training, and travel.
– Development and implementation of intervention programs, including education materials, training workshops, and monitoring and evaluation.
– Collaboration and coordination costs with government agencies, NGOs, and community organizations.
– Communication and awareness campaigns to promote the importance of nutrition and healthy eating.
– Infrastructure and equipment costs, such as setting up nutrition centers or improving existing healthcare facilities.
– Ongoing monitoring and evaluation of interventions to assess their effectiveness and make necessary adjustments.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong because it is based on a cross-sectional population-based survey covering the entire city of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The study included a large sample size of 5467 households with children under five. Standardized tools and procedures were used to collect data on diet, anthropometry, and socio-economic factors. Multivariable analysis with cluster adjustment was performed. The study provides prevalence rates of stunting, wasting, and overweight/obesity among preschoolers in Addis Ababa. It also identifies low maternal education as an important explanatory factor for stunting and being overweight. To improve the evidence, future studies could consider using a longitudinal design to establish causality and explore other potential factors contributing to malnutrition among preschoolers.

In Sub-Saharan Africa, being overweight in childhood is rapidly rising while stunting is still remaining at unacceptable levels. A key contributor to this double burden of malnutrition is dietary changes associated with nutrition transition. Although the importance of socio-economic drivers is known, there is limited knowledge about their stratification and relative importance to diet and to different forms of malnutrition. The aim of this study was to assess diet diversity and malnutrition in preschoolers and evaluate the relative importance of socioeconomic resources. Households with children under five (5467) were enrolled using a multi-stage sampling procedure. Standardized tools and procedures were used to collect data on diet, anthropometry and socio-economic factors. Multivariable analysis with cluster adjustment was performed. The prevalence of stunting was 19.6% (18.5–20.6), wasting 3.2% (2.8–3.7), and overweight/obesity 11.4% (10.6–12.2). Stunting, overweight, wasting and limited diet diversity was present in all social strata. Low maternal education was associated with an increased risk of stunting (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.8; 1.4–2.2), limited diet diversity (AOR: 0.33; 0.26–0.42) and reduced odds of being overweight (AOR: 0.61; 0.44–0.84). Preschoolers in Addis Ababa have limited quality diets and suffer from both under-and over-nutrition. Maternal education was an important explanatory factor for stunting and being overweight. Interventions that promote diet quality for the undernourished whilst also addressing the burgeoning problem of being overweight are needed.

