Community-based scheduled screening and treatment of malaria in pregnancy for improved maternal and infant health in The Gambia, Burkina Faso and Benin: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Malaria continues to cause a significant number of maternal and infant deaths in sub-Saharan Africa.
– Successful control of malaria in pregnancy is crucial for improving maternal and infant health.
– This study aims to determine the effectiveness of community-based scheduled screening and treatment (CSST) using community health workers (CHW) in reducing the prevalence of placental malaria and improving other maternal and infant health outcomes.
Study Highlights:
– Multi-center cluster-randomized controlled trial involving three countries with varying malaria endemicity and SP resistance.
– CHWs in the intervention arm will receive training on community-based case management of malaria in pregnancy.
– Women in the intervention arm will receive monthly screening and treatment in their homes.
– Primary outcome is the prevalence of placental malaria, with secondary outcomes including maternal anaemia, low birth weight, SP resistance markers, and ANC attendance.
Study Recommendations:
– Implement community-based scheduled screening and treatment (CSST) using trained community health workers (CHW) to improve malaria control in pregnancy.
– Increase coverage of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp-SP) through community-based interventions.
– Strengthen antenatal care services and encourage early ANC visits for pregnant women.
– Monitor and address SP resistance markers to ensure effective treatment.
Key Role Players:
– Community health workers (CHW) trained in community-based case management of malaria in pregnancy.
– Health facility staff for ANC visits and delivery care.
– Village/community leaders for community sensitization and involvement.
– Microscopists for reading blood slides and SP resistance markers.
– Data managers and local investigators for data collection and analysis.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training of community health workers (CHW) on community-based case management of malaria in pregnancy.
– Supplies and equipment for screening and treatment, including rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) and antimalarial drugs.
– Transportation and logistics for CHWs to visit pregnant women in their homes.
– Monitoring and evaluation of the intervention.
– Data collection and analysis.
– Community sensitization and involvement activities.
– Reporting and dissemination of study findings.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong because it describes a multi-centre randomized controlled trial involving three countries with varying malaria endemicity and degrees of SP resistance. The study protocol is clearly outlined, including the objectives, methods/design, and discussion. The trial registration numbers are provided. To improve the evidence, the abstract could include more specific information on the sample size calculation and statistical analysis plan.

Background: In sub-Saharan Africa, malaria continues to cause over 10,000 maternal deaths and 75,000 to 200,000 infant deaths. Successful control of malaria in pregnancy could save lives of mothers and babies and is an essential part of antenatal care in endemic areas. The primary objective is to determine the protective efficacy of community-scheduled screening and treatment (CSST) using community health workers (CHW) against the primary outcome of prevalence of placental malaria. The secondary objectives are to determine the protective efficacy of CSST on maternal anaemia, maternal peripheral infection, low birth weight, selection of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) resistance markers, and on antenatal clinic (ANC) attendance and coverage of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp-SP).Methods/design: This is a multi-centre cluster-randomised controlled trial involving three countries with varying malaria endemicity; low (The Gambia) versus high transmission (Burkina Faso and Benin), and varying degrees of SP resistance (high in Benin and moderate in Gambia and Burkina Faso). CHW and their related catchment population who are randomised into the intervention arm will receive specific training on community-based case management of malaria in pregnancy. All women in both study arms will be enrolled at their first ANC visits in their second trimester where they will receive their first dose of IPTp-SP. Thereafter, CHW in the intervention arm will perform scheduled monthly screening and treatment in the womens homes. At time of delivery, a placental biopsy will be collected from all women to determine placental malaria. At each contact point, filter paper and blood slides will be collected for detection of malaria infection and SP resistance markers.Discussion: To reach successful global malaria control, there is an urgent need to access those at greatest risk of malaria infection. The project is designed to develop a low-cost intervention in pregnant women which will have an immediate impact on the malaria burden in resource-limited countries. This will be done by adding to the standard IPTp-SP delivered through the health facilities: an “extension” strategy to the communities in rural areas thus bringing health services closer to where women live. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN37259296 (5 July 2013), and clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01941264 (10 September 2013).

