A community effectiveness trial of strategies promoting intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine in pregnant women in rural Burkina Faso

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aimed to investigate whether a targeted community-based promotion campaign could effectively improve pregnancy outcomes in a rural area of Burkina Faso.
– The study focused on increasing antenatal clinic attendance and uptake of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) for pregnant women, which is a recommended preventive treatment for malaria.
– The study aimed to assess the impact of the promotion campaign on pregnancy outcomes such as peripheral and placental parasitaemia, maternal anaemia, and birth weight.
Study Highlights:
– The study found that the targeted community-based promotion campaign resulted in a significant increase in SP uptake, with 70% of women receiving at least two doses of SP.
– The intervention group that received both community promotion and SP had lower rates of peripheral and placental parasitaemia compared to the control group.
– However, there was no significant difference in maternal anaemia or birth weight between the intervention and control groups.
– The study highlighted the importance of achieving high coverage of preventive treatments, similar to immunization programs, for effective outcomes.
Recommendations for Lay Reader and Policy Maker:
– The study recommends implementing targeted community-based promotion campaigns to increase antenatal clinic attendance and uptake of preventive treatments for pregnant women.
– It suggests that achieving high coverage of preventive treatments is essential for improving pregnancy outcomes.
– The study highlights the need to define a critical threshold of coverage, possibly on a regional basis, to ensure the effectiveness of preventive interventions.
Key Role Players:
– Health centers: Responsible for implementing antenatal clinics and providing preventive treatments to pregnant women.
– Community leaders: Trained to promote health messages and encourage early and regular antenatal clinic attendance.
– Women field assistants: Identified and recruited pregnant women, administered questionnaires, and collected blood samples.
– Technicians: Performed laboratory tests on blood samples.
– Burkina Faso Ministry of Health: Approved the study and provided oversight.
– Ethical Committee at ITM, Antwerp: Approved the study and ensured ethical considerations were met.
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Training materials and resources for community leaders.
– Transportation and logistics for women field assistants.
– Laboratory equipment and supplies for blood sample analysis.
– Administrative and coordination costs for the study.
– Monitoring and evaluation expenses.
– Communication and dissemination of study findings.
– Potential costs for scaling up the intervention to a larger population.
Please note that the above cost items are estimates and may vary depending on the specific context and implementation strategy.

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 7 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is moderately strong. The study design involved a community effectiveness trial with a control group and intervention groups. The study measured various outcomes related to the effectiveness of a targeted community-based promotion campaign to increase ANC attendance and SP uptake in pregnant women in rural Burkina Faso. The study found that the promotional campaign resulted in a major increase in IPTp-coverage, but did not significantly improve maternal anaemia or birth weight. To improve the strength of the evidence, future studies could consider increasing the sample size, conducting a longer follow-up period, and including additional outcome measures such as maternal mortality rates.

Background. Intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine- pyrimethamine for pregnant women (IPTp-SP) is currently being scaled up in many countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite high antenatal clinic (ANC) attendance, coverage with the required two doses of SP remains low. The study investigated whether a targeted community-based promotion campaign to increase ANC attendance and SP uptake could effectively improve pregnancy outcomes in the community. Methods. Between 2004 and 2006 twelve health centres in Boromo Health District, Burkina Faso were involved in this study. Four were strategically assigned to community promotion in addition to IPTp-SP (Intervention A) and eight were randomly allocated to either IPTp-SP (Intervention B) or weekly chloroquine (Control). Primi- and secundigravidae were enrolled at village level and thick films and packed cell volume (PCV) taken at 32 weeks gestation and at delivery. Placental smears were prepared and newborns weighed. Primary outcomes were peripheral parasitaemia during pregnancy and at delivery, placental malaria, maternal anaemia, mean and low birth weight. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of women with ≥ 3 ANC visits and ≥ 2 doses of SP. Intervention groups were compared using logistic and linear regression with linearized variance estimations to correct for the cluster-randomized design. Results. SP uptake (≥ 2 doses) was higher with (Intervention A: 70%) than without promotion (Intervention B: 49%) (OR 2.45 95%CI 1.25-4.82 p = 0.014). Peripheral (33.3%) and placental (30.3%) parasite rates were significantly higher in the control arm compared to Intervention B (peripheral: 20.1% OR 0.50 95%CI 0.37-0.69 p = 0.001; placental: 20.5% OR 0.59 95%CI 0.44-0.78 p = 0.002) but did not differ between Intervention A (17.4%; 18.1%) and Intervention B (20.1; 20.5%) (peripheral: OR 0.84 95%CI 0.60-1.18 p = 0.280; placental: OR 0.86 95%CI 0.58-1.29 p = 0.430). Mean PCV and birth weight and prevalence of anaemia and low birth weight did not differ between study arms. Conclusion. The promotional campaign resulted in a major increase in IPTp-coverage, with two thirds of women at delivery having received ≥ 2 SP. Despite lower prevalence of malaria infection this did not translate into a significant difference in maternal anaemia or birth weight. This data provides evidence that, as with immunization programmes, extremely high coverage is essential for effectiveness. This critical threshold of coverage needs to be defined, possibly on a regional basis. © 2008 Gies et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

