The prevalence and risk factors for acute respiratory infections in children aged 0-59 months in rural Malawi: A cross-sectional study

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) are a leading cause of childhood mortality and morbidity.
– Malawi has high childhood mortality but limited data on the prevalence of ARI in the community.
– This study aimed to provide novel data on the prevalence and risk factors for ARI in children aged 0-59 months in rural Malawi.
Study Highlights:
– The study included 828 children aged 0-59 months in rural Monkey Bay, Malawi.
– The annual prevalence of ARI was found to be 32.6% (95% CI 29.3-36.0%).
– Risk factors for ARI included having a sibling with ARI, increasing household density, and acute malnutrition.
– The point prevalence of ARI was 8.3% (95% CI 6.8-10.4%).
– Risk factors for current ARI included acute-on-chronic malnutrition, increasing household density, and having a sibling with ARI.
– This study provides important baseline data that can be used for monitoring and planning future interventions in this population.
Recommendations for Lay Reader and Policy Maker:
– Increase awareness and education about the risk factors for ARI, such as having a sibling with ARI and acute malnutrition.
– Improve access to healthcare and vaccination services, especially in rural areas with high household density.
– Implement interventions to address malnutrition and improve overall child health in the community.
– Strengthen surveillance and monitoring systems to track the prevalence of ARI and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.
– Collaborate with local health authorities and community leaders to develop and implement targeted interventions for ARI prevention and management.
Key Role Players:
– Health surveillance assistants (HSAs) who provide basic health assessments and refer children with respiratory symptoms to healthcare providers.
– Local health authorities and village chiefs who can provide permission and support for implementing interventions.
– Doctors and medical students trained in assessing children using integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) guidelines.
– Researchers and data collectors responsible for gathering and analyzing data.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training and capacity building for health surveillance assistants and healthcare providers.
– Development and distribution of educational materials on ARI prevention and management.
– Strengthening healthcare infrastructure and services in rural areas.
– Procurement and distribution of vaccines and other necessary medical supplies.
– Monitoring and evaluation activities to assess the impact of interventions.
– Community engagement and mobilization efforts to raise awareness and promote behavior change.
Please note that the provided cost items are general suggestions and may vary depending on the specific context and resources available in Malawi.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is based on a cross-sectional study with a random sample of children in rural Malawi. The study provides prevalence data on acute respiratory infections (ARI) in children aged 0-59 months. The study used health passports, physical examinations, and oral surveys to collect data. The sample size was calculated to detect the prevalence of ARI with 5% precision at the 95% confidence level. The study identified risk factors for ARI and concluded that the high prevalence of ARI in Malawi can be used for future interventions. However, the abstract does not provide information on the study design, data analysis methods, or limitations. To improve the evidence, the abstract could include more details on the study design, such as the sampling method and data collection procedures. Additionally, it would be helpful to include information on the statistical analysis methods used and any limitations of the study.

Background: Acute Respiratory Infections (ARI) are a leading cause of childhood mortality and morbidity. Malawi has high childhood mortality but limited data on the prevalence of disease in the community. Methods: A cross-sectional study of children aged 0-59 months. Health passports were examined for ARI diagnoses in the preceding 12 months. Children were physically examined for malnutrition or current ARI. Results: 828 children participated. The annual prevalence of ARI was 32.6% (95% CI 29.3-36.0%). Having a sibling with ARI (OR 1.44, P =.01), increasing household density (OR 2.17, P =.02) and acute malnutrition (OR 1.69, P =.01) were predictors of infection in the last year. The point prevalence of ARI was 8.3% (95% CI 6.8-10.4%). Risk factors for current ARI were acute-on-chronic malnutrition (OR 3.06, P =.02), increasing household density (OR1.19, P =.05) and having a sibling with ARI (OR 2.30, P =.02). Conclusion: This study provides novel data on the high prevalence of ARI in Malawi. This baseline data can be used in the monitoring and planning of future interventions in this population.

