What is the relationship between contraceptive services and knowledge of abortion availability and legality? Evidence from a national sample of women and facilities in Ethiopia

Health policy and planning, Volume 38, No. 3, Year 2023

Ukuhunyushwa

In Ethiopia, abortions are legal for minors and for rape, incest, foetal impairment or maternal disability. Knowledge of abortion legality and availability is low, and little effort has been made to disseminate this information for fear of invoking anti-abortion sentiment; instead, systems rely on health providers as information gatekeepers. This study explores how exposure to and interaction with family planning service delivery environment, specifically (1) availability of contraceptive and facility-based abortion services within 5 km of one’s residence and (2) contact with a health provider in the past 12 months, relate to women’s knowledge of the legality of accessing abortion services and of where to access facility-based abortion services. We used data from a nationally representative sample of 8719 women in Ethiopia and a linked health facility survey of 799 health facilities. Our outcome of interest was a categorical variable indicating if a woman had (1) knowledge of at least one legal ground for abortion, (2) knowledge of where to access abortion services, (3) knowledge of both or (4) knowledge of neither. We conducted multilevel, multinomial logistic regressions, stratified by residence. Approximately 60% of women had no knowledge of either a legal ground for abortion or a place to access services. Women who visited a health provider or who were visited by a health worker in the past 12 months were significantly more likely to know about abortion legality and availability. There were no differences based on whether women lived within 5 km of a facility that offered contraception and abortion services. We find that health workers are likely valuable sources of information; however, progress to disseminate information may be slowed if it relies on uptake of services and limited outreach. Efforts to train providers on legality and availability are critical, as is additional research on knowledge dissemination pathways. This cross-sectional study uses data from Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA)-Ethiopia, a 5-year (2019–2023) research partnership between Addis Ababa University (AAU), the Ethiopian FMoH and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (JHSPH). PMA-Ethiopia generates cross-sectional and longitudinal data on a range of reproductive, maternal and newborn health indicators (Zimmerman et al., 2020). Data are collected from women, households and service delivery points (SDPs) that offer maternal and reproductive health services to inform policies and priorities at national and regional levels. This analysis uses two data sources from PMA-Ethiopia, the cross-sectional, nationally representative sample of women aged 15–49 years (Addis Ababa University School of Public Health and The Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health at The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2020) and data from the cross-sectional SDP survey (Addis Ababa University School of Public Health; and the Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2019) collected between October and November 2019. National cross-sectional data included both household and female surveys. Enumeration areas (EAs), groupings of approximately 200 households, were selected with probability proportional to size within regional and residential strata, using the national census as the sampling frame. Following a census and listing, 35 households were randomly selected within each EA; all households within a selected EA were eligible for the household survey. Women were eligible to participate if they were aged between 15 and 49 years, slept in the selected household the night prior or who were usual members of the household and were willing and able to provide informed consent. The SDP survey (herein referred to as the ‘facility survey’) was conducted among public and private facilities that served the selected EAs. Public facilities were included if they were a health post, health centre or hospital. A maximum of three private SDPs, including health clinics and health centres that offered maternal health services and pharmacies or drug vendors that provided reproductive health commodities, within the kebele (the smallest administrative unit in Ethiopia) in which the EA was located were randomly selected for interview. Data about facility readiness to offer essential health services, including provision of abortion services, were collected by trained resident interviewers using mobile phones equipped with Open Data Kit Software (Open Data Kit, Seattle, WA, USA). Study procedures, detailed elsewhere including additional information on consent procedures and ethical concerns, were approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health and AAU (Zimmerman et al., 2020). Our primary dependent variable was a categorical measure assessing women’s knowledge of legal grounds for abortion and knowledge of service availability. We defined respondents as having knowledge of legal grounds for abortion using two conditions: if (1) a woman said yes to the question ‘Do you know if there is a law on abortion in Ethiopia?’ and (2) if she spontaneously reported one or more of the conditions under which abortion is legal in Ethiopia to the question ‘Under which circumstances, it is legal to have an abortion in Ethiopia?’