An ethnographic study of how health system, socio-cultural and individual factors influence uptake of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in a Ghanaian context

listen audio

Study Justification:
– The study aimed to understand the factors influencing the uptake of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) in Ghana.
– The justification for the study is that despite the implementation of IPTp-SP policy, Ghana did not achieve the target of 100% access to IPTp-SP by 2015 and negative outcomes of malaria infection in pregnancy continue to occur.
– By exploring the health system, socio-cultural, and individual factors that influence IPTp-SP uptake, the study aimed to provide insights for interventions to improve uptake and prevent negative outcomes.
Study Highlights:
– Health system factors such as the organization of antenatal care (ANC) services and strategies employed by health workers contributed to initial uptake of IPTp-SP.
– Women’s trust in the health care system contributed to continued uptake.
– Inadequate information provided to women accessing ANC, stock-outs, and fees charged for ANC services reduced access to IPTp-SP.
– Socio-cultural factors, such as encouragement from social networks, influenced the utilization of ANC services and IPTp-SP uptake.
– Individual factors, such as refusing to take SP, skipping ANC appointments, and initiating ANC attendance late, affected uptake.
Study Recommendations:
– Interventions to improve IPTp-SP uptake should focus on regular and sufficient supply of SP to health facilities.
– Effective implementation of free ANC services should be ensured.
– Provision of appropriate and adequate information to women accessing ANC should be prioritized.
– Community outreach programs should be conducted to encourage early and regular ANC visits.
Key Role Players:
– Health facility managers and staff
– ANC providers (midwives, nurses)
– Procurement officers
– Laboratory personnel
– Officials at the district health directorate
– Assembly members
– Chiefs
– Opinion leaders
– Mothers and mothers-in-law of pregnant women
Cost Items for Planning Recommendations:
– Supply of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) to health facilities
– Training and capacity building for health facility staff
– Information materials for women accessing ANC
– Community outreach programs
– Monitoring and evaluation of interventions
– Administrative and logistical support for implementation

The strength of evidence for this abstract is 8 out of 10.
The evidence in the abstract is strong, as it provides a clear description of the study design, methods, and findings. The study employed ethnographic methods, including non-participant observation, case studies, and in-depth interviews, to collect data from healthcare providers, healthcare managers, pregnant women, and community members. The study team conducted observations and conversations in 8 health facilities and 8 communities in two Ghanaian regions. The findings highlight the influence of health system, socio-cultural, and individual factors on the uptake of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP). The abstract also suggests actionable steps to improve IPTp-SP uptake, such as ensuring regular and sufficient supply of SP to health facilities, implementing free ANC services effectively, providing appropriate and adequate information to women, and conducting community outreach programs to encourage early and regular ANC visits. However, to further improve the evidence, the abstract could provide more specific details about the sample size, data analysis methods, and limitations of the study.

Background Intermittent preventive treatment of malaria among pregnant women with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP), is one of the three recommended interventions for the prevention of malaria in pregnancy (MiP) in sub-Sahara Africa. The World Health Organisation recommended in 2012 that SP be given at each scheduled ANC visit except during the first trimester and can be given a dose every month until the time of delivery, to ensure that a high proportion of women receive at least three doses of SP during pregnancy. Despite implementation of this policy, Ghana did not attain the target of 100% access to IPTp-SP by 2015. Additionally, negative outcomes of malaria infection in pregnancy are still recurring. This ethnographic study explored how health system, individual and socio-cultural factors influence IPTp-SP uptake in two Ghanaian regions. Methods The study design was ethnographic, employing non-participant observation, case studies and in depth interviews in 8 health facilities and 8 communities, from April 2018 to March 2019, in two Ghanaian regions. Recommended ethical procedures were observed. Results Health system factors such as organization of antenatal care (ANC) services and strategies employed by health workers to administer SP contributed to initial uptake. Women’s trust in the health care system contributed to continued uptake. Inadequate information provided to women accessing ANC, stock-outs and fees charged for ANC services reduced access to IPTp-SP. Socio-cultural factor such as encouragement from social networks influenced utilization of ANC services and IPTp-SP uptake. Individual factors such as refusing to take SP, skipping ANC appointments and initiating ANC attendance late affected uptake. Conclusion Health system, socio-cultural and individual factors influence uptake of optimum doses of IPTp-SP. Consequently, interventions that aim at addressing IPTp-SP uptake should focus on regular and sufficient supply of SP to health facilities, effective implementation of free ANC, provision of appropriate and adequate information to women and community outreach programmes to encourage early and regular ANC visits.

