Individual and Contextual Factors Associated With Malaria Among Children 6–59 Months in Burkina Faso

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aims to understand the individual and contextual factors associated with malaria among children aged 6–59 months in Burkina Faso.
– Malaria is a significant public health issue in Burkina Faso, and understanding the factors contributing to its prevalence can help in the design and implementation of effective policies and interventions.
– By identifying the determinants of malaria among children, this study provides valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders involved in malaria control and prevention efforts.
Study Highlights:
– The study included 5,822 children aged 6–59 months in Burkina Faso.
– 15% of the children had a positive rapid diagnostic test for malaria.
– Factors associated with malaria among children included age, maternal education, household wealth, rural residence, and region.
– The variability in malaria exposure was 16% attributable to the strata level and 23% to the primary sampling unit level.
– Socio-economic status, access to hospital care, and place of living were positively associated with malaria cases in children.
Study Recommendations:
– The study recommends taking into account the identified individual and contextual determinants of malaria in the design and implementation of policies.
– Policies should focus on improving access to healthcare, particularly in rural areas, and addressing socio-economic disparities.
– Targeted interventions should be developed to address the specific needs of different regions in Burkina Faso.
– Education programs should be implemented to raise awareness about malaria prevention and control measures among mothers and caregivers.
Key Role Players:
– Ministry of Health: Responsible for policy development and implementation of malaria control programs.
– National Institute of Statistics and Demography: Provides data collection and analysis support.
– Non-governmental organizations (NGOs): Involved in implementing malaria prevention and control interventions.
– Community health workers: Play a crucial role in delivering healthcare services and raising awareness at the community level.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Healthcare infrastructure development: Funding for the construction and improvement of healthcare facilities in rural areas.
– Training programs: Budget for training healthcare workers and community health workers on malaria prevention and control.
– Education campaigns: Allocation of funds for awareness campaigns targeting mothers and caregivers.
– Supply of malaria prevention tools: Budget for the procurement and distribution of insecticide-treated nets and antimalarial medications.
– Monitoring and evaluation: Funding for the implementation of surveillance systems to monitor the effectiveness of interventions and track malaria cases.
Please note that the provided cost items are general suggestions and may vary based on the specific context and priorities of Burkina Faso.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong, but there are some areas for improvement. The study used a large sample size and conducted a multilevel logistic regression analysis to identify individual and contextual factors associated with malaria among children in Burkina Faso. The study also provided adjusted odds ratios and confidence intervals to describe the measures of association. However, the abstract could be improved by providing more specific details about the methodology, such as the sampling strategy and data collection procedures. Additionally, the abstract could benefit from including the statistical significance of the associations found. To improve the evidence, the authors could consider providing more information about the limitations of the study and potential sources of bias. They could also discuss the implications of their findings and suggest actionable steps for policymakers and public health practitioners to address the identified determinants of malaria in Burkina Faso.

Objective: This study aims to understand the individual and contextual factors associated with malaria among children aged 6–59 months in Burkina Faso. Methods: This cross-sectional study used secondary data extracted from the Burkina Faso Malaria Indicator Survey 2017–2018. Descriptive analysis was used to analyse socio-demographic characteristics. We performed a multilevel logistic regression model to highlight individual and contextual factors of children’s exposure to malaria. Results: Our analysis included 5,822 children aged 6–59 months. Of these, 15% had a positive rapid diagnostic test. Factors associated with malaria among children 6–59 months were age, maternal education, household wealth, rural residence, and region. The variability in malaria exposure was 16% attributable to the strata level and 23% to the primary sampling unit level. Some factors, such as the family’s socio-economic status, access to hospital care, and place of living, were positively associated withs malaria cases in children. Conclusion: The study identified some individual and contextual determinants of malaria among children aged 6–59 months in Burkina Faso. Taking them into account for the design and implementation of policies will undeniably help in the fight against malaria in Burkina Faso.

