Socioecological predictors of breastfeeding practices in rural eastern Ethiopia

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aims to examine predictors of infant feeding practices in rural eastern Ethiopia, specifically in Haramaya, where undernutrition is widespread.
– Identifying factors that promote ideal breastfeeding practices can help decrease neonatal and infant death rates and contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals set for 2030.
– While previous studies have highlighted the benefits of breastfeeding in reducing the risk of undernutrition, infection, and mortality, no studies have explored predictors of breastfeeding practices in this specific region.
Study Highlights:
– The study found that nearly half of the infants in Haramaya were non-exclusively breastfed.
– Prelacteal feeding was a common practice in the region, with gender differences observed.
– Factors such as severe food insecurity and maternal illiteracy were associated with lower odds of early breastfeeding initiation and untimely complementary feeding.
– The study raises questions about gendered breastfeeding norms, the role of khat consumption on infant feeding, and the complex factors that affect breastfeeding practices in the region.
Recommendations for Lay Readers:
– Promote exclusive breastfeeding by providing education and support to mothers, particularly those facing severe food insecurity and with limited literacy.
– Address gendered breastfeeding norms and promote equal access to breastfeeding support for both male and female infants.
– Consider the impact of khat consumption on infant feeding practices and explore interventions to mitigate its effects.
– Further research is needed to better understand the socioecological factors influencing breastfeeding practices in Haramaya and develop targeted interventions.
Recommendations for Policy Makers:
– Allocate resources for breastfeeding education and support programs in rural eastern Ethiopia, with a focus on areas with high rates of undernutrition.
– Implement policies to address gender disparities in breastfeeding support and ensure equal access for all infants.
– Consider integrating breastfeeding promotion into existing programs addressing food security and literacy in the region.
– Support further research to inform evidence-based interventions and monitor progress towards improving breastfeeding practices.
Key Role Players:
– Ministry of Health: Responsible for developing and implementing breastfeeding policies and programs.
– Local Health Authorities: Involved in the delivery of breastfeeding education and support services at the community level.
– Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs): Provide resources and expertise in implementing breastfeeding interventions and support programs.
– Community Health Workers: Play a crucial role in delivering breastfeeding education and support to mothers at the grassroots level.
– Women’s Associations and Community Leaders: Engage in community mobilization and advocacy efforts to promote breastfeeding practices.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training and Capacity Building: Budget for training healthcare providers, community health workers, and volunteers on breastfeeding education and support.
– Educational Materials: Allocate funds for the development and distribution of educational materials, such as brochures, posters, and videos, to raise awareness about breastfeeding practices.
– Community Outreach Programs: Set aside resources for organizing community events, workshops, and support groups to engage and educate mothers on breastfeeding.
– Monitoring and Evaluation: Include budget items for data collection, analysis, and monitoring of breastfeeding practices to assess the impact of interventions.
– Research Funding: Allocate funds for further research to explore the socioecological factors influencing breastfeeding practices and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong. The study provides data from 102 households in rural eastern Ethiopia, which is a significant sample size. The study examines predictors of infant feeding practices, including early initiation, prelacteal feeding, and untimely complementary feeding. The results reveal high rates of prelacteal feeding and low prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding. However, the study did not find statistically significant predictors for early initiation and untimely complementary feeding. To improve the strength of the evidence, future studies could consider increasing the sample size and conducting a more comprehensive analysis to identify additional factors influencing breastfeeding practices in the region.

