SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy is associated with a greater risk of maternal and newborn morbidity and maternal death. In Kenya, pregnant and lactating women (PLW) were ineligible to receive COVID-19 vaccines until August 2021. How shifts in policy influence vaccine behaviors, such as health worker recommendations and vaccine uptake, is not well documented. We conducted qualitative interviews with PLW, health workers, and policymakers in Kenya to understand how different stakeholders’ perceptions of national policy regarding COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy shaped vaccine behaviors and decision-making. Policymakers and health workers described pervasive uncertainty and lack of communication about the national policy, cited vaccine safety as their primary concern for administering COVID-19 vaccines to PLW, and expressed that PLW were inadequately prioritized in the COVID-19 vaccine program. PLW perceived the restrictive policy as indicative of a safety risk, resulting in vaccine hesitancy and potentially exacerbated inequities in vaccine access. These findings support the need for the development and dissemination of effective vaccine communication guidelines and the prioritization of PLW in COVID-19 vaccination policies and campaigns. To ensure PLW do not face the same inequities in future epidemics, data on infectious disease burdens and vaccine uptake should be collected systematically among pregnant women, and PLW should be included in future vaccine trials.
In-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted with 29 PLW, 20 health workers, and 10 policymakers for a total of 59 IDIs. Participants were recruited from Garissa, Kakamega, and Nairobi counties, across three urban communities and three rural communities to try and obtain a representative sample across the country (Figure 1). PLW and health workers were identified through health centers in each community, and health workers were selected based on whether they provided care to PLW, such as midwives, OB/GYNs, and family medicine providers. Policymakers were selected based on their professional involvement in immunization policy and programming and/or maternal health. Study population and setting. Study area for sampling included two rural communities in Garissa county, two urban communities in Nairobi county, and one rural and one urban community in Kakamega county. PLW = pregnant and lactating women; HCW = health care workers; PM = policymakers. Data were collected from August 8th to September 3rd, 2021. Semi-structured interview guides included questions related to the COVID-19 vaccine decision-making process for PLW and the current policy recommendations (see Supplementary Material). A three-day data collection training was held, consisting of field ethics, interview techniques, and pre-testing. Participants were recruited from health clinics for PLW and health workers, and via email/phone for policymakers. After determining eligibility and interest, oral informed consent was obtained. IDIs were conducted in either English, Swahili, or a local language in semi-private settings or via Zoom. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and translated into English. All data were stored on encrypted servers. Prior to the start of data collection, PLW were considered ineligible for vaccination, per the national vaccination plan.3 On August 13th 2021, the Kenya Obstetrical and Gynecological Society issued a statement recommending COVID-19 vaccines for PLW, citing the increased risks associated with COVID-19 during pregnancy and the post-authorization evidence on vaccine safety in pregnancy.27 The following week, the Ministry of Health released a press statement clarifying that PLW could choose to be vaccinated after receiving counseling on the benefits and risks.10 On December 24th, 2021, the Ministry of Health issued updated guidance stating that pregnant women should be offered mRNA vaccines.23 Seven team members analyzed the data using a grounded theory approach, which uses an inductive approach to identify emerging themes and sub-themes. Following three rounds of open coding, a code list was developed (see Supplementary Material). Inter-rater reliability was conducted by two team members using 10% of the transcripts with reliability of >90%. Themes and sub-themes were agreed upon with all members. Data management was conducted with Atlas.ti software. This study received ethical approval from the Kenya Medical Research Institute and the Institutional Review Board of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (IRB00014893).
N/A