Predicting the impact of COVID-19 and the potential impact of the public health response on disease burden in Uganda

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aims to predict the impact of COVID-19 and the potential impact of public health responses on disease burden in Uganda.
– It addresses concerns that the focus on fighting COVID-19 may affect access to non-COVID-19 diseases in Uganda.
– The study uses age-based COVID-19 mortality data from China and applies it to the population structures of Uganda and other countries with previous outbreaks.
– By comparing theoretical mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost, the study predicts the impact of COVID-19 on diseases such as HIV/AIDS, malaria, and maternal health in Uganda.
Study Highlights:
– Uganda is predicted to have a relatively low COVID-19 burden compared to other countries with similar transmission rates.
– The study highlights the potential negative impact of the public health response on malaria and HIV/AIDS, which may outweigh the predicted impact of COVID-19.
– Emerging disease data from Uganda suggests that this deterioration may already be occurring.
– The study emphasizes the importance of tailoring COVID-19 responses based on population structure and local disease vulnerabilities.
Study Recommendations:
– The study recommends considering the potential impact of the public health response on non-COVID-19 diseases, particularly malaria and HIV/AIDS.
– It suggests the need for targeted interventions to prevent a reversal of gains made in addressing vulnerabilities in women and children’s health.
– The study highlights the importance of balancing the response to COVID-19 with maintaining access to essential healthcare services for other diseases.
Key Role Players:
– Policy makers and government officials responsible for healthcare planning and resource allocation.
– Public health experts and epidemiologists to provide guidance on disease control strategies.
– Healthcare providers and facilities to implement and deliver healthcare services.
– Community leaders and organizations to support community engagement and education.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Funding for healthcare infrastructure and resources, including medical equipment, supplies, and medications.
– Training and capacity building for healthcare providers to ensure effective delivery of services.
– Public health campaigns and communication strategies to raise awareness and promote preventive measures.
– Monitoring and surveillance systems to track disease burden and response effectiveness.
– Research and data collection to inform evidence-based decision making.
– Support for community engagement and involvement in healthcare initiatives.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is relatively strong, but there are some areas for improvement. The study used data from Uganda and comparison countries, which adds credibility to the findings. The methods used to calculate disease burden and predict the impact of the public health response are outlined in detail. However, the abstract does not mention the sample size or specific statistical analyses used, which could be included to strengthen the evidence. Additionally, providing more information about the limitations of the study and potential sources of bias would further improve the evidence.

The COVID-19 pandemic and public health “lockdown” responses in sub-Saharan Africa, including Uganda, are now widely reported. Although the impact of COVID-19 on African populations has been relatively light, it is feared that redirecting focus and prioritization of health systems to fight COVID-19 may have an impact on access to non–COVID-19 diseases. We applied age-based COVID-19 mortality data from China to the population structures of Uganda and non-African countries with previously established outbreaks, comparing theoretical mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost. We then predicted the impact of possible scenarios of the COVID-19 public health response on morbidity and mortality for HIV/AIDS, malaria, and maternal health in Uganda. Based on population age structure alone, Uganda is predicted to have a relatively low COVID-19 burden compared with an equivalent transmission in comparison countries, with 12% of the mortality and 19% of the lost DALYs predicted for an equivalent transmission in Italy. By contrast, scenarios of the impact of the public health response on malaria and HIV/AIDS predict additional disease burdens outweighing that predicted from extensive SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Emerging disease data from Uganda suggest that such deterioration may already be occurring. The results predict a relatively low COVID-19 impact on Uganda associated with its young population, with a high risk of negative impact on non–COVID-19 disease burden from a prolonged lockdown response. This may reverse hard-won gains in addressing fundamental vulnerabilities in women and children’s health, and underlines the importance of tailoring COVID-19 responses according to population structure and local disease vulnerabilities.

Data collection was conducted in Uganda, which has a sporadic transmission of COVID-19 and conditions generalizable across several sub-Saharan countries.4 Information on the Ugandan population structure was obtained from the Uganda Bureau of Statistics census report, whereas data on comparison countries were obtained from UN data (Supplemental Table S1).13,24 Data on HIV and tuberculosis were obtained from the aggregated President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR) weekly surge reports generated from data across 13 PEPFAR Uganda implementing partners,25 including the persons newly diagnosed with HIV as per the Uganda national HIV/AIDS treatment guidelines.26 Additional data on age-stratified HIV prevalence were obtained from the Uganda Population-based HIV Impact Assessment final report.27 Age-stratified malaria incidence for 2019–2020 was obtained from the Uganda Health Management Information System (HMIS) quarterly reporting.28 Maternal mortality data including deliveries from January 2019 to March 2020 inclusive were similarly obtained from the Uganda HMIS quarterly reporting.28 Calculations of DALYs lost followed broadly the methods outlined for the most recent WHO global burden of disease estimates.29 This involved defining life years lost by age as the difference between actual age of death and the life expectancy in a standard life table reflecting the highest life expectancy in the world today and a set of disability weights to reflect the relative severity of diseases. The unequal age-weighting function and discounting of future life years applied in earlier DALY versions were excluded.15 COVID-19 disease burden and excess HIV, malaria, and maternal mortality were calculated by multiplying the DALYs lost for a single health event by the population incidence and deaths by age-group. Disability-adjusted life years for COVID-19 are based on age-related mortality reported by Verity et al. from the China outbreak, applied to age structures of comparison countries with relatively high COVID-19 burden (the United States, China, Italy, and Spain) and Iceland,30 where testing rates have been relatively high.23 For the sake of comparison, a 20% total detectable infection rate was applied across all age-groups, this being assumed to be a worst case for comparison with deterioration in non-COVID disease burden. The details of assumptions involved in DALY calculations are provided in the supplementary file. Potential impact of reduced health service access in Uganda through the COVID-19 response was predicted for HIV/AIDS, malaria, and maternal mortality. HIV/AIDS predictions assumed an arbitrarily low (20%) loss to follow-up (no medication) for current infections extending for 6 months, with mortality returning to 1990 levels (essentially pre-ART). Reduced detection of new HIV infections and initiation of management is based on first quarter 2020 data.25 Excess malaria burden was estimated based on 6 months of incidence and mortality rate changes recently predicted by the WHO for three scenarios of minor, moderate, and major reductions in services (WHO scenario 1 [WS1]: no insecticide-treated net [ITN] campaigns, continuous ITN distributions reduced by 25%, WS4: no ITN campaigns, access to effective antimalarial treatment reduced by 25%, and WS9: no ITN campaigns, both continuous ITN distributions and access to effective antimalarial treatment reduced by 75%).31 Relative malaria mortality and incidence rates by age for Uganda were derived from the Institute of Health Metrics data,32 with the 2018 baseline mortality reported by the WHO.18 Maternal mortality was based on Uganda data from 2019 to 2020 and the data include only mortality, not persisting injury (see Results section). The study used publicly available secondary aggregate-level data. No individual person-identifying information was used.