Background: Estimates by the World Health Organization indicate that over 800,000 global neonatal deaths each year are attributed to deviations from recommended best practices in infant feeding. Identifying factors promoting ideal breastfeeding practices may facilitate efforts to decrease neonatal and infant death rates and progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals set for 2030. Though numerous studies have identified the benefits of breastfeeding in reducing the risk of childhood undernutrition, infection and illness, and mortality in low- and middle-income countries, no studies have explored predictors of breastfeeding practices in rural eastern Ethiopia, where undernutrition is widespread. The aim of this study is to examine predictors of infant feeding practices in Haramaya, Ethiopia, using a multi-level conceptual framework. Methods: This study uses data collected from household questionnaires during the Campylobacter Genomics and Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (CAGED) project among 102 households in the Haramaya woreda, Eastern Hararghe Zone, Eastern Ethiopia, and investigates factors influencing breastfeeding practices: early initiation, prelacteal feeding, and untimely complementary feeding. Results: Nearly half (47.9%) of infants in this study were non-exclusively breastfed (n = 96). Generalized liner mixed effects models of breastfeeding practices revealed that prelacteal feeding may be a common practice in the region (43.9%, n = 98) and characterized by gender differences (p =.03). No factors evaluated were statistically significantly predictive of early initiation and untimely complementary feeding (82% and 14%, respectively). Severely food insecure mothers had more than 72% lower odds of early breastfeeding initiation, and participants who self-reported as being illiterate had 1.53 times greater odds of untimely complementary feeding (95% CI, [0.30,7.69]) followed by male children having 1.45 greater odds of being untimely complementary fed compared to female (95% CI,[0.40,5.37]). Conclusions: This study found high rates of prelacteal feeding and low prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding, with girls more likely to be exclusively breastfed. While no predictors evaluated in this multi-level framework were associated with prevalence of early initiation or complementary feeding, rates may be clinically meaningful in a region burdened by undernutrition. Findings raise questions about gendered breastfeeding norms, the under-examined role of khat consumption on infant feeding, and the complex factors that affect breastfeeding practices in this region. This information may be used to guide future research questions and inform intervention strategies.