The study design was ethnographic. It included non-participant observations, case studies, informal conversations and in depth interviews (IDIs) (semi-structured interview guides were used to conduct IDIs), to obtain data from healthcare providers, healthcare managers, pregnant women and community members. Informal conversation in this study is defined as: “An unplanned and unanticipated interaction between an interviewer and a respondent that occurs naturally during the course of fieldwork observation. It is the most open-ended form of interviewing” [40]. IDIs were more formal compared to informal conversations, as research assistants used semi-structured interview guides written with probes, transitions and follow-up questions, which provided more data, direction and control than the informal conversations [41:224]. Data were collected from April 2018 to March 2019. The research team comprised of a female medical anthropologist (MA) and 9 graduate research assistants (RAs). Three of the RAs were females and six were males, who could also speak the indigenous language of their assigned study areas: the Twi language for RAs who were recruited in the Ashanti Region and the Ewe language for those who were recruited in the Volta Region. RAs observed and documented ANC care provision in the 8 study facilities and 8 communities. To prevent a Hawthorne effect, observations were conducted intermittently in the eight facilities and 8 communities [42]. MA trained RAs on observations and writing observation notes in accordance with Emerson, Fretz [43]. They were also trained to carry out community entry, to conduct informal conversations and IDIs prior to data collection and during the data collection process. The study was conducted in five districts, three in the Ashanti region (the third district was included in the study, because the district was a new district that had been separated from one of the selected districts, so some of the pregnant women from the chosen district preferred to visit that health facility located in the new district) and two in the Volta region of Ghana. Eight health facilities (Table 1) and 8 communities were chosen for the study. Ashanti region was selected to represent the middle belt of the country, while Volta region was selected to represent the southernmost belt of Ghana. The two regions are linguistically different, Twi is spoken in the Ashanti region and Ewe is spoken in the Volta region. Ashanti Region reported the second highest percentage (98.8%) of women receiving ANC care from skilled providers in 2014, while the Volta region reported the second lowest percentage (93.9%) of women receiving ANC from skilled providers [29]. The district hospitals in the five districts qualified automatically to participate in the study. Also, interactions and interviews with pregnant women in some of the study communities revealed that they preferred to visit particular health facilities for ANC services. Three of such facilities, which are faith-based were included in the study. Thus, a total of 8 health facilities were selected for the study. Some women preferred the three facilities (2 in the Ashanti region and 1 in the Volta region), because they were closer to their communities than the district hospitals. The women’s assertion of nearness to facilities was further confirmed when the study team conducted transect walk in all the study communities, to confirm the location of health facilities [38]. The study team visited the 8 health facilities and went through ANC records and maternity admission records for malaria in pregnancy (MiP) cases. The total number of MiP cases from January 2015 to March 2018 for the different communities that access the services of each facility were tallied. The community with the highest total number of malaria in pregnancy cases in each facility was chosen to participate in the study. The average population for each study community was 10,000 inhabitants. *Study facilities in the Ashanti region have been given the following pseudonyms: ASF01, ASF02, ASF03 and ASF04. Study communities in the Ashanti region have been given the following pseudonyms: ASC01, ASC02, ASC03 and ASC04. #Study facilities in the Volta region have been given the following pseudonyms VRF01, VRF02, VRF03, and VRF04. Study communities in the Volta Region have been given the following pseudonyms: VRC01, VRC02, VRC03 and VRC04. The study team conducted community entry activities such as visiting assembly members and chiefs and holding meetings with a cross section of opinion leaders to inform and to seek their permission to conduct the study in their communities. A research assistant was assigned to one health facility to carry out non-participant observation and to interact with health providers and pregnant women attending ANC. Convenience sampling was used to select pregnant women for conversations [41:27]. RAs took the phone number of any pregnant woman who was attending ANC and was willing to participate in an IDI. The woman was contacted later on and arrangement was made to meet her at her preferred venue for an in depth interview. The snowball method was also used to recruit pregnant women from the 8 study communities [40:115]. The first pregnant woman who was recruited helped the RA to identify other pregnant women in the community. The study was explained to them and those who were interested were recruited to participate in IDIs, after a written consent had been obtained. Opinion leaders such as assembly members, mothers and mothers in-law of pregnant women were invited to participate in IDIs. Case studies were purposively selected from women who regularly attended ANC every month and those who were irregular or skipped ANC appointments. A total of 12 case studies were followed throughout the study period (Table 2). They were visited several times at home, where RAs observed how they took their medications, whether they honoured their ANC appointments, their experiences from their previous ANC visits especially on being offered SP, and whether they were using LLINs. Also, their maternity record booklets were reviewed to confirm the information. *Observations were carried out intermittently in 4 health facilities and 4 communities from May, 2018 to March 2019 in the Ashanti Region. ** District Health Directorate. #Observations were carried out in 4 health facilities and 4 communities from April 2018 to March 2019 in the Volta Region. *# Eighty ANC interactions between health providers and clients were observed: 40 in the Ashanti region and 40 in the Volta region. An average of 10 were observed in each of the four facilities in each region. Health providers, mostly midwives and nurses providing ANC service, who had one year or more work experience in a health facility were selected to participate in the study. ANC unit managers (commonly referred to as in-charge), facility managers such as senior medical officers, physician assistants and administrators were interviewed to help understand managerial and administrative issues. The study team carried out follow-up informal conversations and interviews with procurement officers, laboratory personnel and officials at the district health directorate. The aim was to clarify some of the issues raised in IDIs and conversations with health providers and health managers. Details of the different category of study participants and the methods used for data collection are presented in Table 2. An RA spent several months in a facility observing ANC procedures, interactions between healthcare providers and women who were attending ANC. RAs first observed women and health workers during the following ANC activities: registration of women, checking of women’s blood pressure and protein in their urine, women being attended to in the ANC consulting room, women visiting the laboratory and the pharmacy. In order to understand and experience the various processes that the women went through, RAs also selected ANC attendants at random and accompanied them throughout the ANC process. The RAs obtained permission from the health providers to interact with the women and they also sought verbal consent from such women to accompany them through the ANC procedures. The RAs talked to the women who they chose at random to clarify actions and activities that were observed. RAs wrote down notes on the conversations that they had with the ANC clients and the health workers and later typed them out. Observations and conversations with women focused on women’s knowledge on SP, knowledge on MiP, their intention to take SP among others. Conversations with health providers centred on SP policies, SP availability, information offered to women before and after offering them SP. Conversations and IDIs that were conducted with pregnant women and community members were in the Ewe language for those in the Volta region and the Twi language for those in the Ashanti region. The IDIs centred on knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices on malaria in pregnancy (MiP) interventions and socio-cultural practices. RAs conducted IDIs with healthcare providers and healthcare managers in English and they focused on maternal and MiP policies and service provision, challenges and facilitators. IDIs were recorded using digital recorders and they were transcribed verbatim to preserve interviewees’ original messages and experiences. Interviews in Ewe and Twi were transcribed into English to enable easy analysis and comparison. The study used English language to conduct IDIs and conversations with healthcare providers and NHIS officials, because English is the official language of Ghana (see additional files for IDI guides and observation checklists). Also, RAs obtained permission from the women to go through their maternity booklets to confirm IPTp-SP uptake. IDI transcripts, observation notes and notes from conversations were uploaded onto qualitative analysis software NVivo Version 11 to support the analysis. The data was triangulated and a coding list on common themes that arose from the data (IDIs, observation notes and conversations) was generated. MA and ED (ED is a qualitative expert who was hired to support coding of the data in order to enhance validity) independently coded the data thematically. The analysis aimed at identifying similarities, patterns, differences and contradictions in the information observed or presented by study participants [44]. Main themes that were identified from the analysis formed the basis for interpreting and reporting on study findings. This manuscript is part of the larger study mentioned in the introduction, so some of the findings have been reported in the earlier paper [38]. Ethical clearance was obtained from the University of Health and Allied Sciences’ Research Ethics Committee [UHAS-REC/A.I Ul 17, 18]. Written consent was obtained from all interview participants. Verbal consent was obtained from study participants that informal conversations were held with and for observations. While written consent is recommended for study participants, verbal consent can be used in situations where time is of the essence, as was the case with the informal conversations that the study team conducted with some of the clients attending ANC, who did not have time to participate in IDIs [45] In this study women who were attending ANC were invited to participate in conversations and interviews. Those who had ample time for an interview were given time to reflect and their phone numbers were taken by the RAs. They were called at a later date by the RAs and if they consented, the RAs followed up to their homes for interviews, after they had obtained written consent from them. However, RAs conversed with women who were willing to participate in the study, but did not have enough time to participant in IDIs. For such study participants RAs first sought permission from ANC department heads and subsequently from the clients, who granted verbal consent to participate in the study. A few of those who were approached declined to be interviewed. Only one study participant was 16 years old and permission was sought from her mother prior to her inclusion in the study. Permission to conduct the study was sought from district directors of health of participating districts, facility managers of the eight study facilities, department managers and chiefs and assembly members in the study communities. Besides actual country and region names, pseudonyms have been used for districts, individuals and facilities’ names, to protect informants’ identity. Health facility pseudonyms beginning with ASF refer to study facilities in the Ashanti Region and ASC refer to study communities in the Ashanti Region. While the prefix VRF refer to facilities in the Volta region and VRC refer to study communities in the Volta Region. Pseudonyms of respondents are thus predicated by the prefix of the facility or community that the observation, conversation and IDI was conducted respectively.

The ethnographic study mentioned in the description explores how health system, socio-cultural, and individual factors influence the uptake of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) in Ghana. The study found that health system factors such as the organization of antenatal care (ANC) services and strategies employed by health workers to administer IPTp-SP contributed to initial uptake. Women’s trust in the healthcare system also contributed to continued uptake. However, inadequate information provided to women accessing ANC, stock-outs of IPTp-SP, and fees charged for ANC services reduced access to IPTp-SP. Socio-cultural factors such as encouragement from social networks influenced the utilization of ANC services and IPTp-SP uptake. Individual factors such as refusing to take IPTp-SP, skipping ANC appointments, and initiating ANC attendance late also affected uptake.

Based on these findings, potential innovations to improve access to maternal health could include:

1. Strengthening the organization of ANC services: This could involve improving the efficiency and effectiveness of ANC service delivery, ensuring an adequate supply of IPTp-SP, and reducing stock-outs.

2. Enhancing communication and information provision: Providing accurate and comprehensive information to women accessing ANC about the importance of IPTp-SP and its benefits could increase uptake. This could be done through educational materials, counseling sessions, and community outreach programs.

3. Addressing financial barriers: Implementing policies to make ANC services and IPTp-SP free or more affordable could help overcome financial barriers that prevent women from accessing these services.

4. Community engagement and social support: Engaging community leaders, social networks, and community health workers to promote the importance of ANC and IPTp-SP could encourage women to seek care early and regularly.

5. Improving healthcare provider training: Ensuring that healthcare providers are well-trained in ANC guidelines and protocols, including the administration of IPTp-SP, can improve the quality of care and increase women’s trust in the healthcare system.

These innovations, when implemented effectively, have the potential to improve access to maternal health services, including IPTp-SP, and contribute to better maternal and child health outcomes.
AI Innovations Description
The recommendation that can be developed into an innovation to improve access to maternal health based on the ethnographic study is as follows:

1. Regular and sufficient supply of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP): Ensure that health facilities have a consistent supply of SP to meet the demand for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp-SP). This can be achieved through effective procurement and distribution systems.

2. Effective implementation of free antenatal care (ANC): Ensure that ANC services, including IPTp-SP, are provided free of charge to pregnant women. This can help remove financial barriers and increase access to essential maternal health services.

3. Provision of appropriate and adequate information: Improve the information provided to women accessing ANC about the importance of IPTp-SP and its benefits in preventing malaria during pregnancy. This can be done through health education sessions, counseling, and the use of visual aids.

4. Community outreach programs: Implement community outreach programs to encourage early and regular ANC visits. These programs can involve community health workers, traditional leaders, and other influential community members who can promote the importance of ANC and IPTp-SP uptake.

By implementing these recommendations, it is expected that access to maternal health, specifically IPTp-SP, will be improved, leading to better health outcomes for pregnant women and reduced negative outcomes of malaria infection during pregnancy.
AI Innovations Methodology
Based on the provided description, here are some potential recommendations to improve access to maternal health:

1. Strengthen Health System: Improve the organization of antenatal care (ANC) services and strategies employed by health workers to administer intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP). This can include training health workers on the proper administration of IPTp-SP, ensuring regular and sufficient supply of SP to health facilities, and addressing stock-outs and fees charged for ANC services.

2. Enhance Information Provision: Provide appropriate and adequate information to women accessing ANC about the importance of IPTp-SP and its benefits in preventing malaria in pregnancy. This can be done through educational materials, counseling sessions, and community outreach programs.

3. Promote Trust in the Healthcare System: Build trust between pregnant women and the healthcare system by ensuring respectful and patient-centered care. This can be achieved through effective communication, addressing women’s concerns and fears, and involving women in decision-making regarding their healthcare.

4. Address Socio-cultural Factors: Encourage social networks and community support to influence the utilization of ANC services and IPTp-SP uptake. This can involve engaging community leaders, traditional birth attendants, and influential community members to promote the importance of ANC and IPTp-SP.

To simulate the impact of these recommendations on improving access to maternal health, a methodology could include the following steps:

1. Define the indicators: Identify specific indicators that measure access to maternal health, such as the percentage of pregnant women receiving IPTp-SP, ANC attendance rates, and maternal health outcomes.

2. Collect baseline data: Gather data on the current status of access to maternal health, including IPTp-SP uptake, ANC attendance rates, and any existing barriers or challenges.

3. Develop a simulation model: Create a simulation model that incorporates the identified recommendations and their potential impact on access to maternal health. This model should consider factors such as the population size, healthcare infrastructure, and socio-cultural context.

4. Input data and parameters: Input the collected baseline data into the simulation model, along with relevant parameters such as the expected increase in IPTp-SP coverage due to improved health system strategies, the expected increase in ANC attendance rates due to enhanced information provision, and the expected influence of social networks on utilization of ANC services.

5. Run simulations: Run the simulation model multiple times, varying the input parameters to assess different scenarios and their potential impact on access to maternal health. This can help identify the most effective combination of recommendations and their potential outcomes.

6. Analyze results: Analyze the simulation results to determine the projected impact of the recommendations on access to maternal health. This can include assessing changes in IPTp-SP coverage, ANC attendance rates, and maternal health outcomes.

7. Refine and validate the model: Refine the simulation model based on the analysis of the results and validate it using additional data or expert input. This can help ensure the accuracy and reliability of the simulation.

8. Communicate findings: Present the findings of the simulation study, including the projected impact of the recommendations on access to maternal health, to relevant stakeholders such as policymakers, healthcare providers, and community leaders. This can help inform decision-making and guide the implementation of interventions to improve access to maternal health.

It is important to note that the methodology for simulating the impact of recommendations may vary depending on the specific context and available data. The steps outlined above provide a general framework for conducting such a simulation study.

Partilhar isto:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Email