Burkina Faso is located in sub-Sahara Africa with a superficies of 272,200 Km2 and is bordered to the north and west by Mali, to the northeast by Niger, to the southeast by Benin and to the south by Togo, Ghana, and Côte d’Ivoire. It ranks 185th out of 188 countries in the 2016 Human Development Index (HDI), published by the UNDP in 2017. The country’s population is characterised by its youth. The average age of the population was 16.6 years in 2006. Children under the age of 5 and 18 represented 17% and 53% of the population, respectively. It is divided into 13 administrative regions, characterised by cultural, socio-economic, and environmental diversity Figure 1. Map of Burkina Faso with administrative regions (Malaria Indicator Survey, Burkina Faso, 2017–2018). Data from the “Enquête sur les Indicateurs du Paludisme au Burkina Faso (EIPBF 2017–2018)” were used for this study. This is a nationally representative cross-sectional survey in which data were collected by the National Institute of Statistics and Demonography (“Institut National de la Statistique et de la Démographie (INSD)”) between December 2017 and March 2018 [6, 8]. The four databases set up were household (HR), household member (PR), mother (IR) and child (KR). The data from the mother (IR) and the child (KR) databases were aggregated for our study. MIS aim to provide quality data to assess the progress of goals and targets necessary for effective monitoring and evaluation of NMCP meaurement implementation. Specifically, these surveys aim to assess insecticide-treated net (ITNs) ownership and use, coverage of the sporadic preventive care programme for pregnant women, and treatment-seeking behaviours. Additionally, it is an assessment of awareness, behaviours and behavioural indicators related to malaria control. Depending on the country’s needs, MIS can also identify the factors related to malaria and anaemia. In addition to these items, several other questions are asked about basic demographics and education. A two-stage stratified cluster sample was used to determine the study sample. The primary sampling unit is the enumeration area (EA). The sampling was described in detail in the survey report (8). Each area was separated into urban and rural parts to form the sampling strata and the sample was drawn independently in each stratum. In total twenty-six sampling strata were created. In the first stage, 252 EAs (52 urban, 200 rural) were drawn with probability proportional to size, where size is the number of households in the EA during the mapping exercise for the 2006 census. In the second stage, from each of the EAs selected in the first stage, 26 households were selected (a total of 1,352 in urban areas and 5,500 in rural areas) that best represent the cultural and socio-economic diversity of the country as well as regional differences in malaria prevalence with a systematic equal probability draw from newly established lists at the time of enumeration. The sample size was calculated to provide statistically representative results on malaria prevalence in children aged 6–59 months [8, 9]. For this study, we examined 5,822 children aged 6–59 years who had a febrile episode during the two weeks preceding the survey and for whom the result of the malaria test (RDT) was available. The response variable in our study is the result of the rapid malaria test (RDT) performed in children aged 6–59 months. The test result is coded “Positive” for a positive test for Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) and “Negative” if it is not. Laboratory microscopy on blood smears and thickened drops was done for three-quarters of the households where RDTs were performed. Malaria results were also classified as positive or negative. There was a strong positive correlation of 0.581 (95% CI: 0.57–0.60; p < 0.0001) between these two test results. However, the laboratory microscopy test was performed primarily as a confirmation test for the RDT [9]. Thus, a malaria case was determined by a positive RDT with fever or a history of fever in the previous two weeks. The explanatory variables considered in our study were identified from the literature data [3, 7, 10–12]. The databases of children under five (KR) and household members (PR) were merged using a common primary key for both databases. The variables are divided into three groups, individual characteristics, household-level factors, and contextual factors [7, 9–14]. A descriptive analysis using frequencies was used to establish the distribution of malaria status among children aged 6–59 months in Burkina Faso with the explanatory variables considered in our study. The explanatory variables were subjected to bivariate analyses to estimate the significance of their association with malaria (Table 2). The chi-square test with the second-order correction of Rao and Scott was used to compare proportions [15, 16]. Cross-tabulation of malaria status with child, parent, community, and administrative area predictors (Malaria Indicator Survey, Burkina Faso, 2017–2018). Multilevel logistic regression was performed to identify individual and contextual effects. The hierarchical nature of the 2017–2018 EIPBF data easily allows the use of multilevel logistic regression models [17, 18]. Variables significant at the 20% level were retained for multilevel modelling. Despite non-significance at the 20% threshold, considering the data in the literature, some variables were retained for the following modelling [19]. Three multilevel logistic models were considered. The principle of parsimony was followed. A likelihood ratio test was performed to determine the most appropriate model [18, 20]. Measures of association (i.e., fixed effects) were described using an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with corresponding p-values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Measures of variation (i.e., random effects) were captured using the intra-class correlation (ICC). The ICC represents the proportion of the total variation in the dependent variable attributable to the contexts (strata or EAs). This coefficient will be 0 when there is no variance between the groups. In our model (three-level model), we identified two ICCs: one concerning children nested at the strata level and the groups at the strata level nested in the group at the administrative zone level. Therefore: From Eqs. 1, 2, the variance between EAs, is the variance between strata, and ≃ 3.29 is the variance between children/individuals with scale factor one for logistic regression [17, 18, 21]. The values of the CCIs help to establish the need for multilevel analysis versus single-level analysis. The rule of thumb could be: when the ICC is less than 5% in the null model, hierarchical modelling may not be necessary [22]. All analyses were performed using R software version 4.0.5. The “svydesign” command in the survey extension was used to adjust for under- and over-reporting in the survey, using a weighting factor of (v005/1000000), where v005 is the sample weight. This study is based on the analysis of secondary data without the use of information about the identity of the participant. All DHS were approved by ICF International and a national ethics committee in each host country. All participants gave written informed consent before taking part in the survey. Although, additional ethical approval was not required in this study, we obtained written permission from the DHS programme to use the data.