Our breastfeeding practices model was developed as a conceptual framework that merges the socioecological model [41] with UNICEF’s conceptual framework on the causes of undernutrition [42]. As described in the introduction, the UNICEF model was adopted and modified to understand: 1) basic, 2) underlying, 3) immediate, and 4) physiological factors that impact breastfeeding practices in Haramaya. In the UNICEF model, suboptimal breastfeeding falls under “care practices” and is an underlying cause of undernutrition. Our model (Fig. 1) integrates these undernutrition factors with breastfeeding practices as our outcomes of interest. Further, our model incorporates factors at the physiological level which have been described in the literature to impact breastfeeding. While the model is certainly not exhaustive, it serves as a framework for conceptualizing how multilevel factors such as economic context, empowerment, and delayed breastfeeding initiation may affect breastfeeding practices in the study population. Breastfeeding practices in Haramaya are largely unknown and thus factors in each level of the model are derived from current literature on predictors of infant feeding in other regions, including in Ethiopia. Socioecological predictors of breastfeeding practices and infant and young child feeding At the center of our conceptual model is breastfeeding practices. These practices include early initiation, prelacteal feeding, colostrum avoidance, exclusive breastfeeding, and untimely complementary feeding. These practices are determined based on recommended and discouraged infant feeding practices reported in the literature. Optimum feeding practices include breastfeeding immediately after birth (early initiation), offering no other foods or liquids (exclusive breastfeeding), and initiating complementary foods no earlier than 6 months of age. The WHO also discourages introducing complementary foods later than 6–8 months of age, as breast milk is then insufficient for the nutritional needs of the infant. Prelacteal feeding is also a discouraged practice, defined as offering food or drinks (such as water, honey, formula milk, or fruit juice) to a newborn prior to establishing breastfeeding. CAGED formative research included rapid ethnography, full household enumeration within the study region, household questionnaires, anthropometric measurement of children, and collection of samples for laboratory analysis. The primary aims, research questions, and results have been published elsewhere [4, 5, 43]. Using data collected through household questionnaires during the formative research, this study examines breastfeeding practices in Haramaya woreda. Full details of data collection methodology have been previously published [5] but are presented briefly below for ease of reference. Haramaya woreda is a semi-arid region of East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Region, where most of the population practices mixed crop-livestock livelihoods. High rates of extreme poverty burden the region, and women are predominantly responsible for both infant and livestock housing, safeguarding, feeding, and healthcare [4]. It is a district characterized by large family sizes, high fertility rates, and very high childhood undernutrition rates [5]. The region is highly affected by climate change, increasing population pressure, and reducing land and water availability. Khat production is pervasive and has partially or fully replaced grain and vegetable production in many households across the region [12]. Within this context, households were targeted for inclusion in the study (see details below); while men, women, and children were participants in the overall study [5] data included in analysis here all come from surveys conducted with women in those households. In Ethiopia, kebeles are the smallest geographic administrative units recognized in census mapping. Five of the twelve Haramaya kebeles were selected for inclusion in the formative research based on maximized geographical distance between the kebeles. Household surveys were conducted with men and women in randomly targeted households across the five Haramaya kebeles. Eligibility criteria of the household included the presence of at least three chickens in the homestead (defined as a collection of households, often extended family, that share common areas), non-participation in any other animal husbandry project, and having lived in Haramaya woreda for at least three months. Eligibility criteria of the child included the absence of any visible congenital anomalies, absence of an extended hospital stay for mother or child following the child’s birth, and child age of 11–13 months. A total of 102 households were randomly selected and completed the household survey. Data were collected between September and December 2018. The sample size was based on the primary research objectives of the formative research; thus, this study is not powered to measure maternal and infant health or breastfeeding outcomes. Research presented here is covered under the CAGED study protocol that underwent ethical review and received approval from the Haramaya University Institutional Health Ethics Research Review Committee (IHRERC/152/2018), the Ethiopia National Research Ethics Review Committee (MoST/3–10/168/2018), and the Institutional Review Board at the University of Florida (201,703,252). The household survey was developed in collaboration with the University of Florida (UF) and Haramaya University (HU) teams. A draft was developed initially by the UF team, then shared electronically with the HU team, who made substantive revisions in early 2018. The modified version was entered in April/May of 2018 into REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute [44]. REDCap draft survey was loaded onto Samsung Galaxy Tablets, where all data entry was conducted. Substantial revisions came from a three-step piloting and revision process that occurred during a two-week training workshop at Haramaya University in August 2018. First, three Ethiopian data collectors recommended a round of revisions after reading the tablet-based survey independently and with each other. A second round of revisions was provided by an extended team of social science and public health experts from UF and HU who went over the survey together, line by line. The team took two full days to review the survey, validate local examples, identify appropriate food choices, brand names, and vitamins available, and reword or remove questions that were not culturally appropriate or relevant. The team also discussed at length how best to ask each question, including what translation into Afan Oromo would be most appropriate to preserve the meaning of questions. Finally, the three data collectors and supervisor field-tested the survey within local non-eligible communities near Haramaya University. Revisions were made to the final survey. The primary outcome variables for this study were 1) early breastfeeding initiation, 2) prelacteal feeding, and 3) untimely complementary feeding. Early initiation was coded dichotomously as whether the infant was put to the breast within one hour of birth. Prelacteal feeding was coded as a dichotomous variable, defined by whether the child was given anything to drink other than breast milk during the first 3 days after delivery. Untimely complementary feeding was measured by identifying the child’s age when first given something to eat other than breast milk (either early – before 6 months or late – after 8 months). Exclusive breastfeeding was analyzed only descriptively, as this practice is a composite of other breastfeeding practices in the analysis but is defined as the infant receiving breast milk and nothing else for the first 6 months of life. Several standard predictor variables used in this study (ie. maternal age, and number of antenatal care visits) were generated using single questions from the household survey. However, composite variables were also used; further detail on methods used to generate those variables is included below. Time poverty was monitored using the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture (WEIA) Index. Participants are asked to define number of hours (sum amount of time) of work-related tasks (ie. employment, own business work, farming, cooking) performed 24 h prior to a household interview [45]. Individuals who worked more than 10.5 h in the day were identified as time impoverished [45]. Whether the participant’s primary source of income was from khat was measured by a single question in which the participant was asked to identify their primary source of livelihood (animal production, crop production, khat production, petty trade, remittances, or other). Severe food insecurity was measured using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) [46] with items which asked whether the participant experienced at least one of these often (more than ten times in the past month): running out of food, going to bed hungry, or going a whole day and night without eating. Food secure, mildly food insecure, and moderately insecure households were not identifiable as our questionnaire included a subset of questions for severe food insecurity from the HFIAS. Statistical analysis was conducted using R version 4.0.2. Descriptive statistics were conducted to characterize breastfeeding practices, potential covariates, and additional factors such as food insecurity. Bivariate logistic regression was conducted on our breastfeeding outcomes. Untimely complementary feeding was disaggregated to early and late complementary feeding in our bivariate analysis and aggregated for multivariate models. Predictors that met the established cut-off (p-value < 0.20) (Table ​(Table2)2) were included in the multivariate analysis. Given the sample size, a backward selection approach was taken to conduct generalized linear mixed effects modeling (GLMM) to account for any dependency between clustered covariates and response variables. The lme4 package in R was utilized for GLMM analysis. Models were created to understand the effect of potential confounders (ie. mother’s age, literacy, child sex, kebele) on each outcome. To select the best fitting model and assign covariates as a fixed or random effect, variance, Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion and log likelihood scores were evaluated. Mother’s age, literacy, and child sex were considered as fixed effects while kebele was included as a random effect in all models. Odds ratios were calculated with a 95% confidence interval to determine the relative odds of targeted breastfeeding practices occurring given exposure to variables of interest. Early initiation of breastfeeding mixed model regression summary (n = 94) 1Kebele included as a random effect