This was a cross‐sectional, population‐based study of a random sample of children aged 0‐59 months in rural Monkey Bay. Data were obtained in three ways: an oral survey, physical examination and inspection of health passports. Malawi is divided into 28 administrative districts. Mangochi district, with an estimated population of 600 000, has lower income and poorer health than average.25 Mangochi is divided into five healthcare zones, one of which is Monkey Bay. Our study population included all children aged 0‐59 months living in rural Monkey Bay. Within areas, health surveillance assistants (HSAs) provide basic health assessments26 and refer children with symptoms of respiratory disease to healthcare providers. Communities were defined as the area under one HSA. Some HSAs oversee multiple villages. Rural communities, with an estimated population of less than 2000 and no trading post, were eligible for inclusion. Within a community, all children aged 0‐59 months were eligible for inclusion in the study provided their parent/guardian consented and the household was registered on a pre‐study census conducted in November 2014 as part of a larger study, ensuring that participants were residents of communities sampled. Villages with a population exceeding 2000 were excluded as larger, urban areas tend to have a more transient population, and it would have therefore have been difficult to follow residents of the November 2014 census up. In the absence of prior similar studies, a conservative pre‐study sample size was calculated utilizing Raosoft (Vovici, Seattle, Washington, USA) assuming a 50% prevalence of infection and population size of 20 000. 754 children were required to detect the prevalence of LRTI with 5% precision at the 95% confidence level. A list of the 72 HSAs in Monkey Bay was obtained. Five HSAs were excluded for having communities with a trading post. 17 HSAs were excluded for overseeing an estimated population exceeding 2000, leaving 50 HSAs eligible for selection. Six HSAs were selected using a random number generator from an alphabetical list. These oversaw eight villages. Within villages, all children aged 0‐59 months were sampled. Households were notified in advance of the researchers’ attendance and the purpose of the study by HSAs. Children were brought to a central location by their parent, and residence in the village was confirmed. After all children had been seen, households in the community were visited door‐to‐door, enabling all resident children to participate. Villages were visited on at least two separate occasions to ensure that children absent on the first visit were sampled. The purpose and procedures of the study were explained to local health authorities and permission obtained from village chiefs, aided by a trained translator. Following parental consent to participate, children were allocated a unique identification number under which data were entered. A verbal survey, obtained from participants’ parents and facilitated by a translator, elicited data on risk factors including maternal educational level (as a proxy for socio‐economic status), clustering of disease (another child with ARI recorded in their health passport in the last 12 months in the household) and number of rooms in household and number of household residents (household density). To determine the annual prevalence of ARI, health passports were examined. These are patient‐held records of all consultations with healthcare professionals. A positive diagnosis of ARI was recorded if an acute respiratory tract infection with clinical signs of pneumonia treated with antibiotics, lower respiratory tract Infection, or pneumonia was documented in the passport in the 12 months prior to the date of visit or since birth in infants less than a year old. Children’s vaccination records, contained within the passport, were also inspected. Whether children had received all age‐appropriate PCV vaccinations and EPI mandated vaccinations for their age (as a proxy for access to health care) were recorded. In older health passports, before the addition of PCV to EPI, data on PCV status were not included in analysis as it was not possible to definitively ascertain whether or not they had received vaccination. Assenting children were then examined physically to determine the point prevalence of ARI using integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) guidelines by doctors/medical students from the United Kingdom who had been trained in assessing children using IMCI.27 Parents were asked whether their child currently had a cough and about the presence of IMCI general danger signs. The child’s temperature was taken. Children’s chests were then exposed and evidence of increased work of breathing (indrawing or subcostal recessions) observed. Next, respiratory rate was counted for one minute during which time the researcher listened for stridor. A positive clinical diagnosis of ARI was recorded if a child had a cough and tachypnoea (respiratory rate >50/minute in children 40/minute in children >12 months old) or cough and chest indrawing or stridor when calm. Finally, children were assessed for malnutrition following Integrated Management of Childhood Illness Guidelines.27 Participants with pitting oedema present for more than two‐seconds after the researcher pressed their thumb inferior to the medial malleolus for three‐seconds were classified as acutely malnourished. Weight was measured to the nearest 0.02 Kg, with shoes and outer clothes removed, using scales that were calibrated each day. Participants aged 0‐23 months had length measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a length board. Participants aged 24‐59 months had height measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a vertical Leicester Height Measure®. All measurements were taken three times, with the median measure used. Measurements were then plotted on Weight‐for‐Height (acute malnutrition), Height‐for‐Age (chronic malnutrition) and Weight‐for‐Age (acute‐on‐chronic malnutrition) z‐score growth charts. Measurements plotted below ‐2 standard deviations from normal were classed as malnourished.27 Data were entered into Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA) on a tablet device at the time of gathering. Data were then checked, coded and entered into spss version 22 (IBM, New York, USA) for analysis. Demographic data were first analysed. Continuous variables were tested for normality. Mean and standard deviations (S.D.) were calculated for normally distributed variables. Median and interquartile ranges (IQR) were analysed for nonparametric variables. The percentage of participants with each categorical variable was calculated. The annual prevalence of ARI was the percentage of children with one or more episodes of ARI recorded in their health passport. The point prevalence of ARI was the percentage of children classified with clinical ARI following physical examination. For all prevalence data, 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Univariate analysis determined potential predictor variables for current and annual ARI. Chi‐square tests examined the significance of differences between groups. Mann‐Whitney U tests examined the association between age and ARI. Variables demonstrating significance at the P < 0.10 level were entered into binary logistic regression models, for annual prevalence of ARI and point prevalence of ARI, to identify independent risk factors. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from University of Birmingham BMedSci Population Sciences and Humanities Internal Ethics Review Committee (reference no. 2014‐15/CI/LJ/04), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (reference no. 6500) and Malawi College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (reference no. P.02/14/1521).

