Protocol for a prospective evaluation of postpartum engagement in HIV care among women living with HIV in South Africa

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aims to address the challenge of postpartum attrition from HIV care among women living with HIV in South Africa, particularly in KwaZulu-Natal, which has the highest prevalence of pregnant women living with HIV in the world.
– Pregnancy and the postpartum period provide opportunities to engage women in HIV care, prevent perinatal transmission, and improve maternal and infant well-being.
– Understanding the factors that contribute to postpartum attrition from HIV care is crucial for developing interventions to support continued engagement in postpartum HIV care.
Study Highlights:
– The study is a 5-year prospective cohort study conducted among pregnant women living with HIV in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
– It aims to estimate the rates and factors associated with attrition from HIV care during the postpartum period.
– The study examines a range of variables at the individual, relational, community, and healthcare system levels to determine who is most likely to fall out of care.
– Participants complete quantitative assessments at baseline (pregnancy) and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postpartum.
– A subset of participants and their partners are invited to complete qualitative interviews to further explore their experiences in HIV care.
– The main study outcomes are suppressed HIV RNA and retention in care at each assessment.
Study Recommendations:
– The study findings will inform the development of interventions to facilitate continued engagement in postpartum HIV care.
– Recommendations may include strategies to address individual-level factors (e.g., health beliefs, depression), relational factors (e.g., social support, intimate partner violence), community-level factors (e.g., stigma, employment policies), and healthcare system factors (e.g., knowledge of service integration, clinic factors).
– Interventions may focus on improving access to care, reducing stigma, enhancing social support, and providing targeted support for women and their partners during the postpartum period.
Key Role Players:
– Researchers and study staff
– Pregnant women living with HIV
– Male partners of the participants
– Healthcare providers and clinics
– Community Advisory Board (CAB)
– Department of Health
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Research staff salaries and benefits
– Participant recruitment and enrollment costs
– Data collection and management expenses
– Laboratory testing and analysis
– Qualitative interview expenses
– Travel and transportation costs for home visits
– Ethics committee fees
– Dissemination of findings (publication, reports, presentations)
– Community engagement activities
– Administrative and overhead costs
Please note that the provided information is a summary of the study and its components. For more detailed information, please refer to the original publication in BMJ Open, Volume 10, No. 1, Year 2020.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong because it describes a well-designed prospective cohort study with a clear objective and methodology. The study aims to estimate the rates and factors associated with attrition from HIV care during the postpartum period among pregnant women living with HIV in South Africa. The study includes quantitative assessments at multiple time points, as well as qualitative interviews to explore participants’ experiences. The study also addresses potential limitations by employing tracing techniques to track participants who are lost to follow-up. To improve the evidence, the abstract could provide more details on the sample size calculation and statistical analysis plan.

Introduction KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), South Africa (SA) has the highest prevalence of pregnant women living with HIV in the world. Pregnancy and the postpartum period offer opportunities to engage women in HIV care, to prevent perinatal transmission and to optimise maternal and infant well-being. However, research suggests that remaining engaged in HIV care during this time can be challenging. Methods and analysis We are conducting a 5-year prospective cohort study among pregnant women living with HIV in KZN to estimate the rates and factors associated with attrition from HIV care during this critical period. To determine who is most likely to fall out of care, we are examining a range of relevant variables informed by a socioecological model of HIV care, including individual, relational, community and healthcare system variables. We are enrolling 18-45-year-old women, at 28 weeks or more of pregnancy, who are living with HIV and currently taking antiretroviral therapies. Participants complete quantitative assessments at baseline (pregnancy) and at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months postpartum. A subset of women and their partners are invited to complete qualitative interviews to further explore their experiences in HIV care. The main study outcomes are suppressed HIV RNA and retention in care at each study assessment. Our understanding of the factors that drive postpartum attrition from HIV care will ultimately inform the development of interventions to facilitate continued engagement in postpartum HIV care. Ethics and dissemination This protocol has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) at The University of the Witwatersrand (Johannesburg, SA) and the Partners Human Research Committee at Partners HealthCare (Boston, Massachusetts, USA). Site support and approval were obtained from the District Hospital and the KZN Provincial Department of Health. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed manuscripts, reports and both local and international presentations (Ethics Registration #170 212).

