Burden of invasive group B Streptococcus disease and early neurological sequelae in South African infants

listen audio

Study Justification:
– Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of neonatal sepsis and meningitis.
– The study aimed to evaluate the burden of invasive GBS disease and subsequent neurological sequelae in infants from a setting with a high prevalence of HIV among pregnant women.
Study Highlights:
– The study identified 122 cases of invasive GBS disease over a 12-month period.
– The risk for late-onset GBS disease was 4.67 times greater in HIV-exposed infants compared to HIV-unexposed infants.
– Serotypes Ia, Ib, and III were the most common serotypes associated with GBS disease.
– Risk factors for GBS disease included offensive draining liquor and maternal GBS bacteriuria.
– The case fatality rate among GBS cases was 18.0%.
– Infants with GBS disease had a 13.18-fold greater risk of neurological sequelae compared to controls.
Recommendations:
– Implement universal screening for recto-vaginal GBS colonization during pregnancy.
– Provide appropriate interventions for pregnant women with risk factors for GBS disease.
– Develop an effective trivalent GBS conjugate vaccine targeted at pregnant women.
Key Role Players:
– Researchers and scientists
– Healthcare providers
– Policy makers
– Public health officials
– Maternal and child health organizations
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Research and data collection
– Screening tests and laboratory equipment
– Training for healthcare providers
– Vaccine development and production
– Public health campaigns and education materials

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong, as it presents the findings of a case-control study conducted at three large academic hospitals in Johannesburg. The study provides detailed information on the burden of invasive group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease and subsequent neurological sequelae in infants, as well as the risk factors associated with GBS infection. The study also includes statistical analysis and adjusted odds ratios. However, to improve the evidence, the abstract could provide more information on the sample size, the specific methods used for data collection and analysis, and any limitations of the study.