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile health clinics: Implementing mobile health clinics that can travel to rural areas, like Monkey Bay, to provide maternal health services. These clinics can offer prenatal care, vaccinations, and education on maternal health.

2. Telemedicine: Introducing telemedicine services that allow pregnant women in rural areas to consult with healthcare professionals remotely. This can help address the lack of healthcare providers in these areas and provide timely advice and guidance.

3. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers in rural areas to provide basic maternal health services, such as prenatal check-ups, health education, and referrals to healthcare facilities when necessary.

4. Health passports: Expanding the use of health passports to track maternal health and ensure continuity of care. These passports can contain important information about prenatal visits, vaccinations, and any health concerns or complications during pregnancy.

5. Improving healthcare infrastructure: Investing in the improvement of healthcare facilities in rural areas, including the availability of essential equipment and supplies for maternal health services.

6. Health education programs: Implementing targeted health education programs to raise awareness about the importance of maternal health and promote healthy practices during pregnancy.

7. Transportation services: Establishing transportation services or subsidies to help pregnant women in rural areas access healthcare facilities for prenatal care, delivery, and postnatal care.

8. Maternal health incentives: Introducing incentives, such as financial assistance or rewards, to encourage pregnant women in rural areas to seek regular prenatal care and follow recommended maternal health practices.

These innovations can help address the challenges of limited access to maternal health services in rural areas and improve the overall health outcomes for pregnant women and their children.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the provided description, the recommendation to improve access to maternal health would be to implement community-based interventions focused on preventing and managing acute respiratory infections (ARI) in children. This can be achieved through the following strategies:

1. Strengthening healthcare infrastructure: Improve access to healthcare facilities and ensure availability of trained healthcare providers who can diagnose and treat ARI in children.

2. Health education and awareness: Conduct community-based health education programs to raise awareness about the causes, symptoms, and prevention of ARI. This can include educating mothers about proper hygiene practices, breastfeeding, and vaccination.

3. Vaccination campaigns: Ensure that all children receive age-appropriate vaccinations, including pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV), which can help prevent respiratory infections.

4. Early detection and treatment: Train community health workers to identify early signs of ARI in children and refer them to healthcare facilities for timely treatment. This can include providing training on Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) guidelines.

5. Nutritional support: Address malnutrition as a risk factor for ARI by providing nutritional support and counseling to mothers and caregivers. This can include promoting exclusive breastfeeding and providing access to nutritious food.

6. Monitoring and evaluation: Establish a system for monitoring the prevalence of ARI in the community and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions. This can help identify areas of improvement and guide future interventions.

By implementing these recommendations, access to maternal health can be improved by reducing the burden of ARI in children and promoting overall child health and well-being.
AI Innovations Methodology
To improve access to maternal health, here are some potential recommendations:

1. Mobile clinics: Implementing mobile clinics that travel to remote areas can provide essential maternal health services to women who lack access to healthcare facilities.

2. Telemedicine: Utilizing telemedicine technologies can connect pregnant women with healthcare providers remotely, allowing them to receive prenatal care and consultations without the need for physical travel.

3. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers can help bridge the gap between healthcare facilities and communities, providing education, prenatal care, and referrals for pregnant women.

4. Maternal health vouchers: Introducing voucher programs that provide financial assistance for maternal health services can help reduce the financial barriers that prevent women from accessing care.

5. Transportation support: Providing transportation support, such as subsidized or free transportation services, can help pregnant women reach healthcare facilities more easily, especially in rural areas with limited transportation options.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define the target population: Identify the specific population that will be affected by the recommendations, such as pregnant women in a particular region or community.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current access to maternal health services, including the number of women receiving care, distance to healthcare facilities, and any existing barriers.

3. Define indicators: Determine the key indicators that will be used to measure the impact of the recommendations, such as the number of women accessing prenatal care, the reduction in travel time to healthcare facilities, or the increase in the number of women receiving postnatal care.

4. Simulate scenarios: Use modeling techniques to simulate different scenarios based on the recommendations. For example, simulate the impact of implementing mobile clinics in different locations or providing transportation support to different percentages of the target population.

5. Analyze results: Evaluate the simulated scenarios to determine the potential impact on improving access to maternal health. Compare the indicators from the baseline data with the indicators from the simulated scenarios to assess the effectiveness of the recommendations.

6. Refine and iterate: Based on the results, refine the recommendations and simulate additional scenarios if necessary. Continuously iterate and improve the methodology to ensure accurate and reliable simulations.

It’s important to note that the methodology described above is a general framework and can be adapted based on the specific context and available data.

Yabelana ngalokhu:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email