Multitype violence exposures and adolescent antiretroviral nonadherence in South Africa

listen audio

Study Justification:
– HIV-positive adolescents have low antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence, which increases their risks of mortality, morbidity, and viral resistance.
– There is a high prevalence of violence against children in the Africa region, but no known studies have examined the impact of violence on HIV-positive adolescents.
– This study aims to examine the associations between ART adherence and various types of violence victimization experienced by HIV-positive adolescents.
Highlights:
– The study found that past-week self-reported ART nonadherence among HIV-positive adolescents was 36%.
– Nonadherence was strongly correlated with virologic failure and symptomatic pulmonary tuberculosis.
– Four types of violence were independently associated with nonadherence: physical abuse by caregivers, witnessing domestic violence, teacher violence, and verbal victimization by healthcare staff.
– The prevalence of nonadherence increased from 25% with no violence exposure to 73.5% with exposure to four types of violence.
– The study highlights the importance of prevention, mitigation, and protection services to support the health and survival of HIV-positive adolescents.
Recommendations:
– Implement prevention programs to address violence exposures at home, school, and clinic settings.
– Provide support services and interventions to mitigate the impact of violence on ART adherence among HIV-positive adolescents.
– Strengthen child protection, health services, and police collaboration to address cases of abuse or violence reported by participants.
– Enhance training and awareness among healthcare staff to prevent verbal victimization of HIV-positive adolescents.
– Improve access to healthcare and social services for HIV-positive adolescents to ensure consistent ART adherence.
Key Role Players:
– South African National Departments of Health, Social Development, and Basic Education
– National AIDS Council
– UNICEF
– PEPFAR-USAID
– NGOs including Pediatric Adolescent Treatment for Africa
– Health facilities and clinics providing adolescent antiretroviral therapy
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Development and implementation of prevention programs
– Training and capacity building for healthcare staff
– Support services for HIV-positive adolescents
– Collaboration and coordination efforts between child protection, health services, and police
– Improving access to healthcare and social services for HIV-positive adolescents
Please note that the provided information is based on the description and highlights of the study. For more detailed and accurate information, it is recommended to refer to the publication in AIDS, Volume 32, No. 8, Year 2018.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong because it is based on a cross-sectional survey of 1060 HIV-positive adolescents in South Africa. The study collected both self-reported data and clinic biomarker data to measure ART adherence. The study also examined the associations between nonadherence and nine different types of violence exposure. The results showed a strong correlation between violence exposure and nonadherence, with past-week nonadherence rising from 25% to 73.5% with four types of violence exposure. The study was conducted in collaboration with various organizations and received ethical approval. To improve the evidence, future studies could consider using a longitudinal design to establish causality and include a larger sample size to increase generalizability.

Objectives: HIV-positive adolescents have low-ART adherence, with consequent increased risks of mortality, morbidity, and viral resistance. Despite high rates of violence against children in the Africa region, no known studies have tested impacts on HIV-positive adolescents. We examine associations of ART adherence with adolescent violence victimization by caregivers, teachers, peers, community members, and healthcare providers. Design and methods: HIV-positive adolescents were interviewed (n = 1060), and clinic biomarker data collected. We sampled all 10-19-year olds ever ART-initiated within 53 clinics in 180 South African communities (90.1% reached). Analyses examined associations between nonadherence and nine violence types using sequential multivariate logistic regressions. Interactive and additive effects were tested with regression and marginal effects. Results: Past-week self-reported ART nonadherence was 36%. Nonadherence correlated strongly with virologic failure (OR 2.3, CI 1.4-3.8) and symptomatic pulmonary tuberculosis (OR 1.49, CI 1.18-2.05). Four violence types were independently associated with nonadherence: physical abuse by caregivers (OR 1.5, CI 1.1-2.1); witnessing domestic violence (OR 1.8, CI 1.22-2.66); teacher violence (OR 1.51, CI 1.16-1.96,) and verbal victimization by healthcare staff (OR 2.15, CI 1.59-2.93). Past-week nonadherence rose from 25% with no violence to 73.5% with four types of violence exposure. Conclusion: Violence exposures at home, school, and clinic are major and cumulating risks for adolescent antiretroviral nonadherence. Prevention, mitigation, and protection services may be essential for the health and survival of HIV-positive adolescents.

