Progression of the epidemiological transition in a rural South African setting: findings from population surveillance in Agincourt, 1993-2013

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aims to assess the progression of the epidemiological transition in a rural South African population over a 20-year period.
– Understanding the shifting burden of diseases in low- and middle-income countries is crucial for effective resource allocation in health and social systems.
– Localized characterization of the epidemiological transition is lacking and necessary to guide decentralized healthcare planning.
Study Highlights:
– From the early 1990s until 2007, the population experienced a reversal in the epidemiological transition, mainly due to increased HIV/AIDS and TB-related mortality.
– In recent years, the transition has followed a positive trajectory with declining HIV/AIDS and TB-related mortality.
– However, the cause of death distribution has not yet reached the levels observed in the early 1990s in most age groups.
– Gender differences persist, with females experiencing more rapid positive progression than males.
Study Recommendations:
– Integrated healthcare planning and program delivery are needed to improve access and adherence to HIV and non-communicable disease treatment.
– Continued progress in reducing preventable mortality and improving health requires addressing the intersection and interaction of HIV/AIDS, non-communicable disease risk factors, and social and behavioral changes.
– The findings contribute to the evidence needed to refine and advance epidemiological transition theory.
Key Role Players:
– Researchers and epidemiologists to analyze and interpret the data.
– Healthcare professionals and policymakers to implement the recommendations.
– Community leaders and organizations to facilitate community engagement and awareness.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Healthcare infrastructure development and improvement.
– Training and capacity building for healthcare professionals.
– Medications and treatment for HIV/AIDS and non-communicable diseases.
– Health education and awareness campaigns.
– Monitoring and evaluation systems to track progress and outcomes.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong because it is based on a rigorous compilation of mortality data over two decades. The study uses a comprehensive assessment of the epidemiological transition in a rural South African population. The methods include estimating overall and cause-specific hazards of death and conducting statistical tests of changes and differentials. The results show a reversal in the epidemiological transition driven by HIV/AIDS and TB related mortality, followed by a positive trajectory due to declining HIV/AIDS and TB related mortality. The study also highlights persistent gender differences in the transition. To improve the evidence, the abstract could provide more details on the sample size, data collection methods, and limitations of the study.

Background: Virtually all low- and middle-income countries are undergoing an epidemiological transition whose progression is more varied than experienced in high-income countries. Observed changes in mortality and disease patterns reveal that the transition in most low- and middle-income countries is characterized by reversals, partial changes and the simultaneous occurrence of different types of diseases of varying magnitude. Localized characterization of this shifting burden, frequently lacking, is essential to guide decentralised health and social systems on the effective targeting of limited resources. Based on a rigorous compilation of mortality data over two decades, this paper provides a comprehensive assessment of the epidemiological transition in a rural South African population. Methods: We estimate overall and cause-specific hazards of death as functions of sex, age and time period from mortality data from the Agincourt Health and socio-Demographic Surveillance System and conduct statistical tests of changes and differentials to assess the progression of the epidemiological transition over the period 1993-2013. Results: From the early 1990s until 2007 the population experienced a reversal in its epidemiological transition, driven mostly by increased HIV/AIDS and TB related mortality. In recent years, the transition is following a positive trajectory as a result of declining HIV/AIDS and TB related mortality. However, in most age groups the cause of death distribution is yet to reach the levels it occupied in the early 1990s. The transition is also characterized by persistent gender differences with more rapid positive progression in females than males. Conclusions: This typical rural South African population is experiencing a protracted epidemiological transition. The intersection and interaction of HIV/AIDS and antiretroviral treatment, non-communicable disease risk factors and complex social and behavioral changes will impact on continued progress in reducing preventable mortality and improving health across the life course. Integrated healthcare planning and program delivery is required to improve access and adherence for HIV and non-communicable disease treatment. These findings from a local, rural setting over an extended period contribute to the evidence needed to inform further refinement and advancement of epidemiological transition theory.

We use mortality and cause of death data collected from 1993 to 2013 as part of annual updates of vital events conducted using the Agincourt HDSS in a population occupying 27 villages in rural northeast South Africa [32, 33]. The population is largely Shangaan (Tsonga)-speaking. Former Mozambican refugees, who arrived in the study area in the early to mid-1980s in the course and aftermath of civil war, and their descendants, make up about 30% of the population. The population has been under epidemiological and demographic surveillance since 1992 and vital events were updated at approximately 15- to 18-month intervals between 1993 and 1999, and annually since 1999. Although the population has limited access to infrastructure and public sector services, it has experienced substantial socioeconomic changes over the years. As documented in our earlier study [34], the proportion of households that own assets associated with greater modern wealth has increased substantially over time. For example, the proportion of households with dwellings constructed with either brick or cement walls increased from 76% in 2001 to 98% in 2013; and the prevalence of tiles as roof and floor materials of dwellings increased respectively from 3% and 0.5% in 2001 to 15% and 14% in 2013. In addition, the use of electricity for lighting and cooking respectively increased from 69% and 4% of households in 2001 to 96% and 50% of households in 2013. Other notable increases are in the proportion of households owning stove, fridge, cellphone and car respectively from 41%, 40%, 37% and 14% in 2001 to 85%, 86%, 98% and 20% in 2013. For individuals identified as having died between the annual surveillance update rounds, verbal autopsy (VA) interviews were conducted with their caregivers to elicit signs and symptoms of the illness or injury prior to their death. The interviews were conducted one to 11 months after death using a locally validated, local-language VA instrument [33, 35]. Given the rigorous processes involved in the collection, quality assurance and processing of HDSS data [14, 36], the data from the Agincourt HDSS population is one of the rare high-quality and methodologically consistent longitudinal health and demographic dataset for populations in resource-poor low- and middle-income settings. The available mortality and cause of death information by age and sex over an extended period provides a unique opportunity for assessing how populations in low- and middle-income settings, including those in rural sub-Saharan Africa are currently experiencing the epidemiological transition. We use the InterVA-4 probabilistic model (version 4.03) to assign probable causes of death to every death with a complete VA interview. For each death, the InterVA-4 model assigns up to three likely causes of death with associated likelihoods [37]. An indeterminate cause of death is assigned when the VA information is inadequate for the model to arrive at any cause of death. We opted for InterVA-4 as opposed to physician-coded causes of death because the InterVA-4 model assigns causes of death in a standardized, automated manner that is much quicker and more consistent than the former (particularly for assessing changes over time and across settings). Additionally, causes of death derived from InterVA-4 have been found to not substantially differ from those generated by physician coding [38]. Similar to some earlier studies [28, 39], we use discrete-time event history analysis (DTEH) [40] to estimate overall and cause-specific annual hazards of death as functions of sex, age and time period. The annual hazard of dying is the probability of dying during a one-year interval starting on a particular date experienced by living individuals, conditional on their state at the beginning of the interval. An individual’s continuously evolving state is described by the combination of values taken by both constant and time-varying variables, for this study, sex, age and time period. One of the basic requirements of DTEH is the splitting of each individual’s survival history into a set of discrete person years [40]. We create a person-year file that contains one record for each full year lived by each individual in the study population. For example, individuals who died after one year of surveillance contribute one person-year each while those who died after five years of surveillance contribute five person-years. Only completely observed person-years are included in the data set except when an individual dies before completing a person-year time unit. Survival histories are truncated for individuals who were alive at the beginning or end of the study and for those who migrated in/out during the study. After constructing the person-year file we estimate the annual hazards of dying using logistic regression models [40–44]. Binary logistic regression models are used for estimates of the risk of dying from all possible causes, and multinomial logistic regression models are used to obtain estimates of the risk of dying from causes in broad cause of death categories. Using the estimated annual hazards of death, we construct standard life tables to derive life expectancies at birth and adult mortality rates (the probability of dying between ages 15 and 60 for those who survive to age 15 if subjected to age-specific mortality rates between those ages for the specified calendar year). In order to contextualize the dynamics of the HIV epidemic and the availability of antiretroviral treatment over time, the years of the study are divided into the following time periods: 1993–1997, 1998–2000, 2001–2003, 2004–2007, 2008–2010 and 2011–2013. We also categorize age into the following commonly used age groups: 0–4, 5–14, 15–49, 50–64 and 65+. For the cause-specific analyses, the most likely causes of death generated by the InterVA-4 model except indeterminate are categorized into four broad groups: (1) HIV/AIDS and TB; (2) other communicable, maternal, perinatal, and nutritional diseases (excluding HIV/AIDS and TB); (3) non-communicable diseases; and (4) injuries, consistent with the burden of disease classification system in South Africa [23]. Following a common, standard approach to analyzing changes in mortality and cause of death patterns, we divide the most likely causes of death generated by the InterVA-4 model into three broad cause groups that can be compared with existing publications: Group I (communicable diseases, maternal, and perinatal conditions and nutritional deficiencies), Group II (non- communicable diseases), and Group III (accidents and injuries) [45, 46]. The proportion of deaths attributed to each cause group ranges from 0 to 1 and the set of proportions for all of the cause groups sums to 1 after excluding indeterminate causes. We follow Salomon and Murray [46] to relate the distribution of deaths among cause groups to the overall level of mortality. We fit estimates of age and cause-specific mortality fractions to a set of regression equations of the following form where i indexes age; Y i1 and Y i2 are the log ratios of the cause-specific fractions for Group II causes (P2) and Group III causes (P3) relative to the cause-specific fraction for Group I causes (P1): Yi1=lnP2P1 and Yi2=lnP3P1; M i is the all-cause mortality rate; β 0 and γ 0 are constant terms and ε i1 and ε i2 are error terms. The coefficients are estimated using seemingly unrelated regression models, separately for each sex and age group. These models provide efficient means of jointly obtaining estimates from a set of equations each with its own error term that may be correlated with the error terms of other equations. As in Salomon and Murray [46] we compute predicted values for Y1 and Y2 for each observation in the dataset. Those predicted values are transformed into predicted proportions for each cause group using the multivariate logistic transformation: where J = 3 and P 3 is 1 − P 1−P 2. All analyses have been conducted using Stata version 14.1 (Stata Corp., College Station, USA).

Based on the provided information, it is difficult to identify specific innovations for improving access to maternal health. The text primarily focuses on the epidemiological transition in a rural South African setting and the analysis of mortality and cause of death data. To recommend innovations for improving access to maternal health, it would be helpful to have more information specifically related to maternal health challenges and potential solutions.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the information provided, it appears that the research paper titled “Progression of the epidemiological transition in a rural South African setting: findings from population surveillance in Agincourt, 1993-2013” focuses on understanding the epidemiological transition and mortality patterns in a rural South African population over a 20-year period.

While the paper does not explicitly mention recommendations for improving access to maternal health, there are several key findings that can inform potential innovations in this area:

1. Reversal in epidemiological transition: The population studied experienced a reversal in the epidemiological transition, primarily driven by increased HIV/AIDS and TB-related mortality. This highlights the need for targeted interventions to address these specific health challenges, including prevention, testing, and treatment programs.

2. Positive trajectory in recent years: The epidemiological transition has shown a positive trajectory in recent years, with declining HIV/AIDS and TB-related mortality. This indicates that efforts to combat these diseases have been effective and should be continued and expanded.

3. Persistent gender differences: The transition is characterized by persistent gender differences, with more rapid positive progression in females than males. This suggests the importance of gender-sensitive approaches to maternal health, ensuring that women have equal access to healthcare services and resources.

4. Integrated healthcare planning and program delivery: The complex intersection and interaction of HIV/AIDS, non-communicable disease risk factors, and social and behavioral changes require integrated healthcare planning and program delivery. This implies the need for comprehensive and coordinated maternal health services that address multiple health issues simultaneously.

Based on these findings, an innovation to improve access to maternal health could involve the development and implementation of integrated healthcare programs specifically tailored to the needs of the rural South African population. These programs could include:

1. Mobile clinics: Utilizing mobile clinics to bring maternal health services directly to rural communities, making it easier for pregnant women to access prenatal care, antenatal check-ups, and postnatal care.

2. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers who can provide education, support, and basic healthcare services to pregnant women and new mothers in their own communities.

3. Telemedicine: Implementing telemedicine solutions to connect rural healthcare facilities with specialized maternal health experts in urban areas, enabling remote consultations and guidance for healthcare providers in rural settings.

4. Health education and awareness campaigns: Conducting targeted health education and awareness campaigns to increase knowledge about maternal health, promote early detection of complications, and encourage women to seek timely care.

5. Strengthening health infrastructure: Investing in the improvement and expansion of healthcare infrastructure in rural areas, including the construction of well-equipped maternity clinics and the provision of essential medical supplies and equipment.

These recommendations, based on the findings of the research paper, aim to address the specific challenges faced by the rural South African population in accessing maternal health services. By implementing innovative approaches that consider the local context and the unique needs of the population, it is possible to improve access to maternal health and ultimately reduce maternal mortality rates.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations for improving access to maternal health:

1. Strengthening healthcare infrastructure: Investing in the development and improvement of healthcare facilities, particularly in rural areas, can help ensure that pregnant women have access to quality maternal health services.

2. Increasing skilled healthcare providers: Expanding the number of skilled healthcare providers, such as doctors, nurses, and midwives, can help address the shortage of personnel and improve access to maternal health services.

3. Enhancing transportation services: Improving transportation infrastructure and services can help overcome geographical barriers and enable pregnant women to reach healthcare facilities in a timely manner.

4. Promoting community-based interventions: Implementing community-based interventions, such as training community health workers and promoting awareness about maternal health, can help reach pregnant women who may have limited access to formal healthcare services.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Data collection: Gather data on the current state of maternal health access, including information on healthcare infrastructure, healthcare providers, transportation services, and community-based interventions.

2. Define indicators: Identify key indicators that can measure the impact of the recommendations, such as the number of healthcare facilities, the number of skilled healthcare providers, transportation availability, and community awareness.

3. Baseline assessment: Assess the current status of the indicators to establish a baseline for comparison.

4. Scenario development: Develop scenarios that reflect the potential impact of the recommendations. For example, simulate the increase in the number of healthcare facilities, healthcare providers, or transportation services based on the recommendations.

5. Modeling and simulation: Use statistical or mathematical models to simulate the impact of the scenarios on the indicators. This could involve analyzing the potential changes in access to maternal health services, such as the increase in the number of pregnant women receiving prenatal care or the reduction in travel time to healthcare facilities.

6. Evaluation and comparison: Compare the simulated results of the different scenarios to the baseline assessment to determine the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health.

7. Policy and decision-making: Use the simulation results to inform policy and decision-making processes, identifying the most effective recommendations for improving access to maternal health and prioritizing resource allocation.

It is important to note that the methodology described above is a general framework and may need to be adapted based on the specific context and available data.

Partilhar isto:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email