Background Pregnancy is associated with changes in hematological and biochemistry values, yet there are no African reference intervals for clinical management of pregnant women. We sought to 1) develop laboratory reference intervals during pregnancy and up to 24 weeks postpartum and 2) determine the proportion of women in a previous clinical trial who would be misclassified as having out-of-range values using reference intervals from a United States (U. S.) population. Methods and findings This was a longitudinal sub-study of 120 clinically healthy, HIV-uninfected, self-selected pregnant women seeking antenatal care services at either of two public hospitals in western Kenya. Blood specimens were obtained from consented women at gestational ages 28 and36 weeks and at 2, 6, 14 and 24 weeks postpartum. Median and 95% reference intervals were calculated for immune-hematological and biochemistry parameters and compared to reference intervals from a Kenyan and United States (U.S.) population, using Wilcoxon tests. Differences with p<0.05 were considered significant. Some hematological parameters, including hemoglobin and neutrophils showed significant variations compared to reference intervals for non-pregnant women. Hemoglobin values were significantly lower during pregnancy but were comparable to the values in non-pregnant women by 6 weeks postpartum. CD4, CD8 and platelets were significantly elevated in early postpartum but declined gradually, reaching normal levels by 24 weeks postpartum. Using the new hemoglobin reference levels from this study to estimate prevalence of 'out of range' values in a prior Kisumu research cohort of pregnant/postpartum women, resulted in 0% out of range values, in contrast to 96.3% using US non-pregnant reference values Conclusion There were substantial differences in U.S. and Kenyan values for immune-hematological parameters among pregnant/postpartum women, specifically in red blood cell parameters in late pregnancy and 2 weeks postpartum. Use of U.S. reference intervals markedly increases likelihood of out of range values, highlighting the need for suitable locally developed reference intervals.
Participants included in our analyses were recruited from a longitudinal cohort study, the Mama Salama study, the aims of which were to define the incidence of HIV infection and identify risk factors associated with HIV infection during peri/postpartum period. Study participants comprised pregnant women seeking antenatal care services at two public hospitals in the former Nyanza Province of Kenya, Bondo County hospital and Ahero sub-County hospital from May 2011 to July 2014. Women were eligible to participate if they were HIV uninfected (based on rapid HIV testing and nucleic acid amplification test [NAAT] at enrolment and subsequently negative on NAAT throughout the study), pregnant, with a plan to remain in the area until at least 9 months postpartum, willing to have serial visits at maternal child health clinic with serial HIV testing through 9 months postpartum, not on medication that could alter hematological parameters, and no clinical evidence of malaria and helminth infections. Blood specimens for hematological and biochemistry values were obtained from consented women 14 years and above at 28 and 36 weeks gestation as well as at 2, 6, 14 and 24 weeks postpartum. The study and the consenting procedures were approved by the Kenya Medical Research Institute’s (KEMRI) ethics review committee, University of Nairobi/Kenyatta National Hospital Ethics and Research Committee (ERC) and University of Washington Institutional Review Board (IRB). Written informed consent was obtained from participants prior to any study procedure. All specimens had a unique study identification linked to the main study consent. For all critical values, participants were referred for clinical management per Kenya standard of care. Whole blood was collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid vacutainer tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) and transported at 4°C to the KEMRI HIV-research laboratory within six hours of specimen collection for processing and analysis. Initially, HIV status was determined using HIV rapid test kits as follows: Determine (Abbot Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan), and Bioline (Standard Diagnostics Inc., Korea) as a confirmatory test for any positive specimen and Unigold (Trinity Biotech Plc, Bray, Ireland), as a tie breaker. Later, HIV infection at enrolment was determined using the new Kenyan testing algorithm, with KHB (Shangai, Kehua Bioengineering Co. Ltd) as primary kit and First Response (PMC Medical Pty. Ltd) as the confirmatory kit. Unigold was used as the tie breaker for any specimen with an indeterminate result. Absolute WBC counts and percentages for leukocytes with differentials (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils), RBC with parameters Hb, Hct and mean cell volume (MCV), and platelet counts were determined from whole blood using a Coulter ACT 5Diff CP analyzer (Beckman Coulter, France). This was performed within 24 hours of specimen collection as recommended by the manufacturer (www.beckmancoulter.com). Clinical chemistries were analyzed from serum obtained from serum separation tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Specimens were analyzed for ALT, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin (Bil) and creatinine (Cr) using the Cobas Integra 400 plus biochemistry analyzer (Roche, Germany) per the manufacturer’s instructions (www.usdiagnostics.roche.com). Quality control protocols included running known standards each day before testing specimens. In addition, the laboratory is enrolled in external quality assurance testing programs with the College of American Pathologists (CAP) (hematology, and clinical chemistry) and the United Kingdom National External Quality Assurance Service (UK NEQAS) (lymphocyte immunophenotyping and hematology). The laboratory has satisfactory performance in UK NEQAS (Lymphocyte Immunophenotyping) and CAP Clinical Chemistry as well as CAP Hematology over the past three years. Based on the CLSI guidelines recommendation of 120 reference subjects for establishing reference intervals and assuming a loss to follow up rate of 20%, 150 pregnant women were targeted for enrollment. Every 6th woman in the parent study was targeted for enrollment into the reference interval sub-study. All data available at each time point were entered into an Access database and the median and 95% reference intervals (2.5 and 97.5 percentiles) for immune-hematological and biochemistry parameters calculated using SAS (SAS system for Windows 9.2; SAS, Inc., Cary, NC). These values were compared to established reference intervals developed for non-pregnant women in western Kenya [16], using the Wilcoxon test. Differences with p≤0.05 were considered significant. In order to demonstrate the use of appropriate reference intervals for a given population, we determined how many of 522 participants in a previous clinical trial, KiBS [17], would have out-of-range values using the newly established reference intervals in the current study, the intervals for non-pregnant women in western Kenya and the intervals from a U.S. population of non-pregnant women [18]. Additionally, we determined the number of women who would have abnormal values using the 2004 National Institutes of Health Division of AIDS (DAIDS) toxicity tables [19].
N/A