Use of a novel supplementary food and measures to control inflammation in malnourished pregnant women in Sierra Leone to improve birth outcomes: Study protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical effectiveness trial

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Maternal malnutrition is a significant issue in Sierra Leone, with high rates of maternal mortality and stunting in children.
– Poor nutritional status during pregnancy can lead to adverse birth outcomes and long-term consequences for both mothers and infants.
– Nutritional interventions alone may not be effective in the presence of increased inflammation from repeated infections.
– There is a need for interventions that can improve maternal outcomes and reduce stunting in this population.
Highlights:
– This study is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical effectiveness trial.
– It aims to evaluate the impact of a specialized nutritious food and a package of anti-inflammatory interventions on birth outcomes in malnourished pregnant women in Sierra Leone.
– The study will enroll pregnant women with moderate or severe malnutrition and compare the intervention group receiving the specialized food and interventions with a control group receiving standard care.
– Primary outcome measure will be birth length, and secondary outcomes will include maternal weight gain, increase in mid-upper arm circumference, birth weight, head circumference, and infant growth.
– The study will be conducted in collaboration with local non-profit organizations and has obtained ethical approval.
Recommendations:
– The study findings will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of combined nutrition and infection control interventions in improving birth outcomes.
– If successful, this intervention bundle can be easily implemented by governments or non-governmental organizations to address maternal malnutrition and reduce stunting in similar populations.
– The study results should be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at conferences, and sharing with relevant stakeholders and communities.
Key Role Players:
– Pregnant women with malnutrition
– Researchers and study investigators
– Local non-profit organizations, such as Project Peanut Butter (PPB)
– Sierra Leone Ethics and Scientific Review Committee (SLESRC)
– Ministry of Health and Sanitation for the government of Sierra Leone
– District Health Officer
– Study team members, including study coordinators, nurses, and field workers
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Production and distribution of the specialized nutritious food (RUSF) by PPB
– Procurement of anti-inflammatory interventions, such as insecticide-treated mosquito nets, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, azithromycin, albendazole, and testing/treatment for bacterial vaginosis
– Training and capacity building for study team members
– Data collection and management
– Monitoring and evaluation activities
– Publication and dissemination of study findings
– Community engagement and information sessions

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong, but there are some areas for improvement. The study design is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical effectiveness trial, which is a strong design. The study aims to determine whether a combined intervention of a specialized nutritious food for pregnant women and a package of anti-inflammatory interventions results in improved birth anthropometry compared with the standard of care. The study will enroll pregnant women with malnutrition in Sierra Leone, a country with high rates of maternal malnutrition and poor birth outcomes. The primary outcome measure is birth length, and secondary outcomes include maternal weight gain, increase in mid-upper arm circumference, and time to maternal anthropometric recovery, as well as birth weight, head circumference, and linear and ponderal growth in infants. The study has obtained ethical approval and support from relevant authorities. However, the abstract lacks specific details on sample size calculation, randomization process, blinding, and statistical analysis plan. Providing more information on these aspects would strengthen the evidence. Additionally, the abstract does not mention any potential limitations or challenges that may affect the study’s validity. To improve the evidence, the authors should provide more details on the study design, sample size calculation, randomization process, blinding, statistical analysis plan, and potential limitations or challenges.