. Interviewers were trained to select one or more of the options that included rape, foetal impairment, risk to the life of the mother or foetus or if the mother is unable to raise the child due to physical or mental infirmity. We chose to define ‘knowledge’ based on identifying a single exemption, rather than all exemptions, as the percentage of women with knowledge of all legal exemptions based on previous research were less than 5% of women (Sheehy et al., 2021). Abortion is also legal in Ethiopia for women under age of 18 years; however, due to a survey programming error, this legal ground was not assessed in the questionnaire. Women could also respond that they knew that there was a law about abortion and that abortion was not legal under any circumstances; these women were not categorized as having knowledge of the legal grounds for abortion. We measured women’s knowledge of where to access services through a single item, ‘Do you know where a woman can access facility-based abortion services in the community where you live?’ (Yes/no). Based on responses to these three questions, women were classified into one of the four categories: (1) no knowledge of either legality or service availability, (2) knowledge of legal grounds only, (3) knowledge of service availability only or (4) knowledge of legality and service availability. Our key independent variables measured a woman’s exposure to and use of the contraceptive service environment, which we examined via three measures captured across the female and facility surveys. First, using the female survey, we assessed two measures: (1) whether the respondent had been visited by a health provider who discussed FP1 in the last 12 months (yes/no) and (2) whether the respondent had visited a health facility in the past 12 months and spoken to someone about FP (categorical: no visit, visit but no FP discussion and visit and FP discussion). Second, using data from the facility survey, we assessed availability of facility-based contraceptive and abortion services for each woman in our sample. Specifically, we identified all facilities within a 5 km radius (geodetic distance) of the woman’s residence and defined a three-level categorical variable indicating availability of services: (1) no contraceptive or abortion services within 5 km, (2) contraceptive services only within 5 km and (3) contraceptive and abortion services available within 5 km. No facilities provided abortion without contraceptive services. Finally, we explored the role of women’s contraceptive use status, which we defined as either using or not using a modern contraceptive method at the time of the survey. Due to significant differences in availability of services and wealth distributions between urban and rural areas (Table 1), all analyses were stratified by residence. Analyses adjusted for a number of additional socio-demographic characteristics and potential confounders that we hypothesized to be associated with exposure to the FP service environment and knowledge of abortion legality and services, including women’s age (5-year age groups), marital status (married/in-union, not in union), wealth quintiles, education (none, primary, secondary or above), parity (0, 1–2, 3–4 and 5+ children) and region. Given high correlation between age and parity (ρ > 0.65 across residence), age was excluded in final models. Wealth quintiles were heavily skewed in urban and rural areas when stratified (Table 1). For subsequent analyses, we thus created wealth quintiles specific to urban/rural women to assess the effect of wealth separately within each residence. Sample characteristics of women participating in the PMA-Ethiopia 2019 cross-sectional survey Of 8976 eligible women who slept in the house the night before (de facto residents), 8839 completed the interview, with a response rate of 98.4%. For this analysis, we dropped 120 women who were missing outcome data (described further later) for a total population of 8719 women (unweighted: n = 3738 urban and n = 4981 rural; weighted: n = 2854 urban and n = 5870 rural). Of 815 SDPs identified for the survey, 799 completed the interview, with a response rate of 98.0%. All observations were included. We used design-based analysis to account for survey weighting due to differential probability of selection and clustering of responses within EAs (Heeringa et al., 2017). Exploratory analyses assessed the distributions of the key outcome and predictor variables and women’s socio-demographic characteristics. We then assessed outcomes by urban and rural strata separately and tested for differences using Pearson chi-square statistics with the Rao and Scott second-order correction. Finally, we used stratified multinomial multilevel regression models, with EA as the second level, to estimate the relative risk ratios (RRRs) of having knowledge of legal grounds only, service availability only or knowledge of both, relative to having no knowledge of either. Models 1 and 3 (rural and urban, respectively) included only covariates that related to exposure to the FP environment, specifically distance to services, visit to a health facility, visits from a health worker, modern contraceptive method use and region. Models 2 and 4 (rural and urban, respectively) additionally adjusted for relevant individual-level socio-demographic characteristics. We tested for shared versus separate random effects using Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion and treated random effects as separate but correlated. All analyses were conducted using Stata 16.1 (College Station, TX, USA).

