Prevalence and Correlates of Viral Load Suppression and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Drug Resistance Among Children and Adolescents in South Rift Valley and Kisumu, Kenya

listen audio

Study Justification:
This study aimed to assess the prevalence of viral load suppression (VS) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drug resistance among children and adolescents living with HIV (CALHIV) in South Rift Valley and Kisumu, Kenya. The study was conducted to address the unique challenges faced by CALHIV, including poorer treatment outcomes, risk for drug-resistance mutations (HIVDRMs), and limited drug formulations. By understanding the factors associated with VS and HIVDRMs, the study aimed to inform interventions and improve treatment outcomes for CALHIV.
Highlights:
– The study enrolled 969 CALHIV aged 1-19 years who had been on antiretroviral therapy (ART) for more than 6 months.
– The prevalence of viral suppression (VL

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is relatively strong, but there are some areas for improvement. The study design is cross-sectional, which limits the ability to establish causality. Additionally, the abstract does not provide information on the sample size or the representativeness of the sample. To improve the evidence, future studies could consider using a longitudinal design to better understand the predictors of viral suppression and HIV drug resistance among children and adolescents. Additionally, providing more details on the sample size and the sampling method would enhance the generalizability of the findings.

BACKGROUND: Children and adolescents living with HIV (CALHIV) face unique challenges, including poorer treatment outcomes, risk for drug-resistance mutations (HIVDRMs), and limited drug formulations. We estimated viral suppression (VS) prevalence and evaluated predictors of VS and HIVDRMs in Kenya. METHODS: From 2018-2020, CALHIV 1-19 years on antiretroviral therapy (ART) >6 months were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Participants underwent viral load (VL) testing; those with VL ≥1000 copies/mL had HIVDRM testing. Sociodemographic questionnaires and medical record abstraction were completed. VS prevalence (VL 24 months (adjusted PR [aPR]: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.06-1.41), an integrase strand transfer inhibitor-containing regimen (1.13; 1.02-1.26), and attending a level 3 health facility (1.23; 1.11-1.36) were associated with VS. Missing ≥3 doses of ART in the past month (aPR: .73; 95% CI: .58-.92), having a viremic mother with HIV (.72; .53-.98), and having 3-7 (.90; .83-.97), 8-13 (.89; .82-.97), or ≥14 (.84; .77-.92) compared with <2 adherence counseling referrals were inversely associated with VS. A high proportion (n = 119, 81.5%) of unsuppressed participants had evidence of any major HIVDRM. CONCLUSIONS: HIV treatment programs should target interventions for pediatric patients at risk for treatment failure-namely, those with a caregiver with failed VS and those struggling with adherence.