Background: The negative synergy between poor nutritional status and infectious diseases is doubly detrimental in pregnancy. In Sierra Leone, maternal malnutrition is amongst the highest in the world, while maternal mortality is high at 1320/100,000 live births and stunting in under-five is 37.9%, ranked 110/132 worldwide. Maternal malnutrition has been associated with preterm birth, small-for-gestational age infants, and poor maternal outcomes. Infants born prematurely or small-for-gestational age experience higher mortality and are at risk for stunting and decreased cognitive performance. Nutritional interventions alone during pregnancy may not be as effective in the setting of increased inflammation from repeated infections. Interventions are needed to improve maternal outcomes and reduce stunting in this population. Methods/design: This will be a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical effectiveness trial of an improved supplementary food plus anti-infective therapies compared to standard therapy in malnourished pregnant women. Pregnant women will be randomized to receive a low water activity, ready-to-use supplementary food plus five anti-infective interventions or the standard of care which is 3.5 kg corn/ soy blended flour with 350 mL vegetable oil every two weeks. The five anti-infective interventions are 1) insecticide-treated mosquito net at the time of enrollment into the study, 2) sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine given every 4 weeks, beginning at enrollment or at 13 weeks’ gestation, whichever is later, 3)azithromycin at a dose of 1 g given once at enrollment (after first trimester)and again during 28-34 weeks of gestation, 4)single dose 400 mg albendazole given in second trimester, and 5) testing and treatment for bacterial vaginosis at enrollment and again at 28-34 weeks of gestation. Treatment will be provided for the duration of the pregnancy. The primary outcome measure will be birth length. Secondary outcomes in the mothers will include rates of maternal weight gain and increase in mid-upper arm circumference, and time to maternal anthropometric recovery. Secondary outcomes in the infants will include birth weight, birth head circumference, and linear and ponderal growth. Discussion: Malnutrition remains a major problem in the developing world with lasting maternal and infant consequences. Maternal malnutrition has been associated with intrauterine growth retardation, low birth weight (LBW), pre-term delivery and poor cognitive development. Nutritional interventions alone have not been successful in reducing stunting. By bundling nutritional and anti-infective interventions, we aim to reduce intrauterine growth restriction and low birth weight in moderately malnourished pregnant women in Sierra Leone. If successful, this bundle can easily be implemented by governments or non-governmental organizations. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03079388; Date: March 5, 2017.