I-AI Digest

Study Justification:

This study aims to investigate the relationship between contraceptive services and knowledge of abortion availability and legality in Ethiopia. The justification for this study is based on the low levels of knowledge regarding abortion legality and availability in the country. Currently, information about abortion is primarily disseminated through health providers, but there is limited outreach and efforts to train providers on this topic. Understanding the relationship between contraceptive services and knowledge of abortion can help inform policies and interventions to improve access to accurate information.

Study Highlights:

– The study used data from a nationally representative sample of 8719 women in Ethiopia and a linked health facility survey of 799 health facilities.
– Approximately 60% of women had no knowledge of either a legal ground for abortion or a place to access services.
– Women who visited a health provider or were visited by a health worker in the past 12 months were significantly more likely to know about abortion legality and availability.
– There were no differences based on whether women lived within 5 km of a facility that offered contraception and abortion services.
– Health workers are valuable sources of information, but progress in disseminating information may be slowed if it relies solely on service uptake and limited outreach.

Study Recommendations:

Based on the findings of the study, the following recommendations can be made:

1. Efforts should be made to train health providers on the legality and availability of abortion services. This will ensure that they can effectively disseminate accurate information to women.
2. Additional research is needed to explore alternative pathways for knowledge dissemination, as relying solely on health providers may limit the reach of information.
3. Policies and interventions should focus on improving access to accurate information about abortion legality and availability, particularly targeting women who have not visited a health facility or been visited by a health worker in the past 12 months.

Key Role Players:

1. Ministry of Health: Responsible for developing and implementing policies related to reproductive health and family planning.
2. Health Providers: Play a crucial role in disseminating information about abortion legality and availability. They need to be trained on these topics.
3. Researchers: Conduct additional research to explore alternative pathways for knowledge dissemination and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.
4. NGOs and Civil Society Organizations: Can support awareness campaigns and provide resources to improve access to accurate information.

Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:

1. Training Programs: Budget for developing and implementing training programs for health providers on abortion legality and availability.
2. Research Funding: Allocate funds for conducting additional research to explore alternative knowledge dissemination pathways.
3. Awareness Campaigns: Budget for developing and implementing awareness campaigns to improve access to accurate information.
4. Resource Materials: Allocate funds for the development and distribution of informational materials on abortion legality and availability.
5. Monitoring and Evaluation: Budget for monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions and adjusting strategies as needed.
Please note that the cost items provided are general categories and the actual cost will depend on the specific context and implementation strategies.

Amandla Obufakazi

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is rated 7 because it provides a detailed description of the study design, data sources, and analysis methods. However, it does not provide specific results or findings from the study. To improve the evidence, the abstract could include a summary of the key findings and their implications for policy and practice.

