Shamba Maisha: A pilot study assessing impacts of a micro-irrigation intervention on the health and economic wellbeing of HIV patients

listen audio

Study Justification:
– HIV/AIDS negatively impacts poverty alleviation and food security, hindering the effectiveness of HIV care programs.
– Nyanza province in Kenya has high HIV prevalence and contributes significantly to rural poverty.
– The study aimed to assess the impact of a micro-irrigation intervention on the health and economic wellbeing of HIV-positive patients and their families.
Highlights:
– Thirty HIV-positive patients in Kisumu, Kenya were provided with a micro-financed loan to receive an irrigation pump and farming guidance.
– Economic data, CD4 counts, household health, and loan repayment history were collected after 12 months.
– Mean annual family income increased by $1,332 over baseline.
– CD4 counts did not change significantly.
– Loan repayment rates were low, likely due to a drought during the intervention period.
Recommendations:
– The study demonstrated the feasibility of an income-generating micro-irrigation intervention among HIV-positive patients.
– Further research is needed to explore ways to improve loan repayment rates.
– Consideration should be given to the impact of external factors, such as drought, on the success of interventions.
Key Role Players:
– Family AIDS Care and Education Services (FACES) program
– Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)
– University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
– KickStart (developer of the irrigation pump)
– Mwanga Agrovet (local store)
– Project coordinator and FACES counselors
– KickStart’s Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Unit
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Micro-irrigation pumps and farming inputs (KickStart’s MoneyMaker Hip Pump, hose pipe, inlet pipe, seeds, fertilizer, pesticides)
– Training and support for farmers and their families
– Monitoring and evaluation activities
– Data collection and analysis
– Communication and coordination expenses

HIV/AIDS negatively impacts poverty alleviation and food security, which reciprocally hinder the rapid scale up and effectiveness of HIV care programs. Nyanza province has the highest HIV prevalence (15.3%), and is the third highest contributor (2.4 million people) to rural poverty in Kenya. Thus, we tested the feasibility of providing a micro-irrigation pump to HIV-positive farmers in order to evaluate its impact on health and economic advancement among HIV-positive patients and their families. Methods. Thirty HIV-positive patients enrolled in the Family AIDS Care and Education Services (FACES) program in Kisumu, Kenya were provided a micro-financed loan to receive an irrigation pump and farming guidance from KickStart, the developer of the pump. Economic data, CD4 counts, household health and loan repayment history were collected 12 months after the pumps were distributed. Results. Mean annual family income increased by $1,332 over baseline. CD4 counts did not change significantly. Though income increased, only three (10%) participants had paid off more than a quarter of the loan. Conclusions. We demonstrated the feasibility of an income-generating micro-irrigation intervention among HIV-positive patients and the collection of health and economic data. While family income improved significantly, loan repayment rates were low- likely complicated by the drought that occurred in Kenya during the intervention period. © 2010 Pandit et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Family AIDS Care and Education Services (FACES) is an HIV care and treatment program in Kenya managed by the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) and the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), funded through the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). Since 2004, FACES has offered services in the diagnosis and treatment of HIV and related illnesses in addition to counseling, support groups, and peer education free of charge. In 2005, FACES expanded to Kisumu (the 3rd largest city in Kenya located on Lake Victoria) at the Lumumba Health Center, Kisumu’s busiest maternal health facility. Between February 2007 and July 2007, community health counselors from the FACES program recruited thirty FACES patients from the Lumumba Health Center in Kisumu, Kenya. Eligibility requirements to receive a loan included participation in FACES treatment program, ability to make a down payment of 600 Kenya shillings (Ksh), approximately US $8, and access to land with an adjacent supply of surface water for farming. The KEMRI Ethical Review Committee and UCSF Committee on Human Research reviewed and approved the study protocol. Eligible participants were counseled on the details of the project and asked to sign a commitment contract. In addition, all participants signed a written informed consent form. After commitment, the farmer received a local purchase order (LPO) to obtain their inputs from the Mwanga Agrovet (a local store). The inputs included: KickStart’s MoneyMaker Hip Pump, a hose pipe, an inlet pipe, seeds, fertilizer, and pesticides. Farmers were able to choose seeds from an assorted range of different vegetable crops to plant. These crops were recommended by other farmers and support group members as successful in the area and approved by FACES and KickStart field experts. The in-kind loan was for approximately 6600 Ksh (US$95). The farmers agreed to repay the loans within a year, during which we anticipated the farmers would have two crop cycles. They were asked to make a down payment of at least 600 Ksh, or approximately 10% of the loan. Though the recruitment communication was primarily with the HIV positive subject, the economic outcome measure was total family income. Thus, it was anticipated that the farming activities would be carried out by the subjects and their families. The project coordinator and FACES counselors conducted initial site visits to train farmers and their families on using the pump, preparing their fields, and planting their seed beds. Thereafter informal quarterly site visits were conducted to ensure proper pump use, follow progress and incomes as well as to provide advice on marketing and sales of vegetables. At the conclusion of the study, eighteen farmers participated in three focus groups, sharing the benefits and challenges of the project and their experiences with loan repayment. Focus groups were divided by gender to allow for consideration of unique experiences between men and women. The groups were facilitated by trained staff. Trained staff of KickStart’s Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Unit (Kihia 2003) and staff from FACES interviewed participants at baseline and 12 months after provision of the loan. The questionnaire, administered by the KickStart M&E Unit, evaluated household income, assets, type of housing, land ownership, total irrigated acres of land, types of crops planted, irrigated income, total family income, expenditures and food security at baseline and 12 months. A household survey administered by FACES staff at 12 months collected health and nutrition data of household members, including illnesses in the family during the past month, children’s missed school days for illness, dietary composition, basic hygiene and household water sources. Clinical health data were also assessed at baseline and at 12 months using the FACES patient database. These indicators included body mass index (BMI) and CD4 T-cell counts. Data was entered into Excel 2003 (Microsoft, Renton, WA) and SAS version 9.2 (Cary, NC) was used for statistical analysis. Data were analyzed using Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate, and continuous variables were analyzed using the Student’s T-test. To examine the change in BMI and CD4 count from baseline to 12 months, the Cochrane’s test was used. Qualitative data was coded and analyzed by one of the authors (RT).