In this study, we aim to determine whether a combined intervention of a specialized nutritious food for pregnant women and a package of anti-inflammatory interventions results in improved birth anthropometry compared with the standard of care. This will be a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical effectiveness trial in pregnant women with malnutrition comparing the impact of combined nutrition and infection control interventions with the standard of care in Sierra Leone. The study will enroll pregnant women at less than 35 weeks of gestation with moderate or severe malnutrition. A probable patient diagram is shown in Fig. 1. Patient flow diagram for clinical trial. *Women 16 years of age or older will be enrolled and followed until 6 months post-partum. **Women less than 35 weeks of gestation will be enrolled The study will enroll patients at twenty antenatal clinics in rural Pujehun District in southern Sierra Leone and 10 antenatal clinics in the Rural Western Area District. In 2013, Pujehun District had the highest rate of under 5 stunting at 46.4% which is 8.4% above the national rate. Mothers who are thin (BMI  23, newborn head circumference, birth weight, infant linear and ponderal growth, and infant survival at 3 months and 6 months. The sample size will be 1514 pregnant women with malnutrition, divided equally between RUSF and control groups. This sample size allows for a 20% drop out rate and/or exclusion rate due to fundal height, leaving a final sample size of 1200 (600 per group) with a two tailed significance of 0.05, power of 80%. This will allow for detection of a difference of 0.22 SD or 0.5 cm in birth length and a difference of 0.19 SD or 80 g in birth weight. Subjects will be randomized to receive the RUSF or the standard of care (supercereal, oil, and iron and folic acid tablets), using a random number generator which prospectively assigns participants to a study group. Since RUSF is visually distinct from flour, neither the study subjects nor the research study team members working directly with participants will be blinded. Study managers will be blinded to treatment during data analysis. A study team member will attend each participating antenatal clinic for subject recruitment. All women attending the antenatal clinic will be briefly informed of the study and entry criteria in a group setting. Women willing to be measured and potentially participate will be offered measurement of MUAC and screened for study eligibility. All women meeting eligibility criteria will be offered enrollment and agree via informed consent. Informed consent will be obtained by the on-site study coordinator. All participants who are 16 years of age or older will be able to consent for themselves as adults. If a participant who is younger than 16 wants to participate in the study, they will be required to have consent from a parent or guardian. Upon enrollment, the participant will be interviewed. Demographic information will be recorded, as well as, time of last menses, estimated date of delivery, and fundal height. Anthropometry will include current weight, height, MUAC, and weight history if available. Available medical records of the women will be reviewed with attention to any current or previous pregnancy complications and medications. Subjects will answer a standard clinical symptoms questionnaire, a food frequency questionnaire, and a Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS). Participants will return for follow-up every 2 weeks for measurements and provision of food until delivery. Since birth measurements are primary outcomes, a birth weight team will be identified and trained in order to obtain accurate birth measurements within 48 h of delivery. Participation in the study will continue throughout pregnancy, and follow-up with the mother and infant will continue until 6 months postpartum. Mothers and infants will be followed at usual infant clinic follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-partum contact point clinic. Infant weight, linear growth, and morbidity will be monitored. Maternal weight, MUAC and morbidity will be assessed at these visits, as well. The primary investigator will be responsible for the overall management of the trial. The on-site investigator will be responsible for day to day management of clinic sites. Adverse events have been defined as any reactions to RUSF, emesis, diarrhea, or rashes suggestive of food allergy. To monitor the safety of participants, a data safety monitoring meeting will be held every other month. The meeting will be convened by the Director of Nutrition for the Ministry of Health and Sanitation for the government of Sierra Leone. Present at this meeting will be the director, a study nurse, the district health officer, and one of the investigators. At the meeting routine morbidity data, enrollment data, and participant satisfaction will be reviewed. Minutes of these meetings will be recorded and forwarded to the Sierra Leone Ethics and Scientific Review Committee (SLESRC). A special inquiry will be convened whenever a serious adverse event is discovered. At any time a study staff member is informed about an unexpected event of a participant by a health surveillance assistant, national clinic staff, or community member, this will be reported to the Director of Nutrition for the Ministry of Health and Sanitation for the government of Sierra Leone within 24 h. Information will be gathered, and a summary of the event will be given to the data safety monitoring board within 24 h of being informed. The event will be reviewed in detail by the principle investigator and if the information supports the concern that this could be study related, an independent physician will be asked to review the case and render an opinion. The findings and conclusions will be recorded and forward to SLESRC and the Washington University IRB. Linear programming (LP) technology, a formulaic computer database program listing all potential ingredients, nutritional composition, prices, and country specific availability for Sierra Leone has been used to develop and optimize the RUSF. The RUSF will be produced by Project Peanut Butter (PPB), Sierra Leone, a local non-profit organization that produces and distributes ready to use therapeutic foods. PPB operates a factory in Freetown, Sierra Leone that has been internationally certified to supply RUSF to UN agencies. The spreadsheet-based tool identified a low-cost formula for RUSF for pregnant women. The tool allows users to consider essentially any candidate ingredient, as long as data on nutrient content, technical parameters, and prices are available. A preliminary step in the RUSF development process was conducting a price survey of all potential local ingredients that could be used in a formulation. An initial list of 89 possible locally-available candidate ingredients was identified through the following multi-step, systematic approach: After this draft list was developed, additional ingredients were excluded based on feedback from local producers, nutritionists, food technologists, Sierra Leone government ministries, and other local experts. A subsequent list of 27 locally available candidate ingredients remained following these additional exclusions. The final candidate ingredient list for the Sierra Leone model consisted of 53 ingredients (Table 1). Candidate ingredient list of locally produced and imported foods Using the LP tool designed for Sierra Leone, preliminary formulations were generated in the Food and Nutrition Food Lab at Washington University School of Medicine (WUSTL). Four potential RUSF formulas were created at WUSTL that contained peanuts, milk powder, vegetable oil, sugar, and a vitamin mineral complex. The major difference between the four was the indigenous ingredient present: millet, split pea, cowpea, bambara bean. These four potential RUSF formulas were then tested informally by pregnant women at an antenatal clinic in Pujehun, Sierra Leone. Informal acceptability showed the formula with millet was the overwhelming favorite. The millet formula was further optimized for nutrient content, feasibility of production and organoleptic acceptability. Rudimentary blending and heating techniques were used to create a homogenous lipid matrix containing a variety of legumes, cereals, milk powders, vegetable oils, sugar, vitamin mineral complex and an emulsifying agent until the final formula was determined. Table 2 specifies the ingredient composition of the study RUSF, named Mama Dutasi. The RUSF will provide a total of 520 kcal, 18 g protein, 200% of RDA for most micronutrients during pregnancy (Table 3). The supplement has also been optimized to provide excellent protein quality. The formulation contains an optimal polyunsaturated fatty acid composition by reducing the percent of energy from linoleic acid (omega-6) and increasing the percent of energy from α-linolenic acid (omega-3) to 4.5% and 1.5%, respectively [36–38]. RUSF Ingredient Composition Nutrient profile of study foods a Amount recommended for supplementation, with 200 mcg to come from dietary sources for total RDA of 600 mg/d b Daily ration: 250 g supercereal (CSB+) with sugar, 20 ml oil, 60 mg Fe supplement with 400 mcg folic acid c Calculated based on a WFP supercereal product containing ~ 64% corn, ~ 24% soybean,~ 20 ml vegetable oil Large scale production of this product requires the millet be in pre-processed form. The most effective pre-processing methods are roasting or extrusion cooking followed by milling. In this instance, the process used was sorting, drying, roasting, and milling. Pre-processing was performed at FINIC Industries in Kissy, Sierra Leone. The following outlines the pre-processing of millet in more detail: Proper sorting and cleaning is a necessary step to all raw commodities regardless of the harvest process. Sorting/cleaning the millet required removing dirt, debris, and stones. Visible debris like twigs and grass were removed by hand while dirt and stones were removed with a de-stoner. Once cleaned, the millet was allowed to drain. Roasting is a dry heat method which bakes/toasts the ingredients. The whole grains will be placed in a rotary oven heated by charcoal and dried for 12+ hours. This process is used to destroy microorganisms, lower the water activity, inactivate enzymes and catalyzes flavors via browning reactions. Milling or size reduction of whole grains was necessary prior at incorporating into the process line as to not damage the existing equipment. Size reduction of ingredients is also important for edibility. Although grinding of the final product occurs during the production process for particle reduction and homogenization, it is important that the millet have a small enough particle size to not damage the grinder plates. The roasted, cooled, dried millet was ground to a particle size similar to baking flour and packaged in clean lined peanut buckets. The millet flour was cleared by quality control and food safety testing for microbial contamination at Eurofins Scientific Inc., Des Moines, Iowa, USA and was stored until production of the RUSF product. The final product was packaged in 100 g foil sachets and identified with a custom Mama Dutasi label. Analytical testing was performed for food safety and quality assurance for aflatoxin and microbial contamination at Eurofins Scientific Inc., Des Moines, Iowa, USA. The control group will receive the standard of care for malnourished pregnant women in Sierra Leone which is 3.5 kg super cereal with 350 mL vegetable oil every two weeks. This provides 250 mg portion per day of the super cereal and 25 g oil per day for the mother. Iron and folic acid supplement goal is 90 pills through pregnancy. The study will assure that women have an uninterrupted access to the ready to use local supplementary food and super cereal if they are in the control group. Table ​Table33 provides a comparison of the nutritional composition of the study RUSF, standard of care food, and recommended daily intake for pregnancy. Women will receive the food for the duration of their pregnancy. The intervention group will receive a package of five interventions aimed at decreasing the burden of infections in pregnant women in order to decrease the risk of stillbirth, fetal growth restriction, and premature delivery. This package will include an insecticide-treated mosquito net at the time of enrollment, sufadoxine-pyrimethamine given every 4 weeks beginning at 13 weeks gestation, azithromycin given at the time of enrollment and at 28–34 weeks of gestation, single dose of albendazole at enrollment, and testing and treatment for bacterial vaginosis at enrollment and again in the third trimester. Table 4 details the anti-inflammatory interventions. Anti-Inflammatory Interventions, Dosing, and Timing of Administration • Enrollment or 13 weeks gestation, whichever is later • Every 4 weeks until delivery • Enrollment or second trimester, whichever is later • Weeks 28–34 • Enrollment • Weeks 28–34 The control group will receive the current recommendations of the government of Sierra Leone, which includes 60 mg iron and 400 μg folic acid supplementation starting at enrollment, an insecticide-treated mosquito net at the time of enrollment, three doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine during second and third trimester, and a single dose of albendazole for deworming at enrollment. Table 5 provides a summary of the schedule of activities and interventions for subjects by week of study participation. Schedule of activities/ interventions for subjects by week of study participation aHFIAS household food insecurity assessment scale Food Safety specifications: RUSF specifications will be in accordance with the CODEX guidelines for supplementary food products [39]. Clinical data including demographics, anthropometry, morbidity, and mortality data will be collected by field workers using standardized forms. Field workers will be trained in the questionnaires and measurements prior to collecting any data. Completed data forms will be stored in a secure locked central location. All data will be double entered, compared, and sealed in a password-protected electronic database before the randomization code is broken. All data discrepancies will be resolved by examination of the original data cards and discussion with the relevant field workers. The data set will be locked after all discrepancies have been resolved. Descriptive statistics will be used to characterize the population. Student’s t-test will be used to assess whether primary outcomes of infant birth weight and length, and secondary outcome of maternal weight gain improved significantly in the intervention group compared with the control. Fisher’s exact test will be used to determine if the proportion of mothers recovering from malnutrition and of infants with LBW are improved in the intervention group. Regression modeling will be used to investigate factors that influence maternal and infant outcomes. Independent variables to be considered as covariates for inclusion in the models include: maternal age, weight, number of previous pregnancies, anemia, illness and number of weeks of intervention. For longitudinal measures, the groups will be compared using repeated measures mixed model analysis of variance. Covariates will include age, number of previous pregnancies, years of education and clinic location. Findings of this study will be disseminated through publication in peer reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences. The findings will also be shared with the Director of Nutrition for the Ministry of Health and Sanitation for the government of Sierra Leone. Study results will be presented to the communities and participants involved through community meetings and information sessions.

The innovation described in this study is the use of a specialized nutritious food, called Mama Dutasi, along with a package of anti-inflammatory interventions to improve birth outcomes in malnourished pregnant women in Sierra Leone. Mama Dutasi is a ready-to-use supplementary food that has been developed specifically for pregnant women in Sierra Leone. It provides 520 kcal and 18g of protein, along with 200% of the recommended daily intake of most micronutrients during pregnancy. The food has been optimized to provide excellent protein quality and an optimal polyunsaturated fatty acid composition.

In addition to the specialized food, the intervention group will also receive a package of five anti-inflammatory interventions. These interventions include the provision of an insecticide-treated mosquito net, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine given every 4 weeks, azithromycin given at enrollment and again during weeks 28-34 of gestation, a single dose of albendazole, and testing and treatment for bacterial vaginosis. These interventions aim to decrease the burden of infections in pregnant women, which can lead to stillbirth, fetal growth restriction, and premature delivery.

The control group will receive the standard of care for malnourished pregnant women in Sierra Leone, which includes a different food supplement (3.5 kg super cereal with 350 mL vegetable oil every two weeks) and a different set of interventions (iron and folic acid supplementation, insecticide-treated mosquito net, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, and a single dose of albendazole).

The study will enroll pregnant women with moderate or severe malnutrition and compare the impact of the combined nutrition and infection control interventions with the standard of care. The primary outcome measure will be birth length, and secondary outcomes will include maternal weight gain, recovery from malnutrition, birth weight, head circumference, and infant growth.

The study aims to determine whether the combined intervention of specialized nutrition and anti-inflammatory interventions will result in improved birth anthropometry compared to the standard of care. If successful, this intervention could be easily implemented by governments or non-governmental organizations to improve maternal and infant health outcomes in populations with high rates of malnutrition and infectious diseases.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation proposed in this study is to implement a combined intervention of a specialized nutritious food for pregnant women and a package of anti-inflammatory interventions to improve birth outcomes and reduce maternal malnutrition in Sierra Leone. The study aims to determine whether this intervention results in improved birth anthropometry compared to the standard of care.

