N/A
Background: The desire for universal health coverage in developing countries has brought attention to community-based health insurance (CBHI) schemes in developing countries. The government of Uganda is currently debating policy for the national health insurance programme, targeting the integration of existing CBHI schemes into a larger national risk pool. However, while enrolment has been largely studied in other countries, it remains a generally under-covered issue from a Ugandan perspective. Using a large CBHI scheme, this study, therefore, aims at shedding more light on the determinants of households’ decisions to enrol and renew membership in these schemes. Methods: We collected household data from 464 households in 14 villages served by a large CBHI scheme in south-western Uganda. We then estimated logistic and zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regressions to understand the determinants of enrolment and renewing membership in CBHI, respectively. Results: Results revealed that household’s socioeconomic status, husband’s employment in rural casual work (odds ratio [OR]: 2.581, CI: 1.104-6.032) and knowledge of health insurance premiums (OR: 17.072, CI: 7.027-41.477) were significant predictors of enrolment. Social capital and connectivity, assessed by the number of voluntary groups a household belonged to, was also positively associated with CBHI participation (OR: 5.664, CI: 2.927-10.963). More positive perceptions on insurance (OR: 2.991, CI: 1.273-7.029), access to information were also associated with enrolment and renewing among others. Burial group size and number of burial groups in a village, were all significantly associated with increased the likelihood of renewing CBHI. Conclusion: While socioeconomic factors remain important predictors of participation in insurance, mechanisms to promote inclusion should be devised. Improving the participation of communities can enhance trust in insurance and eventual coverage. Moreover, for households already insured, access to correct information and strengthening their social network information pathways enhances their chances of renewing.
Data used in this study comes from a cross-sectional survey conducted between August and December 2015, in Kabale and Rukungiri districts in south-western Uganda. A multi-stage simple random sampling criterion was applied to select a population representative sample of 464 households in 14 villages. The first stage was the selection of villages from 3 sub-counties of Nyakishenyi and Nyarushanje in Rukungiri district and Kashambya sub-county in Kabale district, which have the highest coverage of Kisiizi CBHI scheme. The 3 sub-counties represented a population of 106 000 people in 23 500 households as of the 2014 national census.42 We invited leaders from 23 parishes in the 3 sub-counties for a first stage sampling workshop. Fifteen of the 23 parish leaders attended in person or were represented by a committee member. Eight parishes that did not have a representative were excluded. All parish leaders were requested to list all the villages in their area. In addition, they were requested to classify the villages into rich and poor, using access to road, school or health facility or market as a criterion. Altogether, 174 villages were listed, 104 as poor and 70 as rich villages. All the listed villages’ names were put in a raffle box according to their categorisation and a leader randomly selected 7 villages from each box in the presence of other leaders and the research team. Leaders who attended the village sampling workshop provided the contacts of lower level leaders in the selected villages for household listing. The second stage of sampling was household listing and selection of households for the survey. Fourteen lower level leaders were invited for a household listing workshop and requested to generate a list of households in their villages who had a child between 6 months and less than 59 months (5 years) . A total of 511 households were listed and 464 were interviewed. A data collection tool was developed by the first and fourth authors and was duly assessed by the respective ethical committees in Germany and Uganda. The tool included a household demographic module collecting data on household occupancy; a child and maternal health module recording data on healthcare seeking behaviour for mothers and children and a nutrition module recording household food availability and intake data. Data on durable assets holdings and other endowments in agriculture, water and sanitation, and housing was recorded as an indicator for household social and economic welfare. The health insurance and social connectivity modules collected data regarding household insurance status, group membership and participation, and knowledge of insurance such as premiums and benefits package. In line with,22 data on various perceptions on insurance were collected. Moreover, village level information is also collected and used to control for village heterogeneity. Data were collected using Open Data Kit, a computer-assisted personal interviewing platform. Open Data Kit and other platforms of similar fashion are becoming increasingly suggested for their overall cost-effectiveness and reducing of common survey errors.43 Data analysis was conducted in Stata version 14.44 We employ 2 models to understand the determinants of enrolment and renewing CBHI. Since the outcome for CBHI participation (1 if CBHI member and 0 otherwise), the suitable model is a binary logistic model to estimate the determinants of household’s CBHI status. The model is given as: Pr (Insure=1)i = β0+β1X1i+ β2X2i+β3X3i+ϵi Where the probability that a household i was enrolled depends on X1i – a vector of household socioeconomic and demographic variables, X2i – a vector of household enabling variables and X3i is a vector of village level variables and an error term ϵi. All household socioeconomic variables, household enabling variables and village level variables are shown in Table 1. We show odds ratios of the association between the covariates and the decision to enrol in CBHI. To ascertain that the model is well fit, we first re-centre some variables to overcome multi-collinearity.45 We then show the Variance Inflation Factor statistic. Abbreviations: CBHI, community-based health insurance; PCA, principal components analysis. The decision to renew membership in CBHI is modelled in the form of the length of time households are insured. The more the years a household was in CBHI implies the number of annual renewing decisions taken by the households. As seen in the Figure, majority households (56%) are not in CBHI. These are therefore coded as zeros regarding the decision the renew insurance. Number of Years in CBHI. Abbreviation: CBHI, community-based health insurance. Because the outcome is a non-negative count outcome – years of participation in CBHI, a suitable model would be of a Poisson distribution, such as Poisson, Tobit, or negative binomial model. However, as the Figure shows, we are worried about excess zeros (over-dispersion) since more than half the sample does not renew participation. To model the determinants of renewing CBHI, we, therefore, use a zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) model. The ZINB model facilitates the estimation of a non-negative count outcome with possible over-dispersion better than other models for count outcomes.46 The ZINB model performs the inflation equation and an outcome equation. The inflation equation is a logistic estimation of the probability that the outcome is observed as a zero. After accounting for the excess zero in the model estimates the probability of the outcome.47 In order to show that the ZINB is the appropriate model over negative binomial model and other models of count outcomes, we show the Vuong test, which shows a significantly positive test statistic if the data is suitable for zero-inflated models. The basic model is then given as follows. Years i = β0+β1X1i+ β2X2i+β3X3i+ϵi Similar to determinants of CBHI enrolment status, renewing (Yearsi) is a function of vectors for household socioeconomic and demographic variables, household enabling variables and village covariates. In the results, we report incident rate ratios (IRRs) for renewing CBHI.