This study is a cross-sectional population-based survey covering the entire city of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiopia is the second-most populous country in Africa, and the fastest-growing economy in the region [29]. Currently, the urban population constitutes 16% of the country’s population and is expected to double by 2037 [30]. Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia, has an estimated 3.4 million inhabitants [31] and is home to one-fourth of the countries urban population [32]. Despite the city being the main hub for economic activity, contributing approximately 50% towards the national GDP, it faces many challenges: high rates of unemployment (23.5%), poor housing conditions, and severe inequalities among the socio-economic strata [28,32]. The city is administratively divided into 10 sub-cities and each sub-city has 10–15 woredas (districts). This study covered all 116 woredas using a multi-stage sampling strategy; first, each woreda was divided spatially into five equal sections to serve as a cluster, of which one was selected using a computer-generated simple random sampling. In each cluster, guided by an interval of every third household, the team visited 60 households. All households that had at least one child under the age of five years and a caregiver/mother who consented to participate were included in the study. Mothers who were not available after three consecutive visits were deemed ineligible. Anthropometric measurements were taken from all children under five in the selected household. For the dietary assessment, one child from each household was selected. If the household had more than one eligible child, one was randomly selected to serve as a reference (index); this was enabled through the Open Data Kit (ODK) software on tablets. Data collection for this study was based on two rounds of population-based surveys. The first round of collection took place during the wet season, reflecting a lean period, and the second round took place during the dry season, reflecting the post-harvest period. Data were collected using a structured pre-coded interviewer-administered questionnaire uploaded onto tablets. The items included in the questionnaire were socioeconomic factors such as demographics, education, household assets, food security, and food consumption. The questionnaire was first prepared in English and then translated into the Amharic language, the official language of Ethiopia. A bilingual expert panel composed of English and Amharic speakers was convened to translate the study tool [33]. Ten teams of field workers, each consisting of five data collectors and one supervisor, collected the data. Everyone in the team received two weeks of training on interviewing techniques, the questionnaire contents, anthropometric measurements, and the use of tablets for data collection. Field personnel in charge of anthropometric measurements were given training which included a theoretical explanation, demonstration of said skills, and practice sessions both in class and in a mock field setup. Standardization was done according to recommendations [34]. The entire field procedure was pretested in clusters outside of the study sample. Necessary modifications were done following the pretest, which mainly involved replacing ambiguous words. The field supervisors and the researchers were closely involved at every stage of the fieldwork. Data were sent directly to a password-protected server. Stata version 14 software was used for data cleaning, which involved applying logic checks and running frequencies [35]. Anthropometric measurements were taken for each child. Weight and length/height of each child were measured according to the World Health Organization (WHO) standards [36]. The weight of each child, minimally clad and/or removing wet diapers, was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) electronic scale. Recumbent length or height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using the UNICEF model wooden board as per the WHO protocol. The participant’s socio-demographic characteristics were summarized by sex (male or female), age of mother in years, age of the child in months, family size (2–4, 5–7, 8+), current marital status (married/living together, divorced/widowed/separated), sex of the household head (female/male), and whether the mother was involved in an income-earning activity (yes/no). Socioeconomic resources for the purpose of this study were defined as maternal education, household wealth, and household food security. They were measured as follows: Maternal education was assessed by asking what the highest level of schooling completed by the mother at the time of the survey was. The level of education was then grouped into five categories: never attended/not finished first grade, grade 1–4, grade 5–8, grade 9–12, and college-educated, reflecting the Ethiopian educational system [37]. The household wealth index was constructed using principal component analysis (PCA). The indicator variables included were: ownership of house, type of housing unit, housing material (floor, roof, wall material), access to separate toilet facility and clean drinking water, as well as assets such as a bicycle, motorbike, car, cell phone, radio, TV, refrigerator, bed, Metad (electric stove used for making a local bread called Injera) and a savings account. Principal components with eigenvalues greater than one were retained to construct wealth index values and then categorized into wealth tertiles (low, medium and high) to serve as relative measures of household economic status [38]. The household food security status was assessed using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS). A 1-month recall period was used to assess the food security of households. The household was categorized as food secure if it had not experienced any food insecurity conditions or had rarely worried about not having enough food, whereas food-insecure households were categorized as mild, moderate and severe in accordance with the guidelines [39]. The dietary assessment followed the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) recommendations [40]. First, the mothers/caretakers were asked to provide a 24-h recall of foods consumed by the child both at home and outside the home. For each item, the mother was asked whether the child consumed more than a spoonful. Once the mother completed listing the foods, including all the ingredients, she was shown pictures of common foods from each food group to help her recall and verify the food her child consumed within the past 24 h. The child food groups were developed based on the food items recommended in the Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF) guidelines. Total dietary diversity score (which was a count of “yes” response for the 7 food groups the child consumed) was calculated for each child. In accordance with the IYCF guidelines, children were considered to have adequately diversified dietary intake if they had at least four of the seven food groups, and those who had 3 or less of the food groups were considered to have inadequate diversity [41]. Anthropometric indices were calculated using the WHO Anthro software [42]. The Z-scores of indices height-for-age Z-score (HAZ), and weight-for-height Z-score (WHZ) were categorized using the WHO child growth standards. A child with a HAZ less than −2 standard deviations (SD) was defined as stunted, while those with WHZ less than −2 SD from the reference population were classified as wasted and +2 SD as overweight/obese [36]. Data analyses were done using Stata version 14 [35]. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for all categorical variables. Cross-tabulation with a chi-square test for association and linear trend was done. Further, three statistical models were tested to evaluate independent effect associations while adjusting for potential confounders. The first model assessed the association of child nutritional status and diet diversity with each of the selected socioeconomic variables (household wealth, maternal education, household food security, and child sex) individually. The second model controlled for potential confounders (maternal age and child age) and the third model included both the potential confounders and all four socio-economic resources of interest. The generalized equation estimate (GEE) was used in all three models to estimate the crude odds ratios, and the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) along with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). All models were adjusted for clustering and the level of significance was set at p-value (<0.05). Multicollinearity was checked using the variance inflation factor (VIF) with the cut off set at below 5. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Addis Continental Institute of Public Health Ref No. ACIPH/IRB/004/2015 on 15 December 2015. Permission was granted by all the sub-cities and woreda level health offices to facilitate the fieldwork. Each study participant was provided with comprehensive information about the objectives and goals of the research and oral consent was obtained prior to the data collection.

N/A

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions: Develop and implement mobile phone applications or text messaging services to provide pregnant women with information and reminders about prenatal care, nutrition, and vaccinations. This can help improve access to important maternal health information, especially in areas with limited healthcare infrastructure.