The intervention includes providing pregnant women with a low water activity, ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF) that contains peanuts, milk powder, vegetable oil, sugar, and a vitamin mineral complex. The RUSF is designed to provide 520 kcal, 18g protein, and 200% of the recommended daily allowance for most micronutrients during pregnancy. The formulation has been optimized to provide excellent protein quality and an optimal polyunsaturated fatty acid composition.

In addition to the RUSF, the intervention includes five anti-inflammatory interventions: insecticide-treated mosquito nets, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine given every 4 weeks, azithromycin given at enrollment and at 28-34 weeks of gestation, a single dose of albendazole, and testing and treatment for bacterial vaginosis. These interventions aim to decrease the burden of infections in pregnant women and reduce the risk of stillbirth, fetal growth restriction, and premature delivery.

The control group will receive the standard of care for malnourished pregnant women in Sierra Leone, which includes super cereal and vegetable oil supplementation, iron and folic acid supplementation, insecticide-treated mosquito nets, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, albendazole, and testing and treatment for bacterial vaginosis.

The study will enroll pregnant women with moderate or severe malnutrition and compare the impact of the combined nutrition and infection control interventions with the standard of care. The primary outcome measure will be birth length, and secondary outcomes will include maternal weight gain, recovery from malnutrition, birth weight, head circumference, and infant growth.

If successful, this combined intervention could be easily implemented by governments or non-governmental organizations to improve access to maternal health and reduce maternal and infant malnutrition in Sierra Leone.
AI Innovations Methodology
The study aims to improve access to maternal health in Sierra Leone by implementing a combined intervention of a specialized nutritious food for pregnant women and a package of anti-inflammatory interventions. The methodology for simulating the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health includes the following steps:

1. Study Design: The study will be a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical effectiveness trial. Pregnant women with malnutrition will be randomized to receive either the improved supplementary food plus anti-infective therapies or the standard therapy.

2. Participant Enrollment: Pregnant women at less than 35 weeks of gestation with moderate or severe malnutrition will be enrolled from antenatal clinics in rural Pujehun District and the Rural Western Area District in Sierra Leone.

3. Intervention Group: The intervention group will receive a low water activity, ready-to-use supplementary food plus five anti-infective interventions. These interventions include insecticide-treated mosquito nets, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, azithromycin, albendazole, and testing and treatment for bacterial vaginosis.

4. Control Group: The control group will receive the standard of care for malnourished pregnant women in Sierra Leone, which includes super cereal and vegetable oil supplementation, iron and folic acid supplementation, insecticide-treated mosquito nets, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, and albendazole.

5. Data Collection: Data on birth anthropometry, maternal weight gain, mid-upper arm circumference, and time to maternal anthropometric recovery will be collected as primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures include birth weight, head circumference, and linear and ponderal growth of infants.

6. Sample Size: The study aims to enroll 1514 pregnant women with malnutrition, divided equally between the intervention and control groups. This sample size allows for a 20% dropout rate and/or exclusion rate due to fundal height.

7. Randomization: Participants will be randomized to receive either the improved supplementary food plus anti-infective therapies or the standard therapy using a random number generator.

8. Blinding: Participants and research study team members working directly with participants will not be blinded to the treatment group. Study managers will be blinded to treatment during data analysis.

9. Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics, t-tests, Fisher’s exact test, and regression modeling will be used to analyze the data and determine if the intervention group shows significant improvements compared to the control group.

10. Dissemination of Results: The findings of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences, and shared with the Ministry of Health and Sanitation in Sierra Leone. Community meetings and information sessions will also be conducted to share the results with the communities and participants involved.

By implementing this methodology, the study aims to determine the impact of the combined intervention on improving access to maternal health and reducing the negative consequences of maternal malnutrition in Sierra Leone.

Yabelana ngalokhu:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email