This is a multi-centre trial involving three countries with varying malaria endemicity: low (The Gambia) versus high transmission (Burkina Faso and Benin), and varying degrees of SP resistance (high in Benin [19] and moderate in Gambia and Burkina Faso [20]). This will ensure that the study outcomes would be broadly generalisable in order to facilitate the formulation of recommendations for both the West African region and other sub-Saharan countries. The Gambia, a country where malaria transmission has decreased to levels thought not possible a few years ago (and hence in a so-called “epidemiological transition”), will provide information possibly applicable to countries that may reach a similar status in the (near) future. In The Gambia, the study is situated in the eastern part of the country on the southern bank of the Upper River Region (about 170,000 inhabitants). It will be centred around the Basse Health Centre and satellite health facilities. This is an area of seasonal malaria transmission (July-December) that has recently experienced a significant decline in malaria infections. Nevertheless, malaria remains a significant problem with about 15% of pregnant women with placental malaria at delivery as detected by histopathology [9]. In Burkina Faso, the study is situated in the centre-west of the country in the Nanoro health district catchment area (about 145,000 inhabitants). Malaria transmission is high and extremely seasonal and overlaps with the rainy season (June-October). In Benin, the study is situated at the Atlantic Region in the southern part of the country, in the Glo-Djigbé, Zinvié and Zè district communities (about 136,000 inhabitants). Malaria transmission is perennial and the main burden of the disease occurs during the two rainy seasons (April-July and October-November). The current treatment policy of uncomplicated malaria in pregnancy is oral quinine but artemisinin-based combination therapy (artemether-lumefantrine (AL)) may be used in the second and third trimester of pregnancy for all three countries, or amodiaquine-artesunate in Burkina Faso and Benin [21–23]. All pregnant women resident in the study area and willing to remain so until delivery will be invited to participate. Women who have a history of sensitivity to sulphonamides and vulnerable persons (for example, the mentally deficient) will be excluded. In The Gambia, pregnant adolescents younger than 16 years will not be enrolled unless consent is given by a responsible adult. In Burkina Faso and Benin, a pregnant woman is considered an adult if married (regardless of age). Study participants are free to withdraw from the study at any time without giving a reason. Prior to the trial start, community sensitization and involvement of village leaders will be carried out at each study site. Appropriate community meetings will be held where the trial will be explained to all community members and consent at the community level to participate from community leaders will be obtained. Individual signed informed consent will also be obtained from all participants. This is a multicenter, cluster-randomised controlled trial in which the CHWs and related catchment population (village/community) will be randomised to receive either the intervention (IPTp-SP plus CSST) or continue with current activities, that is IPTp-SP alone at health facilities during ANC visits (Figure 1). Schematic of study design. ANC, antenatal clinic; CHW, community health worker; CSST, community-scheduled screening and treatment; FA, field assistant; IPTp-SP, intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine; RDT, rapid diagnostic test. In principle, the first point of contact with pregnant women is at the first ANC visit. Here, the study will be explained to the woman and informed consent will be obtained. If the woman is in the early stage of pregnancy, she will be encouraged to return during her second trimester for IPTp-SP. If the woman is in the second or third trimester stage, health staff will give the first IPTp-SP dose and plan the second one onto the ANC card at least 1 month after the first dose. A data collection form on health and socio-demographic factors and a physical examination will be carried out, and a blood slide and a blood sample on filter paper will be collected for detection of malaria infection and SP resistance markers (Figures 1 and ​and2).2). All women will be encouraged to deliver at the health facility. If women do not attend the ANC, consent will be obtained at village level. Schedule of events. Symbols are from thenounproject.com collection: ‘baby’ symbol (1), ‘baby’ symbol (2) by Edward Boatman, ‘house’ symbol by Marco Olgio, ‘medicine’ symbol by Emmanual Mangatia, ‘medicine’ symbol by Paulo Volkova, ‘doctor’ symbol by Paulo Volkova, ‘pointer’ symbol by Evan MacDonald and ‘drop’ symbol by Eric Bergholz. ANC, antenatal clinic; Hb, haemoglobin; IPTp; intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy. CHWs allocated to the intervention arm will follow specific training on community-based case management of malaria, the need for monthly testing of pregnant women using a rapid diagnostic test (RDT), and on issues related to malaria in pregnancy, including the benefit of IPTp-SP and administering SP as early as possible in the second trimester of pregnancy. The CHWs will continuously identify all pregnant women in their own catchment area, visit eligible women in their home and encourage them to attend the ANC as early as possible in their pregnancy for enrolment. The CHW will check after a week if the ANC was visited. For women who do not attend the ANC, the CHW will further encourage and discuss reasons for non-attendance.Thereafter, at monthly intervals up to the last week of gestation, the CHW will revisit the study participant’s house (Figure 2). The CHW will collect a blood slide and a blood spot on filter paper, perform a RDT and administer a full course of AL to any woman with a positive RDT. In case of treatment, the CHWs will return to assess uptake and compliance by administering a short questionnaire and checking the empty packaging of the treatment at the end of the course. In control communities, CHW will not be trained to administer RDT and AL to pregnant women. The women will be mainly followed through their attendance to the health facilities at the ANC. The final study visit will occur at the time of delivery. A blood sample will be collected just before delivery for haemoglobin measurement as well for detection of malaria infection and SP resistance markers and a short data collection form on their current health status will be administered. A placenta biopsy will be collected and all newborns will be physically examined and weighed as soon as possible after birth (Figures 1 and ​and2).2). Gestational age will be estimated using the Ballard Score [24]. For women not delivering at a health facility, study staff will follow them up at home and will collect the same information and biological samples as at the health facilities as soon as possible. The allocation of the two trial arms will be carried out separately but consistently for each country. Prior to the trial start, maps and population size of the study site in all three countries will be obtained. CHWs who work in villages with a population size of approximately 1,000 to 2,000 will be identified. If more clusters than required are identified, the appropriate number of representative clusters will be selected at random. Distance from the centre of each village to the nearest IPTp-SP-providing health facility will be calculated and used to group the clusters into three categories. Stratification by these categories will ensure that the villages with the larger distances are evenly distributed between trial arms. The balanced allocation of each cluster to a trial arm will be done using a computer-based randomisation (StataCorp LP, USA, http://www.stata.com). All study participants returning to the ANC for scheduled or unscheduled visits will undergo a health assessment by study staff. In case of suspected malaria (fever, headache, and so forth), a RDT test will be performed and, if positive, AL administered. RDT will be performed on a monthly basis for women enrolled in the intervention arm regardless of the presence of malaria symptoms. If positive for malaria, treatment will be given with AL. If the woman is severely ill at time of visit (from malaria or other causes and/or from complications from the pregnancy) she will be referred to the health facility for further care. Maternal haemoglobin will be measured using Hb301 Hemocue® (part of the Radiometer Group, Sweden) and anaemia (haemoglobin <11 g/dL) diagnosed at the time of delivery. Blood samples will be collected by finger pricks at specified time points during the trial for blood slides (thick blood film) and blood spots on filter paper. Thick blood smears will be stained with 3% Giemsa for 30 minutes and read by trained microscopists at each site. Parasite densities will be calculated by counting the number of asexual parasites per 200 leukocytes (or per 500 leukocytes if the count is <10 asexual parasites/200 leukocytes), assuming a leukocyte count of 8,000/μl. A blood smear will be considered negative when the examination of 100 high-power fields does not reveal asexual parasites. Each slide will be read separately by two experienced microscopists and discrepancies resolved by a third reader. Blood spots on filter paper will be used for the molecular diagnosis of P. falciparum (to detect sub-patent infections) and the identification of SP resistance markers. A 1 cm2 biopsy specimen will be obtained from the maternal-facing side of the placenta as soon as possible after delivery. Biopsy specimens will be preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin which will be processed and embedded in paraffin wax by standard techniques. Pending histological evaluation, all biopsies will be kept at 4°C. Paraffin sections 4 millimeters thick will be stained with hematoxylin-eosin stain. Placental biopsies will be classified according to the following definitions [25]: The risk of participating in this cluster randomized trial is low. The World Health Organization recommends the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy, in this case AL, during the second and third trimester of pregnancy [26, 27]. The subjects will not be exposed to any danger or increased risk due to the conduct of the study. There is the possibility of mild discomfort and bruising at the site where blood is obtained. Collection of blood samples is part of the normal procedure in the diagnosis of malaria and is considered not to be a medical risk when adequately performed by a qualified health worker (including CHWs). Placental biopsies will be obtained after delivery, with no risk or discomfort for the neonate or mother. Qualified personnel using appropriate disposable equipment will collect blood samples and placental biopsies. CHWs in the intervention arm will be trained on safety reporting requirements and on the recognition of danger signs and serious adverse events (SAEs). In case of any SAE of the pregnant woman, deterioration of her condition or reaction after the administration of the drug, the CHW will report this immediately to the study staff who will perform the necessary further assessments and referrals to the appropriate health facilities if required. During the course of the study, any important medical events which occur will be appropriately recorded, managed and reported. Midwives and/or research staff will record all occurrences of adverse pregnancy outcomes such as a miscarriage or spontaneous abortion (28 weeks) or the occurrence of any congenital malformation. All reported SAEs and important medical events will be reported to the study site investigator or deputy. The local principal investigator will inform the sponsor and the coordinating investigator. The sponsor will inform the ethics committee and the Data Safety and Monitoring Board. Prevalence of placental malaria (any category, including past infection) determined by a placental biopsy taken soon after delivery at a health facility. The study will test the primary hypothesis that CSST plus IPTp-SP will reduce placenta malaria compared to IPTp-SP alone. Sample size calculation was performed according to Hayes and Bennett [28]. Based on available data, the prevalence of placental malaria (any category, including past infection) is at least 15% in the three study sites. Although the coefficient of variation for placental malaria is not known, it is set at 0.15 within each country. It is assumed that the intervention will decrease placental malaria by 30%, from 15% to 10.5%. Furthermore, the assumption is made that each CHW will recruit at least 40 pregnant women per year, corresponding roughly to a population of 800 people (assuming 5% of the population is pregnant). Within each study site, the study will be able to show a significant difference between intervention and control groups with 15 clusters per arm at 80% power and at the 10% significance level. This translates to 45 clusters per arm across the three study sites. Therefore, the total study population will be 5,400 women, 1,800 women in each country, and will require an 18-month recruitment period in order to enrol at least 60 women per cluster. All data handling and record keeping will be standardised across the three study sites. At the health facility, all pregnant women will be recorded on a study register held at each clinic. Women who are enrolled onto the study will also be given a unique identity number. A standardised data collection form on the health status, medical history of the women, and socio-demographic characteristics will be administered by health staff at the time of enrolment at the health facility. A standardised data collection form on current health status will then be administered at subsequent ANC visits (intervention and control arm) and at each monthly visit by the CHWs in the intervention arm only. All data will be double entered using OpenClinica® (http://www.openclinica.com) databases at each site. Consistency checks will be performed and any outliers and missing data points will be checked against the original forms and subsequently amended in the dataset. Errors including missing data that may have occurred during the data collection will be reported with a minimum delay for further investigation. All names and addresses will be removed from the data collection forms before data entry. The datasets will be password protected and only accessed by the data manager and local investigators at each study site. All samples will be labelled with the woman’s unique identity number and date of collection. This will ensure anonymity so all handlers of the specimens are blinded to the intervention allocation. Appropriate summary statistics (that is, mean and standard deviation for normally distributed variables and median and inter-quartile range for non-normally distributed variables) will be used to describe the baseline data. The primary analysis will compare the prevalence of placental malaria (defined as number of positive samples by total number of samples) between the intervention and the control group. Secondary analysis will compare the following variables between trial arms: (i) mean haemoglobin levels and prevalence of anaemia (haemoglobin <11 g/dL) at delivery, (ii) prevalence of P. falciparum peripheral infection (microscopy and PCR) at delivery and during pregnancy, (iii) mean birth weight and proportion of newborns with low birth weight (<2,500 g) between the two trial arms, (iv) level of ANC attendance by village/cluster and coverage of IPTp-SP (defined by number of doses completed during pregnancy), and (v) SP resistance markers profiles. For the primary and secondary analysis both linear regression (for continuous outcomes such as haemoglobin levels) and logistic regression (for binary outcomes such as placental malaria) will be used to quantify the difference between trial arms. The regression models will allow for the multi-level structure of the data (that is, individuals within villages) using random effects and for all relevant co-variates to be taken into account. Model assumptions will be checked to confirm reliable estimates. The recruitment of study subjects will last for 18 months. The expected duration for each study subject is approximately 6 months – from enrolment during pregnancy up to time of delivery. It is expected that the total duration of the trial will be 24 months to allow the delivery of the last recruited pregnant woman. Ethical approval by the Gambia Government/MRC laboratories Joint Ethics Committee was obtained on 25 June 2013 (ref SCC1336). Ethical approval by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Centre Muraz in Burkina Faso was obtained on 19 September 2013 (ref A20-2013/CE-CM). Ethical approval by the Comité National d’Ethique pour la Recherche en Santé in Benin was obtained on 9 December 2013 (No_0126/MS /DC/SGM /DFR /CNERS/SA).