2. Community health workers: Train and deploy community health workers who can provide basic prenatal care, education, and support to pregnant women in their communities. These workers can help bridge the gap between healthcare facilities and remote or underserved areas, improving access to maternal health services.

3. Telemedicine: Establish telemedicine services that allow pregnant women to consult with healthcare professionals remotely. This can be particularly beneficial for women in rural or remote areas who may have limited access to healthcare facilities.

4. Maternal health clinics: Set up dedicated maternal health clinics in areas with high maternal mortality rates. These clinics can provide comprehensive prenatal care, including regular check-ups, screenings, and education, to ensure the well-being of pregnant women and reduce the risk of complications during childbirth.

5. Financial incentives: Implement financial incentive programs to encourage pregnant women to seek prenatal care and deliver in healthcare facilities. This can help overcome financial barriers and improve access to quality maternal healthcare services.

6. Public-private partnerships: Foster collaborations between public and private sectors to improve access to maternal health services. This can involve leveraging private healthcare providers and resources to expand the reach of maternal health programs and services.

7. Maternal health education campaigns: Launch targeted education campaigns to raise awareness about the importance of prenatal care and maternal health. These campaigns can include community workshops, radio broadcasts, and informational materials to empower women with knowledge and encourage them to seek appropriate care.

8. Transportation support: Provide transportation support for pregnant women to access healthcare facilities for prenatal care and delivery. This can involve arranging affordable or free transportation options, such as community shuttles or vouchers, to ensure that women can reach healthcare facilities in a timely manner.

9. Maternal health insurance coverage: Expand health insurance coverage to include comprehensive maternal health services. This can help reduce financial barriers and ensure that pregnant women have access to necessary prenatal care, delivery services, and postnatal care.

10. Maternal health task forces: Establish local or regional task forces dedicated to improving maternal health outcomes. These task forces can bring together stakeholders from healthcare, government, community organizations, and academia to identify and address barriers to access and develop targeted interventions.

It is important to note that the specific context and needs of the community should be considered when implementing these innovations.
AI Innovations Description
The study titled “Social stratification, diet diversity and malnutrition among preschoolers: A survey of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia” aims to assess diet diversity and malnutrition in preschoolers and evaluate the relative importance of socioeconomic resources. The study found that preschoolers in Addis Ababa have limited quality diets and suffer from both undernutrition (stunting and wasting) and overnutrition (overweight/obesity). Low maternal education was associated with an increased risk of stunting and limited diet diversity, but reduced odds of being overweight. The study recommends interventions that promote diet quality for the undernourished while also addressing the problem of being overweight. These interventions should consider the socioeconomic factors, such as maternal education, household wealth, and household food security, that influence diet diversity and malnutrition.
AI Innovations Methodology
The study titled “Social stratification, diet diversity and malnutrition among preschoolers: A survey of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia” aims to assess diet diversity and malnutrition in preschoolers in Addis Ababa and evaluate the relative importance of socioeconomic resources. The study collected data on diet, anthropometry, and socio-economic factors from households with children under five in Addis Ababa using a multi-stage sampling procedure.

The study found that stunting, overweight/obesity, wasting, and limited diet diversity were present in all social strata. Low maternal education was associated with an increased risk of stunting and limited diet diversity, and reduced odds of being overweight. The study highlights the need for interventions that promote diet quality for the undernourished while also addressing the problem of being overweight.

To simulate the impact of recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Identify the recommendations: Based on the study findings and existing evidence, identify specific recommendations that can improve access to maternal health. These recommendations could include interventions to improve maternal education, increase awareness about nutrition and healthy diets, and enhance healthcare services for pregnant women.

2. Define indicators: Determine the indicators that will be used to measure the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. These indicators could include maternal mortality rates, antenatal care coverage, skilled birth attendance, and access to essential maternal health services.

3. Collect baseline data: Collect baseline data on the selected indicators to establish the current status of access to maternal health. This data can be obtained from existing health records, surveys, or other relevant sources.

4. Simulate the impact: Use mathematical models or simulation techniques to estimate the potential impact of the recommendations on the selected indicators. These models can take into account factors such as population size, demographic characteristics, and the effectiveness of the interventions.

5. Analyze the results: Analyze the simulated results to assess the potential improvements in access to maternal health that can be achieved through the recommended interventions. This analysis can help identify the most effective strategies and prioritize interventions based on their potential impact.

6. Validate the findings: Validate the simulated results by comparing them with real-world data or conducting further research to assess the actual impact of the recommended interventions on access to maternal health.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare providers can gain insights into the potential impact of specific recommendations on improving access to maternal health and make informed decisions about resource allocation and intervention strategies.

Share this:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email