Influences on birth spacing intentions and desired interventions among women who have experienced a poor obstetric outcome in Lilongwe Malawi: A qualitative study

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates are high in low-income countries, including Malawi.
– Understanding the reproductive desires and influences on birth spacing preferences of women who have experienced a poor obstetric outcome is important for optimizing outcomes for subsequent pregnancies.
– This qualitative study aims to explore attitudes surrounding birth spacing and potential interventions to promote family planning in this population.
Highlights:
– 46 women participated in the study.
– After experiencing a stillbirth or neonatal death, most women wanted to wait before becoming pregnant again.
– Women with living children wished to wait for longer periods of time than those with no living children.
– Most women preferred birth spacing interventions led by clinical providers and inclusion of their spouses.
– The spouse was identified as the most significant influencing factor on family size and birth spacing.
Recommendations:
– Interventions to promote birth spacing and improve maternal and neonatal health in this population should involve male partners and knowledgeable health care providers.
– Inclusion of spouses in birth spacing interventions is important.
– Clinical providers should play a leading role in implementing birth spacing interventions.
Key Role Players:
– Clinical providers: They will lead the birth spacing interventions and provide necessary guidance and support.
– Male partners: Their involvement is crucial in promoting birth spacing and improving maternal and neonatal health.
– Researchers: They will continue to study and monitor the effectiveness of the interventions.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training and capacity building for clinical providers: This will ensure they have the necessary skills and knowledge to lead the birth spacing interventions.
– Communication and awareness campaigns: These will be needed to educate the target population about the importance of birth spacing and the available interventions.
– Program implementation and monitoring: This will involve the coordination and management of the interventions, as well as ongoing monitoring and evaluation to assess their effectiveness.
Please note that the cost items provided are general categories and not actual cost estimates. The actual cost will depend on the specific context and implementation plan.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong because it is based on a qualitative study with a sufficient sample size. The study used in-depth interviews and focus group discussions to explore attitudes surrounding birth spacing and potential interventions. The study population was recruited from a district government hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi, which adds to the generalizability of the findings. The study also obtained approval from relevant research committees and ensured informed consent from participants. To improve the evidence, it would be helpful to provide more details on the demographic characteristics of the participants and the specific themes and patterns identified in the analysis.

Background: Stillbirth and neonatal mortality are very high in many low-income countries, including Malawi. Use of family planning to encourage birth spacing may optimize outcomes for subsequent pregnancies. However, reproductive desires and influences on birth spacing preferences of women who have experienced a stillbirth or neonatal death in low-resource settings are not well understood. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using 20 in-depth interviews and four focus group discussions with women who had experienced a stillborn baby or early neonatal death to explore attitudes surrounding birth spacing and potential interventions to promote family planning in this population. Qualitative data were analyzed for recurrent patterns and themes and central ideas were extracted to identify their core meanings. Results: Forty-six women participated in the study. After experiencing a stillbirth or neonatal death, most women wanted to wait to become pregnant again but women with living children wished to wait for longer periods of time than those with no living children. Most women preferred birth spacing interventions led by clinical providers and inclusion of their spouses. Conclusions: Many influences on family size and birth spacing were noted in this population, with the most significant influencing factor being the spouse. Interventions to promote birth spacing and improve maternal and neonatal health in this population need to involve male partners and knowledgeable health care providers to be effective.