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile clinics: Implementing mobile clinics that travel to rural areas, where access to healthcare facilities is limited, can provide essential maternal health services to pregnant women.

2. Telemedicine: Using telemedicine technology, healthcare providers can remotely monitor and provide consultations to pregnant women in remote areas, ensuring they receive necessary prenatal care.

3. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers who can provide basic maternal health services, education, and support to pregnant women in their communities.

4. Maternal health vouchers: Introducing a voucher system that provides pregnant women with access to essential maternal health services, such as antenatal care, skilled birth attendance, and postnatal care.

5. Maternal health education programs: Developing and implementing educational programs that focus on maternal health, including prenatal care, nutrition, and safe delivery practices, to empower women with knowledge and improve their health outcomes.

6. Transportation support: Providing transportation support, such as subsidized or free transportation services, to pregnant women in remote areas to ensure they can access healthcare facilities for prenatal care and delivery.

7. Maternal health financing schemes: Establishing innovative financing schemes that make maternal health services more affordable and accessible, such as microfinance loans specifically for maternal health expenses or community-based health insurance programs.

8. Maternal health technology: Introducing and promoting the use of technology, such as mobile apps or wearable devices, that can help pregnant women monitor their health, receive reminders for appointments, and access information and support.

9. Maternal health partnerships: Collaborating with local organizations, NGOs, and government agencies to strengthen maternal health services and improve access through joint initiatives and resource sharing.

10. Maternal health awareness campaigns: Conducting awareness campaigns to educate communities about the importance of maternal health, dispel myths and misconceptions, and encourage early and regular prenatal care-seeking behavior.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation to improve access to maternal health is the implementation of a micro-irrigation intervention called Shamba Maisha. This pilot study aimed to assess the impacts of providing micro-irrigation pumps to HIV-positive farmers in Nyanza province, Kenya. The intervention was designed to evaluate its effects on the health and economic wellbeing of HIV-positive patients and their families.

The study enrolled thirty HIV-positive patients who were already participating in the Family AIDS Care and Education Services (FACES) program in Kisumu, Kenya. These patients were provided with a micro-financed loan to receive an irrigation pump and farming guidance from KickStart, the developer of the pump.

Data was collected 12 months after the pumps were distributed, including economic data, CD4 counts (a measure of immune function), household health, and loan repayment history. The results showed that the mean annual family income increased by $1,332 over the baseline. However, only three participants (10%) had paid off more than a quarter of the loan.

The study concluded that the micro-irrigation intervention was feasible and resulted in a significant improvement in family income. However, the low loan repayment rates were likely influenced by a drought that occurred during the intervention period.

Overall, the Shamba Maisha intervention demonstrated the potential to improve access to maternal health by addressing the economic challenges faced by HIV-positive patients. By providing them with the means to generate income through farming, this intervention can contribute to poverty alleviation and food security, ultimately enhancing the effectiveness of HIV care programs.

It is important to note that this study was conducted in a specific context and further research is needed to assess the scalability and sustainability of the intervention in different settings.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Strengthening Maternal Health Facilities: Invest in improving the infrastructure, equipment, and staffing of maternal health facilities to ensure they can provide quality care to pregnant women.

2. Mobile Clinics: Implement mobile clinics that can reach remote areas and provide essential maternal health services, including prenatal care, vaccinations, and postnatal care.

3. Community Health Workers: Train and deploy community health workers who can provide basic maternal health services, educate women on pregnancy and childbirth, and refer them to healthcare facilities when necessary.

4. Telemedicine: Utilize telemedicine technologies to provide remote consultations and support for pregnant women, especially in areas with limited access to healthcare facilities.

5. Maternal Health Education: Develop and implement comprehensive maternal health education programs to empower women with knowledge about pregnancy, childbirth, and postnatal care, as well as family planning.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define Key Indicators: Identify key indicators to measure the impact of the recommendations, such as the number of pregnant women receiving prenatal care, the number of deliveries attended by skilled birth attendants, and the maternal mortality rate.

2. Baseline Data Collection: Gather baseline data on the identified indicators before implementing the recommendations. This can be done through surveys, interviews, and data analysis from existing health records.

3. Implement Recommendations: Roll out the recommended interventions, such as strengthening maternal health facilities, deploying mobile clinics, training community health workers, implementing telemedicine services, and conducting maternal health education programs.

4. Data Collection: Continuously collect data on the identified indicators during and after the implementation of the recommendations. This can be done through regular monitoring and evaluation activities, surveys, and health facility records.

5. Data Analysis: Analyze the collected data to assess the impact of the recommendations on the identified indicators. Use statistical methods to compare the baseline data with the data collected after the implementation of the recommendations.

6. Evaluate Results: Evaluate the results of the data analysis to determine the effectiveness of the recommendations in improving access to maternal health. Identify any challenges or areas for improvement.

7. Adjust and Scale-Up: Based on the evaluation results, make necessary adjustments to the recommendations and develop plans for scaling up successful interventions to reach a larger population.

By following this methodology, it will be possible to simulate the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health and make informed decisions on how to further enhance maternal healthcare services.

Yabelana ngalokhu:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email