This is a prospective cohort study of women enrolled in a PMTCT programme, planned to be conducted between 9 June 2017 and 31 May 2022. Up to 500 HIV-positive women between the ages of 18 and 45 will be recruited. The study includes five assessment points: baseline (pregnancy) and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months postpartum. At each assessment, participants complete a quantitative interview and blood draws to measure HIV RNA, which is stored for HIV genotyping, if appropriate. Stored blood samples will be discarded at the end of the study. The baseline assessment occurs on the same day that a participant consents to study participation, unless she prefers that the visit occur on another day (eg, to give her the chance to discuss participation with her partner and/or family). Data collected during this assessment include individual (eg, health beliefs, depression, substance use), relational (eg, social support, relationships with intimate partners, intimate partner violence, HIV disclosure), community (eg, poverty, stigma, work commitment) and healthcare system (eg, knowledge of service integration, HIV clinic distance, time waiting, time travelling to clinic) constructs. Medical details are also assessed related to HIV (eg, CD4 count, current medications) as well as pregnancy (eg, antenatal visits attended) and postpartum (eg, infant weight, gestational age, HIV status) periods. Please see table 1 for details. Measures included at each major assessment HIV RNA levels are retained at each assessment. Genotype results are retained at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months postpartum. *HIV RNA is entered after study visit. †Genotyping only done if participants’ VL>1000. ASI, Addiction Severity Index; BL, baseline; CES-D, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression; PACTG, Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group – Pediatric International Adherence Questionnaire Behavior/Identification; PRAMS, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System; VL, viral load. Optional qualitative interviews are planned to occur during the follow-up period among a subsample of female participants (n~50). These interviews will be conducted among three groups of women: those who achieved suppressed HIV RNA for at least two consecutive assessments (ie, sustained suppression; n=12–15, depending on thematic saturation), those who did not achieve suppressed HIV RNA for at least two consecutive assessments (ie, sustained non-suppression; n=12–15) and those who moved from suppressed HIV RNA to unsuppressed HIV RNA or the reverse (n=14–20). To obtain a diversity of experiences, a proportion of participants meeting these criteria will be offered the qualitative interview after their major assessment visit (ie, 6, 12 and 18 month visits). We will also interview male partners for a subsample of these women (up to 25); women must invite their male partners to participate to avoid inadvertent disclosure of HIV status. To estimate true attrition from care, it is important to determine if a participant who is seemingly lost to follow-up is simply receiving care elsewhere. We employ a number of tracing techniques to keep track of participants throughout the course of the study if a participant cannot be contacted by phone or does not attend a scheduled visit; participants have the option of consenting to each of these strategies. First, we seek permission to contact participants via social media (eg, Facebook, WhatsApp). We also collect the names of up to 10 individuals who might know how to connect with the participant and reach out to these individuals if the participant cannot be contacted. During these calls, study staff protect participants’ confidentiality by identifying their affiliation with a ‘maternal health study’ (or some other programme prespecified by the participant). Finally, we have the option to visit the participant’s home to conduct the assessment and complete the blood draw. For each missed appointment, study staff can attempt up to three home visits. If a participant cannot be located to complete an assessment, a review of the participant’s medical record is conducted. All data drawn from the National Health Laboratory Service medical record (eg, CD4, HIV RNA) are recorded on a record review form. Participants in this study are pregnant women living with HIV who are currently enrolled in a programme to PMTCT of HIV at an antenatal clinic. Women are recruited from a district hospital in a large urban centre in eThekwini District, KZN over a period of 2 years. Although adherence to PMTCT programmes is suboptimal,39–44 97% of women in South Africa receive at least some antenatal care.45 Participants are recruited during the third trimester of pregnancy (as women in South Africa often present late for antenatal care).46 Study inclusion criteria are presented in box 1 and consist of living with HIV; age between 18 and 45 years; at 28 weeks of pregnancy or greater (ie, in the third trimester); currently on ARV therapy; fluent in English or isiZulu; access to a phone and willing to give researchers permission to contact them for repeated assessments and able to give informed consent. After initial consent for screening is obtained, participants are assessed for eligibility using a screening script. Participants who meet all criteria and would like to participate sign a second informed consent document to enrol and then complete a full baseline assessment. There are no exclusion criteria with respect to parity or gravity; all participants are eligible for lifetime ARVs per South African HIV treatment guidelines.10 47 48 The ARV treatment guidelines also indicate that participants who experience a pregnancy loss are still eligible for lifetime treatment; thus, pregnancy loss will not be exclusionary once enrolled in the study. Women with active or untreated major mental illness that would interfere with participation (eg, untreated psychosis, bipolar disorder, dementia or active suicidality) are excluded and referred for mental health treatment via counsellors at the recruitment site. Participants who are acutely distressed or suicidal will be escorted to on-site mental health services immediately. Potential participants may be excluded if, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, participation in the study would be unsafe, would complicate interpretation of study findings or otherwise interfere with achieving study objectives. A range of individual, relational, community and healthcare system variables are measured at each assessment informed by a socioecological model42 (figure 1). Some of the individual-level variables include substance use, health beliefs and