The study was carried out between 2003 and 2006 in Western Burkina Faso, in Boromo Health District (BHD), a rural province with an estimated total population of 204,117 (Figure ​(Figure1).1). There are three seasons: a rainy season (June to October; 20–35°C; mean annual rainfall about 800 mm/year), a cold dry season (November to February, 16–32°C) and a hot dry season (March to May, 25–40°C). Malaria is holo-endemic, with high transmission between July and December. At the time of the study, national guidelines for malaria prevention in pregnant women recommended a full treatment course of CQ (1500 mg over 3 days) at the first antenatal visit followed by 300 mg weekly until 6 weeks post partum. Antenatal care was offered free of charge and included, besides CQ prophylaxis, an ANC card, physical examination, counselling, and haematinic supplementation (200 mg ferrous sulphate and 0.25 mg folic acid). In rural Burkina Faso, antenatal coverage for at least one visit was about 70%, with 22.5% of first visits during the first trimester and 68.5% of deliveries occurring at home [25]. Location of study health centres and dependant villages in Boromo Health District, Burkina Faso. Study interventions were implemented at two different levels: IPTp with SP (two observed doses at the beginning of the second and third trimester) was introduced through antenatal clinics in selected health centres (HC) and promotional activities were conducted at village level. Four out of 26 peripheral HC in BHD were strategically assigned to community promotion in addition to IPTp-SP (Intervention A). Geographically contiguous HC were selected to avoid contamination due to the spread of the promotional campaign across the study arms (Figure ​(Figure1).1). Communities were informed about the dangers of malaria for the pregnant women and their babies and early and regular ANC attendance was promoted to ensure timely IPTp-SP uptake. In 18 villages, female community leaders were trained to promote specifically designed health messages using image boxes for individual and group discussions. These messages were based on a previous socio-anthropological survey investigating local perceptions and beliefs. Eight HC were randomly allocated to either implement IPTp-SP in antenatal clinics without these enhanced promotional activities (Intervention B) or continue with weekly CQ according to the national guidelines (Control). The total study area covered a population of about 75,000 people distributed in 57 villages. Catchment areas of the selected HC varied in number of villages (2–10) and population size (3,500–10,500). In one catchment area (Oury), a new HC (Mou) was opened during the study period, reducing the distance to the nearest HC for two villages. SP was available at ANC from April 2004. The promotional activities in the intervention villages started in May 2004 and continued until June 2006. In August 2004, as part of an additional nutritional study, HC were in a factorial design assigned to one of two forms of micronutrient supplementation: (a) standard haematinics or (b) daily multi-micronutrients [26]. Trained women field assistants (WFA) identified pregnant women by monthly village visits using a screening questionnaire. After obtaining an informed consent, women in their first or second pregnancy were recruited. A questionnaire on demographic and household characteristics, education and socio-economic status, obstetrical history, antenatal visits, illness and treatment during the current pregnancy was administered by the WFA. Uterine fundal height was measured to confirm pregnancy and to estimate the gestational age. If the uterus was non-palpable, a urine pregnancy test was performed. Enrolled women received a card with a unique study number to be shown any time they attended a HC. At around 32 weeks of gestation, WFA visited the enrolled women and administered a questionnaire on antenatal visits, morbidity and treatment received. A capillary blood sample (finger prick) for packed cell volume (PCV) and parasitaemia was collected. At each ANC visit, information on previous illnesses and treatments was collected; fundal height and axillary temperature were measured. Numbers of tablets of directly observed SP treatment and other medicines (CQ, haematinics) handed to mothers were recorded on a study questionnaire. Similar information was collected at unscheduled visits. About half of deliveries were expected to take place at home