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could be used to improve access to maternal health in rural eastern Ethiopia:

1. Mobile Health (mHealth) Applications: Develop mobile applications that provide information and support to pregnant women and new mothers, including guidance on breastfeeding practices, nutrition, and infant care. These apps can be easily accessed on smartphones, which are becoming more prevalent in rural areas.

2. Community Health Workers: Train and deploy community health workers who can provide education and support to pregnant women and new mothers in rural communities. These workers can conduct home visits, organize group sessions, and provide personalized guidance on breastfeeding practices and maternal health.

3. Telemedicine: Establish telemedicine services that allow pregnant women and new mothers in rural areas to consult with healthcare professionals remotely. This can help address barriers to accessing healthcare services, especially in areas with limited healthcare facilities and transportation options.

4. Peer Support Groups: Create peer support groups for pregnant women and new mothers, where they can share experiences, receive emotional support, and learn from each other. These groups can be facilitated by trained community members or healthcare professionals and can provide a supportive environment for breastfeeding and maternal health.

5. Maternal Health Clinics: Set up dedicated maternal health clinics in rural areas, staffed by trained healthcare professionals. These clinics can provide comprehensive prenatal and postnatal care, including breastfeeding support, nutrition counseling, and monitoring of maternal and infant health.

6. Supply Chain Management: Improve the supply chain for maternal health products, such as breastfeeding equipment, supplements, and medications. Ensure that these products are readily available in rural areas and affordable for women and their families.

7. Health Education Campaigns: Conduct targeted health education campaigns to raise awareness about the importance of breastfeeding and maternal health. These campaigns can use various communication channels, such as radio, television, community gatherings, and posters, to reach women and their families in rural areas.

8. Maternity Waiting Homes: Establish maternity waiting homes near healthcare facilities, where pregnant women can stay in the weeks leading up to their due date. These homes provide a safe and supportive environment for women to receive prenatal care, rest, and prepare for childbirth, including learning about breastfeeding practices.

9. Financial Incentives: Introduce financial incentives, such as cash transfers or vouchers, to encourage pregnant women and new mothers to seek and utilize maternal health services. These incentives can help offset the costs associated with transportation, healthcare fees, and purchasing necessary supplies for breastfeeding.

10. Policy and Advocacy: Advocate for policies and programs that prioritize maternal health and breastfeeding support in rural areas. This includes ensuring adequate funding, training healthcare professionals, and integrating maternal health services into existing healthcare systems.