depression. Substance use is assessed with the Addiction Severity Index-Lite,49 which probes lifetime and recent substance use, including severity. Health beliefs are measured with the 8-item Perceived HIV Self-Management Scale,50 and depression is assessed with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale,51 52 which is widely used in South Africa53 and has been validated among pregnant women living with HIV.54 Examples of relational variables measured throughout the study include social support, intimate partner violence and HIV disclosure. Social support is measured via the Modified Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire,55 56 which assesses the availability of emotional, informational and tangible support as well as the number of individuals providing support. The presence of intimate partner violence within the last year is documented with the Abuse Assessment Screen.57 58 If the participant answers ‘yes’ to one or more questions, a clinical assessment is conducted. To assess HIV disclosure, participants are asked to whom they have disclosed their HIV status and if their pregnancy partner is aware of their HIV status. Community-level variables include stigma and employment policies. Stigma is measured with the HIV Stigma Scale,59 which assesses several domains, such as personalised stigma, disclosure concerns, negative self-image and concerns with public attitudes towards HIV. For participants who report employment, we assess maternity leave and sick time policies. Healthcare system variables include knowledge of service integration (ie, participants’ knowledge of how to transfer care from PMTCT to mainstream HIV services after delivery) and specific clinic factors (eg, modes of transportation used to travel to clinic, travel time, amount of time spent at clinic and so on). Other measures that are assessed during the study are included in table 1. Social-ecological model of factors impacting HIV Care. The study is informed by a social-ecological framework42 that has been adapted to address factors potentially relevant to postpartum engagement in HIV care. Study assessments measure these factors at the individual, relational, community and healthcare system levels. PMTCT, prevent mother-to-child transmission. To maximise the integrity of self-report data, a racially and ethnically concordant female research assistant (whenever possible), fluent in both English and isiZulu, conducts the assessments. The baseline assessment is administered by a trained study staff member using an electronic tablet and takes place in a private room at the recruitment site. The data collected at baseline include basic sociodemographic information (eg, age, educational level and ethnicity) as well as the individual, relationship, community and healthcare system variables described above. Measures that are not readily available in isiZulu have been translated and back-translated and piloted before use. Please see table 1 for an outline of all measures that will be included at each assessment. At all assessment visits, nurses collect two 6 mL tubes of blood to measure HIV RNA levels, for possible HIV genotyping and/or sample storage. The HIV RNA testing is being conducted at each time point. Whole blood specimens are separated into plasma using standard centrifugation techniques, and HIV RNA is determined via RNA extraction and PCR amplification (this testing is being conducted by Global Clinical and Viral Laboratory (South Africa) using the Biomerieux assay). Participants with unsuppressed HIV RNA are given a letter referring them to their healthcare providers for further care. Although we use detectable HIV RNA as one indicator of attrition from HIV care, viraemia may also occur as a result of ARV resistance. Therefore, we are conducting HIV drug resistance testing for any participant with unsuppressed HIV RNA at the 6-month assessment. If drug resistance is detected, this information is shared with the participant and her identified provider to optimise clinical care. At all other assessments, plasma is stored if HIV RNA is >1000 copies/mL to enable more extensive resistance testing should our data warrant it. Only blood samples with HIV RNA >1000 copies/mL are retained in storage. Any stored blood samples will be appropriately discarded at the end of the study. The participants who are selected to complete the qualitative interview will be categorised according to the three viral suppression patterns described earlier. Participants who are selected for this phase complete up to two interviews between the 6 and 24 months postpartum visits. The male partners complete one interview during this time. All interview questions are open-ended to most effectively elicit information. For the female participants, the interview includes a free-list exercise to solicit unbiased accounts of experiences with postpartum engagement in HIV care. The participant is asked to list the top five barriers and facilitators of postpartum HIV care. The research assistant then probes to query the topic areas generated by the free-list activity to facilitate depth of discussion. Probes are designed to assess and understand how these factors specifically contributed to success or failure to stay engaged in HIV care, and how interventions may make use of facilitators to support continued engagement in care and/or to overcome barriers to retention in care. In addition to targeting topics generated by the free-list activity, the interviewer asks the participant about her current relationships (family, friends, community, pregnancy partner), perceptions of engagement in postpartum HIV care and how future interventions may support better engagement in postpartum HIV care. During the second interview, the participant is asked about changes in her level of engagement in care, facilitators and barriers experienced since her first interview. For the male pregnancy partners, the interview focuses on how partnership characteristics shape attrition from and retention in HIV care during the postpartum period. Interview themes include: his perception of his partner’s overall HIV care engagement since pregnancy, ways the romantic relationship impacts partner’s HIV care engagement, perceived barriers/facilitators to partner’s HIV care engagement and ways to better integrate male pregnancy partners in postpartum HIV care. Participants, community members and other relevant stakeholders will be involved in the reporting and dissemination of study findings as appropriate. The study team plans to provide regular (approximately quarterly) updates on the data collection process and study findings to the Community Advisory Board (CAB) as well as an annual update to KZN’s Department of Health.

Based on the information provided, here are some potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health:

1. Mobile Health (mHealth) Interventions: Develop mobile applications or text messaging services to provide pregnant women with reminders for antenatal care appointments, medication adherence, and important health information.

2. Community-Based Support Groups: Establish community-based support groups for pregnant women living with HIV, where they can receive emotional support, share experiences, and learn about HIV care and treatment.

3. Integrated Services: Implement integrated services that combine antenatal care, HIV care, and other maternal health services in one location. This can reduce the burden on women and improve access to comprehensive care.

4. Transportation Support: Provide transportation support for pregnant women living with HIV to ensure they can easily access healthcare facilities for antenatal care, HIV treatment, and postpartum follow-up.

5. Task Shifting: Train and empower community health workers or lay health workers to provide basic antenatal care and support for pregnant women living with HIV. This can help alleviate the workload on healthcare professionals and improve access to care.

6. Stigma Reduction Interventions: Develop interventions to reduce HIV-related stigma in healthcare settings and communities, as stigma can be a barrier to accessing maternal health services.

7. Male Involvement: Engage male partners in maternal health and HIV care by providing education and support. This can help create a supportive environment for pregnant women living with HIV and improve their access to care.

8. Telemedicine: Utilize telemedicine technologies to provide remote consultations and follow-up care for pregnant women living with HIV, especially those in remote or underserved areas.

9. Health Education and Literacy Programs: Develop targeted health education programs to improve health literacy among pregnant women living with HIV, empowering them to make informed decisions about their care and treatment.

10. Policy and System-Level Changes: Advocate for policy changes and system-level interventions to address structural barriers to accessing maternal health services, such as improving healthcare infrastructure and increasing healthcare funding.

It’s important to note that these recommendations are based on the information provided and may need to be tailored to the specific context and needs of the population being served.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation to improve access to maternal health based on the described study is to develop interventions that address the factors associated with attrition from HIV care during the postpartum period. This can be achieved by:

1. Enhancing knowledge and awareness: Provide education and information to pregnant women living with HIV about the importance of continued engagement in HIV care during the postpartum period. This can include information about the benefits of HIV care for both maternal and infant well-being, as well as strategies to overcome barriers to care.

2. Strengthening social support: Implement interventions that promote social support for women living with HIV during the postpartum period. This can involve creating support groups, connecting women with peer mentors, and involving partners and family members in the care process.

3. Addressing stigma and discrimination: Develop interventions that address HIV-related stigma and discrimination, which can be a significant barrier to accessing and staying engaged in HIV care. This can include community sensitization campaigns, training healthcare providers on stigma reduction, and implementing policies to protect the rights of women living with HIV.

4. Improving healthcare system factors: Identify and address healthcare system factors that contribute to attrition from HIV care, such as long waiting times, distance to clinics, and lack of integration between PMTCT and mainstream HIV services. This can involve streamlining service delivery, improving clinic infrastructure, and implementing strategies to reduce waiting times.

5. Providing comprehensive support: Offer comprehensive support services to women living with HIV during the postpartum period, including mental health support, access to antiretroviral therapy, and assistance with adherence to medication regimens. This can help women overcome challenges and stay engaged in care.

By implementing these recommendations, it is expected that access to maternal health for women living with HIV can be improved, leading to better health outcomes for both mothers and infants.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided description, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Strengthening PMTCT Programs: Enhance the existing prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) programs by ensuring comprehensive and accessible services, including antenatal care, HIV testing, counseling, and provision of antiretroviral therapy.

2. Community-Based Interventions: Implement community-based interventions to increase awareness and knowledge about maternal health, HIV care, and PMTCT. This can involve community health workers, peer support groups, and educational campaigns.

3. Mobile Health (mHealth) Solutions: Utilize mobile health technologies, such as SMS reminders and mobile applications, to provide information, reminders, and support to pregnant women living with HIV. This can help improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy and retention in care.

4. Addressing Stigma and Discrimination: Develop strategies to address stigma and discrimination associated with HIV and maternal health. This can involve community sensitization programs, training healthcare providers on stigma reduction, and promoting supportive environments for pregnant women living with HIV.

5. Integration of Services: Promote integration of maternal health services with HIV care to ensure seamless access to comprehensive care. This can include co-locating antenatal care and HIV clinics, training healthcare providers on integrated care, and streamlining referral systems.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define the study population: Identify the target population, such as pregnant women living with HIV in a specific region or healthcare setting.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current access to maternal health services, including HIV care, antenatal care, and PMTCT programs. This can involve surveys, interviews, and medical record reviews.

3. Introduce the recommendations: Implement the recommended interventions, such as strengthening PMTCT programs, community-based interventions, mHealth solutions, addressing stigma, and integrating services.

4. Monitor and evaluate: Continuously monitor the implementation of the interventions and collect data on key indicators, such as the number of women accessing maternal health services, adherence to antiretroviral therapy, retention in care, and maternal and infant health outcomes.

5. Analyze the data: Analyze the collected data to assess the impact of the interventions on improving access to maternal health. This can involve statistical analysis, comparing pre- and post-intervention data, and identifying trends and patterns.

6. Assess the outcomes: Evaluate the outcomes of the interventions, including changes in access to maternal health services, improvements in adherence and retention, and maternal and infant health outcomes.

7. Disseminate the findings: Share the results of the study through peer-reviewed publications, reports, and presentations to inform policymakers, healthcare providers, and other stakeholders about the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health.

By following this methodology, researchers can simulate the impact of the recommendations and assess their effectiveness in improving access to maternal health for women living with HIV.

Yabelana ngalokhu:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email