assisted either by a traditional birth attendant (TBA) or a family member. Around the expected time of delivery, WFA weekly visited women likely to deliver at home. As soon as possible after delivery, babies were weighed using a hanging weighing scale (UNICEF Scale, infant, spring, 5 kg × 25 g) and length was measured to the nearest half centimetre using a transportable measuring board (SECA 210 Measure Mat II). A capillary blood sample for PCV and parasitaemia was collected from the mother. Whenever possible, WFA cut a small piece of tissue from the middle third of the maternal side of the placenta and prepared a smear after swabbing it on blotting paper. Similar samples and information were collected from women delivering at a HC or district hospital in the study area. Women recruited in the study and their offspring were visited by WFA about one year after delivery; if the child had died, the time of the event and its circumstances were recorded. All laboratory tests were performed by three experienced technicians in the laboratory of Boromo District Hospital. Thick films and methanol fixed placental smears were stained with 10% Giemsa for 10 minutes. For peripheral blood, parasite density was determined by counting parasite asexual forms per 200 white blood cells (WBC). The parasite density per μl was estimated assuming 8,000 WBC/μl. A slide was considered negative if no parasite was found after counting 500 WBC. All slides were systematically read by two technicians and for discrepant results a third consensus reading was performed. Parasite density for placental smears was expressed as the percentage of parasitized red blood cells (RBC) over the total number of RBC after counting at least 1,000 RBC. Heparinized capillary tubes containing whole blood were centrifuged within 48 hours after collection and PCV read. To minimize losses during the transport two capillaries were collected from the same finger prick. If two results were available the mean value was computed. Asexual P. falciparum parasites of any density, in a thick film of peripheral blood (peripheral parasitaemia) or a placental smear (placental parasitaemia). PCV < 33%; women were further divided according to the degree of anaemia, i.e. moderate to severe anaemia PCV < 30%; severe anaemia PCV < 24%. For the analysis of the haematological status at delivery, only blood samples collected at the day of delivery were considered. Weight values obtained within 24 hours of delivery were analysed as such. Weights obtained between day 1–8 post-delivery were corrected for the physiological fall (D1 4%, D2 3%, D3 3%, D4 1%) and increase (D5 0%, D6 1%, D7 2%, D8 4%) in weight occurring during the first week after delivery. The correction factor was estimated by weighing 132 newborns with known birth weight every two days up to 8 days after delivery. The birth weight analysis includes only singleton live births. Low birth weight (LBW) is defined as a corrected birth weight 19 years), parity, education, marital status, wealth index, bed net ownership, season, distance (dichotomized ≤ 5/> 5 km) and, for birth weight analyses, sex of the baby. Variables associated with outcomes at a significance level with p < 0.1 in univariate analysis were entered in multiple logistic regression models. Intervention arm was kept as a variable in all models. Women enrolled during the first months of the study were likely to have started antenatal clinics before the interventions were implemented and have already received CQ chemoprophylaxis instead of IPTp-SP. The intervention A arm would not have been exposed to promotional activities. Therefore, women in their 4th or later month of pregnancy at the time the study started (delivery date prior to September 1st 2004) were excluded a priori from the analysis. The study was approved by the Burkina Faso Ministry of Health and the Ethical Committee at ITM, Antwerp. Local health authorities and community leaders were informed about the study objectives and procedures for data collection. All study participants gave informed consent after explanation of the procedures in the local language and were free to remove consent at any time of the study without influencing their access to health services. Women found to be parasitaemic or anaemic at 32 weeks or at delivery were offered antimalarial treatment (either quinine in the intervention arms or CQ in the control arm) and extra haematinics according to national guidelines.