It is important to note that the implementation of these innovations should be context-specific and consider the unique needs and challenges of rural eastern Ethiopia.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the description provided, the recommendation to improve access to maternal health in rural eastern Ethiopia is to develop and implement targeted interventions based on the findings of the study. The study identified several factors that influence breastfeeding practices in the region, including prelacteal feeding and untimely complementary feeding.

To address these issues and improve access to maternal health, the following recommendations can be considered:

1. Education and awareness: Implement educational programs to raise awareness about the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding and the risks associated with prelacteal feeding and untimely complementary feeding. This can be done through community health workers, antenatal care visits, and community-based programs.

2. Empowerment of women: Promote women’s empowerment and involvement in decision-making processes related to infant feeding practices. This can be achieved through initiatives that provide women with knowledge, skills, and resources to make informed choices about breastfeeding.

3. Supportive healthcare services: Strengthen healthcare services by providing training to healthcare providers on breastfeeding counseling and support. This can help ensure that mothers receive accurate information and guidance on breastfeeding practices.

4. Addressing food insecurity: Develop strategies to address food insecurity, as the study found that severely food insecure mothers had lower odds of early breastfeeding initiation. This can include interventions such as improving access to nutritious food, promoting income-generating activities, and implementing social safety net programs.

5. Gender-sensitive approach: Take a gender-sensitive approach to breastfeeding interventions, considering the gendered norms and practices that influence breastfeeding practices. This can involve engaging men in discussions and activities related to breastfeeding and promoting gender equality in caregiving responsibilities.

6. Community engagement: Engage the community in promoting and supporting breastfeeding practices. This can be done through community-based support groups, peer counseling programs, and community mobilization activities.

By implementing these recommendations, it is expected that access to maternal health will be improved, leading to increased rates of exclusive breastfeeding and better health outcomes for mothers and infants in rural eastern Ethiopia.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Community-based education and awareness programs: Implement programs that educate and raise awareness among community members about the importance of breastfeeding and the recommended best practices. This can include workshops, seminars, and information campaigns targeting pregnant women, new mothers, and their families.

2. Training and capacity building for healthcare providers: Provide training and capacity building programs for healthcare providers, including doctors, nurses, and midwives, to enhance their knowledge and skills in supporting and promoting breastfeeding. This can include training on breastfeeding techniques, counseling, and addressing common challenges.

3. Establishing breastfeeding support groups: Create support groups within the community where mothers can share their experiences, seek advice, and receive support from other breastfeeding mothers. These groups can be facilitated by trained healthcare providers or community volunteers.

4. Strengthening healthcare infrastructure: Improve the availability and accessibility of healthcare facilities, especially in rural areas, to ensure that pregnant women and new mothers have access to quality maternal health services. This can include building or upgrading healthcare facilities, providing necessary equipment and supplies, and ensuring the availability of skilled healthcare providers.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Baseline data collection: Collect data on the current status of maternal health and breastfeeding practices in the target population. This can include information on breastfeeding rates, early initiation of breastfeeding, prelacteal feeding practices, and untimely complementary feeding.

2. Intervention implementation: Implement the recommended interventions, such as community-based education programs, training for healthcare providers, and establishment of breastfeeding support groups. Ensure proper monitoring and evaluation of the interventions.

3. Data collection post-intervention: Collect data after the implementation of the interventions to assess any changes in breastfeeding practices and access to maternal health services. This can include surveys, interviews, and observations.

4. Data analysis: Analyze the collected data to determine the impact of the interventions on improving access to maternal health. Compare the post-intervention data with the baseline data to identify any significant changes or improvements.

5. Evaluation and feedback: Evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions and provide feedback for further improvement. This can involve assessing the reach and impact of the interventions, identifying any challenges or barriers, and making necessary adjustments for future implementation.

By following this methodology, it would be possible to simulate the impact of the recommended interventions on improving access to maternal health and identify areas for further intervention or improvement.

Yabelana ngalokhu:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email