Between December 2018 and March 2020, participants were invited to enroll in this cross-sectional study based on random selection from 13 treatment clinics supported by the Military HIV Research Program (MHRP) and the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) in Western Kenya. The random sample was approximately weighted by clinic and stratified by time on ART and age. Randomization was conducted in Stata (StataCorp, College Station, TX) using listings of current clients from each clinic and is representative of the general population of children and adolescents on ART. Individuals were eligible for enrollment if they were at least 1 year to 19 years of age, had been on first- or second-line ART for at least 6 months, and had attended at least 1 follow-up ART clinic visit in the last 6 months. Participants aged 13–17 years were required to have been informed of their HIV status. Study staff administered sociodemographic questionnaires to participants aged 18 years and older, caregivers if the participant was younger than 13 years, and both caregivers and participants if the participant was between 13 and 17 years. Responses captured demographics, self- or parent-reported ART adherence, side effects, and support group participation. Participants underwent a blood draw for VL unless results of a VL drawn for routine clinical care within 1 month of study enrollment were available. Medical and pharmacy record abstraction was completed within 3 weeks of the participant’s visit, including duration on ART, ART regimen, referral history, nutritional status assessments, World Health Organization (WHO) staging, maternal VL where available, and tuberculosis (TB) treatment history. Data from medical record abstraction captured information and events prior to enrollment. Referral history captured documented referrals for adherence counselling and other services; however, evidence of completion of the referred services was unavailable. Data were transcribed onto case report forms and entered in the Clinplus platform (Anju Software, Tempe, AZ). HIV VL was measured via nucleic acid amplification methods on the Abbott m2000sp/rt RealTime System testing platform with a 1-mL plasma sample volume and a lower limit of detection of 40 copies/mL. All testing was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasma samples from participants with a VL greater than 1000 copies/mL underwent sequencing of the Pol region using a laboratory-validated modification to the ViroSeq HIV-1 Genotyping System v2.0 (Abbott Molecular, Chicago, IL). Sequences were evaluated for major mutations conferring resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), and protease inhibitors (PIs) using the SmartGene Integrated Database Network System (SmartGene, Zug, Switzerland) to access mutation lists from the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database, version 8.8.0 (Stanford University, Stanford, CA) [16]. The Kericho laboratory is accredited by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and runs CAP EQA for HIVDRM testing. HIV-1 subtype was inferred from the consensus evolutionary tree from SmartGene Integrated Database Network System, which utilizes the neighbor-joining method in MEGA4 software version 4 (Tamura, Dudley, Nei, and Kumar 2007). Evolutionary distances were computed using the maximum composite likelihood method in units of the number of base substitutions per site. The tree was then generated by the neighbor-joining method from a nucleotide alignment. Viral suppression was defined using WHO criteria as a VL of less than 1000 copies/mL. The prevalence of VS was estimated using the Wilson score method and reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in the overall sample, and by age group, duration on ART, and first- versus second-line ART. Bivariate analyses were conducted using Pearson’s chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Generalized linear models with a Poisson distribution and robust standard errors were used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% CIs for associations between sociodemographic and clinical factors and VS. Factors significant (α = .05) in the unadjusted models and those identified based on a priori and clinical knowledge of the study setting were included in the adjusted model. ART regimen was dropped from the adjusted model due to redundancy with ART class. We tested for multicollinearity using the variable inflation factor. Analyses were restricted to complete cases after creating separate categories for unknown data from participant medical records. For participants with a VL of 1000 copies/mL or higher, the prevalence of specific HIVDRMs and categories of HIVDRMs were calculated by dividing the number of participants with 1 or more mutations by the total number of participants genotyped. For the drug-resistance analyses, we included all participants with available HIVDRM data and did not restrict to complete cases. Analyses were performed in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and Stata version 16.1 (StataCorp) software. The study was approved by institutional review boards of the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research and the Kenya Medical Research Institute Scientific and Ethics Review Unit (KEMRI SERU). All participants provided informed consent and assent, as applicable.

Based on the provided information, it appears that the study focuses on evaluating viral load suppression and HIV drug resistance among children and adolescents living with HIV in Kenya. The study identifies several factors associated with viral suppression, such as the duration on antiretroviral therapy (ART), the type of ART regimen, and the level of the health facility attended. It also highlights the importance of adherence to ART and the impact of having a viremic mother with HIV on viral suppression.

To improve access to maternal health, some potential innovations and recommendations could include:

1. Integrated HIV and maternal health services: Implementing integrated services that combine HIV care and maternal health services can improve access to comprehensive care for pregnant women living with HIV. This approach ensures that women receive both antenatal care and HIV treatment in one location, reducing barriers to accessing care.

2. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions: Utilizing mobile technology, such as text messaging or mobile applications, can help improve access to maternal health information and reminders for HIV-positive pregnant women. These interventions can provide educational resources, appointment reminders, medication adherence support, and access to teleconsultations with healthcare providers.

3. Task-shifting and training of healthcare workers: Expanding the roles of healthcare workers, such as nurses and midwives, through task-shifting can help increase access to maternal health services. Training healthcare workers to provide comprehensive HIV care, including antenatal and postnatal care, can help address the shortage of specialized healthcare providers in resource-limited settings.

4. Community-based interventions: Engaging community health workers and peer support groups can improve access to maternal health services for HIV-positive pregnant women. These interventions can provide counseling, education, and support throughout the pregnancy and postpartum period, ensuring that women receive the necessary care and adhere to their treatment.

5. Strengthening health systems: Investing in health system strengthening, including infrastructure development, reliable supply chains for medications, and quality improvement initiatives, can enhance access to maternal health services. This includes ensuring that health facilities have the necessary equipment, medications, and trained staff to provide comprehensive care to HIV-positive pregnant women.

It is important to note that these recommendations are general and may need to be tailored to the specific context and needs of the population being served.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the provided description, the study focused on estimating viral suppression prevalence and evaluating predictors of viral suppression and HIV drug resistance among children and adolescents living with HIV in Kenya. The study found several factors associated with viral suppression, including being on antiretroviral therapy (ART) for more than 24 months, using an integrase strand transfer inhibitor-containing regimen, and attending a level 3 health facility. On the other hand, missing three or more doses of ART in the past month, having a viremic mother with HIV, and having fewer adherence counseling referrals were inversely associated with viral suppression. The study also found a high proportion of unsuppressed participants with evidence of HIV drug resistance mutations.