Based on the provided information, it seems that the study focused on predicting the impact of COVID-19 and the public health response on disease burden in Uganda, specifically for HIV/AIDS, malaria, and maternal health. The study utilized data from various sources, including population structures, HIV and tuberculosis reports, malaria incidence data, and maternal mortality data.

To improve access to maternal health, potential innovations could include:

1. Telemedicine and Telehealth: Implementing telemedicine and telehealth solutions can enable pregnant women to receive prenatal care, consultations, and follow-up appointments remotely. This can help overcome geographical barriers and ensure access to healthcare services, especially in rural or remote areas.

2. Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications: Developing mobile applications that provide information, guidance, and reminders for pregnant women can empower them to take control of their health. These apps can offer personalized advice, track prenatal appointments, provide educational resources, and send alerts for important milestones or medication reminders.

3. Community Health Workers: Expanding the role of community health workers can improve access to maternal health services. These trained individuals can provide education, support, and basic healthcare services to pregnant women in their communities. They can also facilitate referrals to healthcare facilities when necessary.

4. Maternal Health Vouchers: Implementing voucher programs that provide financial assistance for maternal health services can help reduce financial barriers and improve access. These vouchers can cover costs for prenatal care, delivery, postnatal care, and emergency obstetric services.

5. Mobile Clinics: Deploying mobile clinics to remote or underserved areas can bring essential maternal health services closer to the communities in need. These clinics can provide prenatal check-ups, antenatal care, vaccinations, and health education.

6. Birth Preparedness and Emergency Transport Systems: Establishing systems that ensure timely transportation for pregnant women in need of emergency obstetric care can save lives. This can involve setting up emergency phone lines, training ambulance drivers, and coordinating with healthcare facilities to ensure prompt response and care.

It’s important to note that these are potential recommendations based on the general goal of improving access to maternal health. The specific context and feasibility of these innovations would need to be assessed and tailored to the local healthcare system and resources available in Uganda.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation to improve access to maternal health based on the provided description is to tailor COVID-19 responses according to population structure and local disease vulnerabilities. This means that the public health response should take into consideration the specific needs and challenges faced by pregnant women and new mothers in Uganda.

Specifically, the recommendation suggests that while addressing the COVID-19 pandemic is important, it should not come at the expense of other essential healthcare services, such as maternal health. The potential impact of the public health response on maternal health should be predicted and measures should be taken to mitigate any negative effects.

This could involve ensuring that maternal health services remain accessible and available during the pandemic, implementing strategies to minimize the risk of COVID-19 transmission in healthcare facilities, and providing adequate support and resources for pregnant women and new mothers.

By implementing this recommendation, it is hoped that the hard-won gains in addressing vulnerabilities in women and children’s health will not be reversed, and that access to maternal health services will be maintained and improved during the COVID-19 pandemic.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided description, it seems that the methodology used in this study involved collecting data from various sources, including the Uganda Bureau of Statistics census report, UN data, President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) weekly surge reports, Uganda Health Management Information System (HMIS) quarterly reporting, and other relevant reports. The data collected included information on population structure, HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, and maternal mortality.

To simulate the impact of the COVID-19 public health response on access to maternal health, the study used age-based COVID-19 mortality data from China and applied it to the population structures of Uganda and comparison countries with previously established outbreaks. The study then compared theoretical mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost. The impact of possible scenarios of the COVID-19 public health response on morbidity and mortality for HIV/AIDS, malaria, and maternal health in Uganda was also predicted.

The calculations of DALYs lost followed broadly the methods outlined for the most recent WHO global burden of disease estimates. This involved defining life years lost by age, using a standard life table reflecting the highest life expectancy in the world today, and applying disability weights to reflect the relative severity of diseases. The study multiplied the DALYs lost for a single health event by the population incidence and deaths by age-group to calculate the COVID-19 disease burden and excess HIV, malaria, and maternal mortality.

For the simulation of reduced health service access in Uganda through the COVID-19 response, the study made assumptions about the impact on HIV/AIDS, malaria, and maternal mortality. These assumptions included a low loss to follow-up for current HIV infections, reduced detection of new HIV infections, and initiation of management based on first quarter 2020 data. The excess malaria burden was estimated based on changes in incidence and mortality rate predictions by the WHO for different scenarios of reductions in services. Maternal mortality was based on Uganda data from 2019 to 2020.

It is important to note that the study used publicly available secondary aggregate-level data and did not use individual person-identifying information.

Yabelana ngalokhu:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email