The innovation described in the study protocol is community-based scheduled screening and treatment (CSST) using community health workers (CHW) to improve access to maternal health. This approach involves training CHWs to perform scheduled monthly screening and treatment for malaria in pregnant women in their homes. The primary objective of the study is to determine the protective efficacy of CSST against placental malaria. The secondary objectives include assessing the impact of CSST on maternal anaemia, maternal peripheral infection, low birth weight, selection of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) resistance markers, and antenatal clinic attendance and coverage of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp-SP). The study is being conducted in three countries with varying malaria endemicity and SP resistance levels: The Gambia, Burkina Faso, and Benin. The goal of this innovation is to develop a low-cost intervention that brings health services closer to where women live, thereby improving access to maternal health care and reducing the burden of malaria in resource-limited countries.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation described in the study protocol is to implement a community-based scheduled screening and treatment (CSST) program using community health workers (CHWs) to improve access to maternal health in The Gambia, Burkina Faso, and Benin. The primary objective of this program is to determine the protective efficacy of CSST against placental malaria, a major cause of maternal and infant deaths in sub-Saharan Africa. The secondary objectives include assessing the impact of CSST on maternal anaemia, maternal peripheral infection, low birth weight, selection of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) resistance markers, and antenatal clinic attendance and coverage of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp-SP).

The CSST program involves training CHWs to conduct monthly screening and treatment for malaria in pregnant women in their homes. The women will also receive the standard IPTp-SP during their antenatal clinic visits. Placental biopsies, blood slides, and blood samples will be collected to detect malaria infection and SP resistance markers.

The study aims to develop a low-cost intervention that can be implemented in resource-limited countries to reduce the burden of malaria in pregnant women. By bringing health services closer to where women live, this program can improve access to maternal health and potentially save lives. The study will provide valuable data to inform recommendations for malaria control in the West African region and other sub-Saharan countries.
AI Innovations Methodology
The study protocol described is focused on improving access to maternal health by implementing a community-based scheduled screening and treatment (CSST) program for malaria in pregnancy. The primary objective of the study is to determine the protective efficacy of CSST using community health workers (CHWs) against the prevalence of placental malaria. The secondary objectives include assessing the impact of CSST on maternal anaemia, maternal peripheral infection, low birth weight, selection of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) resistance markers, and antenatal clinic (ANC) attendance and coverage of intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp-SP).

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Define the target population: Identify the specific population group that will benefit from the CSST program, such as pregnant women in malaria-endemic areas.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather relevant data on the current status of maternal health in the target population, including prevalence of placental malaria, maternal anaemia rates, ANC attendance, and IPTp-SP coverage.

3. Design the intervention: Develop a detailed plan for implementing the CSST program, including training CHWs, establishing community-based case management protocols, and scheduling monthly screening and treatment visits.

4. Simulate the intervention: Use mathematical modeling techniques to simulate the impact of the CSST program on the target population. This could involve creating a simulation model that incorporates factors such as population size, malaria transmission rates, and the effectiveness of the CSST program in reducing placental malaria and improving other maternal health outcomes.

5. Analyze the results: Evaluate the simulated outcomes of the CSST program, including changes in prevalence of placental malaria, maternal anaemia rates, and other relevant indicators. Compare these results to the baseline data to assess the potential impact of the intervention.

6. Refine the intervention: Based on the simulation results, make any necessary adjustments to the CSST program to optimize its effectiveness in improving access to maternal health. This could include modifying the training protocols for CHWs, adjusting the frequency of screening and treatment visits, or implementing additional strategies to address specific challenges identified in the simulation.

7. Implement and evaluate the intervention: Once the CSST program has been refined, implement it in the target population and monitor its impact in real-world settings. Collect data on key indicators to assess the actual outcomes of the intervention and compare them to the simulated results.

By following this methodology, researchers and policymakers can gain insights into the potential impact of the CSST program on improving access to maternal health and make informed decisions about its implementation and scalability.

Yabelana ngalokhu:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email