Based on the provided information, here are some potential innovations that can be used to improve access to maternal health in Burkina Faso:

1. Mobile Health (mHealth) Solutions: Implementing mobile health technologies, such as SMS reminders for prenatal care appointments, educational messages about maternal health, and access to teleconsultations with healthcare providers, can improve access to maternal health services, especially in remote areas.

2. Community Health Workers: Training and deploying community health workers who can provide basic maternal health services, including antenatal care, postnatal care, and health education, can help reach women in underserved areas and improve access to essential maternal health services.

3. Telemedicine: Establishing telemedicine networks that connect healthcare providers in urban areas with remote health centers can enable remote consultations, diagnosis, and treatment for pregnant women, reducing the need for travel and improving access to specialized care.

4. Maternal Health Vouchers: Introducing maternal health vouchers or subsidies can help reduce financial barriers to accessing maternal health services. These vouchers can cover the cost of antenatal care visits, delivery services, and postnatal care, ensuring that women can afford and access essential care.

5. Maternal Waiting Homes: Building and operating maternal waiting homes near health facilities can provide a safe and comfortable place for pregnant women to stay during the final weeks of pregnancy, ensuring proximity to healthcare services and reducing delays in accessing care during labor and delivery.

6. Transportation Support: Providing transportation support, such as ambulances or transportation vouchers, can help pregnant women overcome geographical barriers and reach healthcare facilities in a timely manner, particularly in rural areas with limited transportation options.

7. Strengthening Health Infrastructure: Investing in the improvement and expansion of health facilities, including maternity wards and delivery rooms, can enhance the availability and quality of maternal health services, making them more accessible to women in need.

8. Maternal Health Education: Implementing comprehensive maternal health education programs that target women, families, and communities can increase awareness about the importance of maternal health, promote healthy behaviors, and empower women to seek timely and appropriate care.

9. Task-Shifting and Training: Training and empowering non-specialist healthcare providers, such as midwives and nurses, to perform certain tasks traditionally done by doctors can help alleviate the shortage of skilled healthcare professionals and improve access to maternal health services in resource-limited settings.

10. Public-Private Partnerships: Collaborating with private sector organizations, such as pharmaceutical companies or technology companies, can leverage their resources, expertise, and networks to improve access to maternal health services through innovative approaches and sustainable solutions.

