Barriers to family planning through structural health vulnerabilities: findings from case studies from rural Uganda

listen audio

Study Justification:
The burden of maternal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa is a significant issue, and high fertility rates contribute to the increased risk to women’s health. While programs and services have been implemented to improve access to family planning, previous studies have primarily focused on sociocultural factors as barriers, such as male resistance and women’s low decision-making power. However, these studies have often overlooked structural barriers that extend beyond women’s motivations. This study aims to address this gap by using a structural health vulnerabilities approach to identify and understand the political, economic, social, and cultural structures that impede access to family planning in rural Uganda.
Highlights:
– The study uses a qualitative evaluation of a family planning program in rural Uganda.
– It analyzes three case studies using a structural health vulnerabilities approach.
– The analysis identifies structural barriers rooted in the local realities faced by women.
– Context-specific structural recommendations are proposed to address these barriers.
– The study contrasts initial results with the case study findings to emphasize the importance of considering structural vulnerabilities in future family planning program evaluations and women’s sexual and reproductive health studies.
Recommendations for Lay Reader and Policy Maker:
1. Recognize the importance of addressing structural barriers in improving access to family planning.
2. Implement context-specific structural recommendations to overcome barriers identified in the study.
3. Consider the findings of this study when evaluating and designing future family planning programs.
4. Promote policies that empower women and address sociocultural and structural factors limiting access to family planning.
5. Allocate resources to support the implementation of recommended structural changes.
Key Role Players:
1. Government agencies responsible for health and family planning policies.
2. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working in the field of sexual and reproductive health.
3. Community leaders and influencers who can advocate for change and challenge sociocultural norms.
4. Health professionals and providers involved in family planning services.
5. Researchers and academics specializing in sexual and reproductive health.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
1. Training and capacity building for health professionals and providers to address structural barriers.
2. Community engagement and awareness campaigns to challenge sociocultural norms and promote family planning.
3. Infrastructure development to improve access to family planning services in rural areas.
4. Research and evaluation to monitor the impact of structural changes and identify further areas of improvement.
5. Policy development and implementation to support the recommended structural changes.

The burden of maternal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa is the highest in the world. As high fertility rates present an increased risk to women’s health, programmes and services have been put in place to increase access to family planning. Several studies have identified sociocultural factors as limiting access to family planning, including male resistance and women’s low decision-making power. However, these studies have often used a behavioural approach that anchors barriers to access in women’s attitudes or motivations. In 2019, a qualitative evaluation of a family planning programme using a behavioural approach was conducted in rural Uganda, focusing on women’s attitudes and unmet needs. With hindsight, we realised that our evaluation was insufficient to adequately capture barriers that extend beyond women’s motivations. This paper shares three case studies that we analysed using a structural health vulnerabilities approach. Our analysis highlights political, economic, social and cultural structures that can impede access to family planning. Using a structural health vulnerabilities approach, we identify structural barriers which have their roots in the local realities women face and propose context-specific structural recommendations. Finally, we contrast our initial results with findings the case studies presented to highlight the relevance of taking structural vulnerabilities into account in future family planning programme evaluation and women’s sexual and reproductive health studies.

Title: Barriers to family planning through structural health vulnerabilities: findings from case studies from rural Uganda
Description: This publication discusses the challenges faced in accessing family planning services in rural Uganda and the need to address structural barriers to improve maternal health. Previous studies have focused on individual attitudes and motivations, but this study recognizes the limitations of this approach and adopts a structural health vulnerabilities approach. Through qualitative evaluation and analysis of three case studies, the study identifies political, economic, social, and cultural structures that hinder access to family planning. The findings emphasize the importance of considering these structural barriers and propose context-specific recommendations to address them. By addressing these barriers, it is possible to develop innovations that improve access to maternal health and reduce maternal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa.
Publication: Culture, Health and Sexuality, Year 2022
AI Innovations Description
The publication titled “Barriers to family planning through structural health vulnerabilities: findings from case studies from rural Uganda” highlights the need to address structural barriers in order to improve access to maternal health. The study conducted a qualitative evaluation of a family planning program in rural Uganda, focusing on women’s attitudes and unmet needs. However, the researchers realized that this approach was insufficient to capture barriers that extend beyond women’s motivations.

To address this gap, the study adopted a structural health vulnerabilities approach and analyzed three case studies. The analysis revealed political, economic, social, and cultural structures that impede access to family planning. By considering these structural barriers rooted in local realities, the study proposes context-specific structural recommendations.

The findings emphasize the importance of taking structural vulnerabilities into account in future family planning program evaluations and women’s sexual and reproductive health studies. By addressing these structural barriers, it is possible to develop innovations that can improve access to maternal health and reduce the burden of maternal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa.
AI Innovations Methodology
To simulate the impact of the main recommendations from this abstract on improving access to maternal health, a mixed-methods research methodology could be employed. Here is a brief outline of the methodology:

1. Study Design: Conduct a pre- and post-intervention study design to assess the impact of implementing the structural recommendations on improving access to maternal health in rural Uganda.

2. Sample Selection: Select a representative sample of women of reproductive age from rural areas in Uganda who have limited access to family planning services. Ensure the sample includes women from different socio-economic backgrounds and cultural contexts.

3. Data Collection:
a. Quantitative Data: Administer structured surveys to collect quantitative data on women’s access to family planning services, knowledge about contraception, decision-making power, and socio-economic factors. Collect data before implementing the structural recommendations and after a certain period of time.
b. Qualitative Data: Conduct in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with women, healthcare providers, community leaders, and policymakers to explore their perspectives on the impact of the structural recommendations on improving access to maternal health. Capture their experiences, challenges, and suggestions for further improvement.

4. Intervention Implementation: Implement the context-specific structural recommendations identified in the publication. This may involve policy changes, community engagement, capacity building for healthcare providers, infrastructure improvements, and addressing socio-cultural barriers.

5. Data Analysis:
a. Quantitative Analysis: Analyze the quantitative data using statistical methods to compare the pre- and post-intervention outcomes. Assess changes in access to family planning services, contraceptive use, maternal health indicators, and socio-economic factors.
b. Qualitative Analysis: Transcribe and analyze the qualitative data using thematic analysis to identify common themes and patterns related to the impact of the structural recommendations on improving access to maternal health.

6. Results and Discussion: Summarize and interpret the findings from both the quantitative and qualitative analyses. Discuss the extent to which the implementation of the structural recommendations has improved access to maternal health and address the identified barriers. Explore any unintended consequences or challenges encountered during the intervention.

7. Recommendations: Based on the findings, provide recommendations for scaling up the structural recommendations to other rural areas in Uganda or similar contexts. Highlight areas for further research and potential modifications to the intervention to enhance its effectiveness.

8. Dissemination: Publish the results in relevant academic journals, present findings at conferences, and share the findings with policymakers, healthcare providers, and community stakeholders to advocate for the implementation of the structural recommendations on a broader scale.

By following this methodology, researchers can assess the impact of the structural recommendations on improving access to maternal health in rural Uganda and contribute to evidence-based interventions that address the structural barriers identified in the publication.

Yabelana ngalokhu:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email