Background: The COVID-19 pandemic causes new challenges to women and their babies who still need to access postnatal care amidst the crisis. The novel application of social network technologies (SNTs) could potentially enhance access to healthcare during this difficult time. Objectives: This study describes the challenges experienced in accessing maternal and child health services by women with limited or no education during this COVID-19 pandemic and discusses the potential of SNTs to support maternal and child health amidst this crisis. Methods: We administered surveys to women who had recently given birth in a rural setting and interviewed a purposively selected subset to ascertain their experiences of accessing maternal and child health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our analysis involved descriptive analysis of quantitative data using STATA 13 to describe study participants’ characteristics, and content analysis of qualitative data to derive categories describing maternal health challenges. Results: Among 50 women, the median age was 28 years (interquartile range 24–34), 42 (84%) completed upper primary education. Access to the health facility was constrained by transport challenges, fear of contracting COVID-19, and delays at the facility. Due to the COVID-19 crisis, 42 (84%) women missed facility visits, 46 (92%) experienced financial distress, 43 (86%) had food insecurity, and 44 (88%) felt stressed. SNTs can facilitate remote and timely access to health services and information, and enable virtual social connections and support. Conclusion: SNTs have the potential to mitigate the challenges faced in accessing maternal and child health services amidst the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
Participants were drawn from a parent study—MatHealth—that has been described previously. 19 Briefly, the parent study was a randomized trial of 80 pregnant women who were enrolled between January and December 2019 and followed until six weeks after delivery. Pregnant women initiating ANC were randomized (1:1) to a mobile phone-based MatHealth App that enabled them to receive tailored monthly maternal and child health-related video and audio files, set clinic attendance appointment reminders, and talk to an obstetrician versus routine care. They were recruited from Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH), which is the largest hospital in rural southwestern Uganda. The MRRH employs 11 obstetricians and 22 midwives and performs over 10,000 deliveries annually with a maternal mortality rate of 270/100,000 live birth, cesarean section rate of 30%, and a perinatal mortality rate of 56/1000. There is currently no follow-up mechanism for pregnant women and no provision for remote consultation of healthcare providers. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) initiating antenatal care at MRRH with a first presentation in the first or second trimester, (b) not having attended school or having a low education level (i.e. not having studied beyond primary seven elementary education), (c) 18 years and above, (d) residents of Mbarara (within 20 km of MRRH), (e) ability to use mobile phones, (f) willing and able to give informed consent, and (g) able to speak Runyankole (the local language). Women who were not able or willing to give informed consent were excluded. These pregnant women were recruited into the study between January and December 2019. The median follow-up was 6 months (interquartile range [IQR] 5-7). The analysis utilized a mixed-methods design. The analysis presented in this paper involved surveys administered to 50 participants as well as an interview of a subset of 21 participants from the MatHealth study, 14 months after concluding the study. We contacted all the participants in the MatHealth study through phone calls. Of the 80 women called, 50 (63%, 50/80) participated in this study—30 participants had either moved away or their phone numbers were not available. Authors ATM, PK, and JK administered surveys to the 50 participants to collect information of their sociodemographic, basic health, as well as data related to COVID-19 prevention (e.g. access to information, vaccination). For qualitative interviews, we purposively sampled participants based on our experience interacting with them in the parent study to achieve varied experiences of the utilization of maternal health services. From private space at a research office near MRRH, ATM and JK carried out semi-structured interviews with participants in July 2021. Interviews were carried out until thematic saturation was achieved (i.e. until no new data was obtained)—which occurred after the 21st participant. Each interview lasted between 40 and 50 min. All questions in the interview guide were translated from English into the local language (Runyankole) and back-translated to English by a different translator, after which the two versions were compared for accuracy. The interviews were carried out in the local language, digitally recorded, transcribed, and translated to English for analysis. Interviews mainly elicited information about the challenges that women are encountering in accessing maternal and child health services amidst COVID-19-induced lockdowns. Although the women had already given birth, they still had to access facilities for postnatal care such as taking their children for immunization, accessing family planning, HIV/AIDS-related services (e.g. early infant diagnosis), as well as seeking treatment for their babies. Following each interview, AM and WT reviewed the transcripts for quality, clarity, and detail. ATM and WT used STATA 13 to describe study participants’ characteristics and COVID-19-related information. AM and ATM used inductive content analysis 20 to derive categories describing and summarizing challenges encountered by participants in utilizing maternal health services. Initially, they reviewed and discussed 20% of transcripts for content relevant to challenges related to access to health services. They then assembled a codebook from the identified concepts, using an iterative process, which included developing codes to represent content, writing operational definitions, and selecting illustrative quotes. Following completion of the codebook, AM and ATM applied codes using NVIVO 11. Differences in coding were harmonized through discussion. All participants provided signed informed consent before study participation. The Institutional Review Committee of Mbarara University of Science and Technology, the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, approved this study.
N/A