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of ALHIV and community controls in South Africa. The study took place in the Eastern Cape, a province with the lowest per-capita GDP nationally, and very limited social service access [32]. Within a health sub-district constituting urban, rural, and peri-urban settlements, all 53 facilities providing adolescent antiretroviral therapy (ART; hospitals, primary care clinics, and community health centres) were visited and included in the study. In each clinic, paper and computerized clinical files were reviewed to identify every patient aged 10–19 who had ever initiated ART, regardless of current healthcare attendance. To prevent sampling bias towards those attending healthcare, adolescents were not interviewed in clinics, but were traced to 180 communities and interviewed in their homes and schools. It was important to avoid risk of stigma or identification of HIV-positive status from participation in the research. Consequently, the study was presented as focusing on general adolescent use of health and social services, and as an additional stigma avoidance strategy, we also interviewed 467 adolescents who were co-resident or living in neighbouring households. Ethical approval was given by IRBs at the Universities of Cape Town (CSSR 2013/4) and Oxford (SSD/CUREC2/12-21), the Provincial Departments of Health and Education and participating health facilities. All participants and their primary caregivers provided written informed consent for interviews and accessing clinical records. Consent procedures were also read aloud in case of low literacy. No financial incentives were used, but participants received a small gift pack, snacks, and a certificate of participation. Confidentiality was maintained except in cases of disclosure of risk of harm. Where participants reported on-going or prior abuse or violence, referrals were made to relevant child protection, health services, or police (n = 112 referrals). A registered child protection social worker oversaw referrals and subsequent follow-up. Adolescents completed confidential 90-min tablet-based questionnaires, designed in collaboration with a Teen Advisory Group to be enjoyable and nonstigmatizing. Measures were translated and back-translated into Xhosa and English and completed in the language of participants’ choice. Audio-CASI was used for sensitive items. Researchers trained in working with vulnerable adolescents provided support for questionnaire completion, depending on adolescents’ literacy, and cognitive needs. Research tools were prepiloted with 25 HIV-positive adolescents in the Eastern Cape. In order to mitigate risk of social desirability bias, self-reported nonadherence was validated against two clinical outcomes that may be associated with nonadherence: clinic-based records of virologic failure [33] and a combination of clinic records and self-reported symptomatic tuberculosis (TB) [34]. The study was developed in collaboration with the South African National Departments of Health, Social Development and Basic Education and National AIDS Council, UNICEF, PEPFAR-USAID, and NGOs including Pediatric Adolescent Treatment for Africa. ART nonadherence was measured using the standardized self-report Patient Medication Adherence Questionnaire, combined with measures developed in Botswana by Lowenthal et al.[35,36]. After piloting, vignettes were added to reduce social desirability bias, for example, ‘Even if Lindiwe tries her best sometimes unexpected things get in the way and prevent her from taking her pills… this is not her fault.’ Past-week nonadherence was defined as ART medication adherence below 95% over the preceding 7 days (always including both a weekend and weekdays) [37]. Two validation measures of self-reported nonadherence were applied. Virologic failure was measured using clinical records and defined as viral load greater than 1000 copies/ml [38]. All viral load measures taken in the year of interview and the prior year were recorded. Concurrent symptomatic pulmonary TB was measured as clinic report of TB diagnosis without subsequent treatment in the past year or self-reported WHO diagnostic criteria for symptomatic TB, validated against sputum specimens [39,40]. To maximize precision for case identification, we combined criteria for highest positive predictive value (chronic cough and weight loss with sensitivity 72.9%, specificity 85%, PPV 11.4) and highest negative predictive value (NPV; any cough, drenching night sweats, and weight loss with sensitivity 75%, specificity 82.4%, NPV 99.2) amongst HIV-positive participants. Ten potential violence factors were measured and coded as dichotomies of exposure/no exposure. Past-year physical abuse victimization by caregivers at home past-year verbal abuse victimization by caregivers at home and past-week witnessing domestic violence between adults in the home were measured using UNICEF Measures for National-level Monitoring of Orphans and Vulnerable Children [41]. Contact sexual violence by any perpetrator was measured using three items from the Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire and defined as any lifetime contact sexual abuse or forced sex [42]. Past-year physical violence from teachers in school was measured as being hit by a teacher ‘sometimes’/‘always.’ Past-year physical violence from peers and past-year verbal violence from peers were measured using the Social and Health Assessment peer victimization scale [43]. Past-year physical violence victimization in community settings was measured as being physically attacked in the community or being robbed and past-year witnessing of violence in community settings was measured as any of past-year witnessing of shootings or stabbings, using the Child Exposure to Community Violence checklist [44]. Past-year verbal violence in the clinic setting was measured as adolescent self-report of being shouted at angrily by clinic staff ‘sometimes’/‘always’. Nine potential confounders were identified using quantitative and qualitative literature review of factors associated with adherence amongst adult, pediatric, and adolescent populations included socio-economic factors of age, sex, urban/rural location, and living in formal or informal housing, using items based on the 2011 Census [45]. They also included family factors of maternal orphanhood and paternal orphanhood, and HIV-related factors of mode of infection (vertical/ horizontal), time on ART treatment (in years), and travel time to clinical care (dichotomized as >1 h) [46]. Analyses were conducted in six stages in SPSS 21.0 and STATA 14. First, associations of self-reported nonadherence were tested in multivariate logistic regressions, against validation measures of virologic failure and symptomatic TB, controlling for potential confounders. Second, known characteristics (sex, age, and location) of excluded and included participants were compared to check for potential differences. Violence variables were excluded if numbers were too small for analysis. Third, sociodemographic characteristics were reported and potential associations between violence and ART nonadherence were assessed following a sequential regression approach recommended by Hosmer and Lemeshow [47]. Three logistic regression models were run: with all violence victimization factors and potential confounders entered simultaneously, with all variables significant at 0.1 or below, and with only variables significant at 0.05 or below. Fourth, we tested all potential two-way interactive effects between violence factors significant in Stage 3, using logistic regression applying Hochberg’s multiple hypothesis step-up method to reduce false discovery rate. Fifth, we tested potential moderation effects of sex and age on associations between violence factors significant in Stage 3 and nonadherence, using interaction terms in the final regression model. Sixth, to test potential cumulative effects of multiple types of violence exposure on ART nonadherence, marginal effects models were run with all potential combinations of significant violence factors and summarized with a marginal effects model using a multiple-violence score of 0–4 types of violence.