It is important to note that the implementation of these innovations should be tailored to the specific context and needs of Burkina Faso, taking into account cultural, social, and economic factors. Additionally, continuous monitoring and evaluation should be conducted to assess the effectiveness and impact of these innovations on improving access to maternal health.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the provided description, the recommendation to improve access to maternal health in Burkina Faso based on the study findings would be to implement targeted interventions that address the individual and contextual factors associated with malaria among children aged 6-59 months. These interventions could include:

1. Strengthening maternal education: Providing education and awareness programs for mothers on malaria prevention, early detection, and treatment can help reduce the risk of malaria among children. This can be done through community health workers, antenatal care visits, and health education campaigns.

2. Improving household wealth: Addressing poverty and improving household wealth can contribute to better access to healthcare services, including maternal health. This can be achieved through income-generating programs, microfinance initiatives, and social protection measures.

3. Enhancing rural healthcare infrastructure: Investing in healthcare facilities and services in rural areas can improve access to maternal health services. This can include establishing or upgrading health centers, training healthcare providers, and ensuring the availability of essential medicines and equipment.

4. Regional-specific interventions: Considering the regional differences in malaria prevalence and other contextual factors, targeted interventions can be developed to address the specific challenges faced in each region. This can involve tailoring healthcare services, awareness campaigns, and resource allocation based on the unique characteristics of each region.

5. Strengthening the national malaria control program: Collaborating with the National Malaria Control Program (NMCP) to integrate maternal health services with malaria prevention and control efforts can improve access to maternal health. This can include incorporating malaria prevention measures into antenatal care visits, promoting the use of insecticide-treated nets, and ensuring the availability of malaria testing and treatment services.

By implementing these recommendations, it is expected that access to maternal health services will be improved, leading to a reduction in malaria cases among children aged 6-59 months in Burkina Faso.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations for improving access to maternal health in Burkina Faso:

1. Strengthening Health Infrastructure: Invest in improving healthcare facilities, including maternity clinics, hospitals, and health centers, particularly in rural areas where access is limited. This can involve expanding existing facilities, building new ones, and ensuring they are adequately staffed and equipped.

2. Mobile Health Clinics: Implement mobile health clinics that can reach remote areas and provide essential maternal health services, including prenatal care, vaccinations, and postnatal care. These clinics can be equipped with medical professionals and necessary equipment to provide comprehensive care.

3. Community Health Workers: Train and deploy community health workers who can provide basic maternal health services, education, and support to pregnant women and new mothers in their communities. These workers can help bridge the gap between healthcare facilities and remote areas, ensuring that women receive the care they need.

4. Telemedicine: Utilize telemedicine technologies to connect healthcare professionals with pregnant women in remote areas. This can involve virtual consultations, remote monitoring of pregnancies, and providing medical advice and guidance through mobile applications or telecommunication platforms.

5. Health Education and Awareness: Implement comprehensive health education programs that focus on maternal health, including prenatal care, nutrition, hygiene, and family planning. These programs can be conducted in schools, community centers, and through mass media to reach a wide audience.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Define Key Indicators: Identify key indicators that measure access to maternal health, such as the number of prenatal visits, percentage of births attended by skilled health personnel, maternal mortality rate, and availability of essential maternal health services.

2. Baseline Data Collection: Collect baseline data on the identified indicators before implementing the recommendations. This can involve surveys, interviews, and data analysis from existing sources such as health records and national surveys.

3. Implement Recommendations: Implement the recommended interventions, such as strengthening health infrastructure, deploying mobile health clinics, training community health workers, and utilizing telemedicine technologies.

4. Data Collection and Monitoring: Continuously collect data on the identified indicators after implementing the recommendations. This can involve regular surveys, monitoring systems, and data analysis to track changes and improvements in access to maternal health.

5. Comparative Analysis: Compare the baseline data with the post-implementation data to assess the impact of the recommendations. Analyze the changes in key indicators to determine the effectiveness of the interventions in improving access to maternal health.

6. Evaluation and Adjustment: Evaluate the results of the simulation and make adjustments to the recommendations if necessary. Identify areas of success and areas that require further improvement to refine the interventions and maximize their impact.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare professionals can assess the potential impact of the recommended interventions on improving access to maternal health in Burkina Faso and make informed decisions for implementation.

Yabelana ngalokhu:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email