Based on these findings, the following recommendation can be developed into an innovation to improve access to maternal health:

1. Strengthen ART adherence support: Develop innovative interventions and strategies to improve ART adherence among pregnant women living with HIV. This can include personalized counseling, reminder systems (such as mobile phone apps or SMS reminders), and peer support programs to address barriers to adherence.

2. Integration of maternal and child health services: Enhance the integration of maternal and child health services with HIV care and treatment programs. This can involve co-locating services, training healthcare providers on comprehensive care for pregnant women living with HIV, and ensuring seamless coordination and communication between different healthcare providers involved in maternal and child health.

3. Community-based interventions: Implement community-based interventions to support pregnant women living with HIV, including home visits by trained healthcare workers or community health workers. These interventions can provide education, counseling, and support to ensure optimal adherence to ART and regular antenatal care visits.

4. Strengthen healthcare infrastructure: Invest in improving the capacity and quality of healthcare facilities, particularly at the primary healthcare level, to provide comprehensive maternal health services for women living with HIV. This can include training healthcare providers, ensuring the availability of essential medicines and diagnostic tools, and improving the overall infrastructure and equipment.

5. Empowerment and education: Promote empowerment and education among pregnant women living with HIV to enable them to make informed decisions about their health and access appropriate care. This can involve providing information on HIV treatment, prevention of mother-to-child transmission, and the importance of regular antenatal care visits.

By implementing these recommendations, it is possible to improve access to maternal health for women living with HIV, leading to better health outcomes for both mothers and their children.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, the study focuses on the prevalence and correlates of viral load suppression and HIV drug resistance among children and adolescents living with HIV in Kenya. The study aims to identify factors associated with viral suppression and drug resistance in order to improve treatment outcomes for pediatric patients.

To improve access to maternal health, the following innovations could be considered:

1. Mobile Health (mHealth) Solutions: Develop mobile applications or SMS-based systems that provide pregnant women with information on prenatal care, nutrition, and postnatal care. These solutions can also be used to schedule appointments, send reminders, and provide access to telemedicine consultations.

2. Community Health Workers (CHWs): Train and deploy CHWs to provide maternal health education, antenatal care, and postnatal care services in remote or underserved areas. CHWs can also conduct home visits to monitor the health of pregnant women and provide support.

3. Telemedicine: Establish telemedicine networks to connect pregnant women in rural areas with healthcare providers in urban centers. This allows for remote consultations, diagnosis, and monitoring of maternal health conditions, reducing the need for travel and improving access to specialized care.

4. Maternal Health Vouchers: Implement voucher programs that provide pregnant women with subsidized or free access to essential maternal health services, including antenatal care, delivery, and postnatal care. These vouchers can be distributed through healthcare facilities or community organizations.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define the target population: Identify the specific group of pregnant women who would benefit from the innovations, such as those in rural areas or with limited access to healthcare facilities.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather information on the current state of maternal health access, including the number of pregnant women, their geographical distribution, and the availability and utilization of maternal health services.

3. Define indicators: Determine key indicators to measure the impact of the innovations, such as the number of prenatal care visits, the percentage of women receiving skilled birth attendance, or the reduction in maternal mortality rates.

4. Simulate scenarios: Use modeling techniques to simulate the potential impact of the innovations on the defined indicators. This can involve creating different scenarios based on the implementation of specific innovations, such as increasing the number of CHWs or expanding telemedicine services.

5. Analyze results: Evaluate the simulated results to assess the potential impact of the innovations on improving access to maternal health. Compare the indicators between different scenarios to identify the most effective interventions.

6. Refine and adjust: Based on the analysis, refine the recommendations and adjust the simulation model if necessary. Consider factors such as cost-effectiveness, scalability, and sustainability of the innovations.

7. Implement and monitor: Implement the recommended innovations and closely monitor their implementation and impact. Continuously collect data on the defined indicators to assess the actual outcomes and make further adjustments if needed.

By following this methodology, stakeholders can assess the potential impact of innovations on improving access to maternal health and make informed decisions on the most effective interventions to implement.

Yabelana ngalokhu:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email