N/A

Based on the provided information, it seems that the study focuses on understanding the associations between violence exposure and antiretroviral therapy (ART) nonadherence among HIV-positive adolescents in South Africa. The study aims to identify potential factors that contribute to nonadherence and highlight the importance of prevention, mitigation, and protection services for the health and survival of these adolescents.

In terms of innovations to improve access to maternal health, it is important to note that the information provided does not directly relate to maternal health. However, based on the broader context of improving access to healthcare for vulnerable populations, including pregnant women, here are some potential recommendations for innovations:

1. Mobile Health (mHealth) Solutions: Develop mobile applications or SMS-based platforms to provide pregnant women with information, reminders, and support related to prenatal care, nutrition, and maternal health. These platforms can also facilitate communication between healthcare providers and pregnant women, enabling remote consultations and monitoring.

2. Telemedicine: Implement telemedicine services to connect pregnant women in remote or underserved areas with healthcare professionals. This can help overcome geographical barriers and provide access to prenatal care, consultations, and monitoring without the need for physical travel.

3. Community Health Workers: Train and deploy community health workers to provide maternal health education, support, and basic healthcare services to pregnant women in their communities. These workers can bridge the gap between healthcare facilities and pregnant women, ensuring access to essential care and promoting healthy behaviors.

4. Integrated Care Models: Establish integrated care models that bring together maternal health services with other essential healthcare services, such as HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention. This can improve coordination, reduce fragmentation, and ensure comprehensive care for pregnant women with multiple healthcare needs.

5. Financial Incentives: Explore innovative financing mechanisms, such as conditional cash transfers or vouchers, to incentivize pregnant women to seek and adhere to maternal health services. This can help address financial barriers and improve access to quality care.

6. Public-Private Partnerships: Foster collaborations between public and private sectors to leverage resources, expertise, and technology for improving access to maternal health services. This can involve partnerships with telecommunications companies, technology providers, and healthcare organizations to develop and implement innovative solutions.

It is important to note that these recommendations are based on the broader goal of improving access to healthcare for vulnerable populations, including pregnant women. Further research and contextual adaptation would be needed to specifically address maternal health in the context of the provided study.
AI Innovations Description
The study mentioned in the description focuses on the association between violence exposure and antiretroviral therapy (ART) nonadherence among HIV-positive adolescents in South Africa. The findings suggest that violence exposures at home, school, and clinic settings are significant risks for nonadherence to ART medication. The study highlights the importance of prevention, mitigation, and protection services to improve the health and survival of HIV-positive adolescents.

Based on these findings, a recommendation to develop an innovation to improve access to maternal health could be to implement comprehensive violence prevention and support programs within healthcare settings. This could involve training healthcare providers on recognizing and addressing violence, establishing protocols for responding to violence disclosures, and providing resources and referrals for victims of violence. Additionally, integrating mental health services and counseling into maternal health programs can help address the psychological impact of violence and improve adherence to maternal health interventions. By addressing violence as a barrier to accessing maternal health services, this innovation can contribute to improving the overall health outcomes of pregnant women and their children.
AI Innovations Methodology
To improve access to maternal health, here are some potential recommendations:

1. Telemedicine: Implementing telemedicine programs can provide remote access to healthcare professionals for prenatal and postnatal care. This allows pregnant women in remote or underserved areas to receive medical advice and support without the need for travel.

2. Mobile health (mHealth) applications: Developing mobile applications that provide information and resources on maternal health can empower women to take control of their own health. These apps can provide guidance on prenatal care, nutrition, and breastfeeding, as well as reminders for appointments and medication.

3. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers who can provide basic maternal health services, education, and support in underserved areas can help bridge the gap in access to healthcare. These workers can conduct home visits, provide health education, and assist with referrals to healthcare facilities when needed.

4. Transportation services: Lack of transportation is a significant barrier to accessing maternal health services in many areas. Implementing transportation services specifically for pregnant women can ensure they can reach healthcare facilities for prenatal check-ups, delivery, and postnatal care.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define the target population: Identify the specific population that would benefit from the recommendations, such as pregnant women in rural areas or low-income communities.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current access to maternal health services in the target population, including factors such as distance to healthcare facilities, availability of transportation, and utilization of prenatal and postnatal care.

3. Introduce the recommendations: Implement the recommended innovations, such as telemedicine programs, mHealth applications, community health worker programs, and transportation services.

4. Monitor and collect data: Track the utilization of the implemented innovations and collect data on the impact they have on access to maternal health services. This can include metrics such as the number of telemedicine consultations, app downloads and usage, community health worker visits, and transportation service utilization.

5. Analyze the data: Analyze the collected data to assess the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health. This can involve comparing the baseline data to the post-implementation data to identify any changes in utilization of maternal health services.

6. Evaluate outcomes: Evaluate the outcomes of the implemented recommendations, such as increased utilization of prenatal and postnatal care, improved health outcomes for mothers and infants, and reduced maternal mortality rates.

By following this methodology, it is possible to simulate the impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health and assess their effectiveness in addressing the barriers faced by pregnant women in accessing healthcare services.

Partilhar isto:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email