This was a qualitative study using in-depth, semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Approval was obtained from the National Health Sciences Research Committee of Malawi (Protocol #1354) and the University of North Carolina School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (#14–2677). Women gave written informed consent at the time of enrollment in the language of their choice (Chichewa or English). The study population was recruited from Bwaila Hospital, a district government hospital in Lilongwe, the capital city of Malawi. Bwaila has approximately 15,000 deliveries annually, of which 2900 are preterm. Between 80 and 110 cases of birth asphyxia (a portion of which results in stillbirth or neonatal death) occur each month on the labor ward. Inclusion criteria for the study were: 1) current admission to the postpartum ward at Bwaila Hospital; 2) delivery of a stillborn over 28 weeks gestation or with a birthweight ≥1000 g, or delivery of a liveborn infant weighing ≥1000 g with a neonatal demise in the first 7 days of life; 3) ability to speak Chichewa (the local language) or English fluently; and 4) age 18–45 years old. We recruited 60 women with and without living children from prior pregnancies at a 1:1 ratio from the postnatal wards. A demographic form was completed for women who consented to be part of the study. This form collected information about age, number of other living children, HIV status, marital status, completed education, and occupation. Data on access to a working phone and roof type were collected to assess socioeconomic status. HIV testing is performed on all Malawian women during antenatal care unless they opt out. HIV status was determined by verifying the participant’s health passport (a government-issued personal medical record booklet kept by the patient) with the participant’s permission at time of enrollment. Enrolled women were then contacted and traced 4–8 weeks later to either participate in an in-depth interview or a focus group discussion. All in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted by the same experienced bilingual researcher (M.T.). Twenty in-depth interviews took place in participants’ homes or another private setting and four focus group discussions (of 6–8 participants each) took place in a private conference room on the campus of Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi. Interviews and focus group discussions were audiotaped, transcribed and translated into English. All transcriptions and translations were completed by the same researcher (M.T.). Accuracy of the translations was verified by two other bilingual members of the research team (A.B. and G.H.). Our analysis approach was to use content analysis to compare the birth spacing intentions of women who did and did not have living children. The interview and focus group discussion guide (Additional files 1 and 2) focused on several domains, two of which are relevant to this analysis: 1) birth spacing plans and influences, and 2) acceptable educational interventions to promote birth spacing and family planning among women with poor obstetric outcome. Focus group and in-depth interview guides were used to ensure that all critical topics were discussed, but the interviewer was given license to cover topics in a manner that facilitated flow and rapport. A specific aim of the focus group discussions was to facilitate brainstorming about potential birth spacing interventions, whereas the in-depth interviews focused more on individual and social influences on birth spacing that may be too personal to share in a group setting. For each domain, results were analyzed separately for women with and without living children prior to the stillbirth or neonatal death to examine the role this plays on reproductive desires. Previous qualitative exploration in this field has demonstrated that the minimum threshold for data saturation can be reached within 20 in-depth interviews and four focus group discussions [14–16]. Transcripts of completed interviews were independently analyzed by two of the investigators (A.B. and D.K.). A code dictionary was developed in an iterative process based on identified domains, and this dictionary was assigned to sections of the text using qualitative software NVivo® 10. Recurrent themes and sub-themes were identified based on these initial codes, and any discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Matrices and tables were used to organize the data and display these to facilitate analysis that integrated both in-depth interviews and focus group discussions based on the conceptual domains determined a priori.

The study recommends developing birth spacing interventions that involve male partners and knowledgeable healthcare providers to improve access to maternal health. This recommendation is based on the finding that the spouse is the most significant influencing factor on family size and birth spacing preferences. By including male partners in the interventions, it can help promote birth spacing and improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Additionally, involving healthcare providers ensures that women receive accurate information and support in making informed decisions about family planning. This recommendation can be used as a basis for developing innovative programs or initiatives that target couples and healthcare providers to improve access to maternal health services and promote birth spacing in low-resource settings like Malawi.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation from the study to improve access to maternal health is to develop birth spacing interventions that involve male partners and knowledgeable healthcare providers. This recommendation is based on the finding that the spouse is the most significant influencing factor on family size and birth spacing preferences. By including male partners in the interventions, it can help promote birth spacing and improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Additionally, involving healthcare providers ensures that women receive accurate information and support in making informed decisions about family planning. This recommendation can be used as a basis for developing innovative programs or initiatives that target couples and healthcare providers to improve access to maternal health services and promote birth spacing in low-resource settings like Malawi.
AI Innovations Methodology
To simulate the impact of the main recommendations of this abstract on improving access to maternal health, a potential methodology could involve the following steps:

1. Design a quantitative study: Develop a survey questionnaire that includes questions related to birth spacing intentions, influences on birth spacing preferences, and the acceptability of interventions involving male partners and healthcare providers. The survey should also include questions about access to maternal health services and the impact of birth spacing on maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

2. Sampling: Select a representative sample of women who have experienced a poor obstetric outcome in Lilongwe, Malawi. This can be done by randomly selecting participants from the postnatal wards of Bwaila Hospital or other relevant healthcare facilities.

3. Data collection: Administer the survey questionnaire to the selected participants. Ensure that the survey is conducted in a language that the participants are comfortable with, such as Chichewa or English. Collect demographic information, including age, number of living children, HIV status, marital status, education level, occupation, and socioeconomic status.

4. Data analysis: Analyze the survey data using appropriate statistical methods. Calculate descriptive statistics to summarize the participants’ birth spacing intentions, influences on birth spacing preferences, and attitudes towards interventions involving male partners and healthcare providers. Conduct inferential statistics, such as chi-square tests or regression analysis, to examine the associations between these variables and access to maternal health services.

5. Simulate the impact: Use the survey findings to simulate the potential impact of the main recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This can be done by estimating the proportion of women who would be more likely to use maternal health services if birth spacing interventions involving male partners and healthcare providers were implemented. Compare this proportion to the current utilization rate of maternal health services to assess the potential improvement.

6. Interpretation and implications: Interpret the simulation results and discuss the implications for policy and program development. Highlight the potential benefits of involving male partners and healthcare providers in birth spacing interventions to improve access to maternal health services and promote better maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

It is important to note that this is a hypothetical methodology and the actual implementation may require further considerations and adjustments based on the specific context and resources available.

Yabelana ngalokhu:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email