Introduction Mental health disorders in pregnant women living with HIV are associated with poor maternal and child outcomes, and undermine the global goals of prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT). This study aimed to determine prevalence of depression and anxiety and identify factors associated with these common mental health disorders among HIV-infeced pregnant women in Tanzania. Methods We enrolled 200 pregnant women living with HIV from antenatal care clinics in the Kilimanjaro region. Women were eligible if they were in the second or third trimester of pregnancy and had been in PMTCT care for a minimum of one month. Data were collected via interviewer administered surveys. Participants self reported depression symptoms (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, EPDS) and anxiety symptoms (Brief Symptom Index, BSI). Multivariate logistic regression models examined factors associated with depression, anxiety, and comorbid depression and anxiety. Results 25.0% of women met screening criteria for depression (EPDS ≥10). Depression was significantly associated with being single (aOR = 4.2, 95% CI = 1.1–15.5), food insecurity (aOR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.0–6.4), and HIV shame (aOR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1–1.3). 23.5% of participants met screening criteria for anxiety (BSI ≥1.01). Anxiety was associated with being single (aOR = 3.6, 95%CI = 1.1–11.1), HIV shame (aOR = 1.1, 95% CI = 1.1–1.2) and lifetime experience of violence (aOR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.0–5.1). 17.8% of the sample met screening criteria for both depression and anxiety. Comorbid depression and anxiety was associated with being single (aOR = 4.5, 95%CI = 1.0–19.1), HIV shame (aOR = 1.2, 95%CI = 1.1–1.3) and lifetime experience of violence (aOR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.2–9.6). Conclusion Depression and anxiety symptomatology was common in this sample of pregnant women living with HIV, with a sizable number screening positive for comorbid depression and anxiety. In order to successfully engage women in PMTCT care and support their well-being, strategies to screen for mental health disorders and support women with mental illnesses are needed.
This was a cross-sectional study among HIV-positive pregnant women in the Kilimanjaro Region. Participants were recruited at nine antenatal clinics, including six from the Moshi municipality and three from the Moshi district. As per Tanzanian national PMTCT guidelines, all pregnant women who test positive for HIV initiate antiretroviral therapy (ART) for lifetime use [22]. Women were eligible to enroll in the study if they were in the second or third trimester of pregnancy and had enrolled in PMTCT care at one of the study antenatal clinics at least one month prior. Additionally, age 18 years and above and provided a written informed consent. The structured survey was based on the baseline survey of a 12 month longitudinal survey of HIV-positve pregnant women in the Kilimanjaro Region [23]. Pregnant women living with HIV presenting for their routine antenatal care were consecutively approached by the clinic nurses informed of the study and asked if they were interested in obtaining more information. Between Juy 2016 and August 2017 436 pregant women living with HIV who attended ANC were approached, 221 experessed interest in the study and were referred to the research office for screening and enrollment (Fig 1). After obtaining informed consent, a structured survey was verbally administered in Swahili by a trained data collector. Study activities were conducted in private offices located within the study clinics. The assessment took approximately 60 minutes to complete. Participants were reimbursed for transportation costs (5,000 Tanzania shillings; approximately $2.30 U.S.) and were provided with light snacks during the interview. Participants with distress and thought of self-harm were counselled by the study nurse and also helped to create an individualized safety plan. Additionally, they were referred back to the clinic counsellor for further support. The data collection tools were translated into Swahili and then back-translated into English by two independent translators. If there was a difference between the two after back translation, a team of Swahili and English-speaking study staff reached consensus on the final wording. In addition to socio-demographic variables (age, level of education, employment status, prior pregnancy, and relationship status), the following measures were included in the survey. Depression was measured using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) [24]. The EPDS contains ten questions asking about depressive symptoms over the past seven days. Each question has four possible responses, with a score of 0 to 3. Items were summed, with a possible range of 0 to 30 and higher scores indicating more depression symptoms (α = 0.88). A score of 10 was used as a cut-off to indicate possible depression [25]. Anxiety was measured using the six-item anxiety subscale of the Brief Symptom Index (BSI-18) [26]. Items asked about anxiety symptoms over the past seven days, with response options on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Items were averaged, with a possible range of 0 to 5 (α = 0.92). Based on instrument norms for a non-clinical, female population, a score of 1.01 or higher was used as a cut-off to indicate probable anxiety [27]. An 8-item measure was adapted from Speizer and colleagues to assess attitudes about pregnancy [28]. Items were summed, with a possible range from 0 to 24 and higher scores indicating more positive attitudes about the pregnancy (α = 0.91). The modified WHO intimate partner violence tool was used to assess for history of intimate partner violence, including questions about emotional, physical, and sexual abuse. The violence scores were dichotomised, with a yes to any of the aforementioned questions being indicative of a lifetime history of violence [29]. A stigma measure was adapted from the Holzemer HIV/AIDS Stigma Instrument (HASI) [30]. The 11 items asked about stigmatizing experiences as a result of HIV (e.g., someone stopped being a friend). Items were summed, with a possible range from 0 to 33 and higher scores indicating greater experience with stigma (α = 0.88). The HIV and Abuse Related Shame Inventory (HARSI) was used to measure HIV shame [31]. The current study adapted 13 statements from the 14-item HIV-related shame subscale of the measure. The 13 items asked about internalized feelings related to living with HIV (e.g., I put myself down for becoming HIV positive, I am ashamed that I’m HIV positive). Items were summed, with a possible range from 0 to 52 and higher scores indicating greater shame (α = 0.86). Four items from the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) were used to assess household food availability over the past 30 days [32]. We adapted four questions from the nine-item household food insecurity scale (e.g. In the past month, how often could you not feed your family?). The measure was dichotomized into whether or not someone reported any food insecurity. The Perceived Availability of Support Scale (PASS) was used to measure social support [33]. The participants were asked to respond to 8 questions (e.g., Would someone be available to talk to you if you were upset, nervous, or depressed?). Scores ranged from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater perceived support from others (α = 0.82). Of the tools used to measure outcomes and the explanotory variables, only food security and enacted stigma assessment tools have been validated in Tanzania [32]. Though not in Tanzania, some have been validated in other East African countries, for example, anxiety measure (BSI) has been validated in Kenya [34] Women enrolled were asked if they had disclosed their HIV status to anyone or a sexual partner (Have you told anyone about your HIV status?). Also, their partner HIV status. Ethical approval for the study was provided by the University of Cape Town Human Research Ethics Committee. The ethical review boards of the Tanzanian National Institute for Medical Research and Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University. Eligible participants were asked to sign a form providing informed consent before their participation. Participants who could not read or write were asked to provide a thumbprint and their consent was verified by the signature of an impartial witness of the participant’s choice. Stata Version 14.0 was used to analyse the data. Frequency distributions and descriptive statistics were calculated for categorical and continuous variables. Three multivariate logistic regression models were developed to assess the factors associated with depression, anxiety, and comorbid depression and anxiety. To control for confounders and reduce residual confounding effects, factors with a p-value of 0.15 or less in bivariate analysis were considered eligible for inclusion in the multivariate analysis, along with demographic variables (age, level of education and marital status) that were selected a priori. Factors with a p-value of less than 0.05 in the final model were considered statistically significant.