Abstract

This cross-sectional study uses data from Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA)-Ethiopia, a 5-year (2019–2023) research partnership between Addis Ababa University (AAU), the Ethiopian FMoH and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (JHSPH). PMA-Ethiopia generates cross-sectional and longitudinal data on a range of reproductive, maternal and newborn health indicators (Zimmerman et al., 2020). Data are collected from women, households and service delivery points (SDPs) that offer maternal and reproductive health services to inform policies and priorities at national and regional levels. This analysis uses two data sources from PMA-Ethiopia, the cross-sectional, nationally representative sample of women aged 15–49 years (Addis Ababa University School of Public Health and The Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health at The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2020) and data from the cross-sectional SDP survey (Addis Ababa University School of Public Health; and the Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2019) collected between October and November 2019. National cross-sectional data included both household and female surveys. Enumeration areas (EAs), groupings of approximately 200 households, were selected with probability proportional to size within regional and residential strata, using the national census as the sampling frame. Following a census and listing, 35 households were randomly selected within each EA; all households within a selected EA were eligible for the household survey. Women were eligible to participate if they were aged between 15 and 49 years, slept in the selected household the night prior or who were usual members of the household and were willing and able to provide informed consent. The SDP survey (herein referred to as the ‘facility survey’) was conducted among public and private facilities that served the selected EAs. Public facilities were included if they were a health post, health centre or hospital. A maximum of three private SDPs, including health clinics and health centres that offered maternal health services and pharmacies or drug vendors that provided reproductive health commodities, within the kebele (the smallest administrative unit in Ethiopia) in which the EA was located were randomly selected for interview. Data about facility readiness to offer essential health services, including provision of abortion services, were collected by trained resident interviewers using mobile phones equipped with Open Data Kit Software (Open Data Kit, Seattle, WA, USA). Study procedures, detailed elsewhere including additional information on consent procedures and ethical concerns, were approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health and AAU (Zimmerman et al., 2020). Our primary dependent variable was a categorical measure assessing women’s knowledge of legal grounds for abortion and knowledge of service availability. We defined respondents as having knowledge of legal grounds for abortion using two conditions: if (1) a woman said yes to the question ‘Do you know if there is a law on abortion in Ethiopia?’ and (2) if she spontaneously reported one or more of the conditions under which abortion is legal in Ethiopia to the question ‘Under which circumstances, it is legal to have an abortion in Ethiopia?’. Interviewers were trained to select one or more of the options that included rape, foetal impairment, risk to the life of the mother or foetus or if the mother is unable to raise the child due to physical or mental infirmity. We chose to define ‘knowledge’ based on identifying a single exemption, rather than all exemptions, as the percentage of women with knowledge of all legal exemptions based on previous research were less than 5% of women (Sheehy et al., 2021). Abortion is also legal in Ethiopia for women under age of 18 years; however, due to a survey programming error, this legal ground was not assessed in the questionnaire. Women could also respond that they knew that there was a law about abortion and that abortion was not legal under any circumstances; these women were not categorized as having knowledge of the legal grounds for abortion. We measured women’s knowledge of where to access services through a single item, ‘Do you know where a woman can access facility-based abortion services in the community where you live?’ (Yes/no). Based on responses to these three questions, women were classified into one of the four categories: (1) no knowledge of either legality or service availability, (2) knowledge of legal grounds only, (3) knowledge of service availability only or (4) knowledge of legality and service availability. Our key independent variables measured a woman’s exposure to and use of the contraceptive service environment, which we examined via three measures captured across the female and facility surveys. First, using the female survey, we assessed two measures: (1) whether the respondent had been visited by a health provider who discussed FP1 in the last 12 months (yes/no) and (2) whether the respondent had visited a health facility in the past 12 months and spoken to someone about FP (categorical: no visit, visit but no FP discussion and visit and FP discussion). Second, using data from the facility survey, we assessed availability of facility-based contraceptive and abortion services for each woman in our sample. Specifically, we identified all facilities within a 5 km radius (geodetic distance) of the woman’s residence and defined a three-level categorical variable indicating availability of services: (1) no contraceptive or abortion services within 5 km, (2) contraceptive services only within 5 km and (3) contraceptive and abortion services available within 5 km. No facilities provided abortion without contraceptive services. Finally, we explored the role of women’s contraceptive use status, which we defined as either using or not using a modern contraceptive method at the time of the survey. Due to significant differences in availability of services and wealth distributions between urban and rural areas (Table 1), all analyses were stratified by residence. Analyses adjusted for a number of additional socio-demographic characteristics and potential confounders that we hypothesized to be associated with exposure to the FP service environment and knowledge of abortion legality and services, including women’s age (5-year age groups), marital status (married/in-union, not in union), wealth quintiles, education (none, primary, secondary or above), parity (0, 1–2, 3–4 and 5+ children) and region. Given high correlation between age and parity (ρ > 0.65 across residence), age was excluded in final models. Wealth quintiles were heavily skewed in urban and rural areas when stratified (Table 1). For subsequent analyses, we thus created wealth quintiles specific to urban/rural women to assess the effect of wealth separately within each residence. Sample characteristics of women participating in the PMA-Ethiopia 2019 cross-sectional survey Of 8976 eligible women who slept in the house the night before (de facto residents), 8839 completed the interview, with a response rate of 98.4%. For this analysis, we dropped 120 women who were missing outcome data (described further later) for a total population of 8719 women (unweighted: n = 3738 urban and n = 4981 rural; weighted: n = 2854 urban and n = 5870 rural). Of 815 SDPs identified for the survey, 799 completed the interview, with a response rate of 98.0%. All observations were included. We used design-based analysis to account for survey weighting due to differential probability of selection and clustering of responses within EAs (Heeringa et al., 2017). Exploratory analyses assessed the distributions of the key outcome and predictor variables and women’s socio-demographic characteristics. We then assessed outcomes by urban and rural strata separately and tested for differences using Pearson chi-square statistics with the Rao and Scott second-order correction. Finally, we used stratified multinomial multilevel regression models, with EA as the second level, to estimate the relative risk ratios (RRRs) of having knowledge of legal grounds only, service availability only or knowledge of both, relative to having no knowledge of either. Models 1 and 3 (rural and urban, respectively) included only covariates that related to exposure to the FP environment, specifically distance to services, visit to a health facility, visits from a health worker, modern contraceptive method use and region. Models 2 and 4 (rural and urban, respectively) additionally adjusted for relevant individual-level socio-demographic characteristics. We tested for shared versus separate random effects using Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian Information Criterion and treated random effects as separate but correlated. All analyses were conducted using Stata 16.1 (College Station, TX, USA).

Izinto zokwakha

N/A

Emisha

Based on the provided description, the study explores the relationship between contraceptive services and knowledge of abortion availability and legality in Ethiopia. The study found that knowledge of abortion legality and availability is low among women in Ethiopia, and little effort has been made to disseminate this information. The study suggests that exposure to and interaction with family planning service delivery environment, such as visiting a health provider or being visited by a health worker, are significantly associated with women’s knowledge of abortion legality and availability. However, there were no differences based on whether women lived within 5 km of a facility that offered contraception and abortion services. The study highlights the importance of training providers on legality and availability and the need for additional research on knowledge dissemination pathways.

It is important to note that the study used data from the Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA)-Ethiopia research partnership, which collects data on reproductive, maternal, and newborn health indicators. The study analyzed data from a nationally representative sample of women aged 15-49 years and a cross-sectional survey of health facilities.

The study used multilevel, multinomial logistic regression models to estimate the relative risk ratios of women having knowledge of legal grounds only, service availability only, or knowledge of both, relative to having no knowledge of either. The models were stratified by residence (urban and rural) and adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics and potential confounders.

Overall, the study highlights the importance of improving access to information about abortion legality and availability in Ethiopia, particularly through training providers and exploring alternative knowledge dissemination pathways.

AI Innovations Description

The study mentioned explores the relationship between contraceptive services and knowledge of abortion availability and legality in Ethiopia, with the aim of improving access to maternal health. The findings suggest that knowledge of abortion legality and availability is low among women in Ethiopia, and efforts to disseminate this information have been limited due to fear of anti-abortion sentiment. The study highlights the importance of health providers as valuable sources of information for women.

Based on the study’s findings, the following recommendations can be developed into innovations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Training and Education for Health Providers: Efforts should be made to train health providers on the legality and availability of abortion services. This will enable them to provide accurate and comprehensive information to women seeking maternal health services.

2. Information Dissemination Campaigns: Innovative strategies should be developed to disseminate information on abortion legality and availability to women. This could include the use of community health workers, mobile health clinics, and digital platforms to reach women in remote areas.

3. Integration of Services: Contraceptive and abortion services should be integrated within health facilities to ensure that women have access to comprehensive reproductive health services in one location. This will reduce the need for women to seek services from multiple providers and improve overall access.

4. Community Engagement and Empowerment: Engaging communities and empowering women with knowledge about their reproductive rights and available services is crucial. This can be achieved through community-based workshops, awareness campaigns, and the involvement of local leaders and influencers.

5. Research and Evaluation: Continued research and evaluation are needed to understand the barriers and facilitators to accessing maternal health services in Ethiopia. This will help inform the development and implementation of effective interventions.

By implementing these recommendations, it is possible to improve access to maternal health services in Ethiopia and ensure that women have the knowledge and resources they need to make informed decisions about their reproductive health.

AI Innovations Methodology

The study you provided explores the relationship between contraceptive services and knowledge of abortion availability and legality in Ethiopia. The researchers used data from the Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA)-Ethiopia project, which collects cross-sectional and longitudinal data on reproductive, maternal, and newborn health indicators. The study included a nationally representative sample of 8,719 women and a survey of 799 health facilities.

The researchers measured women’s knowledge of abortion legality and availability using a categorical variable that indicated if a woman had knowledge of at least one legal ground for abortion, knowledge of where to access abortion services, both, or neither. They also examined women’s exposure to and use of the contraceptive service environment, including visits to health providers and facilities, and the availability of contraceptive and abortion services within a 5km radius of their residence.

The methodology used in the study involved conducting multilevel, multinomial logistic regressions, stratified by residence (urban and rural). The researchers adjusted for various socio-demographic characteristics and potential confounders, such as age, marital status, wealth quintiles, education, parity, and region.

The analysis included exploratory analyses of the distributions of the outcome and predictor variables, as well as women’s socio-demographic characteristics. The researchers then assessed outcomes separately for urban and rural areas and tested for differences using statistical tests. Finally, they used stratified multinomial multilevel regression models to estimate the relative risk ratios of having knowledge of legal grounds only, service availability only, or both, relative to having no knowledge of either.

The study findings showed that women who visited a health provider or were visited by a health worker in the past 12 months were more likely to have knowledge of abortion legality and availability. However, there were no differences based on whether women lived within 5km of a facility that offered contraception and abortion services. The researchers emphasized the importance of training providers on legality and availability and the need for additional research on knowledge dissemination pathways.

Overall, the study used a cross-sectional design and statistical analysis to examine the relationship between contraceptive services and knowledge of abortion availability and legality in Ethiopia. The findings provide insights into the role of health providers as sources of information and highlight the need for targeted efforts to improve knowledge dissemination.

Umbhali

Dima Health

Identifiers:

DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czac103

Research Areas:

Community Interventions, Disability, Health System and Policy, Maternal Access, Maternal and Child Health, Quality of Care, Sexual and Reproductive Health, Social Determinants, Violence and Injury

Study Countries:

Ethiopia

Study Design:

Cohort Study, Cross Sectional Study, Exploratory Study

Study Approach:

Quantitative

Participants Gender:

Female

Yabelana ngalokhu: