Objectives The study tried to determine if malnutrition (underweight, stunting, wasting, overweight) and enamel defects (enamel hypoplasia, hypomineralized second molar, amelogenesis imperfecta, fluorosis) were associated with early childhood caries (ECC). The study also examined whether malnutrition was associated with the presence of enamel defects in 0-5-year-old children. Methods The study was a secondary analysis of primary data of a cross-sectional study assessing the association between maternal psychosocial health and ECC in sub-urban Nigerian population collected in December 2018 and January 2019. One hundred and fifty nine children were recruited. Exploratory variables were malnutrition and enamel defects. The outcome variables were the prevalence of ECC in 0-2-year-old, 3-5-year-old, and 0-5-year-old children. Multivariable Poisson regression analysis was used to determine the associations, and socioeconomic status, oral hygiene status, and frequency of in-between-meals sugar consumption were adjusted for. The adjusted prevalence ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and p values were calculated. Results The prevalence of ECC was 2.1% in 0-2-year-old children and 4.9% in 3-5-year-old children. In adjusted models, underweight, stunting, and wasting/overweight were not significant risk indicators for ECC in either age group. 0-2-year-old children who had amelogenesis imperfecta (p<0.001) and fluorosis (p<0.001) were more likely to have ECC than were children who did not have these lesions. 3-5-year-old children who had hypoplasia (p = 0.004), amelogenesis imperfecta (p<0.001) and fluorosis (p<0.001) were more likely to have ECC than were children who did not have these lesions. 0-5-year-old children with hypoplasia (p<0.001) and fluorosis (p2.00 were classified as overweight. ECC was defined as the presence of cavitated and non-cavitated lesions, filled or missing surfaces in any primary tooth in children less than 72 months of age [41]. The presence of ECC was determined with the dmft index based on the World Health Organization criteria [42]. The dmft score was obtained by adding the d, m and f scores for each child less than six years of age. The dmft score was dichotomized into 0 = ECC absent and >0 = ECC present. Oral hygiene status was assessed with the index of Greene and Vermillion [43]. The index teeth and surfaces examined were the facial and lingual surfaces of teeth number 51, 55, 65, 71, 75, and 85. The debris and calculus scores were recorded, added, and divided by the number of surfaces examined to get the OHI-S score. Oral hygiene was considered “good” when the scores ranged from 0.0 to 1.2; “fair” when the scores ranged from 1.3 to 3.0; or “poor” when the score was 3.1 and above. For children who did not have the index teeth, all the teeth present were scored, and their average was calculated before being classified. Hypomineralized primary second molar was identified when demarcated white, yellow or brown opacities more than or equal to 2 mm in diameter, were present on any of the surfaces of the primary second molar [44, 45]. Fluorosis was identified when there was tooth mottling [46]. A diagnosis of enamel hypoplasia was made when there was either generalized deficiency of enamel formation, or localized deficiency seen as pits or grooves [47]. Amelogenesis imperfecta was identified when enamel hypoplasia and/or hypomaturation or hypocalcification randomly affected multiple teeth in no depictable chronological order [48]. Descriptive statistics were provided for ECC presence (yes/no), malnutrition status (stunting, wasting, underweight and overweight), and enamel defects (hypoplasia, hypomineralized second primary molar, fluorosis and amelogenesis imperfecta). Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to assess the relationship between exposures (malnutrition status and enamel defects), confounders (socio-economic status, frequency of sugar consumption in-between-meals and oral hygiene) and the outcome variable (presence of ECC measured by prevalence ratio). We used robust variance estimation due to the sparse data on some variables. Explanatory variables were grouped into three blocks, and one block was introduced into the model at a time. Model 1 included the block of malnutrition status (stunted, underweight, wasted, overweight); Model 2 included the block of malnutrition status and enamel defects; Model 3 included variables from Model 2 and oral health practices associated with ECC, namely, frequency of daily consumption of sugar between meals and oral hygiene status, in addition to socio-economic status. Age was excluded because of possible collinearity, since it was used to compute malnutrition status. The models were adjusted for the cofounders, and the adjusted prevalence ratios (APR) were calculated. We tested for multicollinearity in each model, using variance inflation factor. A separate model was constructed to assess the association between the dependent variable (types of enamel defect) and independent variables (types of malnutrition) Models were built for 0-2-year-old children, 3-5-year-old children in view of evolving evidence that ECC profile and risk indicators differ for these age groups [49]. A model was also built for and 0-5-year-old children since ECC is often assessed for the age group combined. Statistical analyses were conducted using Stata/SE 14.0 for Windows. The significance level was set at p≤0.05. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex Health Research Ethics Committee (NHREC/27/01/2009a and IRB/EC/0004553).
N/A