Introduction: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of neonatal sepsis and meningitis. We aimed to evaluate the burden of invasive early-onset (0-6 days of life, EOD) and late-onset (7-89 days, LOD) GBS disease and subsequent neurological sequelae in infants from a setting with a high prevalence (29.5%) of HIV among pregnant women. Methods: A case-control study was undertaken at three secondary-tertiary care public hospitals in Johannesburg. Invasive cases in infants <3 months age were identified by surveillance of laboratories from November 2012 to February 2014. Neurodevelopmental screening was done in surviving cases and controls at 3 and 6 months of age. Results: We identified 122 cases of invasive GBS disease over a 12 month period. Although the incidence (per 1,000 live births) of EOD was similar between HIV-exposed and HIV-unexposed infants (1.13 vs. 1.46; p = 0.487), there was a 4.67-fold (95%CI: 2.24-9.74) greater risk for LOD in HIV-exposed infants (2.27 vs. 0.49; p 350 cells/mm3 and WHO stage 1 and 2 received antiretroviral prophylaxis with zidovudine (AZT); whilst those with CD4+ lymphocyte count ≤350 cells/mm3 or WHO stage 3 or 4 were initiated on triple antiretroviral therapy (ART). From April 2013, all pregnant women irrespective of CD4+ lymphocyte count were initiated on ART [16, 17]. Invasive GBS disease (cases) were defined as an infant <90 days of age in whom GBS was cultured from blood, CSF or other normally sterile sites; or when GBS was identified in CSF by latex agglutination. Cases were identified by ZD through daily surveillance of the pediatric wards and microbiology services at the three hospitals. Early-onset disease (EOD) was defined when GBS was isolated in infants younger than seven days of life, and infants between 7–89 days of age with GBS disease were regarded as having late-onset disease (LOD). Control subjects were matched for: (i) gestational age to term, or within 2 weeks for cases born 7 days of life) of chronological age for LOD cases. Controls for EOD were selected from admission and labor wards at CHBAH, whereas controls for LOD were identified through the birth registries and contacted telephonically for possible study-enrolment. For cases born at ≥34 weeks gestational age, at least 5 controls (mean: 7; range: 5–14) were matched for EOD and 3 controls (mean: 5; range: 3–7) for LOD. For cases born at <34 weeks gestational age, at least one control (mean: 2; range: 1–5) was matched for EOD and at least one control (mean: 2, range: 1–4) for LOD. All controls were clinically well at enrolment, and followed up to confirm they did not develop invasive GBS disease. Cases and controls were followed up at 3 and 6 months of the infant’s chronological age. These visits were carried out by either one of three trained research assistants or by ZD. At these visits, the infant’s underwent neurological and development examinations and were screened using the Denver Developmental Screening Test II (Denver-II). The Denver-II makes a valuable screening tool (83% sensitivity) with a high degree of test-retest and inter-examiner reliability [18, 19]. The Denver-II tests 4 domains; gross-motor, fine-motor, language and personal-social. Each test item is represented horizontally as a percentile age range (25–90%) for which it is normally estimated that the item can be achieved. A “fail” or “refusal” by the infant in an item to the left of the age line is classified as a “delay”, whilst a “fail” or “refusal” by the infant in an item through the 75–90% age percentile is classified as a “caution”. The final result was then scored as “normal” (no delays or 1 caution) or “suspect/abnormal” (≥2 cautions or ≥1 delay) in each of the four domains. We defined neurological sequelae as an abnormal Denver-II developmental screening test for any of the four domains or hypertonia and/or hyper-reflexia detected on examination. Infants with developmental delay were referred to occupational, physical and/or speech therapists. Visual and hearing assessments were not routinely tested on participants. GBS was isolated from blood samples using the Bact/Alert microbial system (Organon Teknika, Durham, NC). Positive specimens were subsequently plated on blood or chocolate agar incubated both aerobically and at 35 degrees under 5–10% CO2, and observed for colony growth for 72 hours. Gram-staining was performed on CSF samples, which were also plated onto blood or chocolate agar plates, inoculated into an enrichment broth (Brain Heart Infusion, Diagnostics Media Production) and observed for colony growth for 72 hours. Specimens were also analyzed by a GBS antigen agglutination test if the CSF cell counts were suggestive of bacterial meningitis. Positive GBS isolates were serotyped and stored. Although screening for maternal GBS colonization is not a routine investigation in Johannesburg, maternal colonization status was determined for participants enrolled in the study by separately swabbing the lower vagina and rectum using Rayon tipped swabs and charcoal-free Amies transport medium (Medical Wire Equipment Co. Ltd. Cat: MW170). In addition, a mid-stream urine specimen was also cultured. Mothers of cases and controls were swabbed at the time of enrolment, while controls matched to EOD were swabbed immediately after delivery. Swabs were plated onto CHROMAgar StrepB plates (Media Mage Cat: {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"M10155","term_id":"1059793855"}}M10155) which were incubated at 37°C for 18–24 hours in aerobic conditions and examined for growth of mauve GBS-like colony morphologies. Identified colonies were subjected to further confirmatory tests, such as the catalase test, growth on bile esculin agar, inability to hydrolyze esculin, Christie Atkinson Munch-Petersen (CAMP) test and B antigen latex agglutination test [20]. Serotyping for GBS types Ia, Ib, II to IX was performed using latex agglutination (Statens Serum Institute, SSI, Sweden) [21]. Non-typeable and discordant isolates were further characterized by a single-plex PCR method for serotypes Ia, Ib, II, III, IV and V using primer sequences described by Poyart et al. [22]. The incidence (per 1,000 live births) of invasive GBS disease over a twelve month period was calculated as the number of cases (EOD or LOD) in black-African infants that specifically resided in regions D and G of the Johannesburg metropolitan area. We only included black African infants with GBS disease residing in these specified regions because the care-givers of these infants predominantly access health care at either CHBAH or RMMCH. We did not undertake incidence calculation for non-black African infants or black-African infants not residing in regions D and G because these infants were likely to utilize other health care facilities not under surveillance in the study. There were 31504 live births over 12 months in regions D and G; 8827 (28%) infants were born to HIV-infected women [23]. For proportions, Chi-square or Fischer’s exact test were used to compare demographic and clinical characteristics between cases of EOD and LOD. Medians were reported for non-parametric variables and compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test. Serotype distributions were reported as proportions of the total number of cases serotyped and stratified by EOD and LOD. Univariate analysis was used to identify risk factors for invasive GBS disease, predictors of infant mortality and to compare neurological sequelae. For the multivariate analysis, adjusted odds ratios (aOR) using conditional logistic regression was used to adjust for variables with p-values <0.15 detected by univariate analysis. For the identification of risk factors predisposing to invasive GBS disease, we also included gestational age, maternal age and HIV status. For neurological sequelae, we adjusted for factors that may impact on neurodevelopment; including, gender, gestational age, birth weight <2500 grams, perinatal asphyxia, mechanical ventilation, infant HIV-exposure status and previous non-GBS-related hospitalizations. Data was analyzed using STATA version 13.1 (College Station, Texas, USA). Two-tailed p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The study was approved by the University of Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC number: M120963). Written informed consent was obtained from mothers of infants at enrolment for participation in the study.

Based on the provided information, here are some potential innovations that could improve access to maternal health:

1. Universal screening for recto-vaginal Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization during pregnancy: Implementing routine screening for GBS colonization in pregnant women can help identify those at risk of transmitting the bacteria to their infants. This would allow for targeted interventions, such as intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, to prevent invasive GBS disease in newborns.

2. Development of a trivalent GBS conjugate vaccine: Creating a vaccine that targets the most common GBS serotypes (Ia, Ib, and III) could significantly reduce the burden of invasive GBS disease in settings with a high prevalence of HIV among pregnant women, like South Africa. Vaccinating pregnant women would provide passive immunity to their infants, protecting them from GBS infection.

3. Integration of antenatal care and HIV services: Strengthening the integration of antenatal care and HIV services can ensure that pregnant women receive comprehensive care, including HIV testing and appropriate antiretroviral therapy. This would help reduce the risk of GBS disease in infants born to HIV-infected women.

4. Improved access to diagnostic tools: Enhancing access to diagnostic tools, such as blood and cerebrospinal fluid cultures, can facilitate early detection and diagnosis of GBS disease in infants. This would enable timely initiation of appropriate treatment and improve outcomes.

5. Implementation of neurodevelopmental screening: Incorporating neurodevelopmental screening, such as the Denver Developmental Screening Test II, into routine follow-up visits for infants can help identify any neurological sequelae resulting from GBS disease. Early detection and intervention can lead to better long-term outcomes for affected infants.

It is important to note that these recommendations are based on the specific context provided in the description and may need to be adapted to suit different settings and populations.
AI Innovations Description
Based on the information provided, the recommendation to improve access to maternal health and reduce the burden of invasive Group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease in South Africa is the implementation of an effective trivalent GBS conjugate vaccine targeted at pregnant women.

The study highlighted the high burden of invasive GBS disease in South Africa, particularly among infants born to HIV-infected women. The incidence of late-onset GBS disease was significantly higher in HIV-exposed infants compared to HIV-unexposed infants. Additionally, the study found that GBS infection was associated with high case fatality rates and significant neurological sequelae among survivors.

To address this issue, the recommendation is to develop and implement a trivalent GBS conjugate vaccine. This vaccine would be targeted at pregnant women, as they can pass on GBS infection to their infants during childbirth. By vaccinating pregnant women, the transmission of GBS to newborns can be prevented, reducing the burden of invasive GBS disease and its associated complications.

Implementing this recommendation would require collaboration between healthcare providers, policymakers, and vaccine manufacturers. It would involve conducting further research and clinical trials to develop an effective and safe trivalent GBS conjugate vaccine. Once the vaccine is developed, it would need to be included in the routine antenatal care for pregnant women in South Africa.

By improving access to maternal health through the implementation of a trivalent GBS conjugate vaccine, the goal is to reduce the incidence of invasive GBS disease, decrease case fatality rates, and prevent long-term neurological sequelae in infants. This would contribute to improving overall maternal and infant health outcomes in South Africa.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided information, here are some potential recommendations for improving access to maternal health:

1. Universal screening for recto-vaginal GBS colonization during pregnancy: Implementing universal screening for Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization during pregnancy can help identify women at risk of transmitting the bacteria to their infants. This would allow for targeted interventions, such as intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis, to reduce the risk of invasive GBS disease in newborns.

2. Improved antenatal care for HIV-infected women: Strengthening antenatal care services for HIV-infected women, including regular monitoring of CD4+ lymphocyte count and initiation of appropriate antiretroviral therapy, can help reduce the risk of GBS disease in infants born to HIV-infected mothers.

3. Vaccination against GBS: Developing and implementing an effective trivalent GBS conjugate vaccine targeted at pregnant women can prevent invasive GBS disease in settings with a high prevalence of GBS and HIV among pregnant women.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could be developed as follows:

1. Define the target population: Identify the specific population that will be affected by the recommendations, such as pregnant women in a particular region or healthcare facility.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current access to maternal health services, including rates of GBS colonization, HIV prevalence among pregnant women, and incidence of invasive GBS disease.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a mathematical model that simulates the impact of the recommendations on access to maternal health. This model should take into account factors such as the effectiveness of screening, vaccination coverage, and the impact of improved antenatal care for HIV-infected women.

4. Input data and parameters: Input the baseline data and parameters into the simulation model. This may include data on population size, GBS colonization rates, HIV prevalence, vaccine efficacy, and coverage of antenatal care services.

5. Run simulations: Run the simulation model multiple times to simulate different scenarios, such as varying levels of screening coverage, vaccination coverage, and antenatal care improvements. This will allow for the evaluation of the potential impact of each recommendation on access to maternal health.

6. Analyze results: Analyze the results of the simulations to determine the potential impact of the recommendations on access to maternal health. This may include evaluating changes in GBS colonization rates, incidence of invasive GBS disease, and overall improvement in maternal and infant health outcomes.

7. Refine and validate the model: Continuously refine and validate the simulation model based on new data and feedback from experts in the field. This will ensure that the model accurately reflects the real-world impact of the recommendations.

By following this methodology, policymakers and healthcare providers can gain insights into the potential impact of different recommendations on improving access to maternal health and make informed decisions on implementing interventions.

Partilhar isto:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email