N/A

The study mentioned focuses on improving access to maternal health in rural Burkina Faso. Some potential innovations that can be used to improve access to maternal health include:

1. Mobile health clinics: Bringing healthcare services, including prenatal care and maternal health services, directly to rural communities through mobile clinics can help overcome geographical barriers and improve access to care.

2. Telemedicine: Using telecommunication technology to provide remote healthcare services, such as virtual consultations and remote monitoring, can help pregnant women in rural areas access specialized care without the need for travel.

3. Community health workers: Training and deploying community health workers who are knowledgeable about maternal health can help bridge the gap between healthcare facilities and rural communities. These workers can provide education, support, and basic healthcare services to pregnant women in their own communities.

4. Health information systems: Implementing electronic health records and health information systems can improve the coordination and continuity of care for pregnant women. This can help healthcare providers track and monitor the health of pregnant women, ensuring timely and appropriate interventions.

5. Transportation support: Providing transportation support, such as ambulances or transportation vouchers, can help pregnant women in rural areas overcome transportation barriers and access healthcare facilities for prenatal care, delivery, and postnatal care.

6. Maternal health education programs: Implementing targeted education programs that focus on maternal health, including prenatal care, nutrition, and birth preparedness, can empower pregnant women with knowledge and skills to make informed decisions about their health and seek appropriate care.

These innovations, along with others, can help improve access to maternal health services in rural areas, ultimately leading to better pregnancy outcomes and improved maternal health.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation from the study is to implement a targeted community-based promotion campaign to increase antenatal clinic attendance and uptake of intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) for pregnant women in rural areas. This campaign aims to improve pregnancy outcomes and access to maternal health services. The study found that the promotional campaign resulted in a significant increase in IPTp-SP coverage, with two-thirds of women at delivery having received the recommended two doses of SP. However, despite the increase in coverage, there was no significant difference in maternal anaemia or birth weight. The study highlights the importance of achieving extremely high coverage for effectiveness, similar to immunization programs. It suggests that defining a critical threshold of coverage, possibly on a regional basis, is necessary for improving access to maternal health.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the description provided, the study conducted in Burkina Faso aimed to improve access to maternal health by implementing a targeted community-based promotion campaign to increase antenatal clinic (ANC) attendance and uptake of intermittent preventive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) for pregnant women. The study compared three intervention groups: Intervention A, which included community promotion in addition to IPTp-SP; Intervention B, which only included IPTp-SP; and a control group that received weekly chloroquine.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Define the study population: Identify the target population for the simulation, such as pregnant women in rural areas of Burkina Faso.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather relevant data on the current status of access to maternal health in the study population, including ANC attendance rates, IPTp-SP uptake, prevalence of malaria infection, maternal anaemia rates, and birth outcomes.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a mathematical model that represents the dynamics of maternal health access in the study population. The model should incorporate variables such as ANC attendance, IPTp-SP uptake, malaria infection rates, and birth outcomes. The model should also consider the different intervention groups (Intervention A, Intervention B, and control) and their respective effects on these variables.

4. Define intervention parameters: Specify the parameters of the interventions, such as the intensity and duration of the community promotion campaign, the availability and distribution of IPTp-SP, and the implementation of weekly chloroquine.

5. Run the simulation: Use the developed model to simulate the impact of the interventions on improving access to maternal health. This can be done by running the simulation over a specified time period and comparing the outcomes (e.g., ANC attendance rates, IPTp-SP uptake, malaria infection rates, maternal anaemia rates, and birth outcomes) between the different intervention groups.

6. Analyze the results: Evaluate the simulation results to assess the effectiveness of the interventions in improving access to maternal health. Compare the outcomes between the intervention groups and the control group to determine the impact of the interventions on the desired outcomes.

7. Refine the model and repeat the simulation: If necessary, refine the simulation model based on the initial results and repeat the simulation to further investigate the impact of different intervention parameters or scenarios.

By following this methodology, researchers can simulate the potential impact of the recommendations on improving access to maternal health in the study population. This can help inform decision-making and policy development to effectively implement interventions that can lead to better maternal